Tuesday, November 3, 2020

The COVID-19 Hoax: Attention Ontario Canada Readers - Action Required As Ontario Legislature Bill 218 About To Be Passed To "Shield" Criminals In Ontario From Any Liabilities Due To The COVID Scam-demic!

I am like everyone else right now... Waiting to see how BADLY the criminal Demon-rats aka Communists have STOLEN the 2020 Presidential voting and thus insert their criminal and most evil SOB "creepy" Joe Biden into the White House... And the Demon-rat win is almost a certainty thanks to the 80 MILLION mail in ballots that will absolutely be at least '90%' in favour of Joe Biden... Yes, the American republic will indeed be over within the next 3-4 hours, and sadly the American people stood by and allowed the theft and destruction of their once great nation take place, and DID NOTHING to stop it!

Meanwhile... The war on the fraud COVID-19 hoax up here in central Canada continues, as I will bet that the criminal Pallister regime that runs Manitoba will indeed bring in their 'curfews' and further destroy the lives of Manitobans.... It is indeed diabolical and sadly the sheep here in this province are indeed too brainwashed and stupid now to stop the further erosion of their rights and freedoms..

But the criminality here in Manitoba apparently is NOTHING in comparison to what is quietly happening next door, east of here, in Ontario..... And to show how truly diabolical the Ontario provincial government in Toronto really is, I want to present the following article that comes from the Our Greater Destiny website at www.ourgreaterdestiny.org, where the criminals in the Ontario Conservative party that has been destroying that province with its ludicrous "COVID rules" has now quickly and silently (criminally) filed a new 'bill' in the Ontario Legislature, "Bill 218", that if passed will give those bastards IMMUNITY from any prosecution if and when the entire COVID-19 scam-demic collapses and the people of Ontario go after those pricks for ruining their lives!  Here in fact is that article, and I do have my own thoughts and comments to follow:

ACTION REQUIRED BILL 218 ONTARIO BY NOV 04.20

Bill 218 Ontario Recovery and Municipal Actions Act 2020

We need people to respond by Nov 04.20 to Bill 218 

On ‘short’ notice Ontario introduces Bill 218 to create a shield from COVID-19 liability

Bill 218 if passed would be retroactive to March 17, and requires people harmed as a result of exposure to the coronavirus to prove gross negligence. https://ddohealthlaw.com/blog/

Ontario will provide liability protection to some workers, businesses and non-profits against COVID-19 exposure-related lawsuits. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/covid-19-liability-protection-legislation-ontario-1.5769801

Bill 218 ends responsible government

Randy Hillier, MPP Lanark-Frontenac-Kingson https://www.actforcanada.ca/l/explained-doug-fords-bill-218-would-throw-out-covid-19-lawsuits-against-ontario-government/

Here’s what you can do

Below is my response to Bill 218. There were too many emails to send in one email so I sent two emails.

Simply copy and paste portions or all of my response below. Or email your own response. In Microsoft WORD under OPTIONS, Delivery Receipt, click Request a delivery and Request a read receipt. Uncheck Do not deliver before 5 pm. 

Bill 218 falsely affirms an infectious disease called COVID19 when in fact SARS-COV2, as many now know, has never been proven to exist, and even more alarmingly, SARS-COV2 is harmless to humans. See #2 below.

It is VITAL to speak up otherwise silence is tacit or implied consent. It is also VITAL to inform government of fact based evidence as follows. Please share soonest possible.

From: Doreen <earthcentral@rogers.com>
Sent: November 3, 2020 12:56 PM
To: comm-justicepolicy@ola.org
Cc: roman.baber@pc.ola.orgeffie.triantafilopoulos@pc.ola.orgwill.bouma@pc.ola.orgLCollard.mpp.co@liberal.ola.orgparm.gill@pc.ola.orgnatalia.kusendova@pc.ola.orgdoug.downey@pc.ola.org
Subject: BILL 218 SCHEDULE 1 AND 2 RESPONSE NOTICE

Also emailed to: SMorrison-QP@ndp.on.calindsey.park@pc.ola.orgGSingh-QP@ndp.on.canina.tangri@pc.ola.orgKYarde-QP@ndp.on.cavania.cecchin@ontario.caskee@ibc.cadr.david.williams@ontario.cainfo@gg.ca

WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT RECOURSE

This Notice is non-consent to Bill 218 https://www.ola.org/en/legislative-business/bills/parliament-42/session-1/bill-218 based on the following:

1] Conditions to declare an emergency in Ontario were not, and are not demonstrably justified; evidenced below,
2] Supreme Court Ruling 1959: No public official is above the law nor entitled to immunity,
3] Criminal Code Disobeying a Statute.  

