Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Blowing The Sandy Hook Fraud To Bits: John Friend's Realist Report With Guest Jim Fetzer Discuss The Fraudulence Of Sandy Hook!

I have long said that the Sandy Hook "massacre" of December 14th, 2012 was a complete HOAX!  The fact is, readers, that Sandy Hook was a criminal government controlled operation for the sole purpose of creating the propaganda of fear and grievance to try to convince the American people to give up their second amendment right to bear arms to resist their own tyrannical government.... It is a fact that NOBODY died in the Sandy Hook operation and that the supposed "shooter" himself, Adam Lanza, probably never existed at all!

For this article, I want to present the following article that comes from John Friend's blog at, where John interviewed Jim Fetzer just this morning on his "Realist Report" to discuss the Sandy Hook fraud in great detail.... Please click on the "The Realist Report" part of the article below to listen to the entire interview... It is definitely worth the time....I have my own comments to follow:

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

The Realist Report - Sandy Hook debate

* Michael Collins Piper backed out of the debate late last night. I received an email from him this morning when I woke up stating that he was having health issues, and would be unable to participate in the debate. *
On this edition of The Realist Report, we'll be joined by Dr. Jim Fetzer and Michael Collins Piper. We will be debating the alleged shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14th, 2012. Calls are welcomed during the second hour.
You can download the mp3 for this program here, or visit The Realist Report on BlogTalkRadio to subscribe via iTunes and view past programs.
Below are relevant links for this program:

My opening statement: Anyone following my website and radio program knows that I have taken a keen interest in the alleged Sandy Hook school shooting that took place just over one year ago in Newtown, Connecticut. The Connecticut State Police and mass media reported that on December 14, 2012, a 20-year-old young man named Adam Lanza first shot and killed his mother, Nancy Lanza, in their Newtown home before driving to the Sandy Hook Elementary School and going on a shooting rampage, murdering 20 children and 6 adults - truly an amazing, and highly implausible, feat supposedly accomplished by a young man with no known military training. According to the official narrative of the alleged shooting, Adam Lanza - the “lone gunman” - shot all but two of his victims multiple times, firing 154 total rounds in a matter of minutes. According to the official narrative, Adam Lanza shot himself in the head, killing himself instantly, as soon as first responders arrived at the Sandy Hook Elementary School. Many have questioned the plausibility of such a scenario, and consider the official narrative and subsequent media coverage of this alleged school shooting a total insult to the intelligence of the American public. I include myself in this category.
The simple fact of the matter is that there is absolutely no evidence or proof that a mass shooting took place at the Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14, 2012. There is not a shred of genuine evidence a young man named Adam Lanza shot his way into the elementary school, and proceeded to murder 20 children and 6 adults. The absurd media coverage and testimony from alleged "eye witnesses" and "family members" of the supposedly murdered children truly was a bizarre spectacle to observe.

The hypothesis that the alleged Sandy Hook school shooting was in reality a massive hoax - perhaps some sort of mass shooting drill organized by the Department of Homeland Security working in conjunction with state and local police and officials in Connecticut, which was then presented in the mass media as if it were a real life, genuine event - has been put forth by numerous independent researchers. Based on the known facts and information at our disposal, this hypothesis appears to me to be much more tenable than any other hypothesis or explanation, particularly the official narrative of the Sandy Hook shooting maintained and promoted by the mass media and government.

The Jewish propagandist and public relations specialist Edward Bernays wrote in his 1928 book Propaganda:

The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. [...]
Bernays would go on to write that "it remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons... who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world."
Bernays defined propaganda as "a consistent, enduring effort to create or shape events to influence the relations of the public to an enterprise, idea or group," and contended - correctly in my view - that "Propaganda is the executive arm of the invisible governmen.,"

There can be no doubt that the Jewish-controlled mass media regularly presents altered, distorted, manipulated, or even outright fabricated photographic and video imagery, coupled with false scripted testimony, in order to advance certain geopolitical and cultural agendas, as well as literally creating and manufacturing an artificial reality we are all forced to operate in.

An artificial reality the government is forced to create public policy in.

An artificial reality we are forced to educate our children in.

The mass media is no longer a benevolent, enlightening force - if it ever was one - that seeks to honestly inform the public about important political, economic, social and historical issues, in addition to holding powerful forces operating in society to account. No, the mass media has been weaponized, and has been and continues to be used to systematically deceive and psychologically and emotionally exploit the American public in order to advance certain agendas and false narratives of history and current happenings.

NTS Notes: It does not surprise me one bit that Michael Collins Piper ("Mr. P." in my previous articles) backed out of this debate.... I have long said that this person comes across as an egotist that is much too proud or too arrogant to admit that he has made a serious error of judgment in falling for the fraud of Sandy Hook.....

And about this "Cass Sunstein" ..... I never even heard of this character until recently, but it does not surprise me one bit that individuals like MG and MCP are using that Jewish criminal's writings about "conspiracy theories" as their excuse (!) to attack us for exposing Sandy Hook as a fraud.... In doing so, THEY themselves have exposed themselves as the REAL disinformation agents, and the ones who are the real danger to our efforts in exposing the real truth.

