Recently, we have seen the barrage of attacks by these criminals against Helen Thomas for her truthful statement that they should get the hell out of Palestine! For that truth, Helen lost her job in the White House Press Corps, and has been vilified very falsely as an "antisemite" ever since.
To show that the criminals attacking Helen Thomas are definitely wrong, I want to present the following article from Gordon Duff, over at Veterans Today (www.veteranstoday.com), entitled: "Why Attacking Helen Thomas Is Antisemitism", in its entirety right here for my own readers to view. My comments will follow:
GORDON DUFF: WHY ATTACKING HELEN THOMAS IS ANTISEMITISM
“LUCY, YOU GOT SOME ‘SPLAININ TO DO..”
- Can land be taken from one group of Semites and given to another group of Semites based on religion? Is this not a violation of Article II of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to which Israel is signatory?
Article 2.Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
- Is there, perhaps, some history of colonial exploitation, ethnic cleansing and mass murder based on interpretations of the wishes of invisible supreme beings? Haven’t such practices been widely discredited? With, literally tens of thousands such beings currently worshiped by the people of member states in the United Nations, everything from shark gods to statues with arms and legs coming from every direction, can we fairly establish a criteria for which being has the authority of life and death over the worshipers of another? Doesn’t Article II apply here also?
- Whether Jews wanting to settle in Palestine are or are not of ethnicity directly related to one of the Semitic language groups of the Middle East, how does this diminish the rights of any other person or group? The idea of wanting to establish that European Jews settling in Palestine have superior legal status because of “Semitic” ancestry is, in itself, reasonable proof of intent to use this status, real or imagined, to violate the basic human rights of others.
NTS Notes: Helen Thomas is of Lebanese origin, and is more Semitic than most of the criminals that have been attacking her falsely.
I also have further proof of the falsehood of the entire "antisemitism" ploy, by the video that I have in this blog in the left hand column, entitled: "The Truth About Antisemitism". I want to have any people who have their doubts about the facts of this lie to look at that video for themselves... The truth comes right from the criminals' own mouths!
The simple fact again is that the vast majority of these liars and criminals are from the central steppes of Russia and have absolutely NO Semitic language or blood in them at all. The time has finally come to make everyone aware of the truth about their lies, and for us to not fear their cries of "antisemitism" any longer!
More to come