SCHEDULE 1 Supporting Ontario’s Recovery Act, 2020

This NOTICE is to advise that conditions to declare an emergency in Ontario prescribed in Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act S 7.0.1 (1), 7.0.2 (1), 7.0.2 (3)(1) were not, and are not demonstrably justified as prescribed in CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 PART I, S 1 THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS:

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:

COVID19 measures contravene CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 S 2, 6(2)(b), 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, 26, 31 and 52(1):

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-15.html#h-39

Primacy of Constitution of Canada

S 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

CRIMINAL CODE
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/FullText.html  
Disobeying a statute

S 126 (1) Every person who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament by intentionally doing anything that it forbids or by intentionally omitting to do anything that it requires to be done is, unless a punishment is expressly provided by law, guilty of 

  1. (a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years; or
  2. (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

COVID19 MEASURES NOT DEMONSTRABLY JUSTIFIED

  1. WHERE IS THE PROOF?

There is no proof SARS-COV 2 was ever isolated using Koch’s postulates the gold standard of medical testing, to prove it causes a disease called COVID19. https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/09/scientists-have-utterly-failed-to-prove-that-the-coronavirus-fulfills-kochs-postulates










HEALTH CANADA
No record of “COVID-19 virus” isolation. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Health-Canada-FinalResponse-A-2020-00208-2020-06-13.pdf

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA
No record of “COVID-19 virus” isolation https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/NRC-A2020-0010-Response-NIL.pdf

No record of “COVID19 virus” isolation received from City of Mississauga, University of Toronto, McMaster University, Sunnybrook HSC, Mount Sinai Hospital, Ontario. McGill University, Montreal, Quebec. University of Saskatchewan. Public Health UK, Wales, Ireland, New Zealand, Australia. Copies available on request.

David Crowe 1956-2020 was a Canadian software and telecommunications engineer with a degree in mathematics and biology who became an independent expert in 21st Century global infections such as SARS, Ebola and flu.

June 06.2020 Page 5 Virus Existence: Scientists are detecting novel RNA in multiple patients with influenza or pneumonia-like conditions, and are assuming that the detection of RNA (which is believed to be wrapped in proteins to form an RNA virus, as coronaviruses are believed to be) is equivalent to isolation of the virus. It is not, and one of the groups of scientists was honest enough to admit this: “we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood” [2]

Another paper quietly admitted “our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates”. https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf

July 13, 2020 CDC Admits no quantified virus

Page 39 Performance Characteristics: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA”. https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download Use of the term “quantified” means the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.

  1. CDC EVIDENCE: SARS-COV 2 is harmless to humans

June 20, 2020 Even more alarming, ONLY POISONED MONKEY KIDNEY CELLS ‘GREW’ THE ‘VIRUS’. The SARS-COV 2 virus was unable to be cultured in any of the human cell lines scientists used.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States

“Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T).  In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells. … Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection. No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells, which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection.  In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection.” https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article 

Dr. Thomas Cowan
 is an American Scientist, Physician, and anthroposophist. He served as vice president of the Physicians’ Association for Anthroposophic Medicine and is a founding board member of the Weston A. Price Foundation.