Sandy Hook was an operation where nobody died.... It is time for everyone to see that as fact!

More to come



Anonymous said...


Here is the paper mentioned in the above show:

Sunstein wrote this paper as a policy suggestion on how to deal with people who have figured out that the Government engages in systematic deception as a matter of day to day business and "Statecraft".

Sunstien is worried that people who realize what's going on may seek to take back control over their Government from the control Israelis.

Sunstein provides advice on whether to ignore or rebut certain revelations, which audience to focus on and how to engage in what he calls "Cognitive Infiltration" (which is the intentional spreading of disinfo and bs).

Of particular interest are the references to potential Government responses to "Conspiracy Theories" where Sunstein asks what government can do about conspiracy theories. Among the things it can do, what should it do?

Sunstein says he can readily imagine a series of possible responses.

(1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing.

(2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories (implied threats)

(3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories.

(4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech.

(5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to "help" (implied threats)

Sunstein says each instrument has a distinctive set of potential effects, or costs and benefits, and each will have a place under imaginable conditions.

However, their main policy idea is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories, which involves a mix of points (3), (4) and (5) above.

It is overwhelmingly clear that Piper and Glenn are both engaging in "Counterspeech" as described above.

Sandy Hook was a typical Denial and Deception operation involving Crisis Actors. The various "players" are now moving away from the jewish enclave of Sandy Hook. Yes, they are moving. Where do you suppose they are going? I think they are moving into a form of "Witness Protection Program" where they will undergo identity changes enabling them to perhaps engage in another deception somewhere else.

No doubt you are aware of the Sandy Hook children who sang at the SuperBowl. Interestingly, many of the supposedly "dead" victims appeared there on the 50 yard line - but were about 6 years older.

How can a chile age 6 years in 1 year - and be alive when they were supposedly dead? LOL

Laughing yet?

Anonymous said...

Right on, NT. I respect Piper and Glenn, but they have created a shit fest around this topic. Too bad as they are well worth listening to otherwise.

Gary Anderson said...

HEre is the problem. John Friend is likely right about most conspiracy and hoax activity. Yet he is a racist when he says people of certain descent should band together. That is a BAD IDEA. Now, the question I have is whether John Friend is a racist or if he is a Zionist mole who seeks to establish racism as a means to further Zionism. John Friend never says Zionist, but rather "Jewish". But there are many Jews, especially in the USA who oppose the militant Zionist cause of regime change and war without end. Some oppose the nation of Israel on those grounds. John Friend has to clean up his language or he falls into the same ill fated effort of Hitler himself!

John Friend needs to contact me because my natural father was Jewish and I am adopted and yet I totally oppose the Zionist activities of Sandy Hook hoax, 9/11 conspiracy, etc, etc. Maybe even Zionist involvement in the assassination of JFK. Jews is not a substitute word for Zionist. Never was and never will be.

Northerntruthseeker said...

OK... Gary Anderson, I can see your points, but this is about SANDY HOOK and not other topics put forward by John that have many people criticizing his stances..

And BTW... The trouble is NOT Zionism, but Judaism itself... I and others have already covered the horrific Talmud and the Torah, some of the most RACIST and horrible text ever imaginable... It is surprising that you can even somehow defend the actions of pure criminality and evil as put forward by the tribe itself and pass it off as the machinations of only "Zionists"

Again, this is supposed to be about Sandy Hook, and for now I let your comment stand.. If however you decide to get off topic and try to shoot the messenger, I will block any further statements by yourself.

Anonymous said...

The term "racist" is solely designed to demonize ethnic community.

As if it's not normal and health for people to instinctively want to interact and live among people who are like them and share a similar culture.

The term "racist" is a sick and malicious term that only serves Globalist interests.

John Friend is correct in promoting ethnic cohesion among all of the various ethnic groups. That is what true "diversity" is. True "diversity" is "separate and independent living space".

Forced mixing, cultural destruction and "impossible equality" only serves the jews.

As NTS mentioned, judaism is the base problem. Judaism and its teachings are fundamentally supremacist, deceptive and harbor aims of world domination.

If you are a jew and don't like what your read here - perhaps you should take a closer look at your own world view and belief system. It's in need of a major overhaul.

I suggest you do something about it before it gets done for you.

Northerntruthseeker said...

I really do abhor the term "racist".. Primarily due to the fact that it was the JEWS that invented that term, along with the other lying term "antisemitism" as a means of destroying the Caucasian race...

I have no qualms with most comments made here... But again I do not like the fact that some come in and distort fact and try to slur researchers.... I too look at JF as a researcher who does make mistakes... Everyone makes mistakes...It is part of being human!...And it takes true and honest people, that to me are the real researchers and true truth seekers, to admit when they are wrong..That is why MG and MCP have failed as real researchers...

In this case when it comes to Sandy Hook, John shows proof positive that we have been taken as suckers and he should be give full credit for his efforts.

