Sunday, August 26, 2012

The Aurora Shooting: Important Article By Jim Stone - All The Evidence Behind Why I Believe No One Died At The Theater!

With so much happening right now all over the world, most people have already almost forgotten about the shooting of 12 people at a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, last month.   It does definitely seem that shooting was indeed a setup just to condition the American public into accepting gun control legislations.  The criminals behind the push for confiscating the guns of the American people failed however, leaving many questions still unanswered about the circumstances behind that shooting in the first place...

I have been following the interesting reports from "Jim Stone", since the time he showed strong evidence last year that the Fukushima nuclear disaster was not as it seemed, and that the Fukushima nuclear facility was actually a nuclear weapons breeder reactor for making nuclear bombs for the Japanese government.  Now, Jim Stone, who writes reports under his site:, has come forward with some interesting allegations about the Aurora Shooting, in a new report, entitled: "All The Evidence Behind Why I Believe No One Died At The Theater".   I have that full report for my own readers to look at, and there is much credence to Jim's assertions as you will see right here... My own thoughts and comments to follow:

All the evidence behind why I believe no one died at the theater

Jim Stone, August 22 2012
If you listen to the mainstream press, and even the alternative press, both state that people died at the bat man shooting. I now believe that people probably did die, but not at the theater. I believe that a drill took place at the theater, and inconvenient people the government wanted eliminated were murdered elsewhere and blamed on the bat man shooting. 

This is in contrast with my earlier posts, where I believed no one died at all. But new evidence has surfaced which includes the nurse who drowned in a lake near her home after tending the injuries of one or more of the victims. Regardless of what you have been told about bird shot, bloody little girls, people hitting the floor, etc take a look at what is here, and consider the evidence.

First, the easy stuff.

At no point did we ever get any CCD footage out of the theater. None for the emergency exit, none from inside the screening room, none from the lobby, none from the parking lot, we got NADA. None from a cell phone cam, absolutely NOTHING. Furthermore, the theater was a very nice modern theater which would have had those things in working order, and what about the mall itself? No footage from the mall either? Think about that. Why not?

On top of that, we got no pictures after the fact from the inside of the theater. NONE, NADA. No bullet holes, no gas canisters, no shell casings, no blood on the floor, NOTHING. Why not?

On the outside of the theater, in the back, there was blood on the sidewalk. But there is one problem with it. First and foremost, the spatters were CLEAN. NO FOOTSTEPS in them. People with some exposure to forensics who have posted on my forum have said that at crime scenes the blood ALWAYS has footprints in it, because it is impossible to stay away from it. 

Purportedly the blood on the ground was from someone carrying the little girl. In that case, whoever was carrying her would have stepped in the blood while carrying her, leaving bloody footprints and there were NONE. Furthermore, the blood spatters lead TOWARD the emergency exit, not away from it.

The only way these two things could coincide is if a setup team laid the blood scene out and screwed up doing it. This scene could have happened as photographed only if the blood was in a container at the end of a handle, keeping whoever was dumping it on the sidewalk far enough away to not get it on themselves or walk in it. Stupid as they were, they started in the parking lot and worked their way toward the door, rather than starting at the door and working their way out into the parking lot. It's obvious in the following two photos. 

So we have photos of blood outside, but none from inside. Perhaps because the theater owner did not agree to having a setup crew make a mess of his carpet.

Another thing that should be easy for most people to grasp that it was only a drill is the fact that the police tapes show that the police were discussing where to put the victim's families and press for photos, WHILE THE SHOOTING WAS IN PROGRESS. At that point they would be clueless as to who the victims families even were, or how to get ahold of them, let alone GET THEM TO THE THEATER AT MIDNIGHT. 

In fact, why would the families even go to the theater? would the hospital be a better place for that? or do families let Bobby bleed out before getting into the ambulance just for a photo op? This simple statement in the police tapes proves it was all a pre planned setup, with the families and press already on scene before it even started. If you have been bamboozled into believing people died in that theater, you really need to look at the evidence and switch on your B.S. detector.

Now that we have discussed the obvious, let's talk probabilities.

Two of the victims hit the social security death index before the others. They were Jessica Redfield/Ghawi and Alexander Teves
In the case of Jessica redfield, who I have no doubt is sipping on a pina colada somewhere after a multi million dollar payout, we have a damning tweet where she was laughing about making people believe there is gunfire. Right from her twitter account.

