Tuesday, September 8, 2015

Back To My Roots: More Exposure Of The Fraudulent Apollo Moon Landings And The Scam Artists Behind NASA - THIS Alone Should Tell Everyone That NASA Lies!

I began my own journey on the road to enlightenment and understanding the truth about exactly who controls our very sick world some 36 years ago now when I was informed in a Physics lab, at the local University that I attended taking Engineering courses, by a most brilliant professor that the entire 'man on the moon' missions were a complete fraud....  It was shocking and most disturbing, but always being a critical thinker, I wanted more details and information.... At that time in 1979 there was little to show how NASA scammed the entire world with their fraudulent Apollo moon landings, and the entire Jew spew media at the time was still harping the glories of NASA and their "landings' on the moon and Mars without any criticisms....  I spent months after that point pouring over the photographs and technical data that was available at the time, and I quickly concluded within a short time that the entire Project Apollo was indeed a scam..... For the next two decades I was in an uphill battle against comrades and friends when it came to the moon landing scam, as many of them had indeed swallowed the "koolaid" and looked at me as some kind of nut.... Many laughed for years when I told them that it was a fraud and that NASA bilked BILLIONS of dollars off of suckers and gave them nothing more than a pure piece of propaganda bullshit.... Over the last decade, thanks to the advent of the Internet and people able to explore the true facts about Project Apollo and other NASA 'space missions', very few are now laughing any more....

I was sent the following two videos asking my own personal perspective of what NASA was trying to fool the public with this latest charade, and I definitely want to share these with my own readers...The first video contains the actual NASA video release from about 7 months back where one of its supposed "probes" called "Deep Space Climate Observatory Satellite", or the acronym "DSCOVR" for short, took a series of pictures of the Earth from a distance of some 1 Million miles over a 5+ hour time span, and during that time the moon allegedly transited over the Earth giving a view of the moon's dark side for all to see..Here is that video for all to see:




OK, there a so many things wrong with this image, and I will cover some of them here in detail...

(1) First, the perspective and sizes of the Moon and Earth in such an image from 1 Million miles out are all wrong....  The distance from the Earth to the Moon is some 239000 +- 2000 miles dependent on orbital eccentricity and apogee versus perigee... That means that the distance between the Earth and the moon is some 30+ Earth diameters of 7912 miles!   And yet the Moon at only 2100 miles in diameter still covers about 1/4 of the Earth's image from that 760000 miles further out where the probe sits?   Impossible due to perspective alone... In reality the Earth should be much smaller being so much further distance behind the Moon no matter what the distance to the probe taking the pictures.... That alone should tell everyone that this picture is pure and utter bullshit!  And do not give me the bullshit about 'zooming" in... I have done my own experiments just today to show perspective (anyone can do the same) using a set of balls and properly distancing them to show Earth/Moon distances, and no matter how far you focus or zoom, the Earth is still a decent distance behind the moon in proper pictures and therefore smaller in any images due to that distance....

(2) Second... If this was a "real" picture, then the "dark side" of the moon should be better illuminated as the image shows both Earth and moon on the sunlit side.... But we find a dark side that is unusually dark when it should not be... Lighting alone is therefore all wrong...

(3) If this was an actual Earth- Moon picture, then the Moon is much much closer to the Earth as we have always been led to believe... And the Moon should be casting a massive shadow on the Earth close behind it as in an "Eclipse" and yet we find NO shadow at all as the Moon transits the Earth?  Impossible...

(4) If this perspective is somehow "correct" then anyone standing on the lunar surface especially in the bullshit Apollo missions would see a sky FILLED with the Earth.... But as in the fraud Apollo missions and their wrong perspective in terms of the size of the Earth in the fraud Apollo photos, they still got the perspective wrong with these newest images as well!  Someone is indeed  lying here.....

(5) The dead giveaway as far as I am concern that shows this to be a fraud is the lack of cloud movement in the "Earth" in the pictures over the 5 hours that this was supposedly filmed... If you look closely as the "moon" transits the "Earth" behind it, you find the clouds on the "Earth" mysteriously do NOT move at all...  Our planet has a very fluid atmosphere where clouds are always moving, and yet we find no such movement in any of the "clouds" in the sets of imagery shown here by NASA.... They blew it big time with this one!  This is therefore obviously a painting of the Earth since the clouds are stationary and do not move at all....

