Thursday, December 31, 2020

The Criminal World Health Organization Blows Its Own Cover: FAKE PCR Test

Many readers to this blog may remember 11 days ago when I posted a report where the criminals in the World Health Organization actually admitted that their fraud "PCR testing" was an abomination and was generating only false positive results... Here is the link to that report here:

OK,  Not much has happened since that blatant admission of lying their asses off to the world... But many other writers are finally taking notice of that action by the criminals in the WHO, and now Jon Rappoport has released his own report about this action by these criminals in a new article at his website over at I want to share Jon's report, entitled: "The Criminal WHO Blows Its Own Cover: Fake PCR Test" right here for my own readers to view for themselves.. I have my own thoughts and comments to follow:

The criminal WHO blows its own cover: fake PCR test

by Jon Rappoport

December 31, 2020

(To join our email list, click here.)

In early 2020, the WHO accepted a PCR test for “SARS-CoV-2” that was designed without having possession of the virus. Yet the test is meant to detect…the missing virus. This is evidence of deep criminal intent. [1]

But as of December 14, 2020, WHO has made a correction [2]. Thereby blowing its own cover. Why?

Two reasons. Huge numbers of people have caught on to the PCR test scam. And by their correction, WHO paves the way for “declining COVID case numbers”—thereby making it appear the new vaccine is a roaring success. I predicted this development. [3] [4]

A brief review. The PCR test (a complete fraud for several reasons) is run in “cycles.” Each cycle is a giant magnification of a tiny portion of the swab sample taken from the patient.

As I’ve reported, even Tony Fauci readily asserts that if the PCR is run at 35 cycles or higher, it’s meaningless. [5] [6]

Every positive result—indicating “infection with the virus”—occurring at 35 cycles or higher is meaningless.

BUT, as I’ve also pointed out, public health agencies recommend running the PCR test at up to 40 cycles. Therefore, labs comply.

Therefore, millions upon millions of PCR tests results, over the last nine months, which indicate “infection,” are a vast lie.

Therefore, the COVID case numbers are a vast lie, and the lockdowns, which are based on those numbers, are absurd, insane, criminal, and predatory.

NOW, the WHO is walking back their stance on how the PCR should be run, for the reasons I mentioned above.

The WHO document is titled, “WHO Information Notice for IVD Users/Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2.” [2]

Here are the money quotes. The language is mealy-mouthed, intentionally confusing, cautious, and sterile. Nevertheless, we can see the intent to lower the number of test cycles.

“Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU [Information for Use] carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.”

Translation: Using too many test cycles—aka “high cycle threshold (Ct) value”—has resulted in patients being told they’re infected, which is a lie.

“In some cases, the IFU will state that the cut-off should be manually adjusted to ensure that specimens with high Ct values are not incorrectly assigned SARS-CoV-2 detected due to background noise.”

Translation: Running the test with a high number of cycles yields “background noise”—aka a false positive result. The patient is told he’s infected but he’s not.

“The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus and so the Ct value will be low. Conversely, when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.”

Translation: When the test is run with a high number of cycles, we can’t tell the difference between “irrelevant” and “meaningful.”

A frank and honest translation of the WHO message: “We’re changing the way we’re doing PCR tests. We were running them with a high number of cycles and getting millions of false positives, and those numbers were deployed to justify the lockdowns—but NOW we’re moving to a lower number of cycles. This change, all on its own, will result in fewer positive results, fewer case numbers, making the vaccine look VERY GOOD.”

The WHO is still crazy, still criminal, but not entirely stupid. They know what they’re doing and why.








NTS Notes: I am glad that Jon has also caught onto this scam by the criminals over at the WHO, AND the fact that they basically admitted NOTHING as they will indeed now reduce the number of 'cycles' through their fraud PCR testing and falsely claim that this procedure is being done because the 'VACCINES' are doing their job!!

But the facts are still the same here.. The fuckers running these 'PCR tests' have for the past 9+ months have been over cycling their tests just to generate MILLIONS of false positive results and thus use those fraud results as their means to have nations lock down their citizens for no reason at all!

And yes, now that they have been 'caught' they will simply distort their information as shown to make the vaccines look good.... And suckers out there will swallow their horse shit without any thought at all..

The bottom line is this... The PCR test is and has always been a fraud to begin with as there is NO real 'deadly virus' out there at all... Using a 'test' to try to find a 'phantom' the does not exist has been a propaganda game from the start and a means of fooling the entire planet with fraudulent 'numbers of cases' just to fuel this entire scam-demic.....  And until people actually wake up and challenge these liars on this and their other scams, they will continue with more damage to us all in this coming year..

More to come


What The Hell?? COVID-19 "Outbreak" At First Site In Canada Administering Deadly Vaccines, And Scumbags At Health Canada Claim It Was "Expected"???

I have been looking more closely over the last few days at the reports that are now flying all over the alternative media about the horrific 'side effects' that people are now getting due to their stupidly taking the "COVID-19 vaccines".... And slowly but surely these reports are increasing in frequency and now establishing a very disturbing trend all across the planet...

Yes, I have seen the reports about doctors and even nurses getting horrific side effects from taking these horrific shots.. There was that report of the doctor in Boston Massachusetts the other day that nearly DIED after taking his 'shot' and of course the sad video of that nurse in Nashville Tennessee that came down with "Bell's Palsy" after taking her shot... And yet the criminals administering their garbage and causing these 'side effects' are out there now stating that these type of 'reactions' were 'EXPECTED'!

