The Continuing Push For War Against Iran!

Well, the farce known as the US mid-term elections is finally over.  The results show that the criminal Zionist Jewish controlled Republicans have seized control of the US Congress away from the criminal Zionist Jewish controlled Democrats, while the criminal Zionist Jewish controlled Democrats have been able to maintain a slim majority in the US Senate.   Basically, all that has happened is that one group of criminals has handed over some power to another group of criminals!  Isn't American politics beautiful?

The people of the United States are finally growing tired of Barry Soetoro's Presidency, and guaranteed unless there is something spectacular that he can do over the next two years, he will either not run for re-election in 2012 or he will go down with probably the greatest defeat in American political history.

Well, it seems that there is a new push for Soetoro to attack Iran as a method of saving his Presidency!   Here now, I want to present the latest Iran hit piece, courtesy of the Washington Post, at www.washingtonpost.com.  In this piece of pure propaganda, entitled "The War Recovery?", the writer is calling for Soetoro to attack Iran to bring on economic recovery (?), and also as a means of gaining confidence from the American public to possibly run for re-election in 2012!  Here is that article:

David S. Broder

The war recovery?

David S. Broder

Sunday, October 31, 2010

When the midterm election cycle began, the prevailing opinion was that Barack Obama was cleverer and more inspirational than anyone else on the scene. As it ends, nothing appears to have changed. 

OH, YES, I know that Democrats have fallen into a peck of trouble and may lose control of Congress. But even if they do, Obama can still storm back to win a second term in 2012. He is that much better than the competition. 

In what respects is he enduringly superior? Let's start with the basics. He is much smarter than his challengers in either party, better able to read the evidence and come to the right conclusions.

Over time, his conclusions are likely to stand scrutiny better than those of other politicians. 

The crucial case in point is his analysis of economic forces. No one would pretend that this is anything but a daunting situation. The nation is suffering simultaneously from high and persistent unemployment, lagging investment, massive public and private debt, and a highly inefficient tax system. 

The steps that have been ordered so far in Washington have done nothing more than put the brakes on the runaway decline. They have not spurred new growth. 

But if Obama cannot spur that growth by 2012, he is unlikely to be reelected. The lingering effects of the recession that accompanied him to the White House will probably doom him. 

Can Obama harness the forces that might spur new growth? This is the key question for the next two years.

What are those forces? Essentially, there are two. One is the power of the business cycle, the tidal force that throughout history has dictated when the economy expands and when it contracts.

Economists struggle to analyze this, but they almost inevitably conclude that it cannot be rushed and almost resists political command. As the saying goes, the market will go where it is going to go. 

In this regard, Obama has no advantage over any other pol. Even in analyzing the tidal force correctly, he cannot control it. 

What else might affect the economy? The answer is obvious, but its implications are frightening. War and peace influence the economy. 

Look back at FDR and the Great Depression. What finally resolved that economic crisis? World War II. 

Here is where Obama is likely to prevail. With strong Republican support in Congress for challenging Iran's ambition to become a nuclear power, he can spend much of 2011 and 2012 orchestrating a showdown with the mullahs. This will help him politically because the opposition party will be urging him on. And as tensions rise and we accelerate preparations for war, the economy will improve. 

I am not suggesting, of course, that the president incite a war to get reelected. But the nation will rally around Obama because Iran is the greatest threat to the world in the young century. If he can confront this threat and contain Iran's nuclear ambitions, he will have made the world safer and may be regarded as one of the most successful presidents in history. 

davidbroder@washpost.com

NTS Notes:  This is sheer madness!  Iran is absolutely not the major threat in the young century, and definitely does NOT have nuclear weapons.  Iran has always said clearly that it has absolutely no need or ever a desire to possess them.

I need not even mention that the writer of this piece of pure propaganda BS is Jewish.   But it does seem strange that with almost all major articles calling on the President to attack Iran, the writers are predominantly Jewish!   Coincidence?  I think not...

We all know by now that the real threat to peace on earth is absolutely not Iran, but the criminal state of Israel with its hundreds of nuclear weapons.   I am still waiting for some major publication to come forward with an article on this fact.

War with Iran could lead to a never ending war with Islam itself, and a strong possibility of bringing on war with Russia and China, thus starting World War III!  I cannot even imagine what would happen in a worst case scenario by going to war with Iran, but I am sure that that would definitely give Soetoro a true legacy; as the President that heralded in the possible destruction of the entire planet.

More to come

NTS

Jeff Rense: A Re-Invention Of What?

We all know by now that there is a lot of disinformation in this truth movement.  We now know that the big kahuna in this real fight for our freedoms, Alex Jones, is an agent of disinformation, that will spew absolute garbage and lead his followers and listeners down the wrong path.  

Alex Jones is bad enough, but what about Jeff Rense?   With the recent blowup between Jeff, and Mark Glenn at www.theuglytruth.wordpress.com,  questions have definitely arisen about Jeff Rense, his site, and what he means to this movement. 

Now for some insight into Jeff Rense himself, I want to turn to the following article that I came across from my friend, Noor, over at Snippits and Snappits (www.snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.com).   This article is entitled: "Jeff Rense: A Re-Invention Of What?" and it is a real eye opener.  So without any further adieu, I am placing that entire article right here for my own readers to view:

Monday, 1 November, 2010

JEFF RENSE: A REINVENTION OF WHAT?

Normally, I would think twice before posting something like this. However, I am hearing too much about this man to just let it be. After all, he is supposed to be a top dog in this information movement and there should be a certain amount of camaraderie and bonhomie between us. Even disagreements should be dealt with or just an agreement to disagree. But Jeff went over the top a few weeks ago.

He and Mark Glenn, broadcaster of The Ugly Truth, were having a heated discussion that has been slowly coming to a boil for the past few years. Glenn felt that Rense was posting articles that supported American Islamophobia and Rense was not in agreement. Finally, after some time, Jeff laid out a threat that shocked almost all of us in the truth movement.

