Wednesday, March 31, 2021

This Is A Must Read By Everyone: The Great Covid Power Grab: Why World Leaders’ Push For A Post-WW2-style ‘Pandemic Treaty’ Must Be Resisted

I was alerted just the other night about a most SINISTER "power play" being launched by 24 of the world's leaders, who are now calling for a 'Global Pandemic Treaty' that they are falsely claiming is to be done in the "interests of the world" to 'combat this ongoing pandemic'.... I honestly thought it was a joke at the time for there is NO WAY IN HELL that nations would truly be this diabolical in attempting this kind of world wide power grab and permanent destruction of freedoms and liberties all in the name of this fraudulent scam-demic... But believe it or not, but this is REAL and something that we all must take heed of immediately..

I do want to present the following very important report that comes courtesy of the Aletho News website, at www.alethonews.com, that does indeed put out a warning to everyone about this sinister 'treaty' that is indeed a sinister attempt to basically enslave the planet under the guise of 'fighting' this scam-demic... This article is entitled: "The great Covid power grab: Why world leaders’ push for a post-WW2-style ‘Pandemic Treaty’ must be resisted" and is a must read by everyone.. I have it right here in its entirety and of course my own thoughts and comments to follow:

The great Covid power grab: Why world leaders’ push for a post-WW2-style ‘Pandemic Treaty’ must be resisted

By Neil Clark | RT | March 31, 2021

Johnson, Macron and Merkel have warned that the world needs a settlement to protect itself in the wake of Coronavirus. The question, as ever, must be: ‘who benefits?’ The answer, as ever, is ‘it’s unlikely to be you.’

Out with nationalism and isolationism and in with international ‘Health and Security’!

That’s the cry from 24 world leaders, led by the British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel. The call for a new global ‘pandemic preparedness’ treaty came in a letter to the Daily Telegraph and in papers across the world.

The letter uses words and phrases such as ‘solidarity,’ ‘global community,’ ’international cooperation’ and ‘protect’ repeatedly, to make us all feel that what is being proposed is for the good of us all. But is it?

If we read between the lines, we can see quite clearly that, while the plan is supposed to be about post-Covid pandemics, it is really about making sure that the draconian measures introduced since 2020 are maintained as long as possible. The ‘nobody is safe until everyone is safe’ mantra which appears at the end of the second paragraph in the letter, is saying to us – as Merkel and other globalists have strongly hinted – that restrictions cannot and will not be lifted until everyone in the world has been vaccinated.

If you have any doubts, just take a look at the very next sentence, which states: ‘We are therefore committed to ensuring universal and equitable access to safe, efficacious and affordable vaccines, medicines and diagnostics for this and future pandemics.’

Translation: ‘Africa, you’re going to take the vaccines we offer you whether you like it or not.’

To justify a ‘pandemic treaty,’ and other long-planned changes being implemented in its wake, they have to accord Covid a very special status. The first sentence of the letter boldly states: ‘The Covid-19 pandemic is the biggest challenge to the global community since the 1940s.’ But is that really true? Hong Kong flu claimed the lives of between one and four million people between 1968 and 1970. But it got a lot less coverage than Covid. There was no talk of a permanent ‘New Normal’ being established in 1970, or the need for a post-WW2-like settlement. Neither was there when HIV/AIDS hit in the 1980s. The UN says between 24.8m and 42.2 million people had died of AIDS-related illnesses by the end of 2019.

To compare Covid to the Second World War, as the 24 leaders have done, and argue that it needs a post-WW2 style settlement, surely redefines the word ‘hyperbolic.’ A reminder: some 75 million people died in the Second World War – including around 27 million citizens of the former Soviet Union. 60 million Europeans became refugees. By contrast, the current number of deaths ‘with’ Covid is 2.8 million. Yes, that’s serious –and all deaths are very sad– but the numbers alone can’t explain why it’s Covid –and not other diseases which killed many more and came before it– which necessitates a ‘Great Reset’.

We’re told that Covid-19 is ‘the biggest challenge to the global community since the 1940s’ but what happened to all the other ‘biggest challenges’ we’ve been warned about over the past thirty years by western leaders? Where did the ’War on Terror’ disappear to? And what about climate change?

While of course there needs to be sensible international co-operation on matters concerning global public health, isn’t there something a bit creepy about trying to scare us witless about the ‘next’ pandemic when we are still living under Covid-19 restrictions? When they state ‘there will be other pandemics and other major health emergencies’ the 24 leaders sound an awful lot like Bill Gates, who is forever warning us about the pandemics to come. In January the Microsoft founder declared that the next pandemic, which of course ‘we are not prepared for,’ could be ‘10 times more serious’. Thanks Bill, for cheering everyone up during another lockdown.

And, having read the letter of the world leaders, take a look at this section on the Gates blog: ‘Just as WW2 led to greater cooperation between countries to protect the peace and prioritize the common good, we think the world has an important opportunity to turn the hard-won lessons of this pandemic into a healthier, more equal future for all.’ And that, of course, means ‘getting ready for the next pandemic.’

But is being in a permanent state of worry over ‘the next pandemic’ a good way to live?

Do we really want to give up on things like hugging, kissing, mass social gatherings, the freedom to travel around the world, and accept the establishment of a permanent civil-liberties-destroying bio-security state because of a nasty lurgy that ‘might’ come along in the future?

The 24 leaders talk about building ‘a more robust international health architecture that will protect future generations’ but what if what is really being built – under the guise of ‘keeping us safe,’ is one big hi-tech global prison, where we will not even be able to go to the pub without a ‘Vaccine Passport’ or showing our ‘Covid certification‘ – or be able to board a flight because we haven’t had the latest vaccine ‘update’? Is this the digitally-controlled future we really want?

I don’t know about you, but I’d rather take my chances as a free citizen in ‘the next pandemic,’ whenever that will be, than live under the soul-destroying oppression of ‘protective’ tyranny.

NTS Notes: I knew that eventually these scumbag 'world leaders' would indeed try this type of evil ploy, for the fact is that a lot of people worldwide are FINALLY waking up to the reality that this 'pandemic' has been nothing of the sort and has indeed been the GREATEST HOAX in human history.. Therefore these asshole pricks in those 24 nations are attempting this before enough people do indeed wake the fuck up and put an end to their lies...

Yes, this is indeed so sinister and diabolical... This is NO 'treaty' at all, but a new level of subservience and enslavement... I can guarantee one of the major parts of this fraud 'treaty' will be the demand for FORCED 'vaccinations' world wide that will indeed signal the death culling of human life on this planet....