I found this during a deep dredge of the evidence. Getting stuff like that is what I am known for. Ok, now that we have seen this tweet, let's talk about the other mass shooting Jessica supposedly witnessed.
Supposedly Jessica Redfield, a budding media presense, was in Toronto during a mass shooting there in a mall only a month before being "killed" in another "mass shooting". First of all, if she really did witness a mass shooting in Toronto a month before this tweet, why would she laugh? Pehaps if THAT shooting was fake as well? You don't laugh about things like that.

Second of all, figure the odds. Mass shootings happen about once every five years across the total population of the U.S. and Canada of approximately 370 million combined. With mass shootings occuring once every five years in that big of a population, witnessing two in such a short time span is technically impossible. Let's do a little math here. 

She gets the first one FREE. So over the course of your lifetime there will be a total of 80 years divided by five, or 16 mass shootings. If 150 people witness each one, that's 16X150 or 2,400 possible witnesses. 370 million divided by 2,400 is a 1 in 154,000 chance of witnessing ONE mass shooting. Now let's figure the odds of witnessing a second one. Take that 154,000 and multiply it against itself. That equals 1 in 23 billion (23,710,000,000) and that does not factor in the fact that the two shootings were so close.

So we have two damning things against Redfield, the tweet and those odds. How about a third little tidbit? In her tweets, she talked about moving into a new place with 7 swimming pools and a lake two weeks before the second shooting. She was an intern. How does an intern accomplish that? Perhaps a multi million dollar payout? If I had no morals, I'd love that job. 7 pools and a lake would be great for laying low until things settle down. After that, a facelift and a life in politics, because you proved your ability to keep your mouth shut about corruption. 

Now on to other improbablilites. When doing a search of the names from Aurora on even a small search engine a week after the shooting, ALL VICTIMS FROM AURORA HAD:

1. A complete shutout of the first 50 hits on even a small search engine, as proven by this photo. Search engine hits
2. A memorial page on facebook.
3. A donation page, in their honor on facebook.

Let's contrast that with a real murder scene, the Sikh temple shooting.

2 of the people shut out the first 10 hits on Google, and one of them was the father of the Emmy award winning director Arm Kaleka, who was producing a major disclosure movie about government corruption, stealing of energy technologies, and hidden contact. These hits were because the alternative press covered the story. 

The others who died did not show up on Google at all. Arm Kaleka had received numerous threats that if he did not stop producing the movie, members of his family would be killed. 

NONE of the people at the Sikh temple had a facebook page set up in their honor, nor were any donation pages set up. And attributing this to culture is not good enough, because Sikhs attend Bat Man movies, and not EVERYONE at Aurora would have put up a facebook page in the honor of their lost loved one. It just does not work that way unless it's all a pre planned psy op. These pages were made ahead of time, before the shooting and were simply posted at the "appropriate" time.

Let's look at the difference between the photos coming out of Aurora which was fake, and the Sikh temple where people actually died:

Now onto the harder details.

Let's look into this nurse who died in a lake near her home after tending to the injured from the "bat man shooting". I will tell you where the 10 victims who did not make the social security database early most likely came from. But before doing so, consider this - If the bat man shooting really happened, why would you need to kill a nurse who tended the victims? Anyone who actually got shot in a theater would not know what was going to be said, they would just say it like it was, and there would be no reason for the media to differ on those details and no need for a coverup. But WHAT IF:

What if they staged a phony bat man shooting to frame up Holmes so he would be facing a death sentence at the same time his dad was going to hang the bankers with his testimony at the Libor scandal hearings? What if THEY wanted real bodies? Why have ANY of them come from the theater? Why not just get rid of incovenient people to maximize the benefit from the staged event? If a nurse spoke to someone who was dying, and that dying person,who (for example) had the goods that could have jailed a state senator said something like "I was just getting out of my car after picking up a pizza, was grabbed and shot and now I am here" THAT would be worth killing her for.

Consider the fact that 9 of the "hijackers" from 9/11 were alive later, and consider the fact that representatives from our own governement flew to Egypt and apologized on national television there for this "screw up". The video works, if Youtube says it does not, just click the link above. Youtube often blocks embedded videos on this site:  

Consider the fact that NONE of the supposed hijackers were on the boarding logs for the airplanes. There is also no record of any of them even having tickets. And then, ask yourself, if there were 19 hijackers and 9 of them were found alive, WHERE DID THE OTHER ONES GO, IF THEY WERE NOT ON THE PLANES?