Jeff Rense was fully ready, willing and able to send armed thugs into the home of someone he disagrees with politically. Come listen to today’s program as we discuss Jeff Rense’s recent threats to have agents of the FBI and Department of Homeland Security visit the home of Mark Glenn, where he resides with his wife and 9 children over a personal dispute.

You can listen to a discussion of this situation right here.

Powered by Podbean.com

Then today I was sent the following article and realized that there is more about Rense that raises questions. The betrayal of calling in the enemy to deal with a fellow theorist was a foolish move. But this article will just add to the mystery of who this man is. If we wonder what he stands for, we must also wonder what he is doing here, what is his goal? But first of all, WHO IS Jeff Rense?

JEFF RENSE: A REINVENTION OF WHAT?

by Lisa Guliani

WING TV

Patsy Smullin has run KOBI-TV for the last 30 years, and her father founded it. If anybody would have known Jeff Rense and the supposed 5,000 newscasts he claims to have made, it would be Patsy.

As it happens, Patsy Smullin does remember Jeff Rense, and in two different telephone conversations I had with her over the past few days, she confirmed that he did have a position at her television station for a brief time as a reporter and news anchor. Smullin stressed that Jeff Rense, or “a guy calling himself Jeff Rense” (her words), was employed at KOBI (an NBC affiliate) from June 1983 to May 1984, and she is not aware of him working at any other station in the state of Oregon either prior to his employment at KOBI-TV or afterward. [I would think if he'd worked at other stations previous to his KOBI position, these would be listed on his job application or resume when given to KOBI-TV.]

Patsy had more to say. She revealed that in her experience as Jeff Rense’s employer (and this is a direct quote), “He was not known for his honesty.” Think about it. Patsy Smullin was Rense’s employer some twenty-odd years ago. After all this tiime, the characteristic that has remained clearly in her memory is that “he was not known for his honesty”. What does that say to you? According to Ms. Smullin, at that time Jeff was also involved in several court battles with other people. One wonders if it has anything to do with him not being known for his honesty?

When asked if she could elaborate on the comment she'd made regarding Rense not being known for his honesty, her response was: "Sure. He was a compulsive liar." Also, when questioned as to the claim that Jeff anchored and produced “5000 newscasts,” Patsy Smullin laughed heartily and stated, “This is absolutely false. He never did that here.” Okay, if not at KOBI-TV, then where? Perhaps Jeff Rense will reveal this to us all at some point so we can check it out.

But on his own website, Jeff Rense claims to have been an award winning news director and TV news anchor for 10-12 years (accounts vary). If not at KOBI, then where?

*****

An American Treasure

"…an award-winning television News Director and News Anchor for over ten years, Jeff continually pushed for higher standards of journalism and responsible, intelligent reporting and inquiry. Regrettably, those goals were often at odds with the irrevocable TV news obsession for tabloid exploitation of the trivial, the tragic and the sensational. The situation became so dubious and distasteful that one day he walked away from his highly-successful news anchor/news director career (as high as a 53 Share of the audience - Nielsen) and moved to radio, recognizing it as the last viable approach to bringing reality to the American public...and now with the internet, to the world."

Interesting that Rense declares himself to have worked as a news director and TV news anchor. An online search to verify this claim will return only Jeff’s words – repeated endlessly ad nauseum - as to the truthfulness of this assertion. There is literally no data to substantiate this claim anywhere on the Internet. The claim exists only on the Rense website and a few other websites that have copied and pasted the Rense claims onto their own pages.

Here’s another variation on the same theme: Jeff Rense Hosts Sightings

"During 12 years as an award-winning broadcast journalist, Jeff anchored and produced more than 5,000 television newscasts. This devoted single dad is also author of the book AIDS Exposed and passionately investigates ways to prevent diseases and extend life. His brother is Rip Rense, longtime reporter for the Los Angeles Times. Jeff first did radio while an education major at the University of California Santa Barbara, and in 1994 he returned to this first love with the talk radio show "End of the Line." In 1997, by agreement with Henry ("the Fonz") Winkler and Paramount Pictures, this show transformed into the ratings star "Sightings."

*****

Based on the following article he was a former news anchor at KOBI-TV. However, if one searches KOBI, there is no information on the former popular TV news anchor/news director Jeff Rense to be found.

The Truth Is Up There

"Presiding over this conspiratorial miasma is talk-radio host Jeff Rense, whose weeknight show, Sightings, is broadcast from a studio somewhere in Southern Oregon. (Citing threats to his life, Rense asked WW not to print his exact location.) Five nights a week, millions of Americans (including an estimated 21,000 Portlanders) in 120 cities tune in to Rense to catch up on the latest news on alien abduction, Bigfoot, paranormal phenomena--and chemtrails. A former news anchor at KOBI-TV in Medford, Rense began to hear reports of chemtrails in 1999."

*****

The above page also says:

"...By the late 1980s, Rense had worked for a handful of network affiliates in the West. He said his ratings were high, and he got 'lucrative offers' from several Oregon stations. But he had also become disillusioned with TV news and decided to quit the business...." "...After walking away from his TV career path, Rense returned to Santa Barbara and opened three pet stores..."

"...By the early 1990s, he had sold his All About Pets outlets and in 1994 approached KTMS with his idea for a talk-radio show, or at least his version of one..."

A Professional Broadcast Journalist

"As an award-winning broadcast journalist, Mr. Rense has anchored and produced well over 5,000 live 30-and 60-minute television newscasts… He began his End of the Line radio show which is now in its fourth highly successful year. Recently, the End of the Line was acquired by the Premiere Radio Networks, one of the top two radio syndicators in the U.S., and renamed Sightings On The Radio through an agreement with Paramount."

"As a journalist and private citizen, he became aware of the misinformation and propaganda surrounding the worldwide AIDS epidemic. Devoting three years of his life to researching, collecting, and compiling information, Mr. Rense authored the underground best-seller, AIDS Exposed, published in 1996. This 420-page book has been acclaimed as 'overwhelming,' 'invaluable' and 'the supreme public service' by broadcasters, medical professionals, and educators alike. Appearing on scores of radio and TV talk shows as an author, Mr. Rense has also been invited to lecture at such institutions as the University of California and USC. He has also written numerous articles, papers, and reports on a wide range of subjects and acts as a consultant on many different issues."

