Friday, April 2, 2021

Can We Trust America's (And Everybody Else's) COVID-19 Vaccine Injury Statistics?

 I have been looking over the multitude of different reports coming in over the last while via 'official' channels concerning the TRUE number of those who have indeed been injured or have DIED from taking the deadly kill shots of EXPERIMENTAL genetic modifying 'therapies' into their bodies.... 

There have been a multitude of different statistics coming from so many sources such as VAERS in America that have now stated that THOUSANDS of people have now died from the adverse effects related to having those kill shots injected into their bodies, and I do have to ask the huge question about the accuracy of those reports, and if we are actually being told the entire truth about the actual number of deaths from those deadly shots?

Well, I am not alone in thinking that some of the 'statistics' coming out are being falsified...As I do want to present the following report from Gary Null through the GreenMedInfo website ( courtesy of the Aletho News website at, that does indeed ask the same questions about the accuracy of the number of actual victims from these kill shots... This article is entitled: "Can We Trust American COVID-19 Injury Statistics?" and I have it right here in its entirety for everyone to read for themselves.. I have my usual thoughts and comments to follow:

Can We Trust America’s Covid-19 Vaccine Injury Statistics?

By Gary Null, PhD and Richard Gale | GreenMedinfo | March 29, 2021

According to the latest figures derived from the European Medicines Agency’s database of Covid-19 vaccine adverse reactions, 162,610 injurious events and 3,964 deaths have now been reported. Among the three major vaccines approved and deployed in Europe, Pfizer-Biontech’s vaccine accounts for over two-thirds of reported injuries and mortalities, or 102,100 and 2,540 events respectively. Curiously, women disproportionately account for 77% of adverse events; this greater than 1:4 gender ratio is also being observed for Moderna’s and AstraZeneca’s vaccines. So far there seems to be no scientific explanation to account for this gender disparity.

Recently, we have been alerted that AZ’s adenovirus vaccine is particularly worrisome. It has been less than two months since its administration in the EU commenced; already there have been over 54,000 injuries and 451 deaths registered. Consequently, many European nations, which are more committed to protecting their citizens than increasing pharmaceutical profits, have placed moratoriums on administering AZ’s Covid vaccine. In the UK, over 114,000 adverse reactions from AZ’s product or 4.6 reactions per 1,000 recipients have been reported.

However, the EU’s vaccine injury statistics are disturbing for another reason. It seems very apparent in our review of government and institutional figures that the EU has a far more robust and accurate vaccine injury reporting system in place. Given that the US started vaccinating adults against SARS-CoV-2 before the EU, we would expect to observe the number of reported adverse effects higher or at least proportionate. However, this is not the case. Since December 14, 2020, the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has only reported 44,606 adverse events and 2,050 deaths – a small fraction compared to Europe and where the average European citizen is generally healthier and where far fewer doses have been administered.

Consider two other anomalies. According to Oxford University’s global Covid-19 vaccine tracker, as of March 27th, the US has administered over 136 million doses, which accounts for about 25 percent of all Covid-19 vaccines administered worldwide. On the other hand, the EU nations have only administered 66 million doses — less than a half compared to the US. In addition, the US vaccination rate is now approximately 41 per 100 Americans. EU nations have individually vaccinated 17 per 100 citizens or less. Therefore, why is there such an enormous discrepancy of adverse vaccine reactions between the US and EU? The EU is reporting a 0.2 percent adverse reaction rate whereas the US is claiming only 0.03 percent, almost a ten-fold difference.

Various studies have estimated that only between 1 to 10 percent of vaccine injuries are reported in VAERS. In the past, the CDC has relied upon the conservative 10 percent estimate, which may account for the ten-fold discrepancy in adverse Covid-19 vaccine events in the EU and US. A 2011 Harvard study in collaboration with the Federal Agency for Health Care Research has estimated actual adverse event reporting may be as low as 1 percent. The study states,

“Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.”

If we assume the European Medicines Agency’s statistics are relatively accurate, we would therefore expect that the actual number of US adverse reactions should be in the neighborhood of 335,000 injuries and over 8,100 deaths.

Something is very seriously amiss with this scenario.

