Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Amtrak Train Crash In Washington State: What The Heck Really Happened There?

OK, When I first heard and saw the reports over the Canadian Jew spew media about this crash of an Amtrak train in Washington state yesterday, I thought it was an accident that had to do with the poor state of American infrastructure these days.... The initial reports were all talking about how the train basically jumped the tracks at a 30 MPH curve and the passenger cars went over an embankment and hit US interstate highway 5 that passed under the train tressel below.... The initial reports claimed some 5-10 passengers, as well as some people unlucky enough to be in their cars on the Interstate highway when the train cars came crashing down, were dead, with dozens more injured... I thought it was only an accident, but somethings did not make any sense at all, and being a cynic as well as a critical thinker, I was on the search for the real answers behind this crash....

Well, I had a serious red flag moment about this "crash" this morning when there were "new updated reports" that claim that the Amtrak train was going "80 MPH" when it approached that curve that could safely handle a train only doing 30 MPH..... Something here began to stink to high heaven, for I have seen some train crashes at much less speed than "80 MPH" and the damage done was phenomenal.... But from the pictures that I have seen of this Amtrak crash, the damage to the train cars was actually quite minimal and most were actually intact, which to me was IMPOSSIBLE for an "80 MPH" crash........ Something was terribly amiss and that is why I figured I would have an article here at this blog to cover some of the findings from the alternative media....

First, I want to turn to the following set of reports that comes from Jim Stone's website, at www.jimstone.is, where he is also questioning this entire "crash" and especially a most interesting set of reports where supposedly that American group of "terrorists" known as "Antifa" had released some information BEFORE this Amtrak crash in Washington state where they called for a "derailment" of a passenger train as part of their sick and twisted actions against the American people... Here is the first part of Jim's report where he covers the initial findings of the Amtrak crash as well as those scumbags from "Antifa" and their planned acts of sabotage:

Antifa sabotaged Acela train

It is now confirmed that the train was derailed intentionally by saboteurs, via objects placed on the tracks. Whatever Amtrak says to cover for the people who did it is BULLSHIT. This will probably be covered by the MSM and others as truthfully as Vegas was.

This is huge news so you have probably heard about it -
A high speed Amtrak Acela train derailed onto Interstate 5 in Washington State on it's inaugural run (the first time down the tracks with passengers). These trains are tested on the tracks they are going to operate on numerous times to ensure they are safe.
Antifa took responsibility for the derailment, claiming they put metal on the tracks to derail the train as it was in a turn at 80+ MPH. The train flew off an overpass and landed on I-5.
Amtrak was quick to say (despite reports the train hit something on the tracks) that the train was going too fast (doubt it, GPS would prevent that) and Amtrak also said the tracks did not have a system to override the train operators if they were going too fast (but why would they, when GPS would do that?) If they can put GPS in a rental car they sure as hell can put it in an Amtrak.
At any rate, we can rule out operator error and the lack of an automatic braking mechanism when Antifa themselves said they did it. At around the time antifa said they did it, it was discovered that they posted that they were going to try to derail this train all the way back in April, when it was only being planned to be put in service.
Additionally, CIA run Inspire magazine, which is supposedly for instructing ISIS had an entire issue on how to derail trains, complete with detailed instructions on how to make deraillers to throw trains off the tracks.

GET THIS: GOOGLE, YOUTUBE, AND FACEPLANT THINK IT IS COOL TO CENSOR ALT MEDIA, BUT THEY DID NOT CENSOR ISIS AND LET THESE DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS COME UP ON THE FIRST HIT


AND THEY ARE STILL TRYING TO SAY ANTIFA DID NOT DO IT. I'll tell you why - Because Antifa is Soros funded and belongs to them. George Soros has openly stated he wants to destroy the United States and does nothing but work actively to accomplish it. Why not wipe out a prime train on it's maiden run?

A high percentage of liberal snowflakes took the hit. Yes, those who sympathize with Antifa the most are more likely to be on trains and they just got their butts handed to them on stretchers. The final tally is going to be very high, with the only thing helping keep it down being the fact that the train was not at max capacity. If it had been packed this would have been a lot worse.