Rense's radio show "End of the Line" was renamed "Sightings on the Radio" with Paramount's backing.

An extensive online search for articles, journalistic reports and papers from Rense’s purported pre-Rense.com prior journalism career yields nothing.

How can this possibly be if he has written ‘numerous articles, papers and reports’? His book, AIDS Exposed, does not appear to be available anymore, with the exception of potential availability of a random used copy, if you’re lucky.

A search on the publisher of this book, Bioalert Press, coughs up nothing as far as any listing for a company website. The top link on Google search for Bioalert Press says: Bookstore-- Balaam's Ass Suggests you Read These Good Books-- Health AIDS Exposed-- Jeffrey Rense-- BioAlert Press-- Order from Jeffrey Rense, Box 764, Goleta, CA 93116. www.balaams-ass.com/bookstor/health.htm -

The above Google link would not come up for me in multiple attempts on different days. Regarding the Balaam’s Ass link, one has to order the book directly from Jeff Rense. Is Bioalert Press really just Rense? Has anyone out there ever heard of BioAlert Press?

I find it very ironic that Rense claims to have become so disillusioned with the nature of the mainstream news broadcast business and its inclination to report tabloid style and sensationalistic material, when all anyone has to do is peruse the Rense.com website for 10 minutes to realize that this well-funded site – funded by the same mainstream businesses that Rense claims to detest – is full of nothing but a never-ending series of sensationalistic, tabloid-type, speculative, unsubstantiated or fabricated “news” articles. I have to ask: Is it only wrong, disillusioning and distasteful when “other” people do it, Jeff? Or are you doing it for them?

Furthermore, online searches for any evidence of Jeff Rense’s longstanding claims regarding his extremely elusive broadcast journalism career path result in even more dead ends. There is an article on the Rense website entitled “The Most Dangerous Man in Talk Radio”, authored by an alleged LA writer named Kennedy Grey.

In this article, Kennedy Grey tells us, “When Jeff Rense walked away from a #1 rated Oregon TV news anchor position, people suspected job burnout. But Rense wasn't burned out on his job - his dissatisfaction was with the entire news media mainstream itself. Grey also states that Jeff spent “Twelve years as on on-air news anchor and News Director "up and down the west coast". Grey further says, “Rense set out to re-invent himself into a liberator of truth from the confines of a corrupt and bloated news broadcast industry.” He directly quotes Jeff Rense, who states that “Radio is theatre of the mind - a classroom of the mind."

Very interesting comments, aren’t they? The news anchor/news director statement is impossible to verify via the Internet, and thus far Jeff Rense is not forthcoming with information in spite of email sent to him containing a link to our website inquiry dated Friday, May 26, 2006 entitled Who is "Jeff Rense"?.

Does anyone have a copy of any of these 5,000 Jeff Rense newscasts? We’d sure like to see one. Thus far, we have not been able to locate anyone other than one person who remembers seeing Jeff Rense anchoring a TV newscast.

Only one TV news station’s call letters has been identified thus far. KOBI-TV 5 out of Medford, Oregon, which is an NBC affiliate. Pretty slim pickings. Nevertheless, I made a few phone calls to Medford, Oregon. One would think that as popular as Jeff Rense supposedly was, surely someone would remember him from the 1980s – particularly if he had produced and anchored 5000 newscasts up and down the West Coast. I contacted the Mail Tribune and spoke with an employee in the newsroom there. She had never heard of Oregon’s (former) #1 top rated news anchor, Jeff Rense. I’m awaiting a call back from Bob Hunter, editor of the Mail Tribune newspaper, to see if he has any recollections on this matter.

“5000 newscasts” is a lot of face-time, wouldn’t you agree?

Three calls to Rense’s former place of employment, KOBI-TV, speaking to four people who worked there didn’t help Rense very much. The first three individuals I spoke to had never heard of Jeff Rense and have no idea who he is. The fourth person was the owner of KOBI-TV, Patsy Smullin.

Jeff claims to have left KOBI due to his disillusionment with the mainstream news business and the tendency of TV news to sensationalize and dip into tabloid reporting, as stated above. I read Jeff’s published claims about this to Patsy Smullin. She responded, “That’s not the reason he gave to us at all. He said he was leaving to join his wife in their pet store.” (I am currently checking out the pet store information.)

Overall, Patsy Smullin did not give the impression that Jeff Rense had been a good employee while at KOBI-TV. In fact, her remarks lead one to believe that he was dishonest and untrustworthy. It was all I could do to restrain myself from asking if he conducted newscasts while wearing a wig.

The question we are entitled to ask is: why would Jeff Rense make so many claims about himself, and why would he twist the truth and make public assertions that are simply not true? Isn’t the “reinvented Jeff Rense” supposed to be all about truth and realism as opposed to sensationalistic, tabloid-style garbage? If one looks through his massive website, is it conceivable that a person might have some difficulty trying to discern the difference between Rense shinola and honest-to-god truth? Where does one end and the other begin? Furthermore, is Jeff Rense the person we really want to ask? Maybe that’s a little like asking the Bush Gang to investigate 911? (Oh, right! That’s already been done. Vanity Fair called it a “whitewash.”)

*****

“Jeff Rense” is a familiar name to countless political/conspiracy talk radio listeners and web surfers. In these circles, virtually everyone has heard of Rense.com. What very few people realize, or have even stopped to think about, is that very little is known about Jeff Rense himself. The available online biographical information is vague and deals in generalities, and has been copied and pasted from one web page to another over the years. The Rense legend has been dished out for public consumption in small, measured doses over time in word-bytes, with hardly anyone daring to openly question its veracity. Rense fans embrace, and often even vehemently defend the legend; those who don’t end up being ridiculed and attacked. That’s a curious feature of Rense’s position as a “Don of Conspiracy Theory.”

