Thursday, April 22, 2021

Pregnant Women Should NOT Get A COVID-19 KILL SHOT (Vaccine)!

 I do tend to be playing catch up with a lot of material that is sent my way... Recently I had a LOT of people ask for my opinion concerning the troubling reports about how these KILL SHOTS have had horrible 'adverse' effects on women... I have in fact been following some of the reports concerning how these lethal injections have been playing havoc with female menstruation cycles and how there have been a wide number of reports about excessive 'bleeding' and other horrible adverse effects as well.. I do recommend readers take a look at Jim Stone's website at, where Jim has been periodically updated his site with these reports along with his own assessment of what is occurring.. I fully in fact agree with Jim that women in general MUST NOT be taking these death jabs, period!

BUT one other regard to women taking these KILL SHOTS has had me in an outrage, as I showed in a previous article from last Friday, April 16th, where some truly criminal and murderous Obstetricians had the NERVE to claim that "pregnant women" should be taking these death jabs... Here in fact is the link to that article here:

Northerntruthseeker: Canadian Criminal Obstetricians Call On Criminal Federal Government To Prioritize Those Who Are PREGNANT For KILL SHOTS! THIS Is Murder!

OK, Now I want to present another important article in regards to the dangers of pregnant women taking these KILL SHOTS, and it comes from Doctor Joseph Mercola, through the Global Research website, at This one is a must read and is entitled: "Pregnant Women Should Not Take A COVID Vaccine" ... I have it right here in its entirety, and of course my own thoughts and comments to follow:

Pregnant Women Should Not Get a COVID Vaccine

Global Research, April 21, 2021

By injecting pregnant women with novel COVID-19 mRNA gene technologies, the medical establishment has thrown away one of the most fundamental safety edicts of medicine, which is that you do not experiment on pregnant women.

None of the COVID-19 vaccines on the market are licensed. They’ve only received emergency use authorization, as basic efficacy and safety studies are still ongoing. Yet pregnant women are urged to get vaccinated, and are lining up to get the shot — probably while at the same time being careful about avoiding second-hand smoke, alcohol and drugs with known or suspected toxicity.

In my view, giving these vaccines to pregnant women is beyond reprehensible. This experimentation is doubly unforgivable seeing how women of childbearing age have virtually no risk of dying from COVID-19, their fatality risk being a mere 0.01%.1

Contrast this dramatic downside to the potential benefits of the vaccine. You can still contract the virus if immunized and you can still spread it to others.2 All it is designed to do is lessen your symptoms if or when you get infected. Pregnant women simply do not need this vaccine, and therefore any risk is likely excessive.

It seems like the choice is obvious, unless you are an unethical pharmaceutical company that has been previously convicted of criminal felonies that resulted in billions of dollars in judgments and is seeking to create tens of billions of dollars of revenue.

Abnormal Periods and Miscarriage Reported

As reported by The Defender,3 as of April 1, 2021, VAERS had received 56,869 adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination, including 7,971 serious injuries and 2,342 deaths. Of those deaths, 28% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination. The youngest person to die was just 18 years old.

There were also 110 reports of miscarriage or premature birth among pregnant women. In all, 379 pregnant women reported some sort of adverse event. In the U.K., the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Yellow Card reporting site that collects COVID-19 vaccine side effects had, as of March 28, 2021, 40 miscarriages listed for Pfizer’s vaccine4 and 15 for AstraZeneca’s.5

Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., sent me a 2006 study6 that could explain this, as it showed sperm can take up foreign mRNA, convert it into DNA, and release it as little pellets (plasmids) in the medium around the fertilized egg. The embryo then takes up these plasmids and carries them (sustains and clones them into many of the daughter cells) throughout its life, even passing them on to future generations.

It is possible that the pseudo-exosomes that are the mRNA contents would be perfect for supplying the sperm with mRNA for the spike protein. So, potentially, a vaccinated woman who gets pregnant with an embryo that can (via the sperms’ plasmids) synthesize the spike protein according to the instructions in the vaccine, would have an immune capacity to attack that embryo because of the “foreign” protein it displays on its cells. This then would cause a miscarriage.

If there were, truly, a public health authority in the U.S., the criminals that are recommending this would be put in prison for reprehensible criminal negligence for the unnecessary damages they are causing to pregnant women and the deaths of their unborn children.

Even among non-pregnant women, side effects hinting at reproductive side effects are being reported, such as heavier than normal menstrual flow, uterine bleeding or restarting their period for the first time in years.7,8

While no one knows what might be causing the heavier flow, it may be worth looking into the parallels between the blood clotting disorders reported, both in some COVID-19 cases and post-COVID-19 vaccination, and Von Willebrand disease, a chronic condition that prevents normal blood clotting, thus resulting in excessively heavy periods.