“The shocking thing about the above quote is that using their own methods, virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. These virologists, published by the CDC, performed clear proof on their terms showing that SARS-COV- 2 virus is harmless to human beings.” https://drtomcowan.com/only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus/

      3. LEGAL

1] On July 06, 2020, a Statement of Claim was filed against the Government of Canada, Government of Ontario, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, various public health officials, and Canadian Broadcasting Corporation for COVID19 measures not demonstrably justifiedhttps://vaccinechoicecanada.com/wp-content/uploads/vcc-statement-of-claim-2020-redacted.pdf

2] Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is a member of the German Corona Investigative Committee. Crimes against humanity Statement of Claim: https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2020/10/04/german-corona-investigative-committee Video disabledat https://healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com/2020/10/04/crimes-against-humanity-cdc-admits-covid19-test-does-not-exist/

3] Malfeasance lawsuit filed against government of Canada includes COVID19 measures. Scroll down the page to download Court File CV-20-167 https://thepowershift.ca/

  1. DEATHS – COMPARABLE TO REGULAR FLU SEASON

Sept 2020, CBC reported 9,200 people died in Canada ‘with’ COVID19. In a population of almost 38 million 9,200 deaths equal .00024% or less than ¼ of 1% comparable to a regular flu seasonhttps://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/public-health-agency-of-canada-covid-19-statistics-1.5733069

Deaths with COVID19 are not the same as deaths from COVID19. Government death guidelines require the cause of death to be COVID19 if the subject tested positive, which ignores comorbidity, serious injuries from accidents, and are based on an unreliable RT-PCR test not intended to detect infectious diseases thus stated by its inventor Kary Mullis.

Oct 26.20 Statistics Canada reported 9,936 COVID19 deaths in Canada or ¼ of 1% comparable to a regular flu season.

  1. COVID19 MEASURES EXEMPTION

Business owners who refuse to serve unmasked people exempt from COVID19 measures, not demonstrably justified, contravene the CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 S 2,7,8,9,15, 52(1). specifically the compulsory wearing of face masks https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/wp-content/uploads/vcc-statement-of-claim-2020-redacted.pdf

1959 Supreme Court Judgment RONCARELLI VS. DUPLESSIS  https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/2751/index.do

Roncarelli vs. Duplessis, [1959] S.C.R. 121, was a landmark constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where the Court held that Quebec Premier Maurice Duplessis had overstepped his authority by revoking the liquor license of a Jehovah’s Witness.

Justice Ivan Rand wrote in his often-quoted reasons that the unwritten constitutional principle of the “rule of law” meant no public official was above the law and so could neither suspend nor dispense it. Although Duplessis had authority under the relevant legislation, his decision was not based on any factors related to the operation of the license but was made for unrelated reasons and so was held to be exercised arbitrarily and without good faith.

The six judges who sided with Roncarelli used different legal reasoning to reach their decision. Three judges wrote that Duplessis had ordered the cancellation outside his authority as premier; two judges stated that although Duplessis had the power to order the cancellation, he had done so in bad faith; and the sixth judge concluded the premier was not entitled to immunity as a public officialhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roncarelli_v_Duplessis

SCHEDULE 2 Municipal Elections Act, 1996

Limiting advance notice to comprehend and respond to Bill 218, limiting public hearings to 6 hours, and limiting time for public comment

  1. Treat members of the human family as if they have no dignity nor worth,
  2. Distort justice, negatively impact comfort of the public, and risk peace,
  3. Restrict understanding and mutual respect, and prevent each of us from feeling part of the community, and contributing fully to the development and well being of the community and Province,
  4. Contravene the Human Rights Code, Canadian Bill of Rights and Criminal Code Disobeying a Statute as follows: 

Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19
https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90h19

Preamble

And Whereas it is public policy in Ontario to recognize the dignity and worth of every person and to provide for equal rights and opportunities without discrimination that is contrary to law, and having as its aim the creation of a climate of understanding and mutual respect for the dignity and worth of each person so that each person feels a part of the community and able to contribute fully to the development and well-being of the community and the Province;

Canadian Bill of Rights
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-12.3/page-1.html

Preamble

The Parliament of Canada, affirming that the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that acknowledge the supremacy of God, the dignity and worth of the human person and the position of the family in a society of free men and free institutions;

Affirming also that men and institutions remain free only when freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and the rule of law;

And being desirous of enshrining these principles and the human rights and fundamental freedoms derived from them,in a Bill of Rights which shall reflect the respect of Parliament for its constitutional authority and which shall ensure the protection of these rights and freedoms in Canada.

CRIMINAL CODE
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/FullText.html
Disobeying a statute

S 126 (1) Every person who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament by intentionally doing anything that it forbids or by intentionally omitting to do anything that it requires to be done is, unless a punishment is expressly provided by law, guilty of

  1. (a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years; or
  2. (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Maxims of Law

A verbis legis non est recedendum.
From the words of the law there must be no departure. Broom’s Max. 268; 5 Rep. 119; Wing. Max. 25.