Now, I want to present an interesting video that actually came my way via another real truth seeker, Greencrow, who writes "Greencrow As The Crow Flies" at www.greencrowasthecrowflies.blogspot.com, that originates from Youtube user Rob Skiba, and is entitled: "NASA Shoots Itself In The Foot - Exposing The Apollo Program As A Fraud" and gives a great summary of what I and others think of this fraud NASA imagery of the Earth-Moon from space.. Here is that video:



NTS Notes: OK, I mostly agree with Rob's assessments, but I am firmly against the "flat earthers" who in my own opinion have it all wrong about objects in space... Objects in space are naturally round once they reach a certain size due to gravity..... Planets and stars observed through telescopes are round due to the force of gravity, and this planet is round as well due to gravity... I am deeply perplexed at times by the "flat earthers" and whether or not they are in this fight just to cloud issues and to make truth researchers look ridiculous...

Other than that, the information provided in this video correlates to absolutely everything I have seen so far in terms of the fraudulence of this DSCOVR probe's bullshit images.... And the fraudulence of these images is so overwhelming that it again shows that NASA is nothing but pure bullshit artists selling us their fraud space missions.....

The bottom line is this... NASA has again been caught with lies and pure bullshit when it comes to these "images" from space... Once people properly deduce that these images are fakes, then possibly more of them will go back and look at the fake images that NASA continues to sell when it comes to their fraud Apollo program and other space "missions"...... People need to see the truth....

More to come

NTS

18 comments:

greencrow said...

Thanks for elaborating on this latest hoax, NTS. Just last evening at suppertime, I got into a very animated discussion with my husband and son about whether the lunar landings were a hoax. Both of them desperately clung to their "safe reality" of the official story. For some, it is a horrible shock and situation to be in to know that your government (or such a powerful government) is capable of such a colossal hoax. It rocks their world. When arguing with them, I returned to my favourite argument...the dust on the moon's surface. How, if Neil Armstrong's boot made such a clear imprint in the dust...it being so fine....then the rocket engines on the lunar lander much have stirred up so much dust that the dust storm would have obliterated all the photos and stayed up there to this day. What do you think about this argument?

gc

Northerntruthseeker said...

The dust would actually have fallen and not been suspended due to the gravity of the moon....

But the real argument can be about the Lunar dust being all over the clowns' space suits and getting into all the gearing within the LM itself, AND especially into the seals of their 'airtight' hatch that would have leaked out air due to lunar dust within its seals.... The dust got everywhere...

My other favorite argument is the fact that these clowns were supposedly prancing all over the lunar surface in 250 degree fahrenheit temperatures.... Their space suits had no proper way of dispelling all the built up heat.... In a vacuum, there is no other way of getting rid of heat other than radiation... And to dump the heat would have meant putting it into a useful medium to radiate it out into the vacuum, which of course meant water... BUT in no videos do we see their space suits blasting out that radiated water/heat ....

There are now so many points about the fakery of Apollo... AND do NOT get me even started about the fakery of the Mars rovers/landers/etc.... The biggest proof that NASA has never landed a probe/rover on Mars is their claim to use parachutes for the landers... How in the hell can parachutes work in a 0.004 BAR atmosphere? NOT POSSIBLE.... Even on Earth with its higher atmospheric pressure, parachutes cannot be deployed properly until the object or person is below 15000ft altitude.... But the barometric pressure on the Martian surface is equivalent to 125000 ft altitude here on Earth.... Therefore parachutes can not work on Mars and that blows everything that NASA has claimed out of the water!

Northerntruthseeker said...

BTW... I had always thought Greencrow was a guy! I am discovering more and more that many of the more logical researchers in the real truth movement are actually female....

Anonymous said...

I don't believe we have the technology for a manned mission to the moon now, never mind in 1969. The enormous scientific obstacles and bizarre inconsistencies of the alleged missions can be explained away individually if you try really hard and suspend a lot of disbelief. But there is no getting away from the fact that we have not been 'back' or anywhere near in more than 40 years despite the huge advances in computer technology in that time.
I suspect the truth will officially come out but it will be when all those conned so comprehensively at the time are dead and cannot rise up against the lying government.

Anonymous said...

"about the fakery of the Mars rovers/landers/etc...."
All of the photos allegedly originating from the rovers/landers/ planatery pics, etc. should be analyzed in depth by detailed magnification. It is time consuming recreation, but quite revealing either for amusement, or for scientific observation.

HPrice said...