And I too feel so insulted where these pricks have the nerve to somehow compare this scam-demic with what happened in World War II... That alone is so horrendous and such a lie and does indeed show the depravity and ignorance of these criminal 'world leaders'....  The bottom line here is that this entire scamdemic is such a hoax of horrendous magnitude and is NOTHING in comparison at all to what happened in the second World War...

Of course I have to ask; Is this just another push for their diabolical "Great Reset"?  Very possibly, and these pricks may indeed be trying to rename their already vilified 'Great Reset' as this 'Global COVID Treaty" instead due to the fact that most people around the world are fully aware of what the 'Great Reset' entails!

IMHO, this is indeed a push to impose world wide control and permanent human enslavement... These pricks want medical and world wide tyranny to be placed on all human beings permanently, and thus it is important that EVERYONE sees this for what it is and very quickly... We MUST NOT ALLOW these pricks to get away with this crime, ever!

More to come

NTS


 

Toronto Star Poll: Should COVID-19 "Vaccinations" (Kill Shots) Be Made Mandatory? Please Cast Your Vote!

 I have a good one here for my readers... I do want everyone to please read the following report that comes courtesy of the "Our Greater Destiny" website, at www.ourgreaterdestiny.org, where a propaganda rag called the 'Toronto Star' out of Toronto, Ontario, Canada has had the NERVE to put out a 'poll' that asks everyone the huge question of whether or not 'vaccinations' which are indeed KILL SHOTS, are to be made "mandatory"? 

I have that article right here, and of course my own thoughts and comments to follow:

Toronto Star Poll – Should COVID-19 vaccinations be mandatory?

Governments use poll results to see how hard they can push people

Please speak up.

https://www.thestar.com/politics/political-opinion/2021/03/29/canada-must-make-covid-19-vaccinations-mandatory.html

Mar 31.21 earlier today screen shot

Please share with family and friends who choose freedom. Thank you.

Without Prejudice and Without Recourse
Doreen A Agostino
http://freetobewealthy.net
Via ethernet to safeguard life

NTS Notes: I absolutely want to implore ALL of my readers to please click on that link enclosed for that Toronto Sun article, and VOTE with your conscience as to how you feel about 'MANDATORY' enforcement of death jabs aka Kill shots....

I do hope that the message that RAG of a newspaper gets from the response to this 'poll' becomes crystal clear, for as it stands as of today, there are nearly 90% of people out there that are saying unequivocally absolutely NO to any mandatory kill shots!

More to come

NTS

Manitoba Official COVID-19 Report For Wednesday, March 31st, 2021: 70 New Cases, 1 New Death - And 2251 Morons Went And Stupidly Got "Tested" In Just The Last 24 Hours?

  I am so sick and tired of the retardation of the general public here in Manitoba..  I saw a report earlier today in the 'daily rag' that somehow still classifies itself as a 'newspaper' proclaim that the AstraZeneca kill shots were indeed 'suspended' in this province for anyone under the age of 55... And that rag had an article where a reporter went out over the last day to ask Manitobans what they thought about that suspension.. The answers he got just floored me, as most were angry about the 'suspension' and were asking "How are we going to get our shots then?" rather than be angry and ask questions about how deadly these AstraZeneca kill shots are themselves!  I am still shaking my head about how truly STUPID and brainwashed the people of this province are, and all I can say is for them to hurry up and take those kill shots , for maybe it will be a means of culling the retards in this province...

Well... I just got today's bullshit 'Official Manitoba COVID-19 report' and before I get onto their 'numbers' I am astonished about ONE big glaring number that shows how truly stupid people here can be.. Today's report states that over the last 24 hours alone, some 2251 SUCKERS here in Manitoba went out to those fraudulent 'testing centres' to allow criminals to shove 15cm long sticks up their noses, damaging their cribriform plates at the rear of their nasal passageways in the process, to 'extract' RNA material to use for the fraud PCR testing just to get as many false positive results as possible....  It is no wonder therefore how these criminal liars are able to get  so many false positive 'cases' numbers on a daily basis when you have that outrageous number of RETARDS stupidly giving them all the help they can in this criminal endeavour!

OK, Onto today's 'numbers' from that bullshit report... And once again I want to present them broken down here in alphabetical order for everyone to analyze for themselves:

(a) Now they are claiming '70' new 'cases' of this phantom 'deadly virus' for all of Manitoba over the last 24 hours.. This raises their overall 'cases count' for the last 53+ weeks of this stupidity to a grand total of '34122' in total.. BUT as always, ALL of these 'cases' were derived only through the fraudulent 'PCR testing' that is 100% inaccurate, 100% unreliable, and generates ONLY 100% false positive results..

(b) Now they are claiming '63' active hospital cases of this phantom 'deadly virus' for all of Manitoba as of today... This is a decline of '1' active hospital case from yesterday's total of '64'... And they are now claiming '12' of those '63' active cases are sitting in ICU wards in all of Manitoba's hospitals, which is a decline of '1' ICU case from yesterday's total of '13'...

(c) Now they are claiming '1' new death from this phantom 'deadly virus' for all of Manitoba over the last 24 hours... This raises the overall 'death toll' for the 53+ weeks of this stupidity to '935' in total.. But as usual and once again, that latest death was an 80+ year old senior citizen with severe underlying health problems that were the real cause of his demise..

(d) Now they are claiming '32006' recovered cases of this phantom 'deadly virus' for all of Manitoba for the last 53+ weeks.. This is an increase of '85' recovered cases from yesterday's report of ' 31921'... This '85' number is pretty close to being accurate for this one single day, but it does not even account for the other '650+' that continue to linger away as falsely classified as 'active' instead....

(e) Now they are claiming '1181' active cases of this phantom 'deadly virus' for all of Manitoba as of today.. .This is a decrease of '16'  active cases from yesterday's tally of '1197', but still has some '650+' that rightfully must be listed as recovered.... But no matter, as all of these 'active cases' came ONLY through the fraud 'PCR testing' and therefore are ALL false positive results... Therefore since none of these active cases have this contagion at all, then they all must remain 'suspect' at best..

(f) Now they are claiming '17' new phantom 'variant cases' of this phantom 'deadly virus' over the last 24 hours for Manitoba... This raises their overall fraud 'variant cases' tally for the last 3+ months to '287' in total...But once again since the 'deadly virus' is a fraud, so are all of these 'variants' as well..

Well, what would anyone expect?  These lying assholes running this scam-demic for Manitoba are still cranking out the false positive 'cases' by over cycling the amplification of the FRAUD "PCR testing" and the compliant retards in this province are indeed assisting these pricks by stupidly and moronically going out to be 'tested'.... That and we are now seeing a continuing adding on of the ludicrous and fraudulent  'variant cases' just to drive the fear factor in the stupid of this province as well.... I can bet anything that the criminal Pallister regime will indeed not lift any of their horrid 'restrictions' for this province at all and claim that the rise in fraudulent 'new variants' will mean that Manitobans will have to endure their torture for a 'bit longer'....

