Wednesday, August 22, 2012

The Global Warming Scam: The $6 QUADRILLION Cost Of The Climate Scam!

I have said for a very long time that the entire "Global Warming" scheme that is being still perpetrated by our governments, under the guise of saving the planet from ourselves, is a massive fraud and swindle.  The shysters behind this entire fraudulent scheme are out to both line their own pockets, and to force the general public to pay more of their hard earned wages for "Carbon Taxes" to again.. "Save the Planet" from ourselves.

I came across a most interesting article that I know must be seen by everyone.  It it from Christopher Monckton, courtesy of an appropriately named website: "Hang The Bankers", at, and is entitled: "The $6 Quadrillion Cost Of The Climate Scam".   I have that entire article right here for my own readers to view and judge for themselves, and of course, I do have my usual followup comments to follow:

The $6 Quadrillion cost of the climate scam

22 Aug 2012

Christopher Monckton on the economics of fighting ‘global warming’
The capture of the once-pure environmental movement by the hard left is far from cheap for the rest of us. I have just told the annual planetary-emergencies conference of the World Federation of Scientists that on the basis of the lunatic anti-CO2 policies now fashionable among scientifically illiterate governments, it would cost $6 quadrillion to prevent the 6 degrees Fahrenheit of predicted “global warming” that will not happen anyway.
Professor Antonino Zichichi, one of the world’s top six particle physicists (he discovered a form of anti-matter 40 years before the multi-billion-dollar Large Hadron Collider did), is the most famous Italian scientist since his hero Galileo. He founded the Federation half a century ago and, at the age of 83, is its president to this day.
Nino looks like a proper scientist. Imagine giving his friend Albert Einstein an electric shock, and that is what his hair looks like. He is fitter than me and attributes his good health to walking an hour every day, not drinking alcohol and not eating lunch (that’s for wimps). He lives in a medieval stone house in the unspoiled, monastic village of Erice, Sicily, perched high on a 2,500-foot crag overlooking the blue Mediterranean.
He is an angry man. Angry because he, like me, was brought up in the Classical tradition, which insists that the duty of every “seeker after truth” (Al-Haytham’s beautiful phrase for the scientist) is to be logical and rational. He founded the Federation at the height of the Cold War to remind scientists of their moral responsibility to use their craft for good, not for ill, and of their intellectual obligation to adhere rigorously to the scientific method.
Nino is furious at the politicization of climate science. Science these days is a monopsony. There is only one paying customer: the State. Scientists increasingly produce the results their political paymasters want rather than seeking after truth.
Nowhere is the buying of desired results by governments clearer than in Nick Stern’s now-discredited report of 2006 on climate economics. The U.N.’s absurd climate panel had already at least tripled the true (and harmless) rate of warming to be expected from our adding CO2 to the air. Stern, to please his socialist paymasters, tripled it again without the slightest justification. Then he divided by 10 the true cost of making global warming go away and multiplied by 10 the true cost of not acting to Save The Planet (memo to Old Nick: The planet was triumphantly saved 2,000 years ago and doesn’t need saving again).
Tony Blair, the shifty socialist prime minister of the day, was so delighted with this nonsense that he gave Stern a peerage and installed him as head of the Grantham Institute, a lavishly funded propaganda institution promoting fear of climatic Armageddon and hatred of the West.
Using Old Nick’s report as a pretext, Blair (with the near-unanimous support of all parties, including Call-Me-Dave Cameron’s Not-The-Conservative-Party) introduced the biggest tax increase in human history. With only three votes against, the Climate Change and National Economic Hara-Kiri Act was passed on the very night when the first October snow for 74 years was falling outside in Parliament Square.
With the help of the Italian Government, which takes an intelligent interest in science, Nino Zichichi bought three redundant monasteries in Erice and turned them into a center of scientific excellence, where the world’s finest minds come throughout the year to attend courses and seminars and to exchange ideas.
The crème da la crème come to the annual seminars on planetary emergencies every August. This year, at my suggestion, the Federation’s climate panel organized a discussion on climate economics. None of the distinguished speakers had a kind word for Old Nick and his silly report. In particular, he was criticized for his wild exaggeration of the supposed threat. After 15 years without any global warming at all, his conclusion that there is a 10 percent chance the world will end this century because of global warming now looks sad and dated.
President Vaclav Klaus of the Czech Republic gave the keynote lecture. At the U.N.’s Save-The-Planet climate conference in 2007, he had been the only leader to speak out publicly against the climate scam. A dozen other world leaders told him privately that they agreed with him but did not dare say anything publicly.
President Klaus demanded a hard-headed rational approach to climate policy-making, as did Lord Lawson, Margaret Thatcher’s former finance minister. Professor Ross McKitrick, who had exposed the U.N.’s fraudulent attempt to abolish the medieval warm period in 2001, said climate models and the policies based on them should be adjusted to take account of the failure of temperature to rise as predicted.
Using Australia’s new carbon dioxide tax as a case study, I demonstrated that it is 48 times more expensive to try to make global warming go away than to let it happen and enjoy the sunshine.
Nino, having heard the arguments, announced a new permanent panel to monitor developments in climate economics. Now hear this, if you are thinking of writing a bogus report like Old Nick’s to please your government paymasters: We are watching.
President Klaus’ lectio magistralis to the Federation is available here. My paper is here.