Idem est facere, et nolle prohibere cum possis.
It is the same thing to do a thing as not to prohibit it when in your power. 3 Co. Inst. 178. 

Qui tacet consentire videtur.
He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32

Without Prejudice and Without Recourse
Doreen A Agostino
York Region, Ontario

NTS Notes: Honestly, I KNEW that eventually something like this was going to happen... And it makes sense that these pricks in Ontario are beginning to run scared as LAWSUITS are indeed being launched everywhere across the US right now against the pricks that destroyed their lives with this 'COVID' bullshit... 

It therefore would only be a matter of time, once the lawsuits are successful in the US, that they come to Canada and the citizens go after our crooked governments for the destruction of our economy and their livelihoods as well..

I do hope that I am not too late in alerting Ontario readers of this blog to this heinous act... November 4th is indeed tomorrow, so time is now of the essence to make everyone east of  here aware of this...

Let us all make sure that these criminal pricks do NOT escape justice and rightful prosecution for this entire scam-demic... I personally have been pushing hard for months now to see the Pallister criminals right here in Manitoba never ever escape justice for the lives that they have destroyed, and I am firmly in the belief that the re-introduction of Capital Punishment in this nation must be done to properly have ALL of these criminals responsible get exactly what they truly deserve!

Again, do NOT let these criminals escape and be able to flee from what they deserve... Let us make sure that there is nowhere to run and no where to hide for these monsters.

More to come

NTS


4 comments:

greencrow said...

Isn't this what I was warning about a couple of months ago when RAH one of my sources tipped me off about Bill 19 [appropriately named] which the BC legislature passed and which gave the BC government immunity against any negative consequences of the CovID plandemic.

I asked other bloggers to check their own provincial legislatures to see if similar legislation was being passed.

They are ALL crooks and Liars. But we have them on the run out here in BC...thanks to a very dedicated group of activists with a sound communication network.

This war and we need warriors!

greencrow said...

Here is the Bill. See if it's the same as the Ontario one and then look for similar legislation in your province.

https://www.leg.bc.ca/parliamentary-business/legislation-debates-proceedings/41st-parliament/5th-session/bills/first-reading/gov19-1

Penny said...

Hey North and GC:

I covered this news nearly two weeks ago and shared it over at Off Guardian cause I know there are some Ontario residents there as well

http://pennyforyourthoughts2.blogspot.com/2020/10/yahoo-doug-ford-puts-real-iron-ring-of.html

Ontario's Progressive Conservative government has introduced new legislation that could potentially shield itself, as well as long-term care homes, from COVID-19-related lawsuits, as long as the parties acted in "good faith" during the pandemic.

Attorney General Doug Downey tabled the "Supporting Ontario's Recovery Act," which would introduce a new test for Ontario judges to consider before allowing a COVID-19 civil suit to proceed: whether an "honest effort" was made to follow public health guidelines and laws related to the pandemic.


Sadly the yahoo has a majority here.

Thinking....... said...

Ford apparently sent sick people from Hospitals to Old folks homes. I call that premeditated murder. Even a common cold could kill some of the old folks in those homes. The ordinary flu would also. So in my books he is a mass murder. Add to that, who ever helped him do that one. Dr Williams perhaps and any other sick SOB that thought that was a good idea. Anyone with a single Brain Cell would know that would happen. So it was definitely premeditated. Jail time for a very long time is what Doug and his sick friends need. No way he is getting off the hook. I don't even care if he is a drug addict, like his brother Rob was. Odds are he just might be. He certainly did everything imaginable to protect his brother. He certainly misses a lot of work like his brother did. He is ugly like his brother was. To many things in common I think. No way would I even let him use that as an excuse. His power trip will backfire on him. Making laws to cover his ass, will not fly well. I would even say those laws are illegal to create. Like when you murder people you can't just make a law that says I can't be charged. I don't care, who they are. That in of itself is criminal. Boy do I want that piece of shit in jail. Once upon a time he use to be a drug dealer too. I really wish people would know, who their candidates really are, before they vote for them. Doug is nothing more then a con artist.