Saturday, January 19, 2013

Why Mali? France Launches War In Mali In Bid To Secure Resources And Stamp Out National Rights Struggles

With all the news here in Canada and the United States still focused on the aftermath of the fake Sandy Hook elementary school "shooting", there has definitely been much news happening elsewhere.  We are seeing a new "War for Resources" opening up in the western African nation of Mali, that has many people scratching their heads, and wondering for themselves... Why Mali?

To help answer the "why" for this latest invasion by the criminals in NATO, especially France and the United States, into the impoverished and helpless nation of Mali, I want to turn to the following article that comes from the RINF Alternative News website, at, written by Roger Annis, and entitled: "France Launches War In Mali In Bid To Secure Resources, Stamp Out National Rights Struggles".  This article gives a pretty good assessment as to the "why" for an attack on Mali, with a few key points that are missing that I will discuss in my own thoughts to follow:

France Launches War in Mali in Bid to Secure Resources, Stamp Out National Rights Struggles

  19th January 2013 | Breaking News

Roger Annis |

France, the former slave power of west Africa, has poured into Mali with a vengeance in a military attack launched on January 11. French warplanes are bombing towns and cities across the vast swath of northern Mali, a territory measuring some one thousand kilometers from south to north and east to west. French soldiers in armoured columns have launched a ground offensive, beginning with towns in the south of the northern territory, some 300 km north and east of the Malian capital of Bamako.

A French armoured convoy entered Mali several days ago from neighbouring Ivory Coast, another former French colony. French troops spearheaded the overthrow of that country’s government in 2011.

Off with a handshake into a C-17 transport plane, to support French imperialism.
The invasion has received universal support from France’s imperialist allies. The U.S., Canada and Europe are assisting financially and with military transport. To provide a figleaf of African legitimacy, plans have been accelerated to introduce troops from eight regional countries to join the fighting (map here).

“Islamist terrorists” etc., etc.

The public relations version of the French et al invasion is a familiar refrain. “Islamic terrorists” and “jihadists” have taken control of northern Mali and are a threat to international security and to the well-being of the local population. Terrible atrocities against the local populace are alleged and given wide publicity by corporate media. Similar myths were peddled by the warmakers when they invaded Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003.

It is true that Islamic fundamentalists have ruled northern Mali with an iron hand since taking over in 2012. But the reasons for this latest intervention lie in the determination of the world’s imperial powers to keep the human and natural resources of poor regions of the world as preserves for capitalist profits. West Africa is a region of great resource wealth, including gold, oil and uranium.
The uranium mines in neighbouring Niger and the uranium deposits in Mali are of particular interest to France, which generates 78 per cent of its electricity from nuclear energy. Niger’s uranium mines are highly polluting and deeply resented by the population, including among the semi-nomadic, Tuareg people who reside in the mining regions. The French company Areva is presently constructing in Imouraren, Niger what will become the second largest uranium mine in the world.
Notwithstanding the fabulous wealth created by uranium mining, Niger is one of the poorest countries on earth. As one European researcher puts it, “Uranium mining in Niger sustains light in France and darkness in Niger.”

Mali (population 15.5 million) is the third-largest gold producing country in Africa. Canada’s IAMGOLD operates two mines there (and a third in nearby Burkina Faso). Many other Canadian and foreign investors are present.

A key player in the unfolding war is Algeria. The government there is anxious to prove its loyalty to imperialism. Its lengthy border with northern Mali is a key zone for the “pacification” of northern Mali upon which France and its allies are embarked.

Further proof of the hypocrisy of the ‘democracy’ that France claims to be fighting for in Mali is found in the nature of the Mali regime with which it is allied. Often presented in mainstream media as a ‘beacon of democracy’ in west Africa, the Mali government was little more than a corrupt and pliant neo-colonial regime before last year when the U.S.-trained and equipped Mali army twice overthrew it – in March and again in December. The Mali army now scrambling to fight alongside its French big brother was condemned and boycotted by the U.S., Europe and Canada during a brief, sham interlude of concern following the first coup.