OK, I am truly sick and tired of those lying sacks of shit behind these deadly shots coming out and constantly parroting the ridiculous term "It was all expected' in regards to reactions to their poisons, and I am not alone for my fellow Canadian real truth seeker, Penny, who of course writes the excellent blog 'Penny For Your Thoughts' at, has just released a new report entitled: "COVID Outbreak Hits Site Of First In Canada COVID Vaccination Rollout" that shows that some of the sites that have began administering their deadly concoctions are suddenly seeing 'outbreaks' of the very 'disease' that their 'vaccines' are supposed to be fighting against... And the pricks in charge have the nerve to state that these 'outbreaks' were to be 'expected' as well!!  Here is Penny's article right here for  everyone to see for themselves, and I do have my own thoughts and comments to follow:

Thursday, December 31, 2020

Covid Outbreak Hits Site of First in Canada Covid Vaccination Roll Out

 If you've been paying attention to the weird media coverage surrounding the vaccine roll out- you'll notice the phrase "it was expected"everywhere. Anaphylaxis "it was expected" Really at ten times the usual rate? That was expected?  Or the people contracting Covid- 19 after having the vaccine That was expected as well?  I think it was feared. For the obvious reason that the failure of the vaccine would be demonstrable

That said let's move on to the latest news about the covid vaccine: 

Coronavirus outbreak hits Quebec's first vaccination site, public health says 'it's expected'

On Dec. 11, as the Quebec City health region was preparing to administer the first Canadian doses of the COVID-19 vaccine, two residents at the CHSLD Saint-Antoine tested positive for coronavirus.

The next day, 15 more did. The people affected were from a single unit and were quickly isolated.

Regular testing and isolation is occurring at the home as would be expected  

The CHSLD Saint-Antoine in Quebec City, where the first COVID-19 vaccine doses in Canada were given, is battling a coronavirus outbreak. 

More than 80 people at the centre, including 66 residents, have tested positive for the novel coronavirusince receiving the first of two vaccine doses.

According to the health region, 202 residents took the vaccine, along with 125 staff. It seems likely (weasel wording) several of them were already infected with the coronavirus when they received the shot, Otis indicated.

In any case, immune responses aren't typically instantaneous, Dr. Jacques Girard, the medical adviser to Quebec City's chief public health officer, told Radio-Canada's Première Heure.

"When we give someone a vaccine it's to protect them," but he cautioned that it often takes a couple of weeks to develop sufficient antibodies to stave off the virus, meaning that as of this week there should be signs the outbreak at CHSLD Saint-Antoine is starting to recede.

Yet the rates of anaphylaxis suggest to us that an immune response of some sort is being generated within minutes of the shot being given.

Residents and staff will begin receiving their second dose of the serum beginning Jan. 4.

"The situation at CHSLD Saint-Antoine demonstrates the importance of protecting oneself even after vaccination. And even if the vaccine provided real protection after one dose … we know the virus can still transit through certain people," Otis said.

The experience in Quebec City to this point lends credence to the belief previously expressed by some scientists that while vaccination is good at protecting people against getting desperately sick, it may not inhibit spread.

Let's unpack those few paragraphs above. The idea of vaccination does not included "protecting oneself " afterwards . I've never read that stated previously regarding vaccination. We've always been told that vaccines eradicated diseases- small pox, polio and the like.

"We know the virus can transit through certain people" 

Who are these "certain people" Do we have them identified?  Shouldn't they be? I don't know, that seems such a bizarre statement?

"Vaccination is good at protecting people against getting desperately sick, it may not inhibit spread." 

Excuse me, but, isn't this vaccine supposed to be the light at the end of the tunnel. blah, blah, blah?

And the last few paragraphs of this news article below:

The experience in Quebec City to this point lends credence to the belief previously expressed by some scientists that while vaccination is good at protecting people against getting desperately sick, it may not inhibit spread.

Another factor to consider, Otis said, is the clinical trials for the vaccine weren't held in a long-term care environment that is dealing with an incipient outbreak.

Every item I've read about this vaccine roll out it feels like damage control in real time

The failure to stop transmission has been covered here as well

Why getting a COVID-19 vaccine doesn't mean you should stop mask-wearing 
"Here's what the studies don't yet show. They haven't looked at whether the vaccine prevents someone from carrying COVID-19 and spreading it to others. It's possible that someone could get the vaccine but could still be an asymptomatic carrier." 

Scientists Debate How Much to LOWER THE BAR on Covid-19 Vaccine Potential- Disconcerting

 Additional reading:

NTS Notes: Yes, when I saw this report from Penny, I thought just like everyone else: "What the fuck is going on here??", and of course how in the fuck are people getting these 'shots' suddenly becoming sick with obviously Influenza like symptoms (The 'deadly virus' still does not exist , and thus these 'vaccines' are releasing some other contagion in the bodies of those stupid enough to take them!)????

 So, here we go... Anaphylactic shock, Bell's Palsy, Paralysis, Neurological disorders, Heart Attacks, Sudden shock and dying.... And now Influenza like symptoms.... And these pricks running this scam-demic with their toxic 'vaccines' are claiming that these are all to be 'expected' reactions????

And as Penny pointed out before, these 'vaccines' are 'experimental' at best, and thus what we have here is these pricks using Human Beings as their 'guinea pigs' or 'lab rats' to test for 'reactions' to boot!!!  I for one am sick and tired of this criminality, definitely..

Yes, go out and get your 'vaccines' you dumb ass sheep and get yourselves sick and/or die as a result... But of course the pricks in charge will claim that your permanent damage to yourself including your possible death was to be 'expected'!!!   It does give you a warm feeling about their vaccines, does it not??