911 may paralell Aurora in this way, with the exception of the fact that in the case of 911, someone screwed up and as a result some of the patsies lived. Since the elite have proven that they will vanish people in the name of a psy op as they did on 911, why would Aurora be any different? I believe the bodies they came up with to tag on the bat man shooting were inconvenient people the government wanted eliminated. Once they hit the hospital or coroner's office shot full of holes, who is to say WHERE they really came from before arriving?

This would explain WHY:

There was no CCTV or cell phone footage;
No pictures from inside the theater after the fact;
Why the blood spatters were clean and went the wrong way;
Why the police were talking about where to put the families and press WHILE IT WAS HAPPENING
Why the photos of the mourning family members looked like actors,
How Jessica Redfield witnessed the highly improbable two mass shootings in 1 lifetime,
Why Jessica Redfield hit the SSI database early, after moving to "7 pools and a lake",
The damning tweets,
The dead nurse,
The perfect shut outs on Google and other search engines (IMPOSSIBLE),
WHY the Aurora victims ALL got facebook profiles and donation pages in their honor while the Sikhs got NONE,

AND the fact that there really may have been dead bodies.
The fact that the bankers benefited so much from this alone is damning in and of itself; and really, if people did or did not die in the theater the point is irrelevant when even a drugged llama would be able to see that both of these shootings were government staged, the first to save the bankers, the second to shut down the release of a damning disclosure movie, and BOTH serving the purpose of restricting or banning guns. And if you can't agree with me that it's highly probable that no one died in that theater, at least you should be able to see the other motives. No matter what, neither of those shootings were as seen on TV.

The police tapes are still linked farther down this page, the one of greatest interest is the final one.

UPDATE:  8/8/2012


The trail of blood leads TOWARD the emergency exit!

All of you have probably seen this photo:

This blood trail was supposedly left by the little girl who was rushed from the scene. Problem is, that the SETUP CREW dropped the blood while WALKING THE WRONG DIRECTION!!!! So the splashes all go TOWARD the door rather than away from it. Furthermore, it was NOT a double back, because there would have been an outgoing and returning blood trail if that was the case.


The facts about the Sikh temple shooting are below. It all panned out

This one was a real shooting, and there were 4 gunmen, not one. To top it all off the FBI media show staged a search on "Holmes avenue" which was widely published until the alternative press hopped on it and yelled PSY OP (obviously the elite think we are simpletons living in a Sesame Street world), and to tie in anything Holmes with this false flag was an act of sheer stupidity. I don't think even Elmo would have bought that line.

Since then, they have pulled the Holmes reference in most publications, but I found one with the original content and archived it, and it is also still up HERE

As the result of my take on the bat man shooting, I also got a major breakthrough from a media whistleblower, it's a damning indictment which states that the media records many events Hollywood style and puts them on the shelf for future broadcast, and then just pops in a tape come showtime and lets it rip. According to this whistleblower, they have many news reports ready to go, and I am sure there are a few more phony terror attacks waiting for the play button.

This testimony will be posted as soon as I make contact with the whistleblower again, and if, (as usual) my communications are blocked and I cannot make contact by the end of the day, I am posting it as is. This whistleblower spoke to me because obviously from what is on this web site I am NOT compromised and this whistleblower knew that if I got the message, it WOULD get published.

After seeing this testimony I believe all the news reels and articles related to the Bat Man shooting were produced ahead of time and simply run like a mini series and this is also corroborated by Jessica Redfield in the following referenced tweet where she laughs about "being able to make people think there is gunfire". 

Also, in other tweets she made, only two weeks before showtime Redfield said she moved into a new living accomodation with "7 swimming pools and a lake" - a perfect place to hang out while the dust settles afterward. Any side details, such as memorial web sites, can easily be handled by CIA-tards who can't understand why some things should not be done for a paycheck. Any funds collected could be funneled off to the same pit the Haiti earthquake relief funds fell into.

I think the Sikh Temple shooting was real and impromptu, staged by a Mossad sleeper cell; there are not many Sikhs in the elite Jewish circle and therefore they would view that group as expendable and not needing a lot of caution applied before shooting them up. Hate to say it, but that is simply the way it is.

When they have an entire news sequence canned ahead of time, there will be no witnesses and they don't have to deal with the variables of a live scenario. So from a "witness" perspective the Bat man shooting held up. The temple shooting fell apart really fast because it was a rush job, a live scenario, and real witnesses were present.

Whoever is on Holmes Street - their "lone gunman", a scenario widely refuted by witnesses, is the next patsy and they simply profiled him and had him ready to go ahead of time in case he was needed as another face to pin their murderous corruption on.