NTS Notes: Christopher Monckton's figure of $6 Quadrillion dollars is indeed staggering.  To put it into perspective...That astronomical figure is about 60x the entire value of everything on this planet itself today!

Lets get this straight once and for all... The entire Global Warming scare is a con job. Plain and simple. As I have said, the swindlers behind this con have been using the propaganda of fear to convince people that they should sign up for this scam.  That has to be stopped immediately!

People must be made aware that this planet, Earth, goes through natural warming and cooling cycles.  It is primarily caused by the fluctuations in the energy output of our star, The Sun, or Sol.   Right now, The Sun's energy output is falling, and we are most definitely entering a period of cooling on this planet.  The net result is actually Global Cooling, and absolutely not Global Warming!

One other factor that people have been misled for the last century is the simple fact that CO2, in spite of what the Global Warming enthusiasts continue to claim, is NOT the Greenhouse Gas that they continue to promote.   The simple logic is that CO2 is heavier than air, and therefore stays close to the surface of the Earth, and does not rise into the upper atmosphere as the liars continue to claim.   Thus, it does not promote the so called "Greenhouse" effect that is due to gases in our upper atmosphere, and therefore does NOT promote the warming of this planet as they have long claimed.

I have been in this battle against the Global Warming con artists for a long time now.  I will continue to bring forward interesting articles about this scam for everyone to see as they become available... So stay tuned..

More to come



hans said...

How about cutting number of children born in poor countries. More children means more food, means more pollutants.

Northerntruthseeker said...


I will not fall for that trap.. What you are suggesting is forced sterilization, which I do not stand for.

That suggested program has been the long sought goal of the criminal Jewish power elite, as a method of reducing our numbers so as to make us easily controllable... That again, I will not stand for!

May I suggest that you take another approach, or do not bother commenting in this site again... Agenda 21 and the UN push for population controls are evil and sinister programs that only now most people are finally being made aware of!

Anonymous said...

Ever notice how the population reductionists never say what the correct number of people should be? They simply say 7 billion are too many. If we had 1 billion today, they would still say that is too many. I have been listening to these people talk about reducing the population since about 1970, its amazing how much mileage they get from this subject. I say leave the other countries alone, let them decide for themselves how many people they should have.


opit said...

That 'argument' for population reduction - which happens naturally when people are not robbed blind - is related to another fallacious representation called Carrying Capacity. Indeed, one might think a lot more of such an argument were it not promoted by those who use not merely monopolistic but slavery techniques to control access to necessities of life. Such is Water Empire, only part of the scheme also involving Monsanto control of natural seed stocks. The Panelist lists a video on YouTube : The Real Winner in Iraq Was Monsanto. LaRoche had cached another item which I stumbled upon Dec 1, 2009 on The Global Warming Hoax. And I note Denis Rancourt has been deprived of a tenured position in Ottawa for violating two instances of the 'Denier Meme' : alleged historical revisionism...which means real history with citations...and leading a class debunking AGW.