Saturday, May 25, 2019

Exposing The Lies Of NASA's Project Apollo Fraud Man On The Moon Missions: Great New Interview With Marcus Allen And Scott Henderson

I am and have always been a man of science..... Many who do know me personally know that I have a massive background in Physics, and others have seen my usage of that knowledge in a lot of the articles that I do present here at this blog..... I am also a radical and a true critical thinker and have been applying a lot of cynicism to our modern "science" and some of the greatest lies of science throughout history.... One of those lies is of course the fraudulent Project Apollo missions of 1968-1972, and I have shown many times in previous articles the facts that man has never ever landed men on the moon....

I have found through my own research that NASA was left with an insurmountable problem when they were approached by the then Kennedy administration and later the Johnson administration with trying to achieve then President Kennedy's speech where he wanted to see a man on the moon before the end of the 1960's decade.....What was quickly discovered by the criminals behind NASA is that sending men some 240000 miles to the lunar surface through interstellar space was absolutely impossible using the technology of the 1960's.....And that there was no foreseeable inventions for the time being (still have no such inventions today...) to solve these problems...

But rather than admit to the American public and the entire world that manned missions to the moon was impossible at that time, the criminals in the US government as well as the administrators behind NASA decided that if they could not "make it" to the moon, then they would "fake it" to the moon.....By 1964, the then Johnson administration decided to have NASA work with other groups including MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) to create the Apollo Simulation Program and basically build props and equipment for the faking of the entire lunar missions....

Which leads me to the following video, by Youtube user "Shill Slayers II", where Apollo researchers, Marcus Allen out of the United Kingdom, and Scott Henderson from Canada, were interviewed recently on a podcast to discuss their findings about the fraud of Project Apollo..... I do in fact have that video right here for everyone to see for themselves, and of course I have my own thoughts and comments to follow:



NTS Notes:  I agree with most of what has been stated here by both Scott and Marcus.....

My differences with Scott are minor, for in spite of his videos and information put out there by a known "Flat Earth" shill, the information about the where and how of the actual settings for the fraud Apollo images that he presents are absolutely spot on....  I stated a very long time ago that I suspected that most of the faked lunar settings used by NASA for the Project Apollo lies are located in northern Arizona, and Scott shows that to be evident in his own findings...

Scott has also fallen for the trap that satellites are 'impossible'... My own background, my work, and my expertise in satellite telecommunications says otherwise... Scott fails to understand that there is a wide spectrum of telecommunications signals and bandwidths, and the ionosphere/magnetosphere including the Van Allen belts causes interference in certain frequencies that are NOT used for satellite communications... Such interference can be classified as "noise" in communications and is filtered out by receiving devices on Earth that communicate with satellites.... Therefore, satellites are very real and many are indeed orbiting the earth at the 23600 mile distance needed for geosynchronous orbiting of this planet.....The facts are that the radiation of the Van Allen belts is generated by particles in the MeV and GeV range and usually are associated with frequencies along the wavelengths of Gamma rays and X-rays which are not used for communications but are deadly to human health..

And again, knowing that Project Apollo is a fraud does NOT make someone a sudden believer in the nonsense of "flat earth"..... I have repeated over and over again in previous articles and I will repeat it here that this "flat earth" nonsense has been pushed by the criminals in the US government as a means to make anyone that sees the fraud of Project Apollo labeled as a "kook" or an "idiot"..... And sadly there are indeed so many of these fools out there promoting their flat earth garbage and stupidly using the fraud of NASA's missions as "proof" that the world is somehow "flat"! .... Never, ever link the two together, and never fall for the trap of 'flat earth' stupidity...

It is a fact that we are now less than 2 months from the '50th anniversary' of the fraud of Project Apollo and Apollo 11...... And with that anniversary approaching, we are now seeing an upswing in terms of propaganda pushed out by the liars in the Jew spew media and especially NASA.....

The brainwashing does continue as people have lived their entire lives believing that we put "men on the moon", and many will never accept that they have been conned all their lives.....But the truth has to be told, and one of the greatest "scientific achievements" in human history is indeed nothing more than one of the greatest lies in human history!

More to come

NTS

6 comments:

A smart goy said...

Very nice NTS,I shall watch that video very soon.

greencrow said...

Hi NTS:

One of the reasons for the Fake Moon Missions was to distract Americans from the series of government-sponsored assassinations that took place in the 60's, particularly the JFK, RFK, MLK and Malcolm X assassinations.