Today, the Mali government is a shell of a regime that rules at the behest of the Mali military, the latter’s foreign trainers, and the foreign mining companies that provide much of its revenue.

The Tuareg People

At the political heart of the conflict in Mali is the decades-long struggle of the Tuareg, a semi-nomadic people numbering some 1.2 million. Their language is part of the Berber language group. Their historic homeland includes much of Niger and northern Mali and smaller parts of Nigeria, Burkina Faso, Algeria and Libya. They call themselves Kel Tamasheq (speakers of the Tamasheq language).

The Tuareg have fought a succession of rebellions in the 20th century against the borders imposed by colonialism and then defended by post-independence, neo-colonial regimes. They are one of many minority nationalities in west Africa fighting for national self-determination, including the Sahwari of Western Sahara, a region controlled by Morocco and whose Sahwari leadership, the Polisario Front, is widely recognized internationally.

The Tuareg were brutally subdued by colonial France at the outset of the 20th century. Following the independence of Mali and neighbouring countries in 1960, they continued to suffer discrimination. A first Tuareg Rebellion took place in 1962-64.

A second, larger rebellion began in 1990 and won some autonomy from the Mali government that was elected in 1992 and re-elected in 1997. A third rebellion in Mali and Niger in 2007 won further political and territorial concessions, but these were constantly reneged. A Libya-brokered peace deal ended fighting in 2009.

The Mali state and army constantly sought to retake what they had lost. Violence and even massacres against the Tuareg population pushed matters to a head in 2011. The army was defeated by the military forces of the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (NMLA) and on April 6, 2012, the MNLA declared an independent Azawad, as they call northern Mali and surrounding region. The Tuareg are one of several national groups within the disputed territory.

The independence declaration proved premature and unsustainable. The MNLA was soon pushed aside by Islamist-inspired armed groups that oppose Tuareg self-determination and an independent state. The army, meanwhile, continued to harass and kill people. A group of 17 visiting Muslim clerics, for example, were massacred on September 22, 2012.

According to unconfirmed reports, the MNLA has renounced the goal of an independent Azawad. It entered into talks with the Mali regime in December for autonomy in the northern region. A January 13 statement on the group’s website acquiesces to the French intervention but says it should not allow troops of the Mali army to pass beyond the border demarcation line declared in April of last year.

Militarization of Mali and West Africa

Mali is one of the poorest places on earth but has been drawn into the whirlwind of post-September, 2001 militarization led by the United States. U.S. armed forces have been training the Mali military for years. In 2005, the U.S. established the Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership comprising eleven ‘partner’ African countries-Algeria, Burkina Faso, Libya, Morocco, Tunisia, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria and Senegal.

The ‘partnership’ conducts annual military exercises termed ‘Flintlock.’ This year’s exercise is to take place in Niger and according to the January 12 Globe and Mail, “Canada’s military involvement in Niger has already commenced.”

Canadian troops have participated in military exercises in west Africa since at least 2008. In 2009, Mali was named one of six “countries of focus” in Africa for Canadian aid. Beginning that year, Canadian aid to Mali leaped to where it is now one of the largest country recipients of Canada aid funds.

In 2008, Canada quietly launched a plan to establish at least six, new military bases abroad, including two in Africa. (It is not known exactly where the Africa part of the plan stands today.)

War Atrocities

Only days into the French attack, evidence is mounting of significant civilian and military casualties. In the town of Douentza in central Mali, injured civilians can’t reach the local hospital, according to Médecins sans frontières (Doctors Without Borders). “Because of the bombardments and fighting, nobody is moving in the streets of Douentza and patients are not making it through to the hospital,” said a statement by the agency’s emergency response co-ordinator Rosa Crestani.

The International Red Cross is reporting scores of civilian and military casualties in the towns coming under French attack.