OK, Time to once again do what I always do, and take a much closer look at their 'numbers' as shown above and rip them all to shreds... And in the same alphabetical order as shown above, right here:

(a) Yes, how stupid to see '2251' retards over the last 24 hours go out to be 'tested' to give these pricks their ability to hand select the '70' of those retards to be claimed to be 'positive' when they absolutely are NOT!..... But what the heck, right? Throw out any 'number' they want here to claim as 'cases' for the people of this province are simply too stupid to live now, and most will indeed GLADLY line up to get their kill shots....  I therefore look at this '34122' number and laugh for the fact that NONE of them have or have ever had this non-existent contagion at all..

(b) This hospital cases number continues to be relatively steady at around '60' as I noted yesterday, and that policy is continuing... But of course NONE of these 'hospital cases' have this 'deadly virus' at all, for the fact that the 'deadly virus' continues to never even been proven to exist.... Yes, people are indeed sick in the hospitals, but they are sick from other real diseases and not this COVID-19 fraud... I do wonder when these pricks will make these fraud 'hospital cases' numbers rise and try to blame it on the fraud 'new variants', for I can see that coming....

(c) One death? And once again an 80 year old man with severe other issues that were the real cause of his death!  But of course just like the other '934' deaths, every one was NOT caused by this non-existent 'deadly virus' but from OTHER REAL AILMENTS AND DISEASES... It remains a fact that I have yet to find ONE single death in the last 53+ weeks of this fraud scam-demic that can directly be attributed to this bullshit COVID-19, and I seriously doubt that I ever will with any future 'deaths' as well.... Therefore the answer to the question; 'Has anyone actually died from COVID-19?' is very simple: ABSOLUTELY NONE!

(d) These criminals running these daily numbers game are still heavily manipulating this data, and of course they are doing it purposely to keep the 'active cases' still as artificially high as possible....And when I look at their terminology of 'recovered cases' I have to ask 'recovered' from what?  There is NO 'deadly virus' and therefore if any of these recovered cases were indeed sick, they were sick from OTHER illnesses.... 

(e) Just like in (d) this number continues to be heavily manipulated and falsified... The fact remains that the REAL 'active cases' count by this time if there is a real 'contagion' out there is only around '500' if not less... But since there is NO deadly virus at all, and all of these 'active cases' are actually ALL false positives that were derived from the fraud PCR test, then NONE of them of course have any of this BULLSHIT 'COVID-19' at all.... And yes, I still get people saying 'But NTS.. People are sick", and my answer to them is  OF COURSE they are sick, but they are actually sick from the wide range of real contagions and illnesses out there, but not from this fraud 'deadly virus' at all..

(f) Yes, '17' new fraud 'variant cases' from a fraud  'deadly virus' that were derived from a fraud 'test'...  Is anyone else angry about this?  I surely am... But I can guarantee that these pricks are hell bent on having this fraud 'new variant cases' number slowly or periodically rapidly, increase just to keep the scam going as long as it takes to see most of the retards out there take their kill shots of death into their bodies...

I just do not get it?   People here in Manitoba continue to put up with the lockdowns, restrictions, loss of their rights and freedoms, and somehow do not even sit down and do their own research to find out very quickly  that it is all based on a total fraud and lie?  This only once again proves that the massive and horrendous propaganda of FEAR by the lying whore media has indeed done its job way too well....

And of course, all I see are people everywhere in this province walking around like total zombies.. The few that actually open their mouths are just proclaiming how wonderful it will be when they take their kill shots of 'vaccine' that are NOT even 'vaccines' at all.... . I do not even bother to try to reach out to them any more, for most are simply too far gone now... This is why I continue to say that if these retards are so hell bent on dying from those shots, I have a quicker method of putting them out of their misery now by having them all line up, and put a bullet to their brains now!

And I cannot emphasize enough that this entire scam-demic is indeed a program for mass genocide of the world's population through these deadly KILL SHOTS.....The criminals in our governments, our health care industry, and even the compliant lying whore media, are ALL complicit and accessories to this massive crime against humanity and they ALL must suffer the consequences for their part in this program of mass murder... They ALL must be put on trial, and then summarily sentenced to death for this crime, as this is the ONLY right justice that does indeed fit this crime!

More to come

NTS

BOMBSHELL Report: Disposable Blue Face Masks Found To Contain Toxic, Asbestos-like Substance That Destroys Lungs

Every day when I go out into the strange world of 'COVID-land',  I do encounter the BRAIN DEAD zombies that wear their most disgusting disposable bacteria laden face diapers everywhere I go... I find it so disgusting to see these retards with their glazed over look of unwarranted fear in their eyes wearing those disgusting face coverings, and all I can think to myself is HOW truly fucking stupid these idiots are, and how they do not even realize how much they are destroying their health and ruining their own immune systems.... It has now gotten to the point now, and this is indeed a terrible thought, that I DO want to see them injected as soon as possible with the deadly kill shots just to remove their stupidity from our society...

Yes, it is face diaper heaven out in COVID-land, and I have already tackled the terrible problems with the face diapers and how they are not only useless but are destroying the health of those who stupidly wear them...But I do want to add one more shocking aspect, as I present the following very important article from the Natural News website, at www.naturalnews.com, where a BOMBSHELL report was just issued showing that those disposable blue face masks that everyone stupidly wears has been found to contain a toxic, Asbestos-like substance that destroys lungs!   Here is that important article for everyone to read for themselves right here, and I do have my usual thoughts and comments to follow:

BOMBSHELL: Disposable blue face masks found to contain toxic, asbestos-like substance that destroys lungs

(Natural News) Health Canada has issued a warning about blue and gray disposable face masks, which contain an asbestos-like substance associated with “early pulmonary toxicity.”

The SNN200642 masks, which are made in China and sold and distributed by a Quebec-based company called Métallifer, had been part of Canada’s public school reopening plan. Students were told that they needed to wear them in the classroom to prevent the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19).

Health Canada, however, discovered during a preliminary risk assessment that the masks contain microscopic graphene particles that, when inhaled, could cause severe lung damage.

“Graphene is a strong, very thin material that is used in fabrication, but it can be harmful to lungs when inhaled and can cause long-term health problems,” reported CBC News.

For a while now, some daycare educators had expressed suspicion about the masks, which were causing children to feel as though they were swallowing cat hair while wearing them. We now know that instead of cat hair, children were inhaling the equivalent of asbestos all day long.