I too am a bit baffled by the so called "flat earthers". I have a feeling that some of them are definitely there to muddy the waters, or there might be some sort of agenda pushing a sort of medieval God-centric kind of solar system, and universe. Others are, of course, just not looking the physics properly.

However, I am definitely of the opinion now that we most definitely did not go to the moon ... or if we did, we may haveused some other technology that is "off the books", as it were ... and faked all the pics in a studio.

One little thing came to me quite recently about the fake Moon pics which I've not seen anyone else comment on ... and that's this:

The famous pic of Neil Armstrong's footprint. Where is the "other" footprint? Surely he didn't hop on to the moon. There should be two footprints, surely? And if there were two, then they would be fairly close together ... unless he hopped and then hopped off somewhere else not in the pic ... or he has a really, really big leg stride.

It's just a simple little thing but I think it speaks volumes together with the lack of a blast crater, no dust on the landing legs etc etc etc.

Nope we didn't go to the moon, and this is from someone who grew up loving space stuff, and science fiction books, films and tv programmes. However, I know when I'm smelling and seeing BS, and this is one huge amount of it.

Still you gotta laugh, haven't you?

Best wishes

Harvey P.

Anonymous said...

Speaking of core belief systems..
What would you say if I said as well as the lie NASA sells us, everything else is inside out..

The main reason for not having a real picture of the whole Earth from space is because we live IN the Earth, not on it. It is a spherical concave, one could liken it to a terrarium.
The heavens, sun, moon, planets, and stars all lie within this "Geoverse"
This was well known to the Ancients but the truth has been perverted over time.
The father of the 20th Century Nikola Tesla also knew this to be true. He called Gravity a "universal compression". It is this compression that keeps us and the waters on the surface. Modern Physics is more fakery.

The concavity of the Earth has been proven in 2 notably irrefutable experiments.
One by Ulysses Grant Morrow in 1887 "the Rectilineator Experiment" which proved beyond a doubt the curvature of the Earth was concave.
The other a French experiment "The Tamarac Mines Experiment", using Plumb Bobs down deep parallel mineshafts. The result was that instead of the bobs being closer [as was expected] at the bottom of the very deep shafts, they were further apart..

Both experiments can be replicated and proven with even more accuracy using modern technology but haven't because TPTB at the top already know this and the last thing they would want is for us to know it to be true.

It would change a lot of things if it were revealed that Space travel was not only a hoax but impossible.
There is a glass sky above our heads. No rocket goes straight up either..and it's not due to "rotation"..because the Earth is stationary.

Think of all the money tied up that would stop flowing if the truth was known.
All the industries that would stop, all the jobs lost, all the unemployment, all the sciences that would need to be rewritten, all the downstream chaos that would happen if the concave Earth reality was made public overnight.

Anyway Truthseekers, it's not to say the work you do is in vain, seek this and be all-knowing.
Not wanting to sound nutty or religious the answers are all around us if we know where to look and how to interpret what we find. Clues are everywhere. Many things are truly hidden in plain sight.

greencrow said...

lol, yes the greencrow is a female. Back to the moon...if the gravity on the moon is LOW and, as an example, the astronauts were able to leap and jump for great distances...in relation to what they're capable on earth...wouldn't dust also be suspended for long periods of time, relative to the time it takes to settle on earth? Another observation. Man has never been able to make a "soft landing" on earth with "retro rockets" like what happened with the lunar lander. Why is that? Shouldn't it be a lot easier to do on earth with such greater gravitational pull? In other words, on the moon...with such low gravitational pull....the retro rockets had to work a lot harder to force the lander to the lunar surface...than would happen on earth. Oh, it makes my head hurt to think about all this crap! : )

gc

Northerntruthseeker said...

There can be no suspension as in the sense of what happens on Earth due to no atmosphere to cause the suspension...However, due to the lower gravity, the rate at which the dust falls back to the lunar surface is much slower than on Earth.. Acceleration due to gravity on the moon is slower...

What you would see on the moon is the dust go up and fall back with no suspension..It is the infamous "rooster tail" effect that we see with the rovers....

Believe it or not.. But NASA had never ever tested retrorockets for landings before around the early 1990's with their DCX experimental craft using a retrorocket to attempt to land in a test right here on Earth.. It was a dismal failure as the small craft kicked up so much rock and particles that the rocks hit the craft itself causing it to crash and explode... Therefore when we see NASA claim that the LM used "retrorockets" to land on the airless moon, it is a laugher... Never been tested, and never was performed before Neil Armstrong did is so successfully and for the first time on the moon! Amazing and a huge fraud..