When individuals in the alternative media discovered the Libor scandal tie in with the batman shooting, it nearly fatally damaged that story all by itself, and this, in conjunction with the tweets I found and made public made a second shooting necessary because the first was too badly damaged. This new shooting was uncovered for what it was much sooner, the "elite" were simply too sloppy with the whole thing. So who knows WHAT they will do next? it's obvious they are getting desperate.

Once I get all this stuff sorted out to a final answer, I will post it along with the whistleblower testimony that is really very damning. I would like to speak to the whistlblower again before publishing the story, but censorship of mail is a daily obstacle and if I cannot contact this individual again, I am publishing it as I have it now. Most likely this will be posted tomorrow (to allow time for contact, but not allow a huge delay).

Don't fall for the lone gunman scam

We might have had 3 agents and ONE patsy. In fact, after shooting up the place, the agents may have killed the patsy themselves and then went on to fake being police officers. Israeli intelligence would NOT be questioned, and neither would the CIA. This man tells it as he saw it. "One gunman killed, 3 still inside!" Any deviation from this on the scene witness account is corruption of facts. On top of that, the 4 shooters were in the congregational area. The people there would NOT have messed up their observation of that.

Any story creep after the initial report is likely due to coercion during cross examination.


Shooting "victim's" tweet throws poison on official story

Jessica Ghawi, one of the "victims" of the bat man shooting had a different name on Twitter. That name is Jessica Redfield. And here is one of her tweets!!!

Why the creepy Buhahahahah response?

Another detail which relates to the above tweet - she was supposed to have witnessed another shooting at a mall in Canada the month before. Said tweet would be an indication that it's an inside joke, anyone tweeting her, knowing her, would never have put the quote in that perspective unless the Toronto shooting was fake as well, and he knew about it! The odds just do not stack in favor of the "official" story - such a response from her would NEVER have happened if she really bore witness to another shooting a month prior. She's fake, and she is laughing about it.

Here is her twitter account: GUNFIRE??!!??

"Make up" shooting at Sikh temple in Wisconsin was probably due to this discovery by this web site severely damaging the entire bat man story

The Libor connection did not do the Bat Man shooting story line a whole lot of good either!
MORE TO COME, I have additional goods on this woman that are being ironed out. Seems like she may have received an ENORMOUS payoff for lying in Toronto, but there are many rabbit holes to find and flood. For starters, she was an intern, and after Toronto, moved to a new place with 7 pools and a lake! (possibly for hiding out after the next gig)


A little suggestion from forum member Glitch led to the following:

A tribute to those who died in Aurora

Much of this section has been removed out of respect because people NOT at the theater may have been killed and pegged on the shooting
THIS SHOOTING WAS MAXIMIZED FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT THE SAME WAY THE DATE 911 (AN EMERGENCY NUMBER) IS UNFORGETTABLE So in court, Robert Holmes, who was going to testify before Libor, now has a son with NO MEMORY of the shooting facing a death sentence at the MOST opportune time possible, for a crime that NEVER OCCURRED. But in the world of corruption, actors, and fake news, that won't matter. He will be punished as if it really happened and the bankers are now likely to RUN FREE.

To clarify my position that the Bat man shooting may have never happened at all:

The plot is ridiculous, and at a minimum the event was a false flag. To accomplish a political objective, it did not need to happen at all. Actors could have been in place across the board, and all the blanks filled in by a lying media. Got any other source for this than CNN and FOX? Did they post the police tapes? WHY NOT? I have presented some really good info here that tells a different story than you will find elsewhere. Perhaps there were bullets fired in the theater. In that case, Holmes could not have possibly done it. The entire event was sanitized, there WAS a second shooter, and the following posts and articles, AND the police tapes PROVE IT. The fact that the police DID NOT pursue the other car leaving the scene would indicate that it was all supposed to be a DRILL and the second car was not part of that drill and was therefore permitted to leave, possibly with the real killers inside. Perhaps there was a drill at the same time a real black op shooting took place. Either way it was a false flag and Holmes is virtually assured to be innocent.

Holmes put on trial WAY TOO SOON

Just about everyone knows the line "you have a right to a speedy trial". Fewer people know the line "you will be allowed time to prepare a defense". And in the case of Holmes, this did not happen. WHY?

When I first heard that Holmes went to court within three days of the shooting, I thought that it had to be for a bond hearing. Evidently it was not. Too many questions were asked, bond hearings are short, and if proper procedure had been followed what should have happened in the first court appearance?

Holmes would have been given an amount he had to put up for bail, or been told bail was denied and sent back to jail with a court appearance date a month from now, and if he plead that he needed more time than that to prepare a defense, more than a month would have been allowed.