Rare and Lethal Blood Disorder Reported

Several individuals have rapidly developed immune thrombocytopenia9,10 (ITP), a rare autoimmune disease, following COVID-19 vaccination.11 The condition, which is often lethal, causes your immune system to destroy your platelets (cells that help blood clot), resulting in hemorrhaging. Despite the loss of platelets, serious blood clots are also occurring at the same time.

One example is the 58-year-old Florida doctor who got the Pfizer vaccine and died from sudden onset of ITP two weeks later. Dr. Jerry L. Spivak, an expert on blood disorders at Johns Hopkins University, told The New York Times “it is a medical certainty” that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine caused the man’s death.12,13 Pfizer, of course, denies any connection.

At least two papers have been published on the condition, as scientists search for clues as to how the vaccines might be causing this unusual reaction. As reported by The Defender:14

“Two teams of researchers have published detailed observations of patients who developed thrombotic thrombocytopenia after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine and have speculated about a possible mechanism.

Both groups suggest that the development of serious blood clots alongside falling levels of platelets is an immune response that resembles a rare reaction to the drug heparin, called heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The researchers have labelled the syndrome vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia.”15,16

It’s unclear, however, where the platelet-antagonistic antibodies come from. They might form against the spike antigen, or perhaps it’s a response triggered by some other immune response factor. Either way, doctors at Oslo University Hospital recently announced the blood clotting disorders experienced by some recipients of the AstraZeneca vaccine are caused by the vaccine:17

“Our theory that this is a powerful immune response most likely triggered by the vaccine, has been confirmed … In collaboration with experts in the field from the University Hospital of North Norway HF, we have found specific antibodies against blood platelets that can cause these reactions …

We have the reason. Nothing but the vaccine can explain why these individuals had this immune response. There is nothing in the patient history of these individuals that can give such a powerful immune response. I am confident that the antibodies that we have found are the cause, and I see no other explanation than it being the vaccine which triggers it.”

Several European countries have halted use of the AstraZeneca vaccine due to blood clots in the past several weeks, and in the U.S., the FDA and CDC have agreed to temporarily halt use of Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine while they review six reports of blood clots in combination with low platelet counts. So far, one has died. Another is in serious condition. The announcement was made April 13, 2021.18

Another Novel Hypothesis

Other potential mechanisms of action also exist. For example, as noted by freelance medical writer and neurobiology postgrad Shin Jie Yong in a March 19, 2021, Medium article,19 Dr. Goh Kiang Hua, a consultant general surgeon and Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons, has suggested a novel hypothesis to explain the loss of platelets seen in some COVID-19 vaccine recipients.

He believes the lipid-coated nanoparticles, which transport the mRNA, may be carrying that mRNA into the megakaryocytes in your bone marrow. Megakaryocytes are cells that produce platelets. According to this hypothesis, once the mRNA enters your bone marrow, the megakaryocytes would then begin to express the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which would tag them for destruction by cytotoxic T-cells.

“Platelets then become deficient, causing thrombocytopenia,” Yong writes, adding, “Of course, he emphasized that these are just speculations.” In my view, Hua may well be onto something. If correct, it would be an elegant explanation.

Breast Cancer Symptoms

Many also report developing swollen lymph nodes after their COVID-19 vaccination and, as reported by Fox 8 News Cleveland,20 doctors at Cleveland University Hospital system are seeing swollen lymph nodes in the mammograms of women who have had a COVID vaccine, and typically on the side where the vaccine was given.

Swollen lymph nodes on a mammogram are one sign of breast cancer. University Hospital’s breast imaging department also reported that they are fielding calls from patients who are concerned about finding swollen nodes under their arms.

According to the news report, data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows over 11% of vaccine recipients have swollen lymph nodes after the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine and 16% after the second dose. The swelling typically begins two to four days post-vaccination, and can persist for up to four weeks.

Lymph nodes that remain engorged beyond the four-week mark need to be evaluated by your doctor, Dr. Holly Marshall with University Hospitals told Fox 8 News.

Scarcity of Controlled Trials in Pregnant Women

Getting back to vaccination during pregnancy, it’s important to realize that this is a time during which experimentation can be the most hazardous of all, as you’re not only dealing with potential repercussions for the mother but also for the child. Any number of things can go wrong when you introduce drugs, chemicals or foreign substances during fetal development.

According to the Mayo Clinic,21 30,000 pregnant women have been “successfully” vaccinated against COVID-19 in the U.S. with either Pfizer’s or Moderna’s mRNA vaccines. They don’t mention anything about reported side effects, but as mentioned earlier, 379 VAERS reports had been filed by pregnant women as of April 1, 2021.

A recent BBC article22 sought to make light of post-vaccination miscarriages, saying, “Data showing a miscarriage occurred after a vaccine does not mean that the two events are linked.” Meanwhile, people dying from heart attacks, cancer and other longstanding diseases who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were counted as COVID-19 deaths, no questions asked. There was no difficulty in linking those data points to drive up COVID-19 fatality statistics.