“If you have this type of mask in stock, we ask that you stop distributing them and keep them in a safe place now,” the provincial government wrote in a directive, which was sent to the education, families, and higher education ministries of Canada.

Face masks are neither safe nor effective

As it turns out, the SNN200642 masks that were being used all across Canada in school classrooms had never been tested for safety or effectiveness. Patrick Baillargeon, who heads up purchasing for Quebec’s laboratory supplies, says that because of this, the masks never should have been used.

The risks associated with inhaling graphene particles is unacceptable, he added, and Canadians – and everyone else, for that matter – should immediately stop using the masks.

“We therefore ask all our customers to check if they have any in their possession,” Baillargeon wrote in a notice, further revealing that at the time of their acquisition and distribution, the blue and gray disposable face masks were not in compliance with government regulations.

Schools and other facilities adopted them due to fears surrounding the Chinese virus, but this rushed, reactionary response is now causing other problems in the form of lung damage.

“We are now verifying whether any of these particular masks remain in our schools and centres,” reads a letter sent by the Lester B. Pearson school board to the parents of all exposed children.

“Any unused masks will be returned to our storage depot while we await further directives from the government.”

Back in December, the Quebec government had distributed these toxic masks to more than 15,000 daycare centers throughout the province. None of the masks met safety standards and were later ordered to no longer be used.

Another similar style of disposable mask, known as MC9501, was likewise pulled from distribution throughout Canada after it was determined to be unsafe. As many as 31.1 million toxic masks from this line were distributed before the government realized that they are unfit for use.

“Shouldn’t all this stuff be tested BEFORE it even leaves the factory?” asked one CBC News commenter, expressing outrage over the government’s act now, think later approach to Wuhan flu mitigation.

Others called for heads to roll over the fiasco, as well as an immediate end to all face mask use as the coverings are both useless and harmful no matter what materials were used in their production.

“To force a child to wear a toxic face mask is child abuse,” one wrote. “I hope lawsuits will follow.”

More coverage of the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) can be found at Pandemic.news.

Sources for this article include:

CBC.ca

NaturalNews.com

NTS Notes: Honestly, why should anyone with common sense and two brain cells to rub together be the least bit shocked by the findings in that Natural News report?

And yes, this is indeed interesting that "Health Canada" has come out with this warning at this time about these horrid face diapers... You would have thought by now that these criminals would have had these horrible face diapers tested last year BEFORE these criminal fuckers demanded that all Canadians be forced to wear them in public places, right?

But Graphene particles are only one of the problems that I see with these face diapers.. The other major issue is where the criminals manufacturing these health destroying face coverings have probably been using Ethylene Oxide for their process of 'sterilization' of the face coverings before they are boxed and put out to market... There has been a LOT of recent reports about how this chemical is indeed carcinogenic...

Well, we can add lung destroying Graphene particles to the long list of terrible substances that are generated into the lungs of those stupid enough to wear face diapers...  How much more do people need to understand that they should never ever wear these coverings at all?

I for one never wear a face diaper, period, unless I absolutely have to when entering any businesses here in Manitoba that have 'face mask' bullshit rules in place... I do not put them on until absolutely the last second when entering any of these premises, then do my shopping quickly, and then throw the gawd awful things away the moment I leave..... I for one prefer to breathe and be as healthy as possible instead of having my Oxygen levels to my body reduced by wearing those things..

More to come

NTS




Tuesday, March 30, 2021

COVID Vaccine Nonsense!

I am continuing to read up and study on whether or not states and provinces here in both Canada and the United States can rightfully ENFORCE mandatory shooting up their citizens with the EXPERIMENTAL genetic therapy KILL SHOTS, and from every avenue of law I have found that these pricks trying to enforce 'mandatory Kill shots (remember that crap are NOT vaccines at all) on their citizens at all as they themselves would have massive cases in courts where the International Law FORBIDDING mandatory or forced experimentation on human beings is indeed strictly prohibited..... 

Which once again brings us to these 'vaccines' that are ABSOLUTELY NOT vaccines at all... I do want to present the following report that comes from writer P Jerome, from the Off Guardian website (www.off-guardian.org) through the Aletho News website, at www.alethonews.com... This important article delves into some of the key issues surrounding these fraud 'vaccines' that are indeed nothing more than KILL SHOTS, and is an  important article for everyone to read for themselves... I have that entire article right here, and I do have my own thoughts and comments to follow:

Covid Vaccine Nonsense

US-based human rights lawyer breaks down the contradictory claims of “effectiveness”, the incomplete studies and legal minefield of forced use of experimental vaccines

By P Jerome | OffGuardian | March 30, 2021

The efforts to require every American to be injected with an experimental vaccine for Covid-19 are based on the false notion that vaccination will protect recipients from becoming infected with SARS-Cov-2, the virus that causes Covid-19, or protect them from passing along the infection to other people

The FDA, the CDC, the NIH and the pharmaceutical companies involved have all stated very clearly that there is no evidence to support this idea.

None of the three experimental Covid-19 vaccines now being distributed in the United States have been demonstrated to protect against infection with or transmission of the virus believed to cause Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2), or even prevent symptoms of Covid-19 disease from developing.

This fact is indisputable, yet media, medical providers, and politicians continue to repeat the lie that vaccination provides “immunity to Covid” and even sources like the Mayo Clinic make irresponsible and unsubstantiated claims that vaccination “might prevent you from getting” or “spreading” Covid-19. The same lies are the basis for President Biden’s hard press for mass vaccination to “make this Independence Day truly special.”

On February 27, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it had “issued an emergency use authorization (EUA) for the third vaccine for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19),” the Janssen (Johnson&Johnson) Covid-19 vaccine.

This announcement is virtually identical to the EUAs previously issued for Covid-19 vaccines produced by Pfizer-Biontech and Moderna.

In each of the EUAs, the FDA has been careful to avoid any claim that the vaccines provide protection against infection or transmission of the virus. Similarly, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have each publicly stated that the vaccines have NOT been shown to prevent infection or transmission.

All of their regulatory documents and commentary addressing the issue state clearly that there is no evidence that the vaccines affect either infection with or transmission of the virus, nor do they prevent symptoms of Covid-19 from appearing.

THE US GOVERNMENT POSITION

The FDA’s Briefing Document analyzing clinical trial data for the Pfizer vaccine, released the day before the FDA’s issuance of an EUA for that vaccine, noted (on page 47):

Data are limited to assess the effect of the vaccine against asymptomatic infection

And:

Data are limited to assess the effect of the vaccine against transmission of SARS-CoV-2 [virus] from individuals who are infected despite vaccination.