Amnesty International is worried. Its West Africa researcher, Salvatore Saguès, was in the country last September and saw the recruitment of children into the Mali army. He is worried about retaliatory attacks by the army if it retakes control of the towns and cities it has lost, notably in the northern cities of Gao, Kidal and Timbuktu.

He also warned of the plans to bring neighbouring armies into northern Mali. “These armies, who are already committing serious violations in their countries, are most likely to do the same, or at least not behave in accordance to international law if they are in Mali,” he said.

According to the U.N. refugee agency UNHCR, the latest crisis has internally displaced nearly 230,000 Malians. An additional 144,500 Malians were already refugees in neighbouring countries.
UNHCR spokesperson Adrian Edwards says half the population of the town of Konna, some 5,000 people, sought as French bombs threatened to fall by fleeing across the River Niger.

In an ominous sign of more civilian casualties to come, and echoing the excuses for atrocities by invading armies against civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine in recent years, French military commanders are complaining of the difficulty in distinguishing fighters they are bombing from non-combatant populations. France’s army chief Edouard Guillaud told Reuters that France’s air strikes were being hampered because militants were using civilian populations as shields.

No to the War in Mali

The military attack in Mali was ordered by French President François Hollande, the winner of the 2012 election on behalf of the Socialist Party. His decision has been condemned by groups on the political left in France, including the Nouveau parti anticapitaliste and the Gauche anticapitaliste. The latter is a tendency with the Front de gauche (Left Front) that captured 11 per cent of the first-round presidential vote last year.

Shockingly, the Left Front leadership group has come out in favour of the intervention. Deputy François Asensi spoke on behalf of the party leadership in the National Assembly on January 16 and declared,

“The positions of the deputies of the Left Front, Communists and republicans, is clear: To abandon the people of Mali to the barbarism of fanatics would be a moral mistake… International military action was necessary in order to avoid the installation of a terrorist state.”

His statement went on to complain that President Hollande did not bother to seek the approval of the National Assembly.

A January 12 statement by the French Communist Party (PCF), a component of the Left Front, said,
“The PCF shares the concern of Malians over the armed offensive of the Jihadist groups toward the south of their country… The party recalls here that the response to the request for assistance by the president of Mali should have been made in the framework of a United Nations and African Union sponsorship, under the flag of the UN…”

Unlike the overthrow of Haiti’s elected government in 2004, which the PCF and Socialist Party supported at the time, France and its allies did not feel the need to obtain a rubber stamp of approval from the UN Security Council this time in Mali. But doing so would not have changed the predatory nature of this latest mission, just as it didn’t in Haiti.

A January 15 statement by the Canadian Peace Alliance explains:

“The real reason for NATO’s involvement is to secure strategic, resource rich areas of Africa for the West. Canadian gold mining operations have significant holdings in Mali as do may other western nations…

“It is ironic that since the death of Osama Bin Laden, the U.S. military boasts that Al-Qaeda is on the run and has no ability to wage its war. Meanwhile, any time there is a need for intervention, there is suddenly a new Al-Qaeda threat that comes out of the woodwork. Canada must not participate in this process of unending war.”

That’s a call to action which should be acted upon in the coming days and weeks as one of the poorest and most ecologically fragile regions of the world falls victim to deeper militarization and plundering. •

Roger Annis is an antiwar activist who lives in Vancouver, Canada.

NTS Notes:  OK, I read this article, and I see where my once great nation, Canada, is very much criminally involved this latest fiasco.  Again, so much for Canada being a true nation of "peace" on this planet!  

This article also touches on the vast Malian Gold reserves, which to me is the real reason for this latest invasion, and I will explain it right here:

Germany last week called for all of its gold deposits held as reserves to be repatriated back to its country, which has left the United States (and France) in a lurch..... The fact is again readers that there is absolutely NO gold reserves at all in America, or even it seems now in France as well.  All the so called Gold bullion stored in the NY reserve in the United States, and the Bank of France, had long ago been removed and is now sitting in the criminal Rothschild private vaults that are mostly located in Europe.   Any gold "bullion" that is seen in these criminal nations' vaults is not gold at all, but Tungsten cored frauds.