Jeff Rense is an interesting guy, wouldn’t you say? He’s almost a “legend,” and is even listed on a government site as the number one purveyor of “misinformation.” That’s quite an accomplishment in a world where “conspiracy theories” are mostly ignored and/or ridiculed. You could even say that it’s very good PR to get on such a list.

My curiosity about Jeff Rense began to grow when I realized that he has maintained a large Internet presence for over a decade, and despite this, there is virtually no information on him other than that which one finds on his website. How has Jeff Rense managed to keep information about himself off the world wide web all these years? That’s an interesting question.

We live in a time that discourages curiosity about the ‘wrong” topics – that’s a hallmark of the Fascist Bushistas - and it seems that questioning Rense is definitely “off limits”. We have to wonder why that is? Asking questions about the ‘wrong” people is treated almost as sacrilege. We love to hold our heroes and gurus high, don’t we? But we have learned the hard way that questions are only discouraged by those who have something to hide.

What could such a nice guy, such a great “patriot” as Jeff Rense possibly have to hide?

After spending some time combing through his claims and trying to find verification, I began to realize that “Jeff Rense” is little more than a reinvention. He has made some very interesting claims over the years, particularly with respect to his former stints in broadcasting and journalism; claims that served as building blocks in the creation of a legend, a legend constructed from the twisting of truth.

Well, let’s look at “Jeff Rense” shall we?

Claim #1: On the Rense.com homepage, we see the following:

“7-time Peabody Award Nominee”

Rense Peabody Talkers claim

Peabody Awards

Truth: The Rense.com website claims 7 Peabody Award nominations. The Peabody Awards do not have nominees. Anyone can fill out an entry, and then later the winners are announced. The following is an email from the Peabody Awards Foundation:

"The Peabody Awards program receives between 1,000 and 1,200 entries each year. We have a 15 member judging panel that meets several times during the judging season, as well as listening to/watching entries alone in their homes. They discuss all entries as a group, usually awarding between 30 and 35 Peabodys each year. There are no set number of awards given, and the board does not choose winners according to categories. We do not have a list of finalists or "nominees" as other awards programs have.

Basically we have entrants and winners.

Danna L. Williams Senior Administrative Assistant, emailed Feb. 6th 2006 "

In other words, you could nominate me, I could nominate you, and we could all nominate Bozo the Clown. The Peabody panel will most likely be interested in these suggestions, but ultimately it is THEY who choose the winners – not the public. There are no official lists of “nominees”. Rense’s website claim to be a “7 Time Peabody Award Nominee” is not only misleading, it means essentially nothing. It is presented to create a false impression of Rense’s achievements, basically it’s deceptive bullshit.

Talkers Magazine

Claim # 2: The Rense website states: “Talkers magazine top 100 Host”

Talkers Magazine ‘Heavy Hundred’

Truth: Please note that Jeff Rense isn't listed in the top 100, and he isn't even listed in the additional 250 names cited in the rest of Talkers Top Radio Show Host picks for 2006. Rense failed to make the cut for 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, etc. Rense was on the list once about 6 or 7 years ago, according to a response to my inquiry from Talkers. In fact, they find it pretty interesting that Jeff Rense is continuing to present this claim on his website, creating the appearance of his inclusion on this popular list, when in fact he is currently not listed. Talkers characterized this misleading representation in one word: “deceptive”, saying they will be keeping an eye on Rense and any Talkers-related claims from here on. Take a look at the list linked above. Call Talkers Magazine and ask them yourself if he is indeed on the Heavy Hundred list.

Claim #3: Rense’s Myspace web page at:

Rense My Space Profile lists his location as Ashland, Oregon – yet his Rense.com fan page says he is in California. Which is it? Oregon or California? Does Rense have two residences? If so, how does one afford two residences on an Internet radio income?

Of course, the answer could be that one is his residence and the other is his business address, but again I ask: if he is just doing his thing because he is a “true patriot,” knowing how hard it is for other true patriots to make ends meet, we have to ask who is paying for his office? What money is backing him? His MySpace page states an income of $100,000-$150,000 per year. That’s a pretty good chunk of change for a guy who claims to be in the business out of the goodness of his heart and his interest in truth.

Claim #4: Jeff Rense From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Former television news anchorman Jeff Rense, who lives in Santa Barbara, California, is a popular conspiracy theorist and is the host of the Jeff Rense program which is broadcast on terrestrial radio and on the Internet. He originally became famous in the 90's with the program "Sightings". His radio program and website (See below) cover such subjects as UFO reports, paranormal phenomena, conspiracy theories, reports of new diseases and a plethora of other material rarely covered by the mainstream media. 

Jeff Rense leans towards a populist approach regarding politics and media. Rense does not subscribe to any conventional political standpoint and many of his views are simultaneously left and right leaning. Rense has one brother: writer, Rip Rense. His step mother, New York socialite and editor-in-chief of Architectural Digest Magazine, is Paige Rense. His father, now deceased, was sports journalist, Arthur F. Rense (1917-1990). Jeff Rense is also a vegan."

Here we learn that Rense’s views are simultaneously both left-leaning and right-leaning. Sounds like an impossible contortion to me. It is also established from more than one source that Jeff’s father, Arthur Rense, formerly a sportswriter and sometime poet, also landed a job at Douglas Aircraft doing PR. How does a poet and sports writer qualify for work as a public relations director at Douglas Aircraft, one of the biggies of the Military Industrial Complex? Here is the NY Times obituary for Arthur Rense:

Arthur F. Rense, Public Relations Executive, 74

Published: January 5, 1991

“Arthur F. Rense, a retired public relations executive, died on Dec. 28 at his home in Las Vegas, Nev. He was 74 years old. He died of leukemia, said his wife, Paige Rense, editor in chief of Architectural Digest. Mr. Rense had been director of public relations for the Summa Corporation, owned by Howard R. Hughes, until he retired in 1985. He had been public relations director for the missiles and space systems division of Douglas Aircraft Company and director of public relations at Harvey Mudd College in Claremont, Calif. Besides his wife, Mr. Rense is survived by three sons from a former marriage, Kirk of Irvine, Calif., Jeff of Santa Barbara , Calif., and Rip of Sherman Oaks, Calif.; four brothers, Randy, Andy and Frank, all of Cleveland, and William of Denver; and two grandchildren.”