This did not happen with Holmes, who has been held without bond, and the fact that he is being held without bond proves that he is being rammed through the court system post haste. And there is a reason for it. That reason is, that they want as many of the court proceedings AS POSSIBLE to go by, with Holmes still stoned out of his mind from whatever they drugged him with.

It is obvious that Holmes was heavily drugged before the shooting, and was in a total stupor when arrested; a condition which would have rendered him unable to do it. It is proven by the police tapes linked on this site that there was a second individual in the theater - a fact that got silenced, which means a total of THREE people were at the scene of the shooting: 

1. Holmes, drugged out of his mind, sitting in his car, 

2. The gunman who shot everything up, and 
3, an accomplice to the gunman who opened the emergency exit door and let the gunman in. I think in the original plot (that is, if the shooting even happened at all, see below) Holmes was supposed to shoot up theater 9. There was a drill going on at the time of the shooting that matched the scenario, and that drill had theater 9 getting attacked as well. Nothing happened there.

A brown SUV fled the scene from behind the theater and the police did not pursue. I wonder why? Perhaps that boils down to the fact that that the chief of police was an import from New York, a city famous for major police corruption. It is also possible that the police knew they were doing a drill, and the brown SUV was not part of the drill, so why bother with it?

Had the shooting been real, the police most likely would have blown away Holmes as he sat in his car. Even a casual youtuber would know how trigger happy the police are by now - WHY is Holmes even alive? Was he totally zonked? Not even conscious at all when found?

And then there is another connection. The Libor connection. As it turns out, Holmeses dad was a programmer for Darpa and the credit reporting agency FICO. Rumor has it that his dad had the goods on the bankers, and was going to testify before congress and hang the bankers in the upcoming Libor scandal hearings.

So let's separate cold hard fact from rumor here, so we can know where this all stands:

FACT: Robert Holmes really did work for Darpa as a programmer and really is a senior programmer for Minneapolis based FICO, a company which specializes in credit reporting and has developed special computer algorithms (compliments of Robert Holmes, who wrote them). 

These computer algorithms were able to track the entire Libor scandal down to the names and addresses of the perpetrators, and deliver it to FICO in a neat little package that could hang powerful people.

Here is his linkdln account:

Robert Holmes on Linkdln

FACT: It is obvious that his son, James Holmes, was doing EXCELLENT in college, and showed up for an exam totally stoned out of his mind, and subsequently dropped out of college, all within a span of only two months. From brilliant straight A's in neuroscience to total stoner flunkie in only two months. Very fishy.

FACT: James Holmes had never touched a gun in his life, knew nothing about them. Supposedly then, from that position, he skillfully booby trapped his apartment while totally stoned out of his mind and ordered an arsenal and paid for it with his credit cards and successfully operated the weapons the first time he ever touched them, well enough to totally shoot up a theater.

Hmmmmmmm . . . . I will tell you from experience, that if you NEVER shot a gun in your life, and then had to use SEVERAL to pump off hundreds of rounds YOU COULD NOT DO IT. Guns are not the hardest things to use, but to do that across several the first time you ever tried to use a gun, and have all of them work is a joke of reason. 

I remember buying a semi auto .38 handgun once and it took me 20 minutes to figure out how to load it and fire it because the entire top of the gun had to be slid back to allow access to the chamber, and I had never seen that before. THAT is after having MAJOR experience with long rifles. I felt stupid of course, but it did happen. Operation of a new weapon is not always obvious, and from a point of no experience with ANY gun, Holmes would never have figured out 3 in the course of 90 seconds.

THE BAT MAN SHOOTING STORY READS LIKE SOMETHING AN ELITIST IDIOT WOULD WRITE - someone who wrote fiction and had no real knowledge of the variables at hand. A colorful story, to be sold to the masses.

FACT: The entire theme of the bat man movie that got "shot up" involved the villain BANE, who was on a quest to imprison the elite of Gotham, who had ripped the common people off with scams, and Bane wanted to hold them accountable before the people. The parallel to Libor and Goldman Sachs was obvious. What a great theme to have, IF the father of the man who did the bat man shooting really was going to appear before Congress as a key witness who could name names and addresses of the bankster perpetrators of the Libor scam.

FACT: Someone held the emergency exit open, to allow the shooter in, and no alarm sounded. ALL emergency exits are alarmed, and the theater was NOT a poorly maintained piece of trash. Furthermore, ALL theaters have CCTV cameras in them. Why are we not being allowed to see the footage from the emergency door, