Wednesday, November 11, 2015

The Global Warming Fraud: Are We About To Enter An Ice Age? Cold Sun Rising

One of the subjects that I constantly cover here at this blog is of course the lie called "Global Warming" or as the fraud artists behind this scam tend to call it these days..."Climate Change".. Truth be known is that this planet is always going through climatic changes and it is absolutely NOT due to man's influence on the planet as the scam artists behind the Global Warming fraud constantly claim.. It is due to that big yellow ball in the centre of our Solar System known as "Sol" or as many call it.. "The Sun"....

I came across the following report that I found most interesting and I definitely want to share it right here with all of my readers... It comes from the website: "The Nation" at, and is entitled: "Cold Sun Rising"... This article definitely blows massive holes in the Global Warming fraud and is a must read by everyone... I have it here in its entirety for all to see, and of course my own thoughts and comments to follow:

Cold sun rising

New studies flip climate-change notions upside down

The sun will go into "hibernation" mode around 2030, and it has already started to get sleepy. At the Royal Astronomical Society's annual meeting in July, Professor Valentina Zharkova of Northumbria University in the UK confirmed it - the sun will begin its Maunder Minimum (Grand Solar Minimum) in 15 years. Other scientists had suggested years ago that this change was imminent, but Zharkova's model is said to have near-perfect accuracy.

So what is a "solar minimum"?

Our sun doesn't maintain a constant intensity. Instead, it cycles in spans of approximately 11 years. When it's at its maximum, it has the highest number of sunspots on its surface in that particular cycle. When it's at its minimum, it has almost none. When there are more sunspots, the sun is brighter. When there are fewer, the sun radiates less heat toward Earth.

But that's not the only cooling effect of a solar minimum. A dim sun doesn't deflect cosmic rays away from Earth as efficiently as a bright sun. So, when these rays enter our atmosphere, they seed clouds, which in turn cool our planet even more and increase precipitation in the form of rain, snow and hail.

Solar cycles

Since the early 1800s we have enjoyed healthy solar cycles and the rich agriculture and mild northern temperatures that they guarantee. During the Middle Ages, however, Earth felt the impact of four solar minimums over the course of 400 years.

The last Maunder Minimum and its accompanying mini-Ice Age saw the most consistent cold, continuing into the early 1800s.

The last time we became concerned about cooler temperatures - possibly dangerously cooler - was in the 1970s. Global temperatures have declined since the 1940s, as measured by Pacific Decadal Oscillation. The PDO Index is a recurring pattern of ocean-atmosphere climate variability centred over the Pacific Ocean. Determined by deep currents, it is said to shift between warm and cool modes. Some scientists worried that it might stay cool and drag down the Atlantic Decadal Oscillation with it, spurring a new Ice Age. The fear was exacerbated by the fact that Earth has been in the current inter-glacial period for 10,000 years (depending on how the starting point is gauged).

If Earth were to enter the next Ice Age too quickly, glaciers could advance much further south, rainforests could turn into savannah, and sea levels could drop dramatically, causing havoc.

The BBC, all three major American TV networks, Time magazine and the New York Times all ran feature stories highlighting the scare. Fortunately, by 1978 the PDO Index shifted back to warm and the fear abated.

Climate science vs the sceptics 

By the 1990s the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) had formed the "97 per cent consensus". The consensus was that Earth was warming more than it should, not just due to natural causes but also human activity. This was termed Anthropogenic Global Warming. The culprit was identified as carbon dioxide generated from the burning of fossil fuels.

CO2 is a greenhouse gas and its increase in the atmosphere could be dangerous, the panel claimed. Some of these scientists, particularly those working at the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies and Britain's Meteorological Office, have gone so far as to declare CO2 as the primary driver of climate on Earth. This modern "climate science" has stirred unprecedented controversy in the field. Sceptics, clinging to more traditional approaches, say the science has been corrupted by the billions of dollars in government funding for climate-change research and agencies and industries that claim to be "fighting climate change". The counter-argument is that the sceptics are backed by the oil, gas and coal industries or are affiliated with conservative political groups.