Regarding Summa Corporation: The Washington Post for April 1, 1975, carried this information:

Summa Corp. is the financial umbrella under which most of (Howard)Hughes' worth is contained. . . .Most recently, another Summa "asset" hit the news: the $350 million Hughes Glomar Explorer vessel that Hughes built at the behest (and the expense of) the Central Intelligence Agency . . . Mormons, Hughes, & CIA

Summa Corporation has been tied to CIA contracts on more than one occasion, to say the least. Douglas Aircraft Company is also well-known for its numerous government contracts, not to mention the starring role it is now playing in Bush’s Endless War. So again I ask: how did “poet and sports writer” Arthur Rense end up as public relations director for Douglas Aircraft and Summa Corp? In bed with the Feds? More importantly, what kind of connections does his son Jeff have with these same gangs? After all, his views are “both left and right” which suggests that he could have “left” views to vacuum in his audience all the while subtly converting them to “right” views.

Douglas Aircraft also has ties with RAND Corporation:

RAND (Encyclopedia)

The RAND Corporation is an American think tank.

"A think tank is a group of individuals dedicated to high-level synergistic research on a variety of subjects, usually in military laboratories, corporations,... first formed to offer research and analysis to the U.S. military. The organization has since expanded to working with other government and commercial organizations Project RAND was set up in 1945 by the USAAF, under contract to the Douglas Aircraft Company. An interesting aside, Condoleezza Rice is a former RAND CorporationTrustee 1991-1997 and current Secretary of State for the United States, a war whore if ever there was one."

Okay, I think everybody knows that Summa, Douglas Aircraft, and RAND are all major players with DOD, military and intelligence agencies in the fascist government that Jeff Rense claims to oppose. Yet we find that his father, Arthur Rense, poet, sports writer, was “somehow” a public relations director for both Douglas Aircraft and Summa Corporation? I would very much like to hear Jeff Rense publicly discuss this curious fact one of these fine days and explain how he could live much of his life with alphabet soup guys swarming around and avoid being sucked into the game. Funny how this topic never seems to come up, isn’t it? Perhaps he just keeps forgetting to mention it.

Now I want to come back to the fact that Jeff Rense has been “honored” by being listed on an official government website as a major purveyor of “disinformation.” Among the conspiracy minded crowd, that is a high kudo indeed. But is it evidence that Jeff truly is a news source standing in opposition to the Bush Reich and their Endless Wars of Lies and Aggression? Maybe not. As Robin Ramsay, Editor of Lobster Magazine, wrote in the February issue of Fortean Times:

Recently, the US State Department has begun trying to rebut some of the current conspiracy theories about America. Their first targets were a couple of websites - www.rense.com and Conspiracy Planet - and the late Joe Vialls, an Australian. What a boost for the named sites! Attacked by the State Department![...]

[Y]ou don't have to be a PR genius to see that what you simply mustn't do is launch official attacks: all they do is amplify and legitimize the theories by announcing that they are deemed to be worth attacking. [Fortean Times 206, February 2006, p. 19]

What a coup for Rense and Alex Jones! To be officially declared the primo disinfo sites! Now, if you know anything about COINTELPRO, you expect that the real COINTELPRO operations will be attacked "officially" in order to legitimize them exactly as Robin Ramsay has described. That also means that those who are honest and sincere seekers of truth and who do their homework and expose the lies of the Bush Reich will most certainly NOT be martyred by the official government. It's way too dangerous and gives them legitimacy. 

Rather, they will be defamed by the “officially designated disinformation agents” – and dare we say it? – agents of COINTELPRO - such as Jeff Rense, Alex Jones and similar disinformation agents that have received the Bush Reich seal of approval. In fact, it seems that this is a well-orchestrated plan that is described in detail in that much maligned document, “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.” A really good way to keep your eye on the ball is to consider Protocol 12...

Now, it is important when reading the Protocols to not assign it's origin to any national, ethnic, or religious group. Rather, consider it to be a statement of any group that seeks to control and dominate and use the public for their own gain Then you will truly begin to understand who is who. (Excerpts of Protocol 12: Control of the Press are located at the end of this article):

Recently, Jeff Rense accused WING TV of engaging in deception, trickery, subterfuge, lying, slandering and libel, just to name a few of the charges. He has publicly called Victor Thorn and myself “dirtball scum” and together with Alex Jones and their groupies, charged us with being “cointelpro assets, government agents and un-American operatives." True to form and apparently attached to Rense at the hip and the lip, (and linked on the official government site, I should add), Alex Jones reinforces, endorses, and repeats Rense’s vomitus, only louder. What’s amusing about this is that Rense, Jones, nor any of their groupie parrots have yet to substantiate any of these bogus charges made against us.

Let me get this straight: nobody has to qualify with data anything they say, including (and particularly) veteran journalist Jeff Rense? Alex Jones has yet to qualify any of his ridiculous comments about us either, and he refuses to hold himself accountable for his own words.

Ask yourself: Why? Is it conceivable to anyone out there that they cannot PROVE the things they say about WING TV? Moreover, this begs the question, can they prove any and all of the other “gospel-truth” claims they’ve made over the years? That is another very good question.

You see, we are supposed to just believe what they say simply because they say it. Forget about facts, data or substantiation. Forget about showing evidence of their assertions; forget about journalistic ethics; just nod your head and agree. Don’t ask questions. Gobble up the lies and twisted half-truths and get your fill of the fix du jour. After all, in the words of Jeff Rense, it is all a “theater of the mind”.