More to come


Manitoba Official COVID-19 Report For Thursday December 31st 2020: 187 New Cases And 6 New Deaths, As They Continue To Manipulate Their Artificial Numbers Once Again

I got a few requests over the last two days for the 'links' that I use to get my official Manitoba numbers...So here they are:


This should satisfy the 'naysayers' that have suddenly been claiming that I have been pulling my own numbers 'out of my ass'.... I have no need to lie at all about these 'numbers' and have been clearly using these numbers put out by these criminals on a daily basis against them to expose their lies...

And once again today, this New Year's Eve, the pricks in charge of this entire scam-demic for this province of mine, Manitoba, had the gall to step up to the podium once more just a short while and spew their garbage and basically pull their 'numbers' out of their asses for the fact that their numbers are based on zero credibility and on a 'deadly virus' that simply does not even exist.... No shock therefore that they are once again 'manipulating' their numbers just to continue to scare the most gullible here in Manitoba into the false belief that there is this 'deadly virus' out there...

Anyways, onto their "official numbers" and once again I have them broken down right here for everyone to see for themselves in the usual alphabetical order:

(a) Now they are claiming "187" new 'cases' of this non-existent 'deadly virus' for the last 24 hours for all of Manitoba.. This raises their overall 'case number' for the 41+ weeks since they criminally launched their 'state of emergency' back in mid-March to "24700" in total.. But of course ALL of these ' cases' were entirely derived from the fraud "PCR testing" that gives ONLY false positive results and is therefore completely inaccurate and useless as a test for this ' contagion'..

(b) Now they are claiming '247' active cases of this still non-existent 'deadly virus' in all of the hospitals across Manitoba as of today... This is a decrease of "1" hospitalized case from yesterday's report of '248'.. And they are continuing with their 'sub-category' here as they are claiming some '90' additional cases are no longer "infectious" and are being held in the hospitals for 'further care' (bullshit of course..)... And they are now claiming "33" out of that '247' hospital cases are sitting in Intensive Care Units, which is an increase of "1" ICU case from yesterday's total of "32' ICU cases.. And they are also continuing with their second 'subcategory' here as they are claiming still '4' more 'cases' are sitting in the ICU units that are 'no longer infectious' but are in "critical care" (more bullshit..)

(c) Now they are claiming '6' more deaths from this non-existent 'deadly virus' for the last 24 hours for all of Manitoba... This raises the overall death toll in the 41+ weeks since mid-March to a grand total of "667"... But once again ALL of these new '6 deaths' were of senior citizens in elderly care facilities with severe underlying health issues and/or were suffering from other diseases such as INFLUENZA....This criminal pattern is definitely continuing..

(d) Now they are claiming "19528" recovered cases of this non-existent 'deadly virus' for the last 41+ weeks for Manitoba... This is once again a slight increase of only '120' recovered cases from yesterday's total of "19408' and I am therefore calling BOTH BULLSHIT AND FOUL on these criminals as they are purposely holding back a LOT of recovered cases and refusing to once again release them properly to this category...

(e) Now they are claiming "4505" active cases of this non-existent 'deadly virus' for all of Manitoba as of today.. This is an increase of '61' active cases from yesterday's report of '4444'.. And just like in (d) this is complete bullshit as some '2000+' active cases MUST be in the recovered cases category as they have exceeded their '14 days of mandatory isolation'.... That, and every one of these 'active cases' have been entirely derived from the fraud 'PCR testing' with its 100% inaccuracy rate.. Thus ALL of these 'active cases' are at most 'suspect'...

No shock to me that after almost a week of 'declining numbers' and thus pulling the strings of the people of this province under the false belief that this fraud 'crisis' is over, that they magically increase their 'cases' numbers tremendously in one day.... This is clearly the sick game of manipulation that these pricks are doing to the people of this province and sometimes I think because of how twisted and sick they truly are that they 'get off' on this criminal act.... Playing mind games with the citizens of Manitoba is definitely part of their ploys..

OK, Time once again to take a much closer look at each and every one of their 'numbers' to once again expose them for the clear lies that they all are... And of course in the same alphabetical order as listed above, right here:

(a) Yes, lets make the people of Manitoba feel good by throwing out reduced numbers for days on end, and then suddenly BOOM! have them magically increase tremendously in one day... The facts remain that their 'overall cases' numbers are a pipe dream as this 'deadly virus' does not even exist and their 'numbers' are based solely on false positive results from a 'test' that is NOT even a 'test' at all.....But what the heck, right?? Just throw this '24700' number in the faces of the gullible in this province and many will get paranoia and anxiety from it..... And as I have mentioned before, this province in any 41+ week time frame gets close to 100000+ REAL cases of respiratory illnesses, and nobody is panicking here over that real number... Leave it to the lying whores in the media to take the '24700' fraud number and throw it out there on a daily basis as more fear porn instead...

(b) No shock that they are manipulating the "hospital cases' numbers once more... And honestly, who are they kidding when they claim that the hospitals are still 'overwhelmed' with bullshit 'COVID-19 patients' when the official numbers are staring everyone in their faces and tell a different story?   But again, they are needing to have these 'hospital cases' numbers as high as possible to continue to drive this entire  fraud scam-demic, but once again they are failing so miserably as a REAL deadly virus would have thousands sitting in the hospitals across Manitoba..... 