The biggest bone of contention between the two groups is how the data are assessed. In the United States, the recorded temperature data go back to 1880, and elsewhere not even that far. Those data have to be "stapled on" to the ice-core data used to determine temperatures in earlier times. This has led to controversial representations, such as the infamous "hockey stick" graph released by the IPCC that gave the impression the world is hotter now than ever. Many scientists slammed the graph as wholly unrealistic, insisting that previous eras, such as the medieval warm period and the Holocene maximum were warmer than today.

Another issue is the urban "heat island" effect. Black asphalt roads and concrete structures absorb heat from the sun. Roy Spencer, a climatologist at the University of Alabama and former IPCC alumnus, charged in 2013 that the NOAA was "warming up" readings at rural temperature stations to match the urban ones rather than the reverse. A spokesman for the NOAA responded but stopped short of denying it.

In the 2009 "climategate scandal", e-mails and documents from IPCC-affiliated scientists were leaked that indicated they had manipulated data and reports to jibe with the AGW theory. References were made to "hiding the decline" through the use of "tricks". Then in 2012 Anthony Watts, a meteorologist and self-described whistle-blower, caught the NOAA changing temperature data from the 1930s to make the decade appear colder than it had been. Another whistle-blower, blogger Tony Heller, although clearly aligned with conservative groups like the Heartland Institute, has amassed impressive data. He claims that, since 1997, the world has actually been getting colder and Goddard and the NOAA are committing "climate fraud". The NOAA has declined to respond.

Global cooling?

Around 2000, the PDO Index started to blow cold again, possibly causing global warming to "pause", as the mainstream scientists describe it. IPCC-affiliated scientists as well as Nasa and the NOAA attribute the pause to other factors. This is when the plot thickens.

Solar cycle 24 - two cycles prior the cycle that's expected to bottom out into a Maunder Minimum - was weak. In 2013-14 it reached its maximum far below average. Meanwhile extreme cold-weather anomalies have occurred around the world. Last year "polar vortices" slammed into the central US and Siberia as a third hovered over the Atlantic. All 50 US states, including Hawaii, had temperatures below freezing for the first time in recorded history. Snowfall records were broken in cities in the US, Canada, Italy, New Zealand, Australia, Japan and elsewhere. Southern American states and central Mexico, where snow is rare, got heavy snow, as did the Middle East.

This past summer the cold didn't let up, with more temperature records across the US and rare summer snows seen in Canada, the US and China. Birds have migrated early in the last two years. Antarctic sea ice set a new record in 2013 and it was broken again in 2014.

Not even Thailand was immune. In 2014 Bangkok hit its coldest low in 30 years, while 63 lives were lost in the North.

Scientists at the Climate and Environmental Physics and Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research at the University of Berne in Switzerland have recently backed up theories that support the sun's importance in determining the climate on Earth. A paper published last year by the American Meteorological Society contradicts claims by IPCC scientists that the sun couldn't be responsible for major shifts in climate. Judith Curry, chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology, rejected IPCC assertions that solar variations don't matter. Among the many studies and authorities she cited was the National Research Council's recent report "The Effects of Solar Variability on Earth's Climate".

Other researchers and organisations are also predicting global cooling - the Russian Academy of Science, the Astronomical Institute of the Slovak Academy of Scientists, the Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism Russia, Victor Manuel Velesco Herrera at the National University of Mexico, the Bulgarian Institute of Astronomy, Dr Tim Patterson at Carleton University in Canada, Drs Lin Zhen at Nanjing University in China, just to name a few.

For now nevertheless, the IPCC and other authoritative agencies are sticking to their CO2-dominant climate-forcing theory. They attribute the cold spells to a disruption in the jet stream caused by Anthropogenic Global Warming. Some of their theories have heads being scratched, for instance the "pause" in global warming they attribute to heat being absorbed deep into the oceans. When Antarctic ice reached record levels in 2013, scientists were "baffled" because the water beneath the ice was warm, they claimed. In climate science old and new, nothing is certain.