What we observe is that both Rense and Jones pander to a “least common denominator” audience demographic, the people out there who don’t bother to check things out for themselves and will just repeat what they hear and read over and over, like good little automatons. This is the ideal Rense-Jones target audience, one which will worship blindly, surrender critical thinking skills, believe without questioning or disagreement, and of course, shell out the bucks.

Incidentally, I did a search on Kennedy Grey, the LA writer who penned the article about Rense entitled “The Most Dangerous Man in Talk Radio”. He (she) is supposedly the founder of a group called RAS, an acronym for ‘Rock Against Suicide’. Unfortunately, a Google search for Kennedy Grey did not yield a website for the RAS group anywhere, but there is an interview with Kennedy Grey on this website: The Internet Nirvana Fan club.

Nirvana Fan Club. Oh boy, how impressive. A Curt Cobain suicide website.

I was not able to find any links online to Grey’s organization, RAS, or to Kennedy Grey, other than the single article he wrote which is published on Rense.com. I would like to find Kennedy Grey and ask whether he/she even bothered to check out any of the claims Rense made to him in the interview. I’d like to learn if Kennedy Grey is a real person, for that matter, or just a construct of Rense. Whatever the case may be, it doesn’t look like Grey checked out any of the statements Rense made in that interview. If some fact-checking had been done, Grey’s article would probably be written a bit differently. At the very least, it should have been.

Rense and Alex Jones enjoy howling that “Honest-to-God patriots" NEVER attack other patriots. That sounds a lot like:

"For any attempt to attack us, if such still be possible, we shall inflict fines without mercy…. No one shall with impunity lay a finger on the aureole of our government infallibility. The pretext for stopping any publication will be the alleged plea that it is agitating the public mind without occasion or justification." [Protocols]

The fact is, those who do the research know that the Founding Fathers engaged in a great deal of spirited, heated, sincere dispute with one another. Some of them hated one another with a passion, yet in spite of this animosity, worked together for the common good of all; as the cause was greater than themselves, and they all knew this to be true. So where do Rense and Jones come off bellowing such obnoxious bullshit, especially when we consider the fact that merely branding oneself a “patriot” does not necessarily make it so. I could call myself “Madonna”, but that doesn’t mean I AM Madonna.

Appearances can be very deceiving, especially when some so-called “patriots” choose to hide behind microphones in undisclosed locations, behind wigs and a couple of re-touched, photo-shopped cartoon pictures of themselves, and when all they choose to disclose is a limited amount of extremely vague babble about their alleged past accomplishments, achievements, or experience designed solely to “create a legend”.

And then, when we discover, with a minimum of investigation, that their claims do not hold up, that it is all completely manipulated, twisted, exaggerated, amplified and contorted facts designed to present a false front, we are entitled to question everything else. Why do people tell lies, whether overtly or by omission? Some do it because of mental issues, some do it for profit, and some do it just because they can.

Bottom line: Jeff Rense has falsely accused WING TV of trading in lies, deception, duplicity, innuendo, disinformation and trickery. Jeff Rense better start looking in the mirror, because I see a so-called “patriot” that needs to come clean about a few things, someone who is “not known for his honesty”.

Definitions of deception on the Web:

• misrepresentation: a misleading falsehood

• the act of deceiving

• magic trick: an illusory feat; considered magical by naive observers

• Deception is providing intentionally misleading information to others.

• To practice deceit.

• To give a false impression: appearances can deceive.

• To cause to believe what is not true; mislead.

• to cause to accept as true or valid what is false or invalid intransitive verb : to practice deceit

• be false to; be dishonest with - 2: cause someone to believe an untruth

Stay tuned, because this investigation is not over. More to follow soon.

"The big print giveth and the small print taketh away."

~ Tom Waitts

NTS Notes:  There used to be a lot of questions about Victor Thorn and Lisa Guliani at WingTV over their ethics and whether or not they themselves are agents of disinformation.  However, this article is extremely interesting, well written by Lisa Guliani, and does make anyone stop and think about Jeff Rense, and definitely places him in a different light.

We know that the criminals will put up websites to mislead people and to lead them astray.  We can also see how the US Government has placed their own agents on the internet to put up disinformation.   Therefore the question becomes:  Is Jeff Rense one of these agents of disinformation? 

I used to list Jeff Rense in my links column, but after his atrocious and ridiculous flare up with Mark Glenn,  I made the decision to delist him and his site.    It is a fact that as long as we stay divided over ridiculously silly spats and trivial matters, the criminals win!

Again, thanks to my friend Noor for this article. 

More to come

NTS

From The Files Of Absurdity, Volume CLIII: The Laughable Latest "Terrorist Attack" That Never Was!

I have received several emails asking my opinion on the latest so called false flag attack that supposedly involved a toner cartridge with a circa 1980's circuit board supposedly being sent from Yemen to be delivered to Synagogues in Chicago.   After watching all of the absolute BS coming out of the US Zionist jewish controlled Mainstream media, I laughed so hard that it was difficult for me to believe that anyone would actually fall for this laugher.   But I figure I would put in my 2 cents worth, and file this one as a definite File of (Absolute) Absurdity.

Before I go into my own commentaries about this laugher of a "terrorist attack", I want to place in this article an excellent article from Mike Rivero at www.whatreallyhappened.com, entitled: "The UPS Terror Flight From Yemen That Never Was".   It contains some great details on this false flag attack, and I am enclosing the entire article here for my own readers to view:



THE UPS TERROR FLIGHT FROM YEMEN THAT NEVER 
WAS!

Obama's "scare the Americans into voting Democratic" plan is already in trouble. The official story on Friday October 29th was that an unnamed ally issued a warning for British authorities to be on the lookout for a suspicious package sent from Yemen to Great Britain on a UPS flight. A search of the UPS flighty on the ground in Britain yielded a package containing a printer toner cartridge sprayed with a white substance that looks like plastic Christmas tree snow.

To make the "toner cartridge of death" look even scarier, a circuit board was attached to the outside with wires. Careful analysis of the card itself suggests it is a circuit card from a TV set, most likely the tuner, circa 1980s

Note carefully there is no battery to power this object, nor were any detonators found.