(c) Once again trolling senior citizens homes I see and re-marking any deaths that they come across from other illnesses as 'COVID-19' instead on the death certificates.... And once again ALL of these '667' deaths in the last 41+ weeks from this non-existent 'deadly virus' actually ALL died from other causes.. Oh, and did I also mention that it is still INFLUENZA season up here in Manitoba right now and how that REAL illness kills hundreds of senior citizens alone every year?  And of course we cannot forget about the fact that in any 41+ week time frame, this province gets nearly 10000 deaths from all causes... But once again the lying whores in the media avoid the reality of those 10000 deaths and are solely focusing on this bullshit '667' number instead to generate more fear porn on the gullible in this province...

(d) Honestly, I am so sick and tired of their BLATANT manipulation of this recovered cases number... They have been doing this criminal practice now for months, and have held back a LOT of recovered cases by keeping them purposely in the 'active cases' category instead when they absolutely belong here... And is this criminal?  ABSOLUTELY for it still is a criminal offence to put out false medical data in these reports!  But who is going to have them charged with lying? Nobody for the fact that they are the 'government' and can get away with lying their asses off as much as they want...

(e) Just like in (d) they are criminally lying their asses off with this bullshit '4505' active cases number.. .At least 2000+ out of this 'number' should rightfully be in the recovered cases category as those 2000+ have exceeded their mandatory 14 days isolation period... But the criminals in charge will continue to hold those back due to the need to keep this 'active cases' number as high as possible for the fear porn on gullible people... AND since the 'test' used, the so called 'PCR test', is absolutely 100% a total fraud, none of these 'active cases' actually has this non-existent 'deadly virus' at all... If they are sick, then they are sick from the wide variety of REAL respiratory illnesses that plague this  province annually and especially at this time of year with the seasonal Influenza outbreak.... All we have here is once again total bullshit and fraud manipulation of 'numbers'...

Well, there we go.. .The last day of 2020 and they decided to raise the numbers a bit just to destroy getting everyones' hopes up that this scamdemic is nearly at an end.... I honestly can hardly wait until mid-January when they will really get down to the business of lying by pumping up these 'numbers' tremendously and blame it all on this new non-existent "variant" of this non-existent 'deadly virus' that they will then claim is hitting Manitoba "hard"...

And yes, it is still shocking to me to see in today's daily report that a further "2083" SUCKERS were indeed stupid enough to line up at those fraudulent 'testing centres' and allow these criminal pricks to scrape and destroy their nasal passageways just so they can get their false positive results... Honestly, how fucking braindead must the morons out there be????   All it does is once again prove me so right when I constantly say that you can not fix stupid no matter how hard you try!

Yes, Happy New Year to everyone, for 2020 was shot to hell thanks to these criminal pricks running this entire scam-demic in this province... It is my hope that for 2021 that the good citizens of this province finally say ENOUGH and demand that these pricks running this scam-demic be put on trial for the entire scam and especially for the lives that they did indeed destroy through suicides and overdoses... I honestly would love to see both Brian Pallister and that heinous Brent Roussin fry for this massive crime against humanity that has destroyed so many lives in Manitoba, and I do hope the citizens reading these reports feel the same way as well..

More to come


Ten Facts From The United Kingdom's Government Pfizer Vaccine Guidance That Promote "Vaccine Hesitancy"

Well, it is New Year's Eve, and IMHO it has indeed been the 'year from hell' for most of us including yours truly.... I have watched the world slip down the slippery slope to tyranny over this past year and all from a fear propaganda campaign for a 'deadly virus' that simply to this day DOES NOT EXIST... Yes, the naysayers are still out there screaming "NTS, you are wrong for this virus is real and is killing a lot of people", to which I say to them to please give me the solid evidence and proof required to show that this 'deadly virus' actually exists?  Honestly, I am still waiting for even the naysayers can not give me that proof at all!  Therefore NO proof of existence means NO 'deadly virus' at all and this is logical, rational and common sense!!!

OK, I have been watching the 'news' out of the United Kingdom over the last week, especially in light of the LYING WHORES in the UK media ramming the British people's brains with the fear mongering of this 'new and more deadly strain' aka "variant" of this still non-existent 'deadly virus'... And the fear mongering is supposedly working its "magic" as I see reports of British citizens lining up like sheep to be inoculated by the deadly 'vaccines' that the British Government and the lying pricks in the British Health ministry are wanting to shove into their arms... It is so maddening to see how people have indeed succumbed to unwarranted fear propaganda...

But apparently the campaign to 'vaccinate' the entire British populace has not been as successful as the criminals in charge are intending, for there is a lot of 'hesitancy' in the people as they are more and more weary of these 'vaccines' and very possibly reading up on the horrendous damage they can do to their bodies.... This to me is heart warming indeed, and I do want to see it continue.... 

And why the hesitancy in taking the 'shots' in the UK??? Well, to help answer that question, I do want to present the following report that comes from the Blacklisted News Online website at, that is entitled: "10 Facts From The UK Government Pfizer Vaccine Guidance That Promote "Vaccine Hesitancy"..  Here is that article for everyone to read right here, and especially my readers in the UK, for themselves, and I do have my own thoughts and comments to follow:


Published: December 30, 2020

Official government guidance has been released in the United Kingdom to assist healthcare professionals in administering the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine BNT162b2. While the UK government goes to war against supposed misinformation, the official narrative is clearly based on very little to no supporting data from incomplete clinical trials. This article examines the document “Reg 174 Information for UK Healthcare Professionals” and narratives being pushed in the mainstream media that directly contradict that document.

