Wednesday, July 15, 2020

The COVID-19 Bullshit: The Hidden Agendas Of Masks, Distancing, And Tracing!

Well... Here comes another article to blast this fraud pandemic and the frauds of "social distancing', wearing those gawd awful "face masks" and even the fraud of 'contact tracing' to bits...... I  continue to get a lot of articles, videos, and other material from so many readers, and I am doing my best to post up as many of them that I can and especially those articles and videos that "hit home"....

One article in particular came to my attention thanks to an email from a colleague that said that it should be at this blog.... I looked it over, and it definitely belongs here for all to see... Therefore I do want to present the following very important report that comes from the "Vaxxter" website, at It is entitled: "The Hidden Agendas Of Masks, Distancing, And Tracing" and does indeed rip each of those fraud parts of this entire pandemic to shreds... Here is that article, and I do have my usual thoughts and comments to follow:

The Hidden Agendas of Masks, Distancing, and Tracing

by James Grundvig, Vaxxter contributor, Investigative Reporter
The maker of the N95 respirator mask designed it for the mining and construction industry. It filters out 95 percent of the visible airborne dust particles, keeping them from entering the lungs. It has vents so the wearers can exhale. Demolition crews use them, concrete laborers use them, so do workers who sand wood floors, gypsum board walls, and plaster ceilings. Workers in other trades, such as electrical, plumbing, rough carpentry, and wood finishers rarely wear masks. Why? They inhibit the flow of oxygen into the lungs while stifling the expulsion of waste in the form of carbon dioxide. Workers don’t wear them because masks impede their work.
For too long now, health officials sold us that donning masks and other face coverings, such as bandanas, would somehow slow the spread of the nano-sized virus, SARS-CoV2, which causes the symptom complex referred to as COVID-19. Their theory doesn’t hold water. It has no precedent in medicine or science. Speaking with several veteran nurses about facemasks, they stated they never wore them when treating infected patients, whether they had tuberculosis or were suffering with AIDS during the 1980s epidemic. Hospital patients never wore them either. Why? They don’t protect.
Dust particles are far more significant than nano-sized viruses
How big – or small – is a nanometer? On the nano-scale, a nanometer is a billionth of a meter. It’s invisible to the human eye. Put in perspective, a single sheet of paper is 100,000 nanometers thick. A strand of human DNA, identified under a microscope in the 1950s by Francis Crick and James Watson, is 2.5 nanometers in diameter.
It’s not small. It’s super tiny.
Still, five months into the COVID-19 virus outbreak, many states are pushing for more stringent mask orders, including wearing them outside in the summer heat and humidity. That “mandate” came, even though cases for COVID-19, influenza, and pneumonia have declined over ten straight weeks. Today, the tracking numbers will soon fall below the CDC epidemic threshold of 5.9%. When it does, their emergency will be over.
Because governors have been ignoring the reality of falling epidemic numbers, Kentucky’s Agriculture Commissioner Ryan Quarles (R) and The Evans Orchard and Cider Mills, LLC, filed a lawsuit against Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear (D) handcuffing his new emergency order to wear masks on the same day it was issued.
The circuit court judge challenged Gov. Beshear, telling that in order for him to issue and enforce an executive order related to Covid-19, he must, “specifically state the emergency that requires the order, the location of the emergency, and the name of the local emergency management agency that has determined that the emergency is beyond its capabilities.”
Since the court case, Kentucky had 272 new COVID-19 cases, with the governor threatening citizens to “wear masks to avoid reopening reversal.”