The FDA Briefing Document on the Moderna vaccine stated the same fact, while also describing plans for a future clinical trial to measure infection prevention, but that will not be completed until December 31, 2023 (p.47). The FDA’s review of the Janssen vaccine noted the same “limited” data…

to assess the effect of the vaccine in preventing asymptomatic infection… and definitive conclusions cannot be drawn at this time.”

“Limited data” means there is in fact no evidence to support those conclusions.

The CDC Advisory Committee that recommended emergency use of the Moderna vaccine noted:

“the level of certainty for the benefits of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine was… type 4 (very low certainty) for the estimates of prevention of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and all-cause death.”

The CDC guidance to Covid vaccine administrators (January 2, 2021) asks:

Can a person who has received a Covid-19 vaccine still spread COVID-19? At this time, we do not know if COVID-19 vaccination will have any effect on preventing transmission.”

The World Health Organization (WHO) on January 26, 2021 similarly admitted:

We do not know whether the vaccines will prevent infection and protect against onward transmission.”

This is all very confusing due to the language the FDA, NIH and other agencies use to describe the potential effectiveness of the vaccines. For example, in the NIH analysis of the Janssen vaccine data, the authors note the vaccine’s reported effectiveness in “preventing moderate and severe COVID-19 in adults.”

This deliberately blurs the distinction between infection with a virus (SARS-Cov-2) and the illness called Covid-19.

The NIH claims the Janssen vaccine prevents or lessens symptoms of the illness Covid-19, but is silent on whether the vaccine prevents infection or transmission of the virus said to cause Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2). The similar analysis for the Moderna vaccine notes, however:

“[T]here is not yet enough available data to draw conclusions as to whether the [Moderna] vaccine can impact SARS-CoV-2 transmission.”

Unfortunately, we have seen many reports over the last few months of deaths attributed to Covid-19 days and weeks after vaccination (see here and here (video)), confirming that vaccinated people can and do become infected with the virus.

Health officials have avoided blaming these deaths on side effects from the vaccines themselves. Instead, they say these deaths are the result of infections with the virus (SARS-Cov-2) acquired after receiving the vaccines.

Particularly devastating reports from an isolated Kentucky monastery describe how two nuns died of Covid-19 after receiving Covid-19 vaccines, despite the complete absence of any cases of infection in the monastery during the ten months prior to vaccination.

Moderna’s chief science officer was quoted in the British Medical Journal about the clinical trials in 2020 that resulted in the FDA’s decision to grant a EUA to the Moderna shot:

Our trial will not demonstrate prevention of transmission,” Zaks said, “because in order to do that you have to swab people twice a week for very long periods, and that becomes operationally untenable.”

The most important questions about the experimental Covid-19 vaccines were not even asked during the clinical trials: Do these experimental vaccines prevent infection with the virus and do they prevent transmission of that virus? The short answer is No.

The FDA has stated clearly in each of the Covid vaccine Briefing Documents (see Moderna document here, Pfizer here, Janssen here) that the trials were not even designed prove or disprove a hypothesis that the vaccines prevent infection or transmission of the virus, or even prevent symptoms of Covid-19 from developing.

The FDA issued Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) for the Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen vaccines on December 11 and December 18, 2020, and on February 27, 2021, respectively.

The EUAs indicate that the vaccines “prevent severe Covid-19,” that is, they don’t prevent infection or development of symptoms after infection, but they may make the illness less severe.

The EUAs explicitly deny any evidence that the Pfizer, Moderna or Janssen vaccines prevent infection, or prevent hospitalization or even death from Covid-19 after vaccination. The highly publicized “success rates” of the vaccines refer only their potential ability to lessen the severity of those symptoms, but there is “no data” that they prevent the infection that could cause those symptoms.

MANDATING VACCINATION UNDER EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION IS IMPERMISSIBLE

An EUA is not “FDA Approval.”

An EUA indicates that a product has not been fully tested but, despite the obvious risks, distribution is permitted because the government declared a “public health emergency” in January 2020.

As the FDA notes in its Information Sheet for the Moderna shot:

The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine has not undergone the same type of review as an FDA- approved or cleared product.”

The FDA granted EUAs for all three experimental vaccines after less than five months of clinical trials, with most of trial data still to be collected. All three vaccines will be in clinical trial status through January 31, 2023.

According to comments from vaccine scientists in September 2020 (prior to the Covid-19 EUA issuances), no vaccine had ever before been distributed on an EUA basis.

“We don’t do EUAs for vaccines,” [Dr. Peter] Hotez said, “It’s a lesser review, it’s a lower-quality review, and when you’re talking about vaccinating a large chunk of the American population, that’s not acceptable.”

Three months later, the FDA issued EUAs for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, but with explicit guidance that the vaccine “has not undergone the same type of review as an FDA- approved or cleared product.”

Indeed, the highly experimental nature of the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine, in particular, is extraordinary as that vaccine is the first and only product the company has ever been allowed to distribute, and it was allegedly developed in only two days.

Any use of an experimental vaccine under an EUA must be voluntary and recipients must be informed “of the option to accept or refuse administration of the productof the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.

This information is repeated in small print on each of the FDA Covid-19 vaccine Fact Sheets, but it is largely ignored.

Dr Amanda Cohn, the executive secretary of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, was asked in October 22, 2020, if the new Covid-19 vaccines could be legally required. She responded that, under a EUA:

Vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in this vaccination phase, individuals will have to be consented and they won’t be able to be mandatory.”

Under EUA status, the government is not permitted to require Covid-19 vaccinations because the vaccines are not FDA-approved and recipients are clinical trial participants. This is why states cannot legally require vaccination, despite suggestions by some legislators to do just that.

Indeed, the US military is barred from mandating the vaccines. This ban on government vaccine mandates explains why some private companies are trying to require vaccination of employees, which makes the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidance on this issue potentially relevant.

THE EEOC GUIDANCE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION DOES NOT AUTHORIZE VACCINE MANDATES

The EEOC updated its guidance on the issue of Covid-19 vaccination on December 16, 2020.

This update appeared five days after the FDA issued an EUA for the Pfizer vaccine and two days prior to issuing the Moderna EUA. Based on this timing, we can safely assume that the EEOC was well-aware of the contents of the FDA briefing documents and Fact Sheets, specifically the FDA statements about the lack of proof that the vaccines prevent infection with or transmission of the virus (SARS-CoV-2).

The EEOC guidance evaluates the idea of employer Covid-19 vaccine mandates under the Americans with Disabilities Act’s (ADA) “direct threat” analysis:

The ADA allows an employer to have a qualification standard that includes ‘a requirement that an individual shall not pose a direct threat to the health or safety of individuals in the workplace.’“

But the EEOC’s analysis presupposes that vaccines protect against infection, which is false.