Healthcare professionals globally have begun the controversial campaign to vaccinate large swathes of their respective populations with various experimental medical products. The vanguard of the mainstream pro-vax extremists have been busy enacting mass censorship tactics and committing blatant acts of digital book burning on a scale never before seen in the internet era. So-called “trusted sources” have become indistinguishable from the state-run media apparatus of your bog-standard dictatorship with the usual MSM outlets working non-stop to skew any information that threatens their hyper-aggressive official narrative. Throughout 2020, our basic civil liberties have been quickly stripped away by countless unelected officials from a wide array of unaccountable global power structures, all of them connected to a small group of elites who are sitting aloft the COVID-19 money train and using the heavily exaggerated epidemic to achieve their own long term goals.  

Any useful data, scientific paper, or other credible research contradicting the official narrative is being purposely hidden from view. Too many uncomfortable, yet ultimately necessary, questions for vaccine companies such as Moderna, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and their many collaborators, are being heavily censored by those pushing their own various COVID-related agendas. The promised “war on truth” is in full swing throughout all nations globally and their respective state media machines are nearly all towing their official government lines. Mainstream talk shows and podcasts worldwide are also in lockstep, and have often been caught publicly guilt-tripping their easily swayed audiences to help push them deeper into queues for mass medical trials for vaccines and other products that lack research studies on their long term effects. This inconvenient lack of completed research will not stop the money men from pumping this milky white liquid into the arms of hundreds of millions of people worldwide.

At this point in the process, the medical professionals who are administering these heavily rushed vaccines are being given the opportunity to defer responsibility and accountability for their actions to the government’s vaccine-related guidance. As the Stanley Milgram experiments have proven, when the option to defer responsibility is present, then roughly 65% of participants will follow the orders they have received regardless of the risk to their subjects. In 1974, Stanley Milgram detailed the behaviour of his participants in his famous study and suggested that people have two basic states of behaviour when they are in a social situation: “The autonomous state”, where people direct their own actions and ultimately take responsibility for the results of those actions and “the agentic state”, where people allow others to direct their actions and then pass off the responsibility for the consequences to the person giving orders, in essence acting as agents of another person’s will.

The majority of the people who are injecting these experimental drugs into their trusting patients are not likely to question the official guidance, as the overwhelming majority will often simply be in an agentic state. Thus, it should be in the best interest of anyone thinking of receiving a mRNA vaccine to first study the guidance offered by the various government sources. And, when one does study the official guidance given to healthcare professionals, one will find many different glaring contradictions and shocking admissions.

While all official bodies are attacking any inconvenient fact as misinformation, they are all busy defrauding the global population with their own misinformation campaigns that surely would have inspired awe in the likes of Joseph Stalin. So, let’s study their own words and examine the NHS guidance given to the medical professionals in the UK for the administration of the recently approved Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.


The short ten page official guidance being given to UK healthcare professionals contains many interesting admissions. In fact, the document, released in early December 2020 to accompany the vaccine rollout, appears to advise healthcare practitioners not to risk giving the experimental injection to the majority of the people who are due to receive the vaccine, particularly “prioritized” populations. Those in charge are pushing to vaccinate as much of the population as possible, before any critical public questions can be asked and answered, a situation that has left the safety and ethics of the vaccination campaign questionable at best and inhumane at worst.  

In going through the Reg 174 document, it becomes very clear that there are many issues and recommendations that are being hidden from the general public. Here are ten of the most notable causes for concern contained within the official UK guidance document.


The authorisation to produce and supply this experimental vaccine in the UK was given by the UK Department of Health and Social Care, led by Matt Hancock – the UK Secretary of Health, and also by the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). While the MHRA is part funded by the Department of Health and Social Care for the regulation of medical devices, the costs of medicine regulations are met through fees paid by the pharmaceutical industry. The agency’s financial reliance on Big Pharma has led to suggestions by some Members of the UK Parliament that the MHRA is not actually independent. Being in associated roles at the MHRA since 1985, June Raine was officially appointed as CEO in September 2019 and had previously been the Director of Vigilance and Risk Management in the Medicines Division. 


Section 1 of the medical guidance clearly states that this vaccine guidance refers specifically to the “Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 concentrate for solution for injection.” On 2 December 2020, the MHRA became the first medicines regulator in history to approve an mRNA vaccine for human use, granting emergency authorisation for BioNTech and Pfizer’s BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine for widespread use only a week after its first Phase III eight-week trial had finished. However, the Phase III trials for BNT162b2 will not actually be fully completed until January 2023 meaning that, if you’re ready to take the vaccine now, then you should be informed that the safety trials for these experimental vaccines have at least two more years before the results are in. Regardless of that fact, Raine told reporters “no corners have been cut in approving it” and that “the benefits outweigh any risk”.


The official guidance clearly states that individuals may not be protected until at least 7 days after their second dose of the vaccine. This fact has again been ignored by various reckless pro-vax media campaigns where powerful elites such as Tony Blair have contradicted this specific recommendation, suggesting recently in an interview that people should only be given a single dose of any vaccine. Mr Blair told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that “Does the first dose give you substantial immunity, and by that I mean over 50 percent effectiveness? If it does, there is a very strong case for not, as it were, holding back doses of the vaccine.” Blair, writing in the Independent, stated that the current vaccination strategy needed to be “altered and radically accelerated”. In responding to Blair’s call for radical acceleration, Professor Wendy Barclay, chair of virology at Imperial College London and member of the UK government’s NERVTAG, said: “I think that the issue with [Mr Blair’s suggestion] is that the vaccine is on the basis of being given in two doses, and the efficacy is on that basis.” Barclay went on to point out that “To change at that point, one would have to see a lot more analysis coming out from perhaps the clinical trial data.”