The Hidden Agenda of Telehealth

The temporary restraining order also uncovered yet another hidden agenda by the Democrat governor. “Surprisingly, lawyers for the governor admitted in court this week that the administration used the emergency regulatory process to expand telehealth during the pandemic, but they didn’t do that when they closed or began to reopen the economy,” said Quarles. This goes beyond telemedicine. They are beta testing face recognition apps in order to surveil people with and without masks. This hidden agenda is for the benefit of artificial intelligence.
Many other governors, including New York’s Andrew Cuomo (D) and New Jersey’s Phil Murphy (D), are not basing their decisions on science. What are their hidden agendas? What ulterior motives do they have for not reopening society long after the pandemic has peaked and waned? On July 6, Cuomo continued the “temporary suspension and modification laws” for New York’s emergency disaster declaration. Murphy, who had dinner with rocker John Bon Jovi on July 1 at a New Jersey restaurant while not wearing masks or following social distancing, established new rules for wearing masksoutdoors a few days later.
Why are they doing this in the summer with the illnesses from this infection fading in the rearview mirror? Why are they doing this when there’s a lot of UV virus-killing light and heat and humidity that shortens the “half-life of coronavirus in droplets to less than one hour?
None of this makes sense unless the “rulers” are working from the Big Pharma playbook.
New York State hired the consulting firms Deloitte and McKinsey to create an “anti-Trump,” science-proof COVID-19 plan. One wonders if McKinsey was the consultant that advised Governor Cuomo to commit sanctioned manslaughter by sending 6,300 coronavirus-infected senior citizens into nursing homes across the state that juiced the state’s death totals.
In 2019, McKinsey paid a $15 million fine over “disclosure failures” during bankruptcy proceedings, hiding conflicts of interest. The year before, a competitor accused the consulting giant ofracketeering. And yet, in the thick of the COVID-19 crisis, McKinsey is expanding its pharmaceuticalbusinesses by conducting mask surveys and keeping an eye on the quarter-trillion dollar telehealth market waiting to be mined.
What else are the American people not being told about the hidden agendas of the states, the mainstream media, the pharmaceutical industry and Big Tech? What are their real plans for us? It goes beyond vaccines.
So, how does wearing masks and maintaining six feet of social distance further their hidden agendas?

Surveillance, AI, and Mask Wearing

For the past three years, Communist China has carried out a social-biological experiment that emerged in the world’s most surveilled state, Xinjiang province. Beyond the more than one million Uyghur people placed in “re-education” camps, its citizens are spied on, monitored, and followed. Everything they do, from going to work and passing checkpoints to grocery shopping and all social activities, their every move is tracked and logged. The New York Times rightly observed that mass surveillance “subdues the minorities,” breaking their human spirit and free will. The Chinese citizens are also exposed to EMF frequencies that inhibit the “fight or flight” chemical reaction in humans’ brains, making them docile.

Coming to America?

Is this what the Vaccine Deep State is planning here in the United States? Let’s examine the list of COVID-19 rules, listing them as “what-if” scenarios to see what might exist behind the curtain.
  • What-if the COVID-19 swab tests are a hidden agenda to harvest people’s DNA?
  • What-if contact tracing is designed to track your every move and link your activities to all of your family and friends?
  • What-if wearing masks is really to beta-test face-recognition software, to see if the software can identify people with partially covered faces?
  • What-if social distancing aides the face-recognition beta test?
What could the planners do with our DNA? People could be grouped together by damaged genes, called abnormal snips. Pharma could tailor-make vaccines and drugs and then implant those products into a person’s body using RFID nano-chips. EMF frequencies could then be used to tune into a subset of people and subdue them.
On face detection software, here is how the program works. It’s a two-step process in which the surveillance system locates the “region of interest” on a person (the face), and then identifies facial landmarks. In 2017, the U.S. National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST) created datasets and challenges for face recognition vendors to improve their software. NIST created standards via simulations and data parameters that enabled vendors to test, reiterate, and improve their programs.
A Slovakia software firm, Innovatrics, has already demonstrated its technology in a brief video of people wearing masks during COVID-19. They tested it on their own employees in the building, who gain access to the biometric scans of the face. That was before COVID. They then tested it with the same employees wearing masks, enabling their machine-learning technology to identify masked people accurately. NIST rated Innovatrics as a top performer across all categories in its Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT). So, the technology is already here, and it works.
Dr. Judy Mikovits on Masks
In reaching out to former NIH virologist, Dr. Judy Mikovits, she said, “The unprecedented widespread use of masks is ineffective and harmful. If you are healthy, you only need to wear a mask if you are taking care of a person who is ill with COVID-19,” according to the WHO guidelines.
She added,
“Masks weaken the body making the virus’ job easier. They also reduce the intake of oxygen and trap the exhaling of carbon dioxide at the mouth and nose so that the body’s ability to fight off infection can be diminished.”
Dr. Mikovits quoted Dr. Jim Meehan, MD:
“Medical masks [cloth] are single-use devices designed to be worn for a relatively short period. Once the mask becomes saturated with moisture from breath, which, if properly fit, takes about an hour, it should be replaced. The more moisture-saturated the mask becomes, the more it blocks oxygen, increases re-breathing of carbon dioxide, re-breathing of viral particles, and becomes a breeding ground for other pathogens.”
Mikovits also noted that Dr. Anthony Fauci told 60 Minutes on March 8, 2020, that
“There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask. While masks may block some droplets, they do not provide the level of protection people think they do. Wearing a mask may also have unintended consequences: People who wear masks tend to touch their faces more often to adjust them, which can spread germs from their hands.”
Fauci flipped on not wearing masks, to now wearing them in July.
Judy Mikovits, the author of the New York Times bestselling book Plague of Corruption, shrugged when she thought about Dr. Fauci and his inner circle of public health officials. “They love to toss about—false—allegations of actual experimental evidence being only anecdotal, or not, alternately, to advance their agenda.”
“I cannot recall any time in human history when nearly universal use of masks throughout society has successfully controlled the spread of disease,” Dr. Mikovits said. “The data support the opposite. That is, masks suppress the immune system, render the mist vulnerable to infection, and amplify more viruses in the compromised who become victims and further spread the disease among family and close contacts.
Without transparency on emergency rules, actual case infection numbers, and auditable certified COVID-deaths, the abuses by elected officials on mask-wearing, social distancing, and other forms of public control will continue until more lawsuits are filed. They will challenge the unconstitutional orders and government overreach.
As if on cue with the other states, on Friday, July 10, Governor Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI) signed an order requiring people in her state to wear masks “in all indoor places.”
Have we been played? Yes. I also believe we are part of a global biological experiment that is unprecedented in human history.