The initial reports of the toner cartridge reported no explosives were found in it.

Of course, Obama claimed exactly the opposite, which left the BBC struggling to placate the President while not allowing themselves to look like they were changing the original story to do it!

But the story gets better! The original claim was that the suspicious package originated in Yemen and flew to Britain on an aircraft owned by UPS, and the media showed us all the video of a UPS aircraft being stopped and searched on the runway in Britain.

But there is a problem. There are no UPS aircraft flying in and out of Yemen!

UPS own website (from before the so-called terror incident) does not list Yemen as one of their service regions.

A PDF file (which includes the history of the document from weeks ago) listing of all the international airports the UPS aircraft fleet flies to does not list Yemen as a destination!

In short, there was not and could not be a UPS aircraft flying out of Yemen.

UPS uses a subcontractor, Sun Tours, to handle shipping in and out of Yemen. Sun Tours sends their shipments via Yemenia Air, and Yemenia Air's Cargo Director reports there were no shipments sent through Yemen to Chicago for the 48 hours prior to the "discovery" of the toner cartridge in Britain.

A second claim that a flight from Dubais carried packages from Yemen has been refuted by the United Arab Emirates� Civil Aviation Authority.

In short a toner cartridge that cannot explode shows up on a UPS jet which could not have come from Yemen, and Obama pounds it for all its worth trying to save the Democrats next Tuesday. Frankly I think Americans should be outraged not that Obama tried such a stunt, but that after all the times Bush was caught using terror scares for political gain that Obama thinks you are all stupid enough to fall for it again! If tonight's polls are accurate, you weren't and you didn't and Obama may have just screwed his own party to the point where they are all praying for Diebold to save them!

NTS Notes:  Mike is right on the money with his facts presented here.   It must also be noted that since this What Really Happened article came out several days ago, the case against the first suspect, a woman out of Yemen, has fallen apart, and the US is still scrambling to blame this laugher of a "terrorist attack" on someone.    

Readers, the facts are simple... This latest phony false flag attack has Mossad/CIA written all over it.   The idea of this laugher was to again scare the American public that "Al Qaeda" is launching new terrorist threats against the United States, and that the American public should somehow rally behind their leadership to fight this absolutely phony and artificial terrorist organization.  

We all know by now that Al Qaeda itself is totally phony and is nothing more than a creation of the CIA and the Mossad for their just as phony "war on terror".   This laugher has all the earmarks of being the latest in their long list of false flag terrorist attacks to keep people in a state of fear.    Therefore it is so obvious that these two evil groups are actually behind this latest phony terror attack!

It is also a fact that there is no coincidence that this laugher is happening just before the US mid-term elections.  The Democratic party in the US is actually under the belief that the American public would be so fearful of "terrorist" attacks that they would rally behind their leadership and somehow give the President and his party the vote on Tuesday!   I cannot believe that these morons would actually think the American public would fall for this scam.

Welcome to my latest chapter in my Files Of Absurdity, readers.   This one is absolutely pathetic and shows that the criminals are running out of ideas on how to fool the people when they try to pull off this laugher.   Did they really think the American people are this stupid?

More to come

NTS

Zionist Treachery: A Matter Of Choice, Or Simple Law Of Gravity!

No man can serve two masters.   That readers is fact.   The United States right now allows for dual citizenship for all people of the Jewish faith.  They are allowed to be both citizens of the United States and the state of Israel.   But there has always been a question that has bugged me for years when I hear about these "dual citizens", and that is simple:  Where is their allegiance?  Do they fully support their host country, the United States, or are they willing to do anything for Israel?


Well, to give my own readers a better understanding of the importance of allegiance, I want to present the following article from Mark Glenn, at www.theuglytruth.wordpress.com, that ponders the questions of loyalty and allegiance to their country.  The article is entitled: "Zionist Treachery - A Matter Of Choice, Or Simple Law Of Gravity" and I am enclosing it in its entirety for my own readers to view and ponder:

Zionist Treachery–A Matter of Choice or Simple Law of Gravity?

In Uncategorized on November 1, 2010 by crescentandcross

Leapin’ lizards, what IS it with these people? I mean, is it something as primal as magnetic pull that they gravitate towards betrayal, deceit and treason? After all, the law of averages says that once in a while–like the proverbial broken clock being right twice a day–they have to be loyal, even if only ACCIDENTALLY.

We are not asking this rhetorically. Curious minds REALLY want to know, and not in the salacious way some tabloid asks whether or not so-and-so starlet is carrying the love child of some space alien, but rather for reasons involving life and death on a mass scale. Why does it seem that every time at that proverbial fork in the road when they can choose “A”–which is to stand by the country of their origin to which they owe their allegiance–they seem to be propelled towards “B” with the G-force of a Minuteman rocket? Is it that tendency described in the story of the scorpion and the frog, that they simply can’t help themselves and are dealing with internal forces of nature as powerful as gravity?

The latest event causing this question to burn in those aforementioned inquiring minds stems from the very-public/ organized push to see convicted spy for Israel Jonathon Pollard released from the same prison cell he should thank his lucky stars he’s in, given the severity of his crimes. In a piece appearing in the LA Times written by former Reagan administration assistant Secretary of Defense Lawrence Korb entitled “Free Jonathan Pollard” we in the sane world are now treated to YET ANOTHER, SURPRISE SURPRISE, verbal tapdance that Israel and her supporters perform whenever they get ants in their pants over some issue. A few of the mind-boggling whoppers include the following–

“About 25 years ago, Jonathan Jay Pollard, a U.S. naval intelligence analyst, betrayed his country by providing highly classified information to Israel. Even though Israel was and still is a U.S. ally and is routinely supplied with U.S. intelligence, Pollard deserved to be severely punished for his actions. However, the punishment should fit the crime. In his case, it does not…”

Ok, let’s just press “pause” here for a minute and dissect this frog scientifically. “Pollard betrayed his country”–First, let’s not make the mistake of thinking that Korb is saying this because he believes it. This is a typical theatrical technique that people of Korb’s ilk employ when they want to gain the trust of the seated jury, something proven correct in the last statement of that paragraph when he talks about the “punishment fitting the crime”. What Korb is banking on here is that the readers of his piece of lying propaganda do not know that treason is a capital offence. Pollard did not simply sell trivial information to Israel, he gave away the store. His crimes led to the deaths of over 1,000 American intelligence assets/agents and PERMANENTLY compromised America’s methods and means of acquiring sensitive intelligence.