It is very important to pay attention to the wording of Reg 174 because the Pfizer vaccine purportedly boosts the immune system, rather than stopping the transmission of the virus. This would suggest that you will not be fully “protected” from COVID-19 and that you will still be able to catch the virus and could still suffer complications. The official guidance also states that “Immunocompromised persons, including individuals receiving immunosuppressant therapy, may have a diminished immune response to the vaccine,” with the guidance admitting “No data are available about concomitant use of Immunosuppressants.”

Reg 174 goes on to make this most pertinent of points when it states:  “As with any vaccine, vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 may not protect all vaccine recipients.” The guidance also states clearly that “administration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should be postponed in individuals suffering from acute severe febrile illness and that individuals receiving anticoagulant therapy or those with a bleeding disorder that would contraindicate intramuscular injection, should not be given the vaccine unless the potential benefit clearly outweighs the risk.”


In investigating the official instructions for the vaccine’s administration, we can clearly see that there are plenty of opportunities for potential human error. Section 2 of this document describes the distributed vaccine as coming in “a multidose vial and must be diluted before use.” Confirming that each vial contains 0.45 ml (which equates to 5 doses of 30 micrograms) of BNT162b2 RNA embedded in lipid nanoparticles. The delicate preparation process will be repeated 100s of millions of times globally and the multidose vial will be stored frozen and must be thawed prior to dilution. The guidance describes the process for preparing the frozen vials stating that they should be transferred to temperatures of between 2 °C to 8 °C to thaw or, alternatively, the frozen vials may also be thawed for 30 minutes at temperatures up to 25 °C for immediate use. Once thawed, the undiluted vaccine can be stored for up to 5 days at 2 °C to 8 °C, and up to 2 hours at temperatures up to 25 °C. The thawed vial must then come to room temperature and be gently inverted 10 times prior to dilution.

Some of the featured diagrams and instructions found in Reg 174

The complicated thawing and dilution process will obviously leave room for individual error. Healthcare practitioners are also warned not to shake the vials and instead to gently turn them 10 times. Prior to dilution, the vaccine should present as an off-white solution with no particulates visible. The guidance states that you must discard the vaccine if particulates or discolouration are present. The thawed vaccine must be diluted in its original vial with 1.8 mL sodium chloride 9 mg/mL (0.9%) solution for injection, using a 21 gauge or narrower needle and aseptic techniques and this complex, multistage process isn’t completed there. 

The healthcare professional should then equalise vial pressure before removing the needle from the vial by withdrawing 1.8 mL of air into the empty diluent syringe. Then they should gently invert the diluted solution 10 times, again being careful not to shake the solution. The official guidance continues: “The diluted vials should be marked with the dilution date and time and stored between 2 °C to 25 °C. After dilution, the vial contains 5 doses of 0.3 mL.” The healthcare professionals are then told to “withdraw the required 0.3 mL dose of diluted vaccine using a sterile needle and syringe and discard any unused vaccine within 6 hours after dilution.”

The instructions must be followed precisely to safely administer the mRNA vaccine; there are no data available on potential consequences for the vaccine recipient if anything goes wrong during this tedious and complex multistage process. On 19 December 2020, video emerged of an official drive-thru vaccination hub which had begun operating out of a car park of Hyde Leisure Centre in Greater Manchester. The video in question, shared by No Comment TV on YouTube, shows people being vaccinated outdoors at Hyde Leisure Centre by gloveless staff and in less than sterile conditions. In an article in the Manchester Evening News four days prior to the videos release the local news site stated that “The first batch of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine arrives in the borough on Tuesday, with vaccinations starting at Hyde Leisure Centre on Wednesday, December 15.”


When reading Reg 174, you will soon notice a recurring theme throughout the document. The guidance clearly states on multiple occasions that there are no data available concerning some of the most important questions surrounding the mRNA vaccine. As previously noted, the actual Phase III section of the safety trials will not be completed until January 2023, meaning that two years of trials are still to be run before the vaccine can be confirmed as safe, effective and ethical.


Although the guidance states that the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine has not been established in children, it doesn’t mean that children have not been included within the studies. In fact, in the official Pfizer study entitled “Protocol C4591001”, one of the two main study groups included children as young as 12 years old. The inclusion of children in trials but not the guidance raises the important question, why were children included in the trial? If the vaccine is not to be given to those under the age of 16 years old, then why include children as young as 12 in the trials for an experimental vaccine technology never before authorised for use in humans?

The mainstream media, instead of raising concerns about the involvement of children in the Pfizer clinical trials, have been fully supportive of the move to test experimental pharmaceuticals on minors. CNN reported on children as young as 12 being involved in trials in an October 2020 article entitled “This 12-year-old is happy to be testing a Covid-19 vaccine” while Microsoft News recently announced that “China begins Covid test trials on children as young as age three.” 


We are currently witnessing the very first of many tailor-made vaccines being rolled out for general use, so don’t expect the COVID-19 jabs to be the only vaccines coming our way. With a 20 to 1 return on investment on many of these new technologies, most pharmaceutical giants will surely be lobbying governments across the globe for the next “necessary” vaccination program. The idea of multiple COVID-19 vaccinations throughout the year is already being presented as a very possible outcome for the future of humanity. Yet, no studies have been completed showing the risk of taking different types of vaccines. There have also been suggestions that people will have to have the same vaccine that they had previously taken every six months or so. This will leave Astrazeneca, Pfizer and Moderna picking up repeat vaccine contracts worth billions in secured future revenue before there are any real data on the results of the vaccines. 