The BBC also notes that miscarriage is “very common,” with 1 in 8 pregnancies (12.5%) ending in miscarriage. The U.K. MHRA, in an effort to put a lid on concerns about miscarriages, claim they occur in “about 1 in 4 pregnancies,”23 or 25%, which strikes me as an exaggeration.

Other sources24 reviewing statistical data stress that the risk of miscarriage drops from an overall, average risk rate of 21.3% for the duration of the pregnancy as a whole, to 5% between Weeks 6 and 7, all the way down to 1% between Weeks 14 and 20. One way to assess whether miscarriages are in fact increasing after vaccination could be to compare miscarriage rates during the second and third trimester, when spontaneous losses are at their lowest under normal circumstances.

A vaccination safety monitoring program led by the CDC called V-Safe currently has 2,000 pregnant patients enrolled, but fewer than 300 had completed their pregnancies by the end of March 2021.25Their babies will be evaluated for side effects until they’re 3 months old.26

These are not significant numbers. It’s also a very short follow-up for the babies. So, while COVID-19 vaccines are hailed as safe for pregnant women and their babies alike, they seem to be basing such claims on extremely limited data.

On the whole, injecting pregnant women with novel gene therapy technology that can trigger systemic inflammation, cardiac effects and bleeding disorders (among other things), isn’t a good idea in my view, and violates both the Hippocratic Oath that admonishes doctors to “First, do no harm,” and the precautionary principle that, historically, has governed health care for pregnant women.

Report All COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

If you or someone you love has received a COVID-19 vaccine and are experiencing side effects, be sure to report it, preferably to all three of these locations:27

  1. If you live in the U.S., file a report on VAERS
  2. Report the injury on, which is a nongovernmental adverse event tracker (you can file anonymously if you like)
  3. Report the injury on the Children’s Health Defense website


Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.


1 Annals of Internal Medicine September 2, 2020 DOI: 10.7326/M20-5352

2 The Defender April 6, 2021

3 The Defender April 9, 2021

4 UK Gov Yellow Card Report for Pfizer, March 28, 2021 (PDF)

5 UK Gov Yellow Card Report for AstraZeneca, March 28, 2021 (PDF)

6 Molecular Reproduction and Development 73(10):1239-46

7 MSN April 10, 2021

8 UK Gov Yellow Card Report Unspecified Brand March 28, 2021 (PDF)

9 Hopkins Medicine ITP

10, 14 The Defender April 13, 2021

11 The Defender February 9, 2021

12 New York Times January 12, 2021

13 The Defender January 13, 2021

15 NEJM April 9, 2021 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104882

16 NEJM April 9, 2021 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104840

17 Science Norway March 18, 2021

18 NBC News April 13, 2021

19 Medium March 19, 2021

20 Fox 8 Cleveland February 2021

21, 25, 26 Mayo Clinic March 29, 2021

22 BBC April 11, 2021

23 Reuters March 31, 2021

24 Medical News Today January 12, 2020

27 The Defender January 25, 2021

Featured image is from Health Impact News

NTS Notes: To me, this is simple.. If these maniacs in our so called health care industry including the quacks and nefarious pricks that pass themselves off as 'doctors' are pushing this garbage that are indeed KILL SHOTS into pregnant women, then they should all be charged with attempted MURDER.. AND if the baby and/or the mother come down with horrible adverse reactions and die, then they can all have those charges upgraded to first degree murder..

I have wondered what kind of psychopaths would want to do this to pregnant women? And I keep on thinking of the ghastly want to see both the mother and their unborn child destroyed, which I would not put past these monsters...

I do hope that this message gets out there to all women, either pregnant, or of child bearing age, as to NEVER take this crap into your bodies, period... It is bad enough this garbage destroys the protein in the placenta thus making women possibly permanently infertile, but the horror it causes to unborn children I can only imagine.

More to come



Barney said...

(((They))) always go after the young, shooting Palestinian kids, creating "gender confusion" elsewhere, and now the bastards are going after the unborn.

The idea, of course, is to prevent the next generation having kids of their own, resulting in extinction of the species. That's worse than mass murder. It's genocide.

One minor point I'd like to bring up is that there should not be a "lesser" crime of "attempted ..." anything. If a serious attempt is made to commit a crime, the perpetrator obviously intends to succeed, so why go easy on him if he bungles the job?

Incompetence is no excuse. The penalty should be the same, even where the attempt failed, because the intent was there.

Northerntruthseeker said...

I agree, Barney... I was just keeping with the intent of the law of course..

But of course the plan is the mass extermination, and by any means necessary including targeting the unborn for destruction as well...

greencrow said...


This MZM source will no doubt be in the accused dock at the Nuremberg Trial 2.0

Can you imagine? How absolutely criminal is this!!


Anonymous said...

"I have wondered what kind of psychopaths would want to do this to pregnant women?"
** The Sanhedrin.The beast that walks like men.