Korb continues–

“The average sentence meted out to individuals convicted of giving classified information to an ally is seven years, with average time served about four years.”

Again, this was not just “classified” information. It was life or death/do or die intelligence that directly jeopardized the physical well-being of hundreds of millions of Americans, and continues to do so. Secondly, Korb’s offhand statement that Israel is an “ally” of America has got to be one of the sickest jokes ever told, on par with those publicly making fun of paraplegics and people born with birth defects. Israel is as much an ally to the US as a virus is to any healthy body. The Jewish state has murdered American citizens on several occasions, including her deliberate attack on the USS LIBERTY in 1967, her role in the Marine barracks bombings in Beirut in 1983 and her role in allowing 911 to take place. Saying that Israel is in any way friendly to the US is no different than a mob lawyer trying to sway a jury away from convicting his client with the argument that he provides much-needed jobs for the community while not mentioning that these “jobs” revolve around prostitution, drugs, gambling, and murder for hire.

“The question is why Pollard received such a harsh sentence and why he still languishes in prison despite the pleas of hundreds of U.S. legislators, dozens of distinguished attorneys (including a former solicitor general), a former CIA director, one former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee and several Israeli leaders to have him released…There are at least three reasons for this state of affairs. First is the victim impact statement of my former boss, Caspar Weinberger, the secretary of Defense at the time of Pollard’s arrest. The statement, much of which remains classified, implied that some of the information that Pollard had supplied to Israel made its way to the Soviet Union. Weinberger argued that Pollard was no different from spies who provided information to the Soviets and was guilty of treason.

Yes, and I think we can safely say that Weinberger, tasked as he was with the relatively unimportant role of Sec of Defense, knew what he was talking about. So do you Korb, but what is at stake here is not the national security of the United States, but rather what is good for “home sweet home”, meaning Israel.

“Weinberger’s contention has been debunked. Information that Pollard gave to Israel did not make its way to the USSR. Instead, the information that the Soviets received during the 18 months Pollard was spying for Israel most likely came from Ames and Robert Hanssen, a onetime FBI agent who spied for the USSR and Russia from 1979 to 2001.”

WRONG, and here Korb shows the true magnetic pull Israel’s supporters have towards lying and treachery when speaking in the court of public opinion. Israel traded that information to the USSR in return for increased emigration quotas that would allow Soviet Jews to come to Israel and that is an undisputed fact and we can all be rest assured that Korb knows this.

“In 1998, the Israeli government finally admitted that Pollard was one of its agents, granted him Israeli citizenship and has sought clemency for him from three U.S. presidents. Finally, Pollard himself not only expressed remorse before the sentencing judge but has done so several times publicly over the past 25 years (and the government has conceded that the jailhouse interviews had to have been authorized).

News flash here Korb–all caught criminals express remorse. It’s a ploy to get a reduced sentence and the fact you would include this in your argument is an insult to the intelligence of the readers of your inane article. Furthermore, Israel would absolutely LOVE to get Pollard sprung from his cage for 3 reasons–first and foremost is that Pollard still has information related to US National security that would be dangerous if he were released, (2) it would be a huge propaganda coup for Israel and her supporters in the US, showing how the US willingly slits her own throat when Jews demand it and (3) would go a long way towards alleviating/eliminating the fears that Israeli spies harbor towards getting caught viz a viz waging war against America.

“Some now argue that Pollard should be released because it would improve U.S.-Israeli relations and enhance the prospects of success of the Obama administration’s Middle East peace process…”

Again, this is akin to the “Free Al Capone because he does a lot for the city”s economy” argument. Have these people ANY shame?

But then, I have just asked something where the answer is contained in the question itself. Like albinos born without any pigment in their skin, hair, and eyes, supporters of Israel are born without any sense of objective right or wrong, where God is not some omnipotent force that demands good and commands against evil, but rather is the Jewish people and their political creature known as Israel.

Probably the best argument however, as to whether Israel’s supporters indeed have a gravitational pull towards treachery when it comes to doing Israel’s bidding came from Jonathon Pollard himself who, when being interrogated by the Naval officer responsible for arresting him had the following to say–

“The US should never give security clearances to Jews, because when asked to, we are willing to do whatever is necessary for our country, Israel.”

© 2010 Mark Glenn

NTS Notes:  This article focuses in on the question of allegiance by the case of Jonathan Pollard and his treasonous actions against the United States.  It is remarkable that this criminal is haled as a hero in Israel for acts of treason against Israel's biggest supporter.


In a real world ruled by law, Jonathan Pollard would be executed for treason.  But such is the power of Zionist Jews in America that Pollard may actually be released soon and be allowed to escape to Israel!


I started this article by stating a very important statement, and this is absolutely true when it comes to the Zionist Jewish question of allegiance.   We need to understand that these people, the tribe or the "chosen ones" as they like to be called, swear their undying love and allegiance to Israel first and foremost.    Because of their allegiance to Israel, it is obvious that the majority of them would sell the United States and any other of their host nations down the river in a heartbeat.   The evidence is so clear when we look at what  Jonathan Pollard did in giving away secrets because of his loyalty to Israel first and foremost.


To give the criminal Zionist Jews the right  to dual citizenship between their host nations and the criminal state of Israel has allowed some of these people to do acts of treason and in some cases irreparable damage to their host nations.   Therefore the policy of allowing dual citizenship for these criminals must end immediately!


More to come


NTS