OK, I for one have not touched much on these "Antifa" bozos, for I see them as nothing more than a bunch of idiots that should be on trial for their crimes against America.... I also have already reported previously that "Antifa" is indeed the creation of the man who I call "Dr Evil", George Soros, and his want to wreck havoc across America..... I am surprised that to this day the leadership in "Antifa" are NOT in jail.....

Here is part II of Jim Stone's report from his website, that came out just today that takes a close look at the train crash itself and also concludes that the train was NOT going this "80MPH" as the liars in the Jew spew media are promoting:

I do not believe the Amtrak was going 80 when it crashed

They are clearly lying. It was obviously a 30 mph train wreck, and it can be easily proven.

Yesterday, witnesses were not saying the train was going between 70 and 80 mph, they just said the crash started so smoothly they were not sure anything was wrong, and then ended with them being thrown. Today, in all witness accounts, they are saying the train was obviously going fast, even in reports which yesterday said no such thing. There is an obvious expungement of facts going on.

The train was not going 80+mph and it is easy to prove.

The cars are not damaged enough, and the death toll is not high enough. Additionally, the cars did not go far enough after the crash. 3 of them stayed on the tracks, with a fourth one off the tracks but not fallen. The stories told by people are not consistent with an 80 mph crash either. From the pictures, the train was going 30. There's plenty of evidence to support this.
The 2013 Santiago derailment in Spain happened at a high speed similar to what is being claimed for this Amtrak crash, and the Santiago train stayed on level ground and killed 77 people.
In the American tale, a high speed Amtrak fell from a high place and landed in traffic, with a perfect dead end to smash into and only 7 people are dead because the train had a good soul and decided to not cross the interstate to bash into the dead end on the other side. THAT'S BULLSHIT. The death toll in the American crash should have been almost everyone aboard and it should have been a crumpled mess on the opposite side of the interstate if the speed was as claimed.
The engine that is still sitting happily on the tracks should have been a bashed up piece of flipped over metal a half mile down the tracks if it did not fall onto the highway. There's no way passenger cars took all the momentum away from it, especially when they were falling out of sight with no way to push back on it. The fact that engine is where it is alone proves the train was going 30. Laughably, the MSM is now calling the engine at the back of the train a "caboose" and not a heavy engine to cover up the fakery of the current story and explain why it is not a half mile down the tracks, past the crash scene. Their fakery with this key info is proof they are reporting based on an agenda, and not the facts.

7 people dead would be an amazingly low number for even a train that was not moving at all falling off an overpass. At first I figured maybe it was going 80, but the next day numbers don't add up, and I was not thinking at all about how on earth that engine stayed on the tracks without blasting right past the crash scene. If that engine stayed on the tracks and the crash happened at 80, you should have seen a lone engine with the train ripped away, sitting on the tracks farther away than you could ever put into context with a picture. It would have gone at least a half mile past the accident even with full brake.

The accident scene does not match up with claims of high speed. It matches up perfectly with Antifa derailing the train at the request of George Soros.
Yesterday some of the MSM reports were saying they found what derailed the train. Those are all gone now. What happened to them? Obviously white wash. You can't go from "we found the obstacle" to "oh, it was going too fast" in the real world, especially with all the rest of the evidence at hand.
What we have with this crash is an act of sabotage, being buried by commies and liberals who just can't admit that the scum they supported had a real and serious impact in the real world, on a train they themselves would ride. We also have a situation where Amtrak would lie, to prevent copycats from doing the same thing.
What would you do if you were Amtrak? Tell the world a bunch of pukes did it, and encourage more, and have 15 more trains off the tracks as a result, or would you rather take the rap, blame the engineer, give him a nice pension and stay on the tracks elsewhere?
I have ridden Amtrak many times. People do not wear seatbelts. There are dining and entertainment areas. People are randomly walking around. And 80 MPH does not turn into 15 mph just because you are on a train. The death and injury toll is way too low, if the train really was going 80+ when it went off the tracks, almost everyone should be dead. This crash should have been worse than the one in Spain that happened a while back. Though the train in spain was going about 30 percent faster than the claimed speed for this Amtrak, it did not fall off a freeway overpass. It stayed on level ground. What's worse? wrecking a car in a corn field or driving one off a cliff? That is literally the difference here.