The “direct threat” doctrine is an employer’s potential defense to a claim of disability discrimination under the ADA. According to the EEOC, “A conclusion that there is a direct threat would include a determination that an unvaccinated individual will expose others to the virus at the worksite.”

The specific but theoretical “direct threat” described here is one allegedly posed by an unvaccinated person who might become infected with the virus (SARS-CoV-2) and then spread infection to the workplace.

But no “determination” of such a threat is possible. The EEOC was careful to state only that a direct threat defense “would include” such a “determination.” The EEOC took no position on this issue because officials there were likely aware there has been no determination that vaccination prevents infection or transmission, and none is possible with current data.

Aspirational claims that vaccination “might” [be eventually be shown to] prevent infection or that “some data tends to show” such an effect are insufficient bases for a direct threat defense.

The US Supreme Court ruled in Bragdon v Abbott (1988) that the assertion of a direct threat defense must be evaluated “in light of the available medical evidence,” noting that “the views of public health authorities, such as the U.S. Public Health Service, CDC, and the National Institutes of Health, are of special weight and authority.”

Overcoming the long-standing protections of the right to bodily integrity and informed, voluntary consent to medical treatment requires articulation of an actual and imminent, not theoretical, threat presented by an unvaccinated person in the workplace.

The CDC, the National Institutes of Health and numerous other “public health authorities” have all stated that there is no evidence to show that vaccination prevents viral infection or transmission, a fact the EEOC should have presented but did not.

The EEOC guidance does not provide any legal cover for employers to require vaccination. The guidance proposes that employers might be successful in proving a direct threat if they were able to prove facts which, it turns out, cannot be proven.

Even more importantly, according to the CDC, more than 29 million Americans (and likely many, many more) have already contracted the virus (SARS-CoV-2) and recovered from it.

recent NIH study demonstrates that these millions of “recovered” people have long-lasting, and likely permanent protection from re-infection. They present no threat of infection or transmission of the virus. However, under a blanket employer vaccine requirement, these people who are already immune would still be required to get vaccinated. It makes no sense logically or legally to require the vaccination of people who already have more protection from the virus than people who get vaccinated.

WHAT IS THE THREAT PREVENTED BY MANDATORY VACCINATION?

Outside the employment context, companies are demanding proof of vaccination from travelers and even movie- and concert-goers, based on the same debunked idea that vaccination with one of the Covid-19 vaccines will prevent the theoretical spread of the virus in trains, planes, movie theaters and concert halls among low-risk populations. But the relevant government agencies have all stated clearly that the vaccines do not prevent infection or the spread of infection.

The benefit from any vaccination lies with the recipient of the vaccine. In the case of Covid-19 vaccines, vaccinated people may have fewer symptoms after becoming infected. While this is an important consideration for many people, this benefit has nothing to do with preventing the spread of the virus SARS-Cov-2.

A vaccinated person presents at least the same “risk” of infection and transmission of the virus (if not more risk) as a person who is not vaccinated. At best, vaccination might prevent a more serious case of Covid-19 illness from developing. The vaccines do not prevent infection or the spread of the virus that causes Covid-19. They can have little or no impact on stopping transmission.

Because no one has shown that vaccination prevents infection or transmission of the virus SARS-CoV-2, a fact undisputed by all official sources, this also means that vaccination cannot help to achieve the goal of herd immunity.

“Herd immunity” means that a population can be protected from a virus after enough of the population has become immune to infection, either through exposure to the virus and later recovery, or through vaccination.

But with Covid-19, there is no proof that vaccination makes anyone immune to the virus SARS-CoV-2. Covid-19 vaccination cannot play any meaningful role in the pursuit of herd immunity because the Covid-19 vaccines do not provide immunity from infection.

Oddly, the WHO contradicts itself in arguing that Covid-19 vaccination promotes herd immunity to the virus that causes Covid-19, claiming:

To safely achieve herd immunity against COVID-19, a substantial proportion of a population would need to be vaccinated, lowering the overall amount of virus able to spread in the whole population.”

This statement is simply false. It also contradicts the WHO’s prior admission that “We do not know whether the vaccines will prevent infection and protect against onward transmission.”

If the WHO has already acknowledged that it “does not know if” the Covid-19 vaccines protect people from becoming infected or transmitting the virus, it is a deliberate lie to claim that somehow these vaccines can lead to herd immunity.

A far more useful strategy than forcing people to accept an experimental vaccine that does not even protect them from infection would be to instead protect those most vulnerable to serious illness or death as a result of infection. Tens of thousands of renowned doctors and scientists in the U.S. and around the world proposed such a strategy in October 2020.

Unfortunately, the media and Silicon Valley tech monopolies attacked and effectively censored discussion of this common sense approach as “anti-science” and “right wing” by removing discussion of the proposal from nearly all media platforms.

Yet the fake “scientific” approach to herd immunity touted by the WHO, US government agencies and politicians, and media monopolists is blatantly dishonest, and has nothing to do with “science.” The push by private companies to require vaccination and “immunity passports” is similarly based on private financial interests, not scientific research.

Government scientists admit that the Covid-19 vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of the virus they say causes Covid-19, but many of these same scientists also dishonestly claim the vaccines will somehow prevent the spread of the virus, leading to herd immunity.

Such an approach is not only unscientific and dishonest. It’s nonsense.

P Jerome is civil rights attorney based in Washington, D.C. He can be reached at jeromeinpassing@protonmail.com

NTS Notes: Honestly, I am not in the least bit surprised for the fact remains that these death jabs are absolutely NOT 'vaccines' at all as they DO NOT even meet the very definition of the word 'vaccine' at all...

The fact remains that this is indeed THE greatest experiment ever conducted on human beings ever in our entire history... Human beings taking these experimental shots of certain death are indeed nothing but HUMAN GUINEA PIGS and the pricks pushing these deadly concoctions are indeed sitting back and watching to see what happens to the victims of their deadly poisons.... As I said before, these foul creatures in the Pharmaceutical giants pushing these concoctions do not really care if anyone lives or dies from their poisons, for all they care about is to make profits and push even MORE of these poisons into the survivors of their deadly onslaught.

And yes, I too want everyone who is indeed considering taking these KILL SHOTS to be absolutely aware that there is ZERO PROOF that these shots will even 'protect them' from this phantom 'deadly virus'... There is zero evidence that these deadly concoctions are doing as they are 'advertised' to do in regards to stopping and preventing the spread of this fraud 'COVID-19' at all.....

Yes, the pricks running this scam are indeed lying their asses off, and the compliant lying whore media is out there trying to sell everyone this LIE that these are 'vaccines' and that they will protect people from this non-existent 'deadly virus'.... That brainwashing will indeed cost the lives of millions of suckers out there so dearly as they are still out there just screaming to be injected with these kill shots.....