NTS Notes:  This article summarizes all of the key points that I have already covered in great detail in previous articles, very nicely....

I also look at how "social distancing" is indeed part of the surveillance system that these bastards have planned, as their surveillance satellite system that is presently almost in place orbiting this planet requires each enslaved sucker on the surface to be a certain distance apart from each other for the system to detect and recognize each person.. And voila but that distance of separation is almost exactly 2 Meters or 6 feet apart!  Thus the "6 foot social distancing" propaganda has indeed a most evil agenda...

I also have long looked at that Anthony Fauci as one of the most disgusting creatures alive today on planet Earth... The only scumbag that I see more evil, especially in regards to this fraud pandemic, is of course Bill Gates himself!

The conclusion to this article asks;  Have we been played?  I have been saying that we have been played for months now... Most of the idiots out there do not even know that they have been played thanks to the horrible amount of brainwashing done by the Jewish controlled media to know any better.... And those idiots are the guinea pigs being used in this global biological experiment, as they will blindly and stupidly accept the DNA destroying vaccines that are coming our way very soon without any thought at all about the dangers they present....

More to come



Catti said...

If you click on the "WHO guidelines" link late in the article you will see that they have now flipflopped again and are parroting the same tired mantra about cloth masks being beneficial "when social distancing is impossible" such as on public transit. They then go on to wax poetic about the benefits of cloth masks.

I don't know why anyone who is not in on the fix is still quoting WHO or CDC, since both organizations have been sold out to communist China and Big Pharma. They flipflop every time China or Big Pharma snaps their fingers. Whenever someone from WHO or CDC's mouth is moving, lies are spewing out. They are nothing but grist for the politician and jews media propaganda mills.

The EMF theory is interesting. It wouldn't surprise me to learn that everyone in locked down countries is already being bombarded with EMF using cell phone towers, that would explain why they are so willing to submit to house arrest and to strap wet diapers to their faces, and why they are so hostile towards dissidents (people who don't agree with the covid nonsense).

Jody Paulson said...

Great article, NTS!

WretchedHope said...

The claims made by this article is interesting.

Let's take a look at these questions and see if they make any sense.

"What-if wearing masks is really to beta-test face-recognition software, to see if the software can identify people with partially covered faces?"

This could make some sense, however, if this is the case, then why were masks pushed in other pandemics. For example, there are photos of WW1 soldiers wearing facemasks when they returned home to prevent the spread of Spanish Flu [1] and pictures of people advocating for masks [2,3].

As I have shown, there is ample evidence that masks work. See a list of evidence in this comment I made: .