Due to the circumstance at the scene of the Amtrak crash, the death toll equals ONE THING: the train went off the tracks slowly, and coasted down a steep embankment onto the highway. A few people died because there is no way out of having casualties when a train goes onto an interstate.

1. The media does not want to report the truth, because their pals did it.
2. Amtrak does not want to report the truth, because they don't want more of this.
3. George Soros had a martini.

Put your thinking cap on and look at this photo. None of this train, which was supposedly going 80, made it across the interstate despite a majority of the cars staying on their wheels. How is that possible?
QUESTION: How does a train that is going 80 suddenly stop on top of a highway and on a hillside before the highway and not cross the highway? How does it mostly stay on it's wheels?
ANSWER: George Soros had a martini.
"Gus Ubaldi, a train expert with Robson Forensic, told Patch that's it's possible an object on the tracks caused the derailment. Looking at photos of the wreck, Ubaldi pointed out that the front cars, including the locomotive, were heavily damaged, which might indicate the train hit an object. The caboose was the only car not to derail and appeared largely undamaged.
"I'm beginning to lend credence to the idea that something was on the track," he said. "The track behind the train, it's pristine, there are no marks."


My comment: Since in the universe I come from 80 mph trains take miles to stop and don't pay courtesies to interstates when they wreck, I'd have to agree.


Well, I have looked at all of the photos of this crash scene and THIS one was NOT an "80 MPH" crash as they are perpetrating... The damage is much too light for such a high speed crash, and I tend to agree with Jim's assessment that the casualty figure is much too light for an "80 MPH" crash!   Something is terribly amiss here...

OK, There are indeed a lot of questions and few answers... Is the US government and the liars in the Jew spew media covering for the actions of "Antifa" by promoting this fraud of the train going "80 MPH"?   Perhaps... And if so, then there is so much more than meets the eye with this incident....

At least one other person who I do respect in the real truth movement, Greg Bacon, is also questioning the real facts about this crash.... And I want to present the link to his article from "Goon Squad" (www.careandwashingofthebrain.blogspot.com) for everyone to read it right here:

https://careandwashingofthebrain.blogspot.ca/2017/12/the-sick-twisted-antifa-bastards-are.html?showComment=1513709897424#c7802249229737400907


Greg is a great writer, but I am not entirely sold yet on this being the work of "Antifa" and want to research and check more evidence before I come to that judgment and that conclusion... There is far more here than meets the eye, definitely...

But the question remains.. WHY are they lying about the speed of this Amtrak train when it crashed?  Obviously to cover up the facts about what really happened and who is responsible..... I for one will continue to search for those answers, and will post them up here if and when they do become available...

I am also wanting to once again turn to my readers for their comments and any findings that they may have come across that exposes the truth about this incident....  Let me know what you have found, and I will add those findings to this article....

More to come

NTS

3 comments:

Greg Bacon said...

When the MSM releases an animation of what MIGHT of happened, you know the fix is in.

https://twitter.com/KATUNews/status/943224181981790208/video/1

What's next, a mutli-page layout showing Bin Laden's luxurious Afghanistan hideout or maybe they should get the NIST to explain how this happened. NIST will invent a new term that goes against the laws of physics and there you go!

PNW_DPer said...

I have been mostly trying to ignore the MSN reporting on the crash due to the MSN's persistent lying on everything all the time. While I don't have any idea what really caused the crash, thank you for bringing to my attention some reasonable ideas of what might have happened.

Marycatherine Barton said...

And Cowboy, the commenter at NoDisinfo.com, yesterday has been presenting his argument, with evidence, that the whole thing was contrived. You can find these at that site, under the last post done there, which is about the NYC pipe bomb dud - zionist connec.