The United States and France know they are in serious trouble and had requested Germany to "delay" the shipment of physical Gold back to Germany for a period of 7 years, while they search for a way out of their mess.  Rather than go after the Rothschild scoundrels that have stolen all the Gold, they instead came up with a new evil scheme... Invade Mali, which is Gold rich, and begin large scale extraction of any remaining Malian gold ore to cover their shipments to Germany.   It has been estimated that it would take 7 years of gold extraction from Mali to cover the amount Germany is demanding, thus the requested 7 year "delay" to fill Germany's demands...

Therefore there is no coincidence by this week's reports of France invading Mali to go after the phony "Al Qaeda terrorists" that the liars in both France and the United States have falsely claimed to be imbedded there.   They need their boogeyman again to warrant enslaving that nation for the sole purpose of grabbing Mali's Gold!

The subject of the Malian people's struggles for their own interests is of little interest to these criminal nations, because they create the so called "terrorist" groups that undermine any nation's integrity.  It is indeed sad that thousands, if not millions of innocent people will indeed die in the process, while the Malian nation is raped of its natural resources to feed the greed of France and the United States.

This again shows how truly sick this planet has become when our nations invade other peaceful or defenseless nations for their selfish self centered interests.... And I can guarantee that we have only seen the beginning, because on top of Mali, we see reports of "terrorists" in the neighboring nation of Algeria as well!!!... When the hell will people finally wake up?

More to come


1 comment:

yogicowboy said...

Mali was once the site of one of the richest and largest empires of the world. During its golden age there was a flourishing of mathematics, astronomy, literature and the arts. These are talented people. We all loose in this one!
Here is a classic example of US/Pentagon/international power broker aggression against a foreign and sovereign country for the exploitation of people and resources.
In 1999 Mali's US backed government sold the country to the IMF and the World Central Bank by entering into long term financial agreements. Most of the large entities operating in Mali were then privatized, in other words, placed under the control of capitalist bankers.
The two entities that provide economic slavery packages designed to exploit people and their countries resources, supported by large multinational corporations, enforced by the United Nations and clandestinely set up and enforced by the CIA, the US state department, and the pentagon' using the tax money of US citizens. This is also called "making the world safe for MacDonalds"
THE PEOPLE OF MALI. 14.5 million of them
They average $1.25 per day in wages for seasonal work in such fulfilling jobs as gold mining, cotton production and livestock. They are mostly poor or starving.
the 3rd largest gold mining reserves in Africa. Also large uranium deposits.
A puppet regime under outside control via the US and the world banking industry (kin to the same banking system that just raked billions out of the pockets of us citizens, took half of their retirement funds, and permanently trashed the US economy via the intentional ballooning of the housing market and susequent exploitation via the invention of the derivative trading system.
Who have chosen Islamic fundamentalism as a means of asserting their right to govern their own country, and who have repossessed the northern half of their own country as a means of succession from the puppet government.
channeling money for arms to Mali's military to make sure the country continues to be exploited by the world bank and IMF and to terminate Islamic fundamentalist Mali citizens from taking back their own country, and now supporting the bombing of yet another foreign country.
The state department official who is carrying out the banker agenda of exploitation by spreading terrorist fears about the Islamic fundamentalists of Mali who want their country back.
Labels placed on the above by USA, THE US STATE DEPARTMENT, AND THE MURDOCH CONTROLLED MEDIA, to justify putting military pressure on the Mali government to maintain its hold on the country for the purpose of economic exploitation benefitting elite bankers and their elitist international power broker bosses.
The resource that is required to support the people of MALI. If they were each given a quarter of an acre, taught about permaculture, veganism, and sustainable housing, poverty, starvation and exploitation would be eliminated from their lives allowing for their rich cultural heritage to flourish and be gifted to the world, having been in the 14th century one of the three great trading empires of the trans Sahara.