It was also a "feel good" project to offset and distract from all the plane loads of body bags coming back from the Vietnam War.

So, when NASA starts revving up their fake space exploration engines again...humanity has to ask itself: WHAT is being distracted from????

brian boru said...

I don't think that it's farfetched to say that most of what we have been told for hundreds of years and are being told by our controllers now have been lies or distortions. Most of what is termed history is simply an agreed upon set of lies by the victors. Anyone who believes what the MM tells them is deluded. If they can pull off a hoax as big as the Apollo landings then why not 9/11 or the Holohoax or any of the other lies they foist on us? They hold us in utter contempt. Their attitude is similar to that of the Church for the mediaeval peasants. However, we can at present still seek alternative answers which is why they are trying to shut down uncontrolled views on the internet. They want a world similar to the one envisioned by Orwell in 1984.

marc said...

Great article again,thanks.
Here is a little background of so-called 'flat-earth' Psy-Op.
https://creation.com/the-flat-earth-myth-and-creationism

Stevie K. said...

Hi NTS, fully agree on the Apollo hoax, it never ceases to amaze me how if you apply any critical thinking to the subject you can still believe in it as fact. how did they cool the inside of the Lunar lander or the space suits while supposedly in direct sunlight on the moon the temperature is well in excess of boiling water and the walk in the shade of something and it's instantly well below freezing. Remarkable pieces of kit those space suits. Added to that the fact that it's been worked out they had nowhere near enough power to supposedly broadcast live television photos from 240,000 mls away ffs the only power source was 8 batteries wasn't it and this had to supply the power for all their needs for over a week. I used to have a caravan and if you had the radio on for more than a couple of days the battery went flat.
lf you analyse the supposed Mars missions how do they explain the feat of navigating in space? There is no GPS system to navigate by and where exactly do you aim the rocket at when in the 6 months it took to get there Mars has supposedly moved by 200,000,000 mls, is moving at 50,000 mls an hour so if you're half an hour late at the rendezvous point you've missed it by a tidy stride and the rocket isn't moving fast enough to catch up. Plus just how exactly do you do a reasonably controlled landing at a designated site on an object travelling at 14 mls a second? An amazing feat is indeed.
On another subject but still regarding the moon can you explain to me the difference in size cast in Lunar and Solar eclipses. In a total lunar eclipse the earths shadow totally covers the moon making it at least 2,000 mls in dia, but in a solar eclipse the shadow cast by the moon on Earth is only about 70 mls in dia, even accounting for the difference in sizes this doesn't make sense, plus try as l have l can"t cast a shadow that is smaller than the object casting it. Also if the Moons light is reflected sunlight how come it's properties are totally different? The shade of sunlight is cooler than in direct sunlight but the shade of moonlight is warmer than in direct moonlight and you can magnify the coolness of the moonlight with a magnifying glass. Hopefully a guy with your scientific background can answer these questions.

Northerntruthseeker said...

Stevie K... The penumbras are a result of the distances involved and the size of the objects..

Sol is some 865000 miles in diameter at a distance of 93 million miles to Earth ... Earth is some 7912 miles in diameter...

Luna is some 2146 or so miles in diameter at a distance of 238000 miles.....

The light source is of course Sol and even at that distance of some 93 million miles, light rays do go almost right around Luna as it moves at 238000 miles above Earth's surface, causing the penumbra to be very small at some 70-80 miles usually and moving rapidly in association with Luna's orbital velocity as well as Earth's rotation... Maximum solar eclipses therefore last only about 7 and 1/2 minutes...

But of course Earth being larger than Luna causes a larger shadow aka penumbra effect and even at 238000 miles is quite large and in a lot of instances does cover the lunar surface facing Earth completely....

It does make sense as perceived by real perspective and where the different solar bodies are ....

I have already been all over the fraud of Mar's missions.. The problem goes way beyond the navigational problems of getting to intercept Mars in its orbit, but the actual LANDING of the probes by the US... Every landing has been using conventional parachutes which are impossible to create any drag in the ultra thin Martian atmosphere of some 0.004 BAR of Earth's.... The surface pressure on Mars is very close to what we find at 120000 ft above Earth's surface, and parachutes can not operate in that near vacuum condition... Therefore when you hear of Viking, and even Curiosity and their "parachute" landings on Mars, then Nasa is full of crap!