Thursday, January 28, 2021

The Coronavirus: Using "Animal Models" As Proof Of Infection? Another LIE!

I am once again continuing my assault against this scam-demic... And I am contemplating actually increase the articles at this blog, at least for the next while, for the fact that I saw horrific reports that the criminals are indeed going to 'go for broke' by increasing and inundating all of the fraud propaganda 'news' channels with their push for their EXPERIMENTAL "vaccines".... These pricks absolutely want to have everyone so frightened of this 'deadly virus' that does not even exist, that most will be brainwashed enough to line up like dumb ass brain dead sheep and take their deadly 'shots'..... 

And yes, it is back to blasting the fraud of this 'COVID-19' head on, and right now I do want to present the newest article from Jon Rappoport's blog over at www.nomorefakenews.com that is entitled: 'The Coronavirus: Using "Animal Models" As Proof Of Infection, Another Lie".... And as this article shows, all of their claims of using animals to test the validity of their vaccines is pure BULLSHIT.... Here in fact is Jon's article in its entirety right here for all to see for themselves, and I do have my own thoughts and comments to follow:

The coronavirus: using “animal models” as proof of infection; another lie

by Jon Rappoport

January 28, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

There are a number of badly informed scientists who believe current “animal models” prove SARS-CoV-2 is infectious. They’re wrong.

First of all, I’ve been demonstrating that no one has proved the virus exists. But putting that aside for the moment and assuming it does exist, for the purposes of argument only…what is an animal model?

Researchers take a group of animals and inject them with a serum which contains a purported virus. Then the researchers see whether the animals develop symptoms and (supposed) markers of the disease in question.

So far, I have only found evidence that researchers are using mice and, perhaps, another similar species for their model.

Yet they claim, because of the mice’s reactions, that, yes, the virus is infectious.

This is absurd.

The whole point of animal models is: you work your way up the tree of species, from mice, rabbits, dogs, cats, and so on, until you arrive at the species which most closely resembles humans, which would be chimps. The reactions of chimps are what you’re looking for.

After all, the entire enterprise is geared to estimate whether the virus will infect humans. Since injecting humans with a virus is verboten, you work with chimps.

So, asserting that infecting mice is proof of anything is a gross lie.

Any conventional scientist would know that.

Another issue: quite often, you’ll find that the mice in these experiments have been genetically altered. Why? Why can’t researchers work with ordinary wild mice?

Obviously, because they want to prep the mice in a way that would make them more vulnerable to viruses. Another absurdity. In that case, the researchers are not really working with animals at all. They’re working with artifacts modified in the lab.

Using a mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 to prove the virus is infectious is a con. A farce.

Back in 1988, when I was writing my book, AIDS INC., I looked into HIV experiments using chimps. I spoke with the man who was monitoring all the facilities in the US where groups of these chimps were held.

Keep in mind, this was four years after HIV had been announced as the cause of AIDS. So the chimps had been in cages for a while. Cut off from their companions and families, in a completely alien environment, imprisoned, isolated. These circumstances alone would have contributed to a grossly reduced state of immune-system capability. And yet…

The chief monitor over all these chimp facilities told me that, thus far, none of the injections of HIV (assuming the virus actually exists) had caused any symptoms which could be aligned with the wide-ranging definition of AIDS.

This utter failure deterred no mainstream AIDS scientist. In other words, if the animal model fails, ignore it. Claim the virus is infectious anyway.

Welcome to big-time research.

—Oh, and one other thing. Newsflash: Chimps are not humans. ALL animal models are false.

Other than that, the system is perfect.

NTS Notes: Here is a reality check for everyone... These pricks have NOT even bothered with any testing on 'animals' and especially using 'chimpanzees' as they are the closest to human beings, for any vaccine testing and trials, as they have been using HUMAN BEINGS as their 'lab rats' to verify if their concoctions work and to test for 'side effects'!  Is this criminal? Absolutely!  Will they be charged for this criminal act? Absolutely not!

Yes, there have been ZERO animal trials for these poisons... These pricks have bypassed all that 'testing' and gone directly to using human 'volunteers' first as they claimed months back, and in a  lot of cases  have  gone directly to shooting their crap into our bodies without even knowing if there are consequences... 

This is WHY these poisons are indeed still listed as 'EXPERIMENTAL' and have not even been 'approved' by the CDC at all..... This way they can try to avoid any litigation and possible backlash for when many start dying from these chemicals in their bodies, as they will say that everyone that has taken their concoctions 'knew the risks involved as the vaccine is experimental'...

And as Jon shows, they have NEVER even shown that their 'contagion' actually exists, period!   That means we have the brainwashing propaganda going full steam ahead causing people to actually believe that they NEED these EXPERIMENTAL 'vaccines' in their bodies to save them from a non-existent 'deadly virus'!  This to me is the most horrible aspect of this entire fraud....

So, if you want to be a human lab rat and accept the horrible side effects including the strong possibility of DEATH, go right out and take their shots...  Sadly there are still some 72% of the  people here in my province of Manitoba that are so willing to do so!

More to come

NTS


No comments: