Thursday, December 21, 2017

Amtrak Train Crash In Washington State: Latest Update Shows That It Was Purposely Derailed, But By WHOM?

*I took another of those "me days" yesterday... I had to take care of the last bit of Christmas shopping as well as spend some time with my mother who is still not getting any better.... It has been a very stressful time, and once again my ability to post articles at this blog has had to suffer...

I received a heck of a lot of emails and some most interesting comments from my last posting where I was asking some serious questions about that Amtrak train crash in Washington state three days ago that caused the death of at least 6 people and injured dozens of others.... I also got a lot of "hate mail" and "hate comments" (obviously I deleted every single one of them) saying that I was nuts and that I should "trust what the officials state as to the cause of this disaster".... I always wonder why there are some who get angry when real truth seekers such as myself and others only want to ask questions and get to the truth about these disasters......

Well, I once again want to turn to a new update from Jim Stone's site at, where Jim shows clear evidence that this "crash" was indeed a clear cut case of man caused derailment of the Amtrak train.... I first want to present that update here, and I have my own thoughts and comments to follow:


BUSTED BUSTED BUSTED. I tried to post this at 1 PM today but my bandwidth ran out. HERE IT IS.

Three separate news anchors reported that the state and city were on scene ready to respond instantly to the train wreckbecause they were running an enormous disaster drill at the exact time and location of the Amtrack derailing.
This confirms 100 percent that I was completely right when I said the train was going 30 and was knocked off the tracks on purpose. It might have been going less but was absolutely not going faster. The bottom line is that this train went off the tracks AS PLANNED by saboteurs who were operating via the shadow state at the state level. The following video proves it.

In this video (which is served by this web site and not Youtube because it is sure to get censored) three different news anchors, two of them who are on scene, talk about "how lucky they were" that an emergency preparedness drill was happening at the train crash site right at the exact same time the train went off the tracks (obviously to make the drill as realistic as possible I guess).

SEE THIS, and you can right click and save this video. I suggest you do.

NTS Notes: OK, I am now convinced that this was a contrived set up and a man caused disaster... But the big question  still remains:  WHY and by WHOM????

And gosh darn, but what are the chances that once again the criminals involved were running one of their patented "disaster drills" nearby, just before this disaster actually occurs?   And sure enough, but that was exactly what was occurring just before this crash! What a "coinky-dink" indeed!

And apparently I found out just the other day that the "Antifa book" that was indeed published BEFORE this derailment suddenly has "disappeared" off the Internet and is no longer available via any Google search.... Apparently, someone is trying to cover for the real criminals involved... But for what purpose???

Needless to say, but we have been seriously LIED TO in regards to this "crash" and someone is still trying so hard to push the lies that the train was going "80 MPH" when in reality it was indeed only doing around "30 MPH" when it was derailed.....

I again want to thank those commentators that have sent me some most interesting links to other alternative media reports about this train disaster.... And again, if anyone else finds anything more that helps expose the truth about this train derailment and who were the perpetrators involved, I am all ears....

More to come



wallflower said...

Hi North...
This is OT somewhat...but it's something I caught twice today surfing news. I do not listen to Alex Jones nor spread him around...but this coincidence of two different chances of news was hard to dismiss. Sure there could be force fed news like always, but I thought I would send it anyway...[note the dates] (listen to video) Published on Dec 19, 2017

and... Suspicious Case of Mobile Phones Dying En Mass Published on Dec 20, 2017

Adrian Chetwynd said...

About 14 hours ago I attempted to view your site but was faced with the message that your site had been "removed" (rather than unavailable at the moment), so I'm pleased to see you back.

This train has not been derailed, and for me the "elephant in the room" is the upside down carriage under the bridge.

I am sure that you will agree with me that it is very strange why that carriage ended up turning right to get under the bridge, rather than carry on traveling forward and veering to its left.
Well it's now apparent to me that it was the truck that was carrying an orange container that had allegedly pushed it into that position.

Before this (staged) event had occurred, I wasn't aware that such a design of train existed, and what a unique design it is. But it does have a major limitation in that it will not be able to navigate very tight bends due to its extremely long wheel base, and because of that, the designers of these trains have linked each of the carriages very close together which means that if ever they are turned against each other too far, then the corners of the carriages would be damaged.

The reason why these carriages have very long wheel bases and cannot navigate very tight bends in the track is because they only have one axle per carriage, and because they only have one axle instead of 4 axles that are attached to 2 very heavy bogies, they are extremely lightweight carriages.
And because the carriages only have one axle, moving the engine from one end of the train to the other end of the train before it changes direction at the end of its journey to go back to where it came from, the designers of the train decided to put an engine at both ends of the train with the added benefit that both ends of the train are held down by the heavy weight of an engine. Also, because the carriages only have one axle, they have a relatively high centre of gravity, so the designers of the train most likely decided to use very ridged links between each of the carriages that have next to zero tolerance for any twisting between the carriages...

Anyway, to cut a very long story short, how the fuck did the carriage that was being pulled by the carriage (that ended up under the bridge because of the truck that pushed it there), end up sitting on top of it?
And how the heck could the carriage under the bridge, come to a halt, upside down?

Adrian Chetwynd said...

Following on from my previous comment about the "upside down carriage under the bridge".

I have discovered that both sides of the road were closed. Why? But no time of day was mentioned, which reminded me of the Westminster bridge (staged)event in London of many months ago. Because at the time, I was sure that the bridge must have been closed to the public before the "event", so was looking out for any evidence that it was closed before the event. But all I could find was just 1 comment that was made on YouTube by a Taxi driver to confirm of such. But how do they "keep the lid on" such information?

Also, according to JEWrasic liars, all the televised victims of this train crash were Jewish!