Gary Anderson said...

Judaism misinterprets some aspects of the bible because they stop with the Old Testament. I am not defending Judaism. But Jewish refers to an ethnic group. In that context, it is racist to condemn an entire ethnic group and you are on a slippery slope to failure. Again, many Jews support your understanding of false flags but they will not support you guys. You must understand that Jewish people in the USA are wanting to live here and assimilate. They are not interested in racism. They oppose the occupation of the Palestinians. They don't believe that the kingdom of God, even from their non Christian perspective, can be ushered in by violence. The violent ones are the Zionists, not them.

If you want to shut them out and force them to deny their ethnic heritage you are going about this all wrong. I won't even support you.

I do appreciate that you shared my views and hope we can do so in the future.

Gary Anderson said...

So you are accusing me of slurring the researchers when God says it is evil to be racist and says that the elect of God come from all races and should fellowship together.

How do you defend yourself, blogger, to the charge of racism based on God's own directive?

Northerntruthseeker said...

"Gary Anderson" or what ever your JIDF handle is... I will no longer be publishing any of your comments... You have refused to stay on the subject of the Sandy Hook fraud, and instead are trying desperately to attack the integrity of those who are exposing it to be a fraud.. You are therefore exposing yourself as disinformation..

About the religion fraud known as Judaism... You are obviously brainwashed and cannot see the true EVIL that Judaism truly is.. Please go and investigate why "Judaism" promotes pedophilia and mass murder before you associate us with being evil.. Please go and investigate why Judaism promotes a sense of superiority over others and is the true racist and ugly "religion" out there..

And please go and investigate the truth about the "tribe" as a whole.. How they are not a race but a severely mentally unbalanced cult of psychotic individuals tied together by mental disorders.... Once you get to the bottom of all that, then contact me...

Anonymous said...

NTS, I haven't followed this closely enough to comment but here is a newer link which appears to solidly back your contention. It's available through:

Noor al Haqiqa said...

NTS Shame for jumping on the crap-on-a-man-when-he-is-down bandwagon. To claim a heart attack is an excuse to avoid a discussion? Come on now, even you know better than that.

MCP was having a heart attack and your slurs are just crappy ~ period. You assumed ~ when you had no motive other than your own bias ~ that MCP was faking it from fear.

I could not even finish your attack I was so ticked at you. Still am for that matter.

I gave up on Friend awhile back as an agent of some disinfo (IE the no planes theory) and have never thought too much of Fetzer seeing as he is all Veterans Today with Gordon Duff. But I don't go around ripping them apart from a personal bias. I just pay them no nevermind unless they do something like this.

As for you, shame. This sort of thing lessens a person, NTS.

Northerntruthseeker said...

Noor.. I am truly shocked...

Yes, I have called MCP an egotist, and I stand behind that because he does come across as an arrogant egotist! That has nothing to do with his heart condition at all..

I am also shocked at the sudden attack somehow claiming that I made that statement knowing in advance that the man has a heart condition... I am not a mind reader and NOBODY knew about MCP's condition at the time of this report... Only one week later are we finding the facts..

I look at evidence and facts, and all the facts show that both MCP and MG are wrong about this fraud massacre. That evidence stands for itself and was only again brought forward in this interview between Fetzer and Friend...

To suddenly correlate MCP's heart condition with the Sandy Hook fraud is quite disturbing... They are obviously two very unrelated matters and for people to suddenly say "shame on you" by linking these events together is most troubling indeed....

And how exactly did I "slur" MCP? I called the man an egotist when so many call him exactly that as well....

MCP is wrong and when a person is wrong they are still wrong... It has nothing to do with his heart condition and should be kept that way.

I should know how it feels to have the scare of a heart condition hovering over one's head... It is not good at all.... But again to suddenly seek sympathy for this man when he is dead wrong about an incident via his heart condition is again quite disturbing...We should not be going "Oh poor MCP, we should all now say that everything he says and writes is absolutely correct because he has a heart condition"....

I have no shame in showing that someone is in error.... I am again troubled by those that say "shame on you NTS for attacking someone with a heart condition"... At the time of this report, nobody knew exactly the state of MCP and his heart... And to now somehow link the two events together is absolutely wrong and quite alarming!

I again have my differences with John Friend... His recent activities with many whom you and I know are trouble has indeed been an eye opener, and I have distanced myself from his activities in that regard... However his work on the Sandy Hook fraud has been quite excellent and I am in full support of THAT work and his efforts in this exposure.

I am also troubled by the push for sympathy here, when there was none when this same individual and his cohorts ruthlessly attacked WW last spring. How quickly people forget about that as well!

You and I have known each other for some time now, and I will continue to support you...

Exposing the truth does not lessen a person, and I am still in pursuit of the truth about Sandy Hook.

Northerntruthseeker said...

And BTW.. I never "assumed" that MCP backed out of the interview by faking it via fear... I have double checked my own wording, and nowhere did I make that assumption... Nobody at the time of this report knew about MCP's heart troubles and I again am not a mind reader...