Northerntruthseeker said...

The big issue with retrorockets is of course the massive amount of dirt AND ROCK that the rockets would kick up during a landing... Astounding that the "retrorockets" worked so well on the moon (laugh)... There is also absolutely no blast crater below any of the LM's that were photographed at all.... The reason is simple.. When the stage hands using the cranes lowered them into the set, they were numbskulls and forgot to put a big hole below the LM's to show the blast crater... And because they blew it with Apollo 11, they had to make sure that the 5 other landings as well had no blast crater...

NASA's excuse for no blast crater? Ridiculously, they say the retrorockets just blew the dust around but left no blast crater... But again, in all photos of below the LM we find intact dust as if there were no retrorockets at all in use!

Northerntruthseeker said...

Never been sold on the concave Earth idea... Gravity alone defeats that idea... I chalk up the concave Earthers, though much fewer than the flat-Earthers, as just more distraction..

Frank Fredenburg said...

Northern the other day I was looking at links BuelahMan posted about the moon landing hoax and one of those links pointed out that the name Apollo was evidence of it being fake. Or words to that affect. Do you have any idea what he meant? I know Apollo was a Greek God. That is all I know about the name.

Anonymous said...

Yes, gravity certainly explains away everything flat-earthers say. Now what exactly is gravity since even scientists can't explain simple gravity basics. How does water stay in place and yet fish are able swim under the intense pressure.... amazing little creatures. As an engineer, please enlighten me how the Keystone XL pipeline will be adjusted for Earth's curvature? Why have I never felt dizzy from this crazy fast spinning ball? I'm dizzy just thinking about it. Have you ever seen the earth's curvature? I haven't. Pictures please.

Thanks in advance for answering my elementary questions.

Anonymous said...

The numbers you provide in the article are consistent with the images in the video. The width of the Earth is actually 3.76 times the width of the Moon, using your numbers. The Earth is 1000000/760000 = 1.316 times farther away in the video. This means that from where the video was taken, the Earth will only appear 3.76/1.316 = 2.86 times as wide as the Moon, which is about how it looks in the video.

Northerntruthseeker said...

Wrong, anonymous.. The perspective is all wrong..

The focal point is the moon itself....the focus is not 1.316x further away.. The moon is 2102+-20 miles in diameter... while the Earth, some 30+ Earth diameters further away would still be well behind the zooming in of the moon itself....

Try the same experiment I did in a parking lot... Take one ball, in my case a basketball, and then take a regular baseball... One represents pretty close the diameter of the Earth (basketball) and the baseball is pretty close to the diameter of the moon in perspective to the basketball... I put both on platforms and placed the baseball a full 30 basketball diameters closer to me than the basketball Earth.. Then I took out some binoculars and marched off some 4x the "earth" "moon" platforms distance (pretty close to the "1 million miles" as claimed by Nasa using the same ratio), and then standing way back at the end of the parking lot, pulled out my binoculars and then focused in on the "moon" with the binocular zoom to as close as the image we see from NASA.... The basketball was still much much smaller in the distance behind the "moon" with the zooming in of the "moon" as we see in the Nasa "images" and was no where in the lens of the binoculars at all... Defeat for those who claim the picture is accurate... Actually try it and then you will see for yourself....

That ends your first argument... And then we have the 5 hours that Nasa claims that the "moon" transited the Earth, and you do NOT see the clouds change at all!!!!! Our atmosphere is quite fluid and constantly in motion.. Our clouds move constantly, and yet NASA claims their "Earth" image is accurate?

Northerntruthseeker said...

I do enjoy when those "NASA" supporters come in and try to dissuade the arguments about the lies that NASA perpetrates... But again, just like with Apollo and Mars, the criminals behind NASA are counting on the gullibility and blindness of people who do not think in perpetrating their scams...

Anonymous said...

Both the Earth and Moon should be at the infinite focus. I don't think the camera is focusing on one and not the other.

Northerntruthseeker said...

Even in infinite focus, the zoom is on and if you consider the zoom in creates the effect of being less than 10 radii above the lunar surface, then the Earth should still be much more distant..

And you are still avoiding the big issue of the lack of cloud movement on the "earth"... That alone is IMPOSSIBLE..... And blows the entire NASA scam right out of the water!