Admissions like these should be a cause for concern for anybody reading the official guidance. While officials and carefully chosen “trusted sources” are telling you that “no corners have been cut” in the race to approve these vaccines, it is also true that no full length studies have been completed either. These two facts are juxtaposed and obviously contradict the official narrative that is being thrust upon the general public by all of those involved.

It is clear that the officials have no real data on what will happen next and that there is a tsunami of ethical questions that are not being answered. In the absence of data, there will be speculation.


It is vital to note the potential dangers posed by the BNT162b2 to unborn and newborn babies as well as the reproductive organs in general. There are so many parts of the Pfizer/BioNTech clinical trials that have not yet been completed. Dr. Peter Klatsky, the Director of Fertility Preservation at the Bay Area’s Spring Fertility, talking about the coming animal trials which are to be performed over the coming months was quoted in SFGate as saying, “It will reassure me an awful lot if the protein expression is not seen on the placenta. That the mRNA isn’t making it to the placenta in animals,” he said. “I don’t expect to see any.” The article goes on to explain that it will be about another 9 months until the data has been collected and analyzed. 

Section 4.6 of the official guidance recommends pregnant women should not recieve the BNT162b2 vaccine

Big names in mainstream media have also been caught recklessly promoting the vaccine to pregnant women, such as Karen Weintraub writing for USA Today, whose recent article quickly states, “Although there are very little data on how pregnant and nursing mothers will respond to a COVID-19 vaccine, professional organizations and individual doctors say the benefits are very likely to outweigh the risks.” Even though the clinical trials intentionally excluded pregnant women, Weintraub went on to state that “23 women in the Pfizer-BioNTech trial and 13 in Moderna’s became pregnant during the trial.”

While the UK’s official guidance is left sounding ambiguous, on the European continent, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) states that “the Pfizer vaccine should be considered on a case by case basis for pregnant women”, but they also reserve the right to alter the guidance if more data becomes available. It seems there is no longer any erring on the side of caution with some regulators when it comes to the COVID-19 vaccinations. 


Animal studies have not been completed and, as referred to in the previous section, the data on those animal trials will not be available for another 9 months.  It is, of course, a very rare decision to approve an experimental medical technology before any animal studies have been completed. This should be a great cause for concern for any free thinking man or woman. The fact that they have had to use what they refer to as “non-clinical” data in these studies is also in conflict with the idea that the trials were conducted to the highest professional standard. The document also fails to clearly define what non-clinical data actually means. 


Possibly the most fascinating admission in the entire document is the absence of any compatibility studies when somebody is given the vaccine while on any other medication or medical treatment. The guidance clearly states “this medicinal product should not be mixed with other medical products.” This completely jaw dropping sentence will lead many to assume that if you are on any medication at all, then you shouldn’t be given the vaccine. Whether this refers to the mixing of other medical properties directly together with the vaccine, or simultaneous dosing of any other medical product is unclear from the official guidance. 

The Mail Online and The Guardian reported in 2019 that a staggering 1 in 4 people in England – nearly 12 million people – were taking what was described as “addictive” prescription medicines such as antidepressants, sleeping pills and opioid painkillers, saying that “the NHS must take action”. Those statistics throw into question the mass rollout of a vaccination with no compatability studies. This makes the fact that elderly care home residents, followed by those aged over 80, will be the first to recieve the experimental Pfizer vaccine an extremely risky strategy. Also in 2019, Age UK reported that nearly 2 million older people were on more that 7 prescription medicines and were at “risk of side effects that are severe in some cases, and occasionally even life threatening.” This worrying issue has been barely reported by the “trusted news sources”.


After examining the official guidance, one fact becomes glaringly obvious — there is little to no data on the official Pfizer vaccine in key areas. In the clinical trials, children as young as 12 years old were used as unnecessary guinea pigs. There also wasn’t enough care taken to avoid pregnant women being involved in the initial clinical trials and under the cover of unyielding and uneducated mainstream propaganda, the safety of some of the most vulnerable people involved in the vaccine trials have been ignored by Pfizer and the politicians who have successfully pushed for the public vaccination campaign to essentially replace mass clinical trials. The stage has been set for a potential disaster on an unimaginable scale. It isn’t only the participants of the trials who are risking their health for the sake of big pharmaceutical companies’ hyperinflated profit margin, but it is also the medical professionals who could be risking their futures by collaborating in these risky experimental trials, which will certainly see many people dead and irreversibly injured.

In one section of Reg 174, the Big Pharma giant lays out the risk to people’s health from the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. The most common adverse reaction in participants 16 years of age and older was pain at the injection site, which affected a massive 80% of those taking part in the Pfizer trials. Fatigue came a close second with 60% of trial participants becoming sluggish and tired. Half of those involved in the studies suffered from a headache as the experimental vaccine went to work while myalgia was experienced by 30% of vaccine recipients, though the results do not indicate whether the myalgia was acute (short-term) or chronic (long-term). Almost a third of participants came down with chills, while just under 1 in 5 people suffered from arthralgia (joint pain) and 1 in 10 from pyrexia (increased body temperature).

Adverse reactions reported in clinical trials are listed in the study in decreasing order of frequency and seriousness. Just under 1 in 10 people who take the vaccine will suffer from the very common and common adverse reactions referred to in the latter paragraph, such as headaches, myalgia and chills, but the more serious issues are classified as uncommon – including Lymphadenopathy (which causes swollen or enlarged lymph nodes) and nervous system disorders – which may affect up to 1 in 100 people. Rare adverse reactions that could affect up to 1 in 1000 people and very rare adverse reactions that would affect less than 1 in 10,000 of the vaccine recipients were not included in Pfizer’s self-reported safety information. It has obviously been decided that this information should be kept out of the public domain as much as possible to avoid any further vaccine hesitancy. 