We conclude with a bit of good news, though. Recent research has determined that the famous Stradivarius violin owes its unique, esteemed sound to the last Maunder Minimum. The solar condition changed the texture of the trees that provided the wood from which the instrument was crafted. So lovers of classical music can place their orders for the next generation of incomparable violins, coming - giving the trees time to mature - in about 100 years.

- See more at:

NTS Notes:  Many of the findings in this report are what I and others have already been reporting on for the last few years....

The fact is that Sol has indeed begun to "go quiet" as scientists call it, and the proof is in both diminished solar surface activities such as a decline in sunspot activity and of course solar corona and solar flares... However, the truth is that Sol goes through these cycles constantly and even though there are many who are fearful that we may be entering a new "ice age" I would not go that far... From what I am seeing and from real scientific facts and evidence, we will be entering another "Maunder Minimum" that will see a long period of intense cooling along the lines of the "Little Ice Age" that the planet endured several centuries ago.. .However, that period will end in some 30-40 years and Sol will again naturally increase its solar output and we will see a warming period on this planet as a result...

It should be obvious to everyone by now that our governments are indeed hoodwinked by the liars behind the Global Warming fraud and are about to sign agreements later this month at that Paris Conference on "Climate Change" that will do nothing more than put another tax burden on our societies in the form of "Carbon taxation"... The scam artists behind the Global Warming fraud are absolutely behind this new tax and many, such as that ultra criminal Al Gore, will get filthy rich in the process...

It is again time to awaken the masses to the understanding that there is NO Global Warming, and instead we should be prepared for a long period of Global Cooling... But the idea that we are about to enter a "new ice age" is conjecture at best....

More to come



Barney said...

Here in the jewnited queendom (or should that be queerdom?), apart from an occasional warm day, daytime temperatures remained at a constant 64 degrees (Fahrenheit) throughout August and September, 20 degrees colder than "normal".

Hardly seems like "global warming" to me. More like HAARP.

Carbon Dioxide is NOT a "greenhouse gas" because, being heavier than air, it sinks to the ground, where plants convert it into sugars and release Oxygen.

Again we get the "fossil fuel" LIE. Oil, tar and coal are MINERAL products, created in the depths of the Earth. If they really were fermented dinosaurs and vegetation, they'd have run out decades ago.

Lie after lie after lie. That's all we get from zog.

Reality Bites said...

Climate change is absolutely real. Be careful what kind of "information" you share. It is pertinent to do our best to take care of the planet we live on. Humans have already caused so much destruction and despair. There's no need to be spreading false nonsense. It will only prolong the ignorance and leave some people to care less and less. Please begin to share real facts about climate change. I have read many of your other postings and I believe that those are very good. Keep it factual and consistent.

Reality Bites said...

Climate change is absolutely real. Be careful what kind of "information" you share. It is pertinent to do our best to take care of the planet we live on. Humans have already caused so much destruction and despair. There's no need to be spreading false nonsense. It will only prolong the ignorance and leave some people to care less and less. Please begin to share real facts about climate change. I have read many of your other postings and I believe that those are very good. Keep it factual and consistent.

Anonymous said...

Climate change is real. Please try to stick to the facts. Your intentions are good. But unfortunately, spreading this particular type of balderdash only keeps people ignorant and continues to spread carelessness. It is in our best interest to take care of our planet and to reduce the carbon emissions that have created such rapidly rising temperatures globally.

Northerntruthseeker said...

Sorry, but I cannot understand the twisting going on in the comment section here...

Climate Change is of course real.. But it is a natural occurrence and absolutely has very little to do with mankind's influence... I for one am not blind, and neither am I ignorant of that being the reality...

And one other thing.. I wish that you guys would get with the real science and the fact that CO2 itself is absolutely NOT a "greenhouse gas" as it has been claimed for the last 1/2 century at least.. CO2 is in fact a coolant and its molecular structure does not lead to entrapment of infrared radiation and heat.. This is fact...

It is no wonder many cannot see the truth and are stuck on the Carbon taxation fraud bandwagon...