First, we can surely agree that Covid vaccines do not hold a personal vendetta against Europeans. Nor does owning an EU passport make one more susceptible to a serious vaccine reaction.

Although anyone can report an adverse reaction to VAERS, very few Americans know it exists. The CDC notes that reporting vaccine injuries and deaths in the database is completely voluntary. Consequently, there is no requirement for a vaccine administering physician or health professional to report an injury or death. In fact, many doctors and healthcare workers are largely ignorant about VAERS’ existence as is the public. Because VAERS is an extremely flawed passive surveillance system, it provides an extremely inaccurate picture for risks associated with every approved vaccine, let alone those against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The CDC’s National Immunization Program has acknowledged VAERS’ glaring limitations for over 25 years, but nothing has fundamentally changed in mandating its use throughout the medical establishment. As millions of Americans are rushing to get their shots, our health officials have been relying upon “a patchwork of existing programs that they acknowledge are inadequate because of small sample size, missing critical data or other problems.” Anthony Fauci and the heads of our health agencies have known for many months that these vaccines were forthcoming. However they have been utterly negligent, according to a New York Times article, to put in place a robust monitoring system to record adverse vaccine reactions and to undertake appropriate analysis.


VAERS has served as a highly successful propaganda tool to mask and hide actual vaccine risks instead of a reliable monitoring system. Anyone can access the database, and it is the most common resource for those who follow and report adverse vaccine reaction trends.

Yet, the CDC also relies upon other monitoring sources, notably the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), a database controlled in a collaboration between the CDC and nine large managed healthcare organizations. In fact, the CDC states that it relies upon VSD “to evaluate vaccine safety issues.” The Institute of Medicine ranks VSD as the best resource for conducting necessary analysis on vaccine safety and contains the electronic records of over 9 million Americans. It is also relied upon for comparing the health status of vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups and for investigating long-term adverse vaccine risks. However, despite our tax dollars going towards the funding of VSD, the database’s content is inaccessible to the public. Federal agencies have assured that its data remain the proprietary property of the private healthcare organizations to prevent it being used by independent researchers and journalists.

Given the CDC’s and FDA’s long history of secrecy and lack of transparency, and its long public relations arm that infiltrates every mainstream media source, it is not surprising that we never hear public service announcements notifying viewers and readership that the CDC has a system in place to report any adverse effects from Covid-vaccination. Now that the vaccines are being rolled en masse, we would expect our government to enforce due diligence to track vaccine injuries in the public interest. But we will never hear this information coming from the lips of the pharmaceutical media shills such as Sanjay Gupta and George Stephanopoulos. Not even during flu seasons when the media follows its marching orders from federal health agencies to persuade the public to roll up their sleeves.

In the meantime, the medical establishment gives lukewarm condolences towards those unfortunate to have become seriously ill or have died from the virus. But think of all the others, Fauci and his federal colleagues consistently tell us over the media waves, who have been lucky enough to be vaccinated and can return to a normal life. Just take these experimental vaccines despite the shoddy evidence to convince any objective reviewer that they prevent transmission or protect anyone from contracting the virus. Nor were they tested to determine rates of hospitalization or deaths. Yet the media makes every effort to assure us that we are being given the best information science can provide. And sadly, all this science is preferentially cherry picked to strengthen the false narrative to increase vaccination compliance. And since lockdowns, masks, social distancing and quarantining remain in place, it is near impossible to conduct any vigorous scientific study to determine how much or how little these vaccines are contributing to the rise and fall of infectious rates. Is it vaccination or all of the mandatory social restrictions that is the major contributing factor?

“The greatest enemy of knowledge,” wrote renowned historian Daniel Boorstein, “is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.” Today, this illusion of authoritative knowledge pervades the medical establishment and brainwashes the sleeping media. In our opinion, it is becoming a dangerous collective mental disorder. The good news is that more and more scientists, researchers and doctors within the towering medical citadel are exiting rapidly in order to publicly speak out against the litany of falsehoods, lies and corruption spewed from the orifices of the CDC, the FDA, World Health Organization and Big Pharma.

Gary Null is an internationally recognized thought leader and activist who holds a Ph.D. in human nutrition and public health science and Richard Gall is the Executive Producer for the Progressive Radio Network.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

NTS Notes: Honestly... I thought this was a 'trick question' for the answer is  obviously NOT!