Not only does the official guidance actively hide the types of rare and very rare adverse effects, but they have also been leaving out some of the adverse reactions reported during the clinical trials. As I write this, the Reg 174 guidance for healthcare professionals is on version 10.1 of the document and, since its release, they have yet to admit to the potential of a certain uncommon adverse reaction to the vaccine being a specific nervous system disorder. Structural nervous system disorders include brain or spinal cord injury, Bell’s palsy, cervical spondylosis, carpal tunnel syndrome, brain or spinal cord tumors, peripheral neuropathy, and Guillain-Barré syndrome. However, previous versions of the guidance gives no clue as to what type of nervous system disorders they were referring to. However, recent articles in the USA Today, heavily promoted by the Microsoft Network, suggested that the Bell’s palsy some people came down with in the vaccine trials wasn’t related to the Pfizer jab. The article states that on Dec. 10, the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research held the 162nd meeting of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee to discuss the emergency use authorization of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The USA Today piece even goes on to admit that , “a 53-page briefing noted that there had been four cases of Bell’s palsy among the vaccinated group and none among the placebo group.” 

Bell’s palsy causes drooping facial muscles similar to the effects of a stroke, image source

Even though Miriam Fauzia, who wrote the USA Today piece, claims that the Bell’s palsy was not related to the experimental Pfizer vaccine, the 53-page briefing she sources clearly states, “Among non-serious unsolicited adverse events, there was a numerical imbalance of four cases of Bell’s palsy in the vaccine group compared with no cases in the placebo group, though the four cases in the vaccine group do not represent a frequency above that expected in the general population.” While it is true that 1 to 4 people in 10,000 will develop Bell’s palsy within the general population, it should be noted that the 4 cases in the vaccine trials and none in the placebo group makes for a statistical anomoly that must be examined more thoroughly. Instead, the mainstream media moved quickly to discredit the Bell’s palsy links to the Pfizer vaccine using various mislead tactics to achieve their aims.

Many mainstream outlets were caught spouting the same misleading information with articles entitled “Why you shouldn’t worry about a connection between Bell’s palsy and COVID-19 vaccines,” from Business Insider and a Reuters article from 14 December 2020 entitled, “Fact check: Photo does not show three recipients of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine that developed Bell’s palsy.”

In the case of the Reuters article, which is described as written by “Reuters Staff” rather than a specific journalist, the focus was not on the four Pfizer clinical trial participants who developed Bell’s palsy but instead the article discredits a random post on social media of three people with Bell’s palsy unconnected to the Pfizer vaccine. These type of misinforming mainstream media articles are commonly found to be using obvious fallacies to mislead their readership and with no individual taking responsibility for writing the misinforming piece, a trick repeated by many other media companies complicit with the official narrative. The Reuters article even goes on to admit that: “According to the FDA’s briefing document dated December 10, Bell’s palsy was reported in four vaccine participants and none in the placebo group, out of the 44,000 total participants of the late-stage vaccine trial.” However, the title of the Reuters article would mislead even some of the most keen eyed observers. 

The mainstream media has been creating a flood of misleading stories, but it appears as though they have been given carte blanche to continue to do so, probably because they are sticking so tightly to the official narrative. It’s a narrative that is thick with irony, for it is the “trusted sources” who are being caught systematically misleading the general population again and again while also declaring a propaganda war against “fake news”.

The official guidance noted in Reg 174 doesn’t only highlight the serious lack of real data gained from Pfizer’s clinical trials for its Covid-19 vaccine so far, but it also exposes the wealthy medical professionals involved in these experimental vaccine development programs as complacent, reckless and very naive. It’s no secret that children are, more often than not, incapable of giving informed legal consent for such a risky and unethical enterprise. But the pro-vax extremists are using every tactic to coerce and manipulate children and their guardians into becoming human guinea pigs for Big Pharma. Pregnant women are also treated as acceptable collateral damage to advance the new science of gene, mRNA and DNA manipulation, a science and technology that pushes a sinister transhumanist agenda.

Don’t be fooled by the carefully worded vacuous celebrities, self-serving politicians, Big Pharma, and the mainstream medias authoritarian style misinformation campaigns. Keep your humanity intact and read their own words. The government guidance to healthcare professionals clearly states on multiple occasions that there are “no data available”.

NTS Notes: Honestly, these 10 key points are indeed damning for these 'vaccines' indeed..

And honestly, I am deeply perturbed by this push for everyone in the UK to rush out and be vaccinated from the aspect of this 'virus' and its new 'variant' for the fact once again that these do NOT EVEN EXIST...

I have been saying for a long time that people must stop and think and ask themselves the following:

If there is NO deadly virus out there as there has never been any isolation of this contagion anywhere around the world to this day, then HOW in the hell can they even have a 'vaccine' ready for this non-existent contagion to shove into everyone's bodies??

That, readers, has always been the multi-BILLION dollar question, and one that everyone should be asking themselves before they go out and allow these pricks to 'inoculate' them with their poisons....

I am glad that the people in the United Kingdom are not being this stupid to fall for the criminal tricks by their crooked government and the lying whores in the media outlets..... These criminals absolutely needed the scam of this 'new variant' to scare the people into lining up to get their deadly shots, and luckily the British people are being very hesitant, and with very good reason...

More to come