I know this is difficult to consider, but applying Occam's Razor, I think the "preventing spread" method makes more sense? Because after the pandemic, many people will stop wearing facemasks anyway, and there will be no need. People who care about privacy (for example at protests), were anonymous masks:

(That is a photo of people wearing anonymous masks btw). So, face recognition cannot protect against this at all.

"What-if social distancing aides the face-recognition beta test?"

This makes little sense. When the pandemic is over, people will go back to staying close to each other, especially in very crowded cities. A software that cannot detect people in big crowds is literally pointless.

Using the logic this article used for facemasks, shouldn't the authorities be against social distancing? Because people crowded together makes better test conditions to see if this "software" works in crowded conditions?

"What-if contact tracing is designed to track your every move and link your activities to all of your family and friends?"

I believe this is true, to some extent. Governments are going to use this crisis to track populations, just like they did with 9/11. (Look up "PRISM surveillance program", look up "NSA", look up "Edward Snowden"). We know our government tracks us.

However, there is some hope. The DP3T algorithm is open source, so ANYONE can read the code. It respects your privacy. Don't trust me? Read the code yourself:

Because anyone can read the code and find any privacy violations, it is trustworthy and can be improved.

Sadly, not many governments will use this system. They will invent their own system to track their users, or use Google/Apple's one (which also will probably track their users).

As for the last question, I can't exactly "disprove" that claim, but no evidence or reasoning is provided. The "burden of proof" is on you.

"Mikovits also noted that Dr. Anthony Fauci told 60 Minutes on March 8, 2020"

Do you realise people can change their mind? You realise no one is perfect right?

Regardless, the reason for this change of mind was a change in his attitude of thinking.

Masks don't protect you. They protect other people from you. When people realised this, they also realised that if everyone wore a mask, spread would be reduced.

Before, it wasn't recommended because people's attitude was that it protected oneself. (It doesn't). Masks protect OTHER PEOPLE from presymptomatic/asymptomatic carriers of the virus.

Then, people realised that if EVERYONE wore it, then people who are infected and don't know WON'T spread it.

Here is a diagram to make it simple:


Facemasks during Spanish Flu:



This is an article showing images of people wearing facemasks in the Spanish Flu. It was published in 2018, so it is not Covid-19 propoganda.

SysAdmin said...

As one who does not wear masks, does not endorse the use of masks (at least in this particular situation for the stated reasons), and is really sick (no pun intended) to death with the international hyperbole, I admit to being confused about something Dr. Russell Blaylock is widely quoted to have said: "By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain” (

The overwhelming majority of "anti-mask" content (if you will) states that, paraphrasing here, masks are ineffective at stopping the virus due to their size.

If this is true, then how is it that, as Dr. Blaylock states, "the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape....?"

I mean, either the viruses are too small to be stopped by the mask, or the viruses are too big (or something else, I presume) to escape the mask.

Someone enlighten me.


Catti said...

>"I admit to being confused about something Dr. Russell Blaylock is widely quoted to have said: "By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain”"

Unfortunately there's just as much false info floating around on the anti-mask side as there is on the mask pusher side. It wouldn't surprise me to learn that the crazier conspiracy theories are actually planted by pro-mask tyrants.

I've read some laughable theories about masks and those who are forcing us to wear them. For example, I recently read an article by someone who thinks that the sinus swab used to test for coronavirus is actually meant to pierce your brain and turn people into zombies! Clearly this person has no concept of human anatomy. The kooks often have louder voices and their messages drown out those from the sane people. Worse, the mask oppressors propagandize the kook theories against us, to discredit and pathologize anti-mask dissidents.

In this case, you're right, the quote makes no sense. If you already have the virus it can't be "pushed back" into your body (and especially not your brain!) from wearing a mask. And even if "pushing back into your body" were possible, if a virus can pass through a mask in one direction it certainly can in the other. In fact the mask oppressors' excuse for forcing people to wear masks is "you're not protecting yourself, you're protecting others, and they're protecting you". Even they are peddling the nonsense about one-way disease transmission through a mask. That's proof positive that it's bullshit, because whenever a mask nazi's mouth opens, lies spew out.

When you hear or read something new about the coronascam, first do a common sense check. If you're still not sure, research the concepts being discussed.