Therefore, as I stated at the start of this article, the pricks trying to ram through their fraud 'Mandatory Vaccination' program definitely do not have a leg to stand on legally.... These are experimental kill shots and can never be classified at all as 'vaccines', period... Thus people must indeed stand firm, and not be coerced into believing that they must or are being forced to take these kill shots, and have every legal avenue to fight these evil pricks if they try to enforce such rules through bullying, or threats.... 

Stand firm, everyone, and do not accept their kill shots as your very lives depend on it!

More to come

NTS

Former Pfizer Vice President Warns That The Kill Shots Of Deadly mRNA Genetic Modifying Concoctions Could Be Used For Massive-Scale Depopulation!

 I have been watching and reading up on the issues with Geert Vanden Bossche over the last few weeks after he came forward and claimed that we MUST put an end to these 'vaccinations' of the public with the criminals EXPERIMENTAL genetic modifying concoctions of certain death (which I rightfully call 'KILL SHOTS') immediately... Geert claimed in an important video two weeks ago (at the time of this article writing) that there was a real risk that these kill shots would cause horrendous mutations and unleash horrible new 'variants' of these 'viruses' that could destroy all humanity..... 

At the time and when I posted up subsequent articles at this blog, I felt that Vanden Bossche's warning to the entire world would have to be heeded... BUT I was a skeptic at the very start for the fact that I have had my suspicions about this person who did indeed work for years with the very criminals in the manufacturing of deadly vaccines, and thus I kept an 'open mind' to what he was stating simply because he could not be fully trusted and as I said to so many his coming forward at this critical time was indeed rather suspicious... 

Many have claimed that Geert Vanden Bossche has finally come out due to a 'change of heart' and is realizing that he has to come forward to help save us all, which I do find commendable if true.... I am for just keeping our guards up as we rightfully should...

Well, I want to present the following important report that comes from the American Frontline Doctors website at www.americanfrontlinedoctors.com, where former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer, Doctor Mike Yeadon, has come out out with his views on the present 'COVID-19' bullshit situation and well as his own take on what Geert Vanden Bossche had to say about the possibility of these kill shots leading to more mutant and deadly strains that could indeed kill us all... Here is that article, and I  have my own thoughts and comments to follow:

by Mordechai Sones

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) spoke to former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer Dr. Mike Yeadon about his views on the COVID-19 vaccine, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the regulatory authorities, and more.

At the outset, Dr. Yeadon said “I’m well aware of the global crimes against humanity being perpetrated against a large proportion of the worlds population.

“I feel great fear, but I’m not deterred from giving expert testimony to multiple groups of able lawyers like Rocco Galati in Canada and Reiner Fuellmich in Germany.

“I have absolutely no doubt that we are in the presence of evil (not a determination I’ve ever made before in a 40-year research career) and dangerous products.

“In the U.K., it’s abundantly clear that the authorities are bent on a course which will result in administering ‘vaccines’ to as many of the population as they can. This is madness, because even if these agents were legitimate, protection is needed only by those at notably elevated risk of death from the virus. In those people, there might even be an argument that the risks are worth bearing. And there definitely are risks which are what I call ‘mechanistic’: inbuilt in the way they work.

“But all the other people, those in good health and younger than 60 years, perhaps a little older, they don’t perish from the virus. In this large group, it’s wholly unethical to administer something novel and for which the potential for unwanted effects after a few months is completely uncharacterized.

“In no other era would it be wise to do what is stated as the intention.

“Since I know this with certainty, and I know those driving it know this too, we have to enquire: What is their motive?

“While I don’t know, I have strong theoretical answers, only one of which relates to money and that motive doesn’t work, because the same quantum can be arrived at by doubling the unit cost and giving the agent to half as many people. Dilemma solved. So it’s something else.
Appreciating that, by entire population, it is also intended that minor children and eventually babies are to be included in the net, and that’s what I interpret to be an evil act.

“There is no medical rationale for it. Knowing as I do that the design of these ‘vaccines’ results, in the expression in the bodies of recipients, expression of the spike protein, which has adverse biological effects of its own which, in some people, are harmful (initiating blood coagulation and activating the immune ‘complement system’), I’m determined to point out that those not at risk from this virus should not be exposed to the risk of unwanted effects from these agents.”

AFLDS: The Israel Supreme Court decision last week cancelling COVID flight restrictions said: “In the future, any new restrictions on travel into or out of Israel need, in legal terms, a comprehensive, factual, data-based foundation.”

In a talk you gave four months ago, you said

“The most likely duration of immunity to a respiratory virus like SARS CoV-2 is multiple years. Why do I say that? We actually have the data for a virus that swept through parts of the world seventeen years ago called SARS, and remember SARS CoV-2 is 80% similar to SARS, so I think that’s the best comparison that anyone can provide.

“The evidence is clear: These very clever cellular immunologists studied all the people they could get hold of who had survived SARS 17 years ago. They took a blood sample, and they tested whether they responded or not to the original SARS and they all did; they all had perfectly normal, robust T cell memory. They were actually also protected against SARS CoV-2, because they’re so similar; it’s cross immunity.

“So, I would say the best data that exists is that immunity should be robust for at least 17 years. I think it’s entirely possible that it is lifelong. The style of the responses of these people’s T cells were the same as if you’ve been vaccinated and then you come back years later to see if that immunity has been retained. So I think the evidence is really strong that the duration of immunity will be multiple years, and possibly lifelong.

In other words, previous exposure to SARS – that is, a variant similar to SARS CoV-2 – bestowed SARS CoV-2 immunity.

The Israel government cites new variants to justify lockdowns, flight closures, restrictions, and Green Passport issuance. Given the Supreme Court verdict, do you think it may be possible to preempt future government measures with accurate information about variants, immunity, herd immunity, etc. that could be provided to the lawyers who will be challenging those future measures?

Yeadon: “What I outlined in relation to immunity to SARS is precisely what we’re seeing with SARS-CoV-2.
The study is from one of the best labs in their field.

“So, theoretically, people could test their T-cell immunity by measuring the responses of cells in a small sample of their blood. There are such tests, they are not “high throughput” and they are likely to cost a few hundred USD each on scale. But not thousands. The test I’m aware of is not yet commercially available, but research only in U.K.

“However, I expect the company could be induced to provide test kits “for research” on scale, subject to an agreement. If you were to arrange to test a few thousand non vaccinated Israelis, it may be a double edged sword. Based on other countries experiences, 30-50% of people had prior immunity & additionally around 25% have been infected & are now immune.

