Saturday, June 5, 2010

The Swine Flu Hoax: New Revelations That Drug Firms Encouraged World Health Organization (WHO) To "Exaggerate" Swine Flu Threat!

For the last year, I and others in the blogosphere have been encouraging people to NOT line up and take the so called Swine Flu "vaccines", due to the fact that the vaccines themselves contained a wide variety of toxins and poisons that would only weaken the body's own immune system. We have been saying that the whole purpose of the Swine Flu scare was for the Pharmaceutical Industry to get rich off of the sales of their deadly potions. Also, people would be so weakened by the so called vaccines that when a more deadly form of virus was unleashed, many would die, and the Pharmaceutical criminals would get even richer from the need to develop and administer their newer vaccines to fight the newer pandemic. Sweet deal for the Pharmaceuticals indeed!

Now it seems that we have been right all along. There is a new report that just surfaced that claims that the drug firms actually encouraged the WHO to exaggerate the Swine Flu threat so as to get the people to line up and take their deadly poisons through the resultant fear generated! Here is an article from the Daily Mail online news service out of the UK at, that backs up this astonishing fact:

The pandemic that never was: Drug firms 'encouraged world health body to exaggerate swine flu threat'

Last updated at 11:49 PM on 4th June 2010

Declaring a swine flu pandemic was a 'monumental error', driven by profit-hungry drug companies spreading fear, an influential report has concluded.

It led to huge amounts of taxpayers' money being wasted in stockpiling vaccines, it added.

Paul Flynn, the Labour MP charged with investigating the handling of the swine flu outbreak for the Council of Europe, described it as 'a pandemic that never really was'.

The report accuses the World Health Organisation of grave shortcomings in the transparency of the process that led to its warning last year.

The MP said that the world relied on the WHO, but after 'crying wolf', its reputation was in jeopardy.

The report questions whether the pandemic was driven by drug companies seeking a profit. Mr Flynn said predictions of a 'plague' that would wipe out up to 7.5million people proved to be 'an exaggeration', with fewer than 20,000 deaths worldwide.

Britain braced itself for up to 65,000 deaths and signed vaccine contracts worth £540million.

The actual number of deaths was fewer than 500 and the country is now desperately trying to unpick the contracts and unload millions of unused jabs.

The focus on swine flu also led to other health services suffering and widespread public fear.

Pharmaceutical companies, however, profited to the tune of £4.6billion from the sale of vaccines alone.

Mr Flynn said: 'There is not much doubt that this was an exaggeration on stilts. They vastly over-stated the danger on bad science and the national governments were in a position where they had to take action.

'In Britain, we have spent at least £1billion on preparations, to the detriment of other parts of the health system. This is a monumental failure on the WHO's part.'

The Council of Europe inquiry heard allegations that the WHO had downgraded its definition for declaring a pandemic last spring - just weeks before announcing there was a worldwide outbreak.

Critics said the decision to remove any need to consider the deadliness of the disease was driven by drug companies desperate to recoup the billions of pounds they had invested in developing pandemic vaccines after the bird flu scares.

But the WHO said its basic definition of a pandemic never changed.

Mr Flynn said: 'It doesn't make any sense as to why they should have changed the definition a month before declaring an outbreak.

'In this case, it might not just be a conspiracy theory, it might be a very profitable conspiracy.'

A Daily Mail investigation earlier this year revealed more than half of the swine flu taskforce advising the Government on its strategy had ties to drug companies.

Eleven of the 20 members of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies had done work for the pharmaceutical industry or are linked to it through their universities.

Concerns about drug companies' influence are also highlighted by a separate investigation by the British Medical Journal and the London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

It found that key scientists behind the WHO's advice on stockpiling pandemic flu pills such as Tamiflu had financial ties with the drug companies that stood to profit. The WHO last night firmly rejected all the criticism.

Spokesman Gregory Hartl said: 'There is no question of this being a fake pandemic. If fits the criteria for a pandemic, which is a new virus to which human beings have little or no immunity and which has spread around the world.

'It spread from zero to 74 countries in the space of 9 weeks - that's a pandemic.'

He said that not all ties to drug companies were necessarily conflicts of interest.

Read more:

NTS Notes: Lets not hold any punches here. GREED was the order of the day for the Pharmaceutical Industry. They wanted to get rich off of the scare tactics employed by exaggerating the threat of Swine Flu. It almost worked, if not for the efforts of real research, and the tireless work of blogs.

I, like others, have watched as thousands upon thousands of innocent people lined up like cattle to take their Swine Flu (poison) shot. The Mainstream media was complicit in this hoax in their unending reports about the threat of Swine Flu. Now there are millions of people out there with these poisonous "vaccines" in their bodies, and the long term health effects of these poisons are still unknown.

I would also like to say Thank you to those who refused to swallow the BS and refused to take their Swine Flu "vaccine". Maybe in the future even more will ask questions and research first before falling for hoaxes.

More to come



Swine Flu Epidemic said...

I recently tweeted and stumbled upon your post. Really your post is very informative and I enjoyed your opinions. Do you use twitter or stumbleupon? So I can follow you there. I am hoping you post again soon.

Northerntruthseeker said...

I have always had a problem with so called "social"networks, considering that they open up avenues for criminals to get private access to personal information. Because of that I have never been sold on either facebook or myspace.... I am also worried about twitter....

But I have talked to many people who say that twitter is more harmless than these other networks, and I may consider your idea.

BTW... I have never used twitter before, and being a newbie to that network, it may take time for me to actually use it.

Stumbleupon.... Until now, I have never heard of that site....

Look, as long as these sites do not interfere with a person's personal data, I am willing to give them a try.



Northerntruthseeker said...

BTW... I most times prefer my information to get around by word of mouth.... I prefer it that way to avoid any type of interference from criminals who troll through the net looking for sites such as mine....

Considering that when I first started, I had maybe 5 views daily, this very basic information site has grown by leaps and bounds.

Feel free to comment anytime!