I have seen the 'statistics' and I too have a LOT of questions about their 'accuracy', especially the proven fact that the criminals running this entire scam-demic would obviously be working 'overtime' in trying to lie and falsify the data about those who have been injured or killed by their concoctions... IMHO, what we have seen in the 'reports' so far is probably only about 5-10% of the REAL numbers of those who have been crippled or killed by their deadly kill shots...

I therefore do not trust the 'statistics' that we are seeing coming from the so called 'officials' that are putting out these numbers of 'injured and killed' by their kill shots.... They will definitely under report the actual numbers for they know that if people knew the real truth about the numbers of those who have really been injured and killed by their deadly concoctions. then more people would be refusing these death jabs into their bodies...

I did add the part in the title for this article of 'And everybody else' for this problem is not just happening in America, but every where else as well including up here in Canada.... The facts are that the criminals over at "Health Canada" have been LYING about the real numbers of those who have been crippled or killed by these kill shots from day one and will continue to falsify those numbers to create the illusion that these kill shots are somehow 'safe'..... 

The bottom line is this... This falsification of data will continue and will probably get much worse as more of the most stupidest people on this planet line up to get these kill shots in their bodies.... What we are seeing right now with these distorted numbers is NOTHING compared to what we will be witnessing some 3-6 months from now when the antigens produced by the mutated cells in the bodies of those stupid enough to take the  kill shots start attacking their own bodies..... I do wonder what the pricks running this scam-demic will do then when people start dying in droves from the effects of their 'vaccines' and I will bet anything that they will just scream 'there is a new 'variant' of this deadly virus on the loose that is killing millions!'... Sadly must of the duped retards out there will fall for it big time.

More to come



Barney said...

Just a quick one for now. Too much to do, too little time.

I don't have - or want - a tel-aviv-zion, and I only subject myself to a single four minute radio propaganda broadcast, presented as "news", each day, so my knowledge of what the sheeple here in England are being told may not be 100% accurate, but my impression, mainly from the the radio and from talking to people is that we're supposed to believe the fake "vaccines" are totally safe and at least 95% effective.

They sometimes admit that there are "side" effects, but claim these are limited to a sore arm for a couple of days at worst, with NO serious adverse effects and NO DEATHS.

We know they're lying, but the lies never stop. It's brainwashing, and the sheeple believe every word of it.

Bob said...


I did watch Icke's video. Confirms almost everything I believe.

I'm not convinced about the Operating System being installed by the shot at all.

I think the whole scam is to depopulate in order to implement the Green New Deal.

The thing that astounds me is who is going to wipe these super elite's asses when there are no more people?! Robots? Try having a robot going out of control wiping your pampered ass! OUCH AND DOUBLE OUCH!!

The most amazing thing about his interview is the man who got the vaccine and his skin peeled off AND THEN HE SAID HE WOULD GET THE SHOT AGAIN AND RECOMMEND IT TO OTHER PEOPLE!

This man is too stupid to live!

Vernon Coleman cannot quit. I can understand why he wants to. But one video from him gets me thru the day.

Robert said...

“Right Now I’m Scared” – CDC Director Chokes Back Tears As She Fearmongers “Impending Doom”
Hysterical CDC Director Belongs in an Insane Asylum, Main Mission is Fearmongering—“Right Now I’m Scared”

In a stunningly insane outburst during this morning’s COVID-19 Response press conference, new CDC Director Rochelle Walensky (jew) went “off-script” (though if one watches her eyes it appears she is very much reading a script) to warn the public about her “impending doom” following a rise in COVID cases and hospitalizations.

Walensky (jew) implored Americans to mask up, socially distance, blah, blah, blah as she is worried about a new wave “if rules are lifted” too soon… blah, blah, blah.

Anonymous said...

I read an article recently that women tend to be more easily persuaded by fear propaganda, which could lead to more women getting the jab than men. I haven't seen any stats to confirm this, but I wouldn't be surprised. And if men are generally more logical, it may be just enough to make some of them think things through and sidestep the vax. Here's a link to the article: In the section titled Gender and Culture, the study authors state that appeals to fear should be particularly effective among women and collectivist groups.