“Personally, I wouldn’t want to deal with the authorities on their own terms: that you’re suspected as a source of infection until proven otherwise. You shouldn’t need to be proving you’re not a health risk to others. Those without symptoms are never a health threat to others. And in any case, once those who are concerned about the virus are vaccinated, there is just no argument for anyone else needing to be vaccinated.”

My understanding of a “leaky vaccine” is that it only lessens symptoms in the vaccinated, but does not stop transmission; it therefore allows the spread of what then becomes a more deadly virus.

For example, in China they deliberately use leaky Avian Flu vaccines to quickly cull flocks of chicken, because the unvaccinated die within three days. In Marek’s Disease, from which they needed to save all the chickens, the only solution was to vaccinate 100% of the flock, because all unvaccinated were at high risk of death. So how a leaky vax is utilized is intention-driven, that is, it is possible that the intent can be to cause great harm to the unvaccinated.

Stronger strains usually would not propagate through a population because they kill the host too rapidly, but if the vaccinated experience only less-serious disease, then they spread these strains to the unvaccinated who contract serious disease and die.

Do you agree with this assessment? Furthermore, do you agree that if the unvaccinated become the susceptible ones, the only way forward is HCQ prophylaxis for those who haven’t already had COVID-19? 

Would the Zelenko Protocol work against these stronger strains if this is the case? 

And if many already have the aforementioned previous “17-year SARS immunity”, would that then not protect from any super-variant?

“I think the Gerrt Vanden Bossche story is highly suspect. There is no evidence at all that vaccination is leading or will lead to ‘dangerous variants’. I am worried that it’s some kind of trick.

“As a general rule, variants form very often, routinely, and tend to become less dangerous & more infectious over time, as it comes into equilibrium with its human host. Variants generally don’t become more dangerous.

“No variant differs from the original sequence by more than 0.3%. In other words, all variants are at least 99.7% identical to the Wuhan sequence.

“It’s a fiction, and an evil one at that, that variants are likely to “escape immunity”.

“Not only is it intrinsically unlikely – because this degree of similarity of variants means zero chance that an immune person (whether from natural infection or from vaccination) will be made ill by a variant – but it’s empirically supported by high-quality research.

“The research I refer to shows that people recovering from infection or who have been vaccinated ALL have a wide range of immune cells which recognize ALL the variants.

This paper shows WHY the extensive molecular recognition by the immune system makes the tiny changes in variants irrelevant.

“I cannot say strongly enough: The stories around variants and need for top up vaccines are FALSE. I am concerned there is a very malign reason behind all this. It is certainly not backed by the best ways to look at immunity. The claims always lack substance when examined, and utilize various tricks, like manipulating conditions for testing the effectiveness of antibodies. Antibodies are probably rather unimportant in host protection against this virus. There have been a few ‘natural experiments’, people who unfortunately cannot make antibodies, yet are able quite successfully to repel this virus. They definitely are better off with antibodies than without. I mention these rare patients because they show that antibodies are not essential to host immunity, so some contrived test in a lab of antibodies and engineered variant viruses do NOT justify need for top up vaccines.

“The only people who might remain vulnerable and need prophylaxis or treatment are those who are elderly and/or ill and do not wish to receive a vaccine (as is their right).

“The good news is that there are multiple choices available: hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, budesonide (inhaled steroid used in asthmatics), and of course oral Vitamin D, zinc, azithromycin etc. These reduce the severity to such an extent that this virus did not need to become a public health crisis.”

Do you feel the FDA does a good job regulating big pharma? In what ways does big pharma get around the regulator? Do you feel they did so for the mRNA injection?

“Until recently, I had high regard for global medicines regulators. When I was in Pfizer, and later CEO of a biotech I founded (Ziarco, later acquired by Novartis), we interacted respectfully with FDA, EMA, and the U.K. MHRA.
Always good quality interactions.

“Recently, I noticed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) had made a grant to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)! Can that ever be appropriate? They’re funded by public money. They should never accept money from a private body.

“So here is an example where the U.K. regulator has a conflict of interest.

“The European Medicines Agency failed to require certain things as disclosed in the ‘hack’ of their files while reviewing the Pfizer vaccine.

“You can find examples on Reiner Fuellmich’s “Corona Committee” online.

“So I no longer believe the regulators are capable of protecting us. ‘Approval’ is therefore meaningless.

“Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and I petitioned the EMA Dec 1, 2020 on the genetic vaccines. They ignored us.

“Recently, we wrote privately to them, warning of blood clots, they ignored us. When we went public with our letter, we were completely censored. Days later, more than ten countries paused use of a vaccine citing blood clots.

“I think the big money of pharma plus cash from BMGF creates the environment where saying no just isn’t an option for the regulator.

“I must return to the issue of ‘top up vaccines’ (booster shots) and it is this whole narrative which I fear will he exploited and used to gain unparalleled power over us.

“PLEASE warn every person not to go near top up vaccines. There is absolutely no need to them.

“As there’s no need for them, yet they’re being made in pharma, and regulators have stood aside (no safety testing), I can only deduce they will be used for nefarious purposes.

“For example, if someone wished to harm or kill a significant proportion of the worlds population over the next few years, the systems being put in place right now will enable it.

“It’s my considered view that it is entirely possible that this will be used for massive-scale depopulation.”

NTS Notes: I want to thank Greencrow, over on the left coast of Canada and in the wilds of southern British Columbia, and who writes her blog at www.greencrowasthecrowflies.blogspot.com, for alerting me to this fabulous report... I do recommend that people go to her own website and see what she has to say about this important interview as well...

Both Greencrow and myself have been highly skeptical of Geert Vanden Bossche from the very start when he suddenly came out of nowhere two weeks ago with his warnings to the world....  I for one am not taking his message seriously for the fact that he continues to push the idea of more 'vaccines'  as well as his insistence that there is a 'deadly virus' called 'COVID-19' out there and yet to this day it still has never been even proven to exist... Therefore I am still going to hold that person under suspicion and the possibility that there could indeed be a sinister motive behind his coming forward at this time..

But of course there are so many others out there that support what Vanden Bossche has to say, such as Doctor Vernon Coleman, with high regard and thus give him a lot of credibility..... I do support Vernon Coleman tremendously for his fine work, but I will continue to keep my skepticism of Vanden Bossche for the time being..

The bottom line is this.. We must not let this issue divide us now.. This is too important a fight for our very survival and I for one would insist that we put the minor differences that we have on so many subjects to rest for the moment and  be a combined force for the good of the planet against these monsters and their ultimate aim of world wide genocide.... We can settle any personal or petty differences later, for we must stay united and focused in on having these monsters destroyed for the sake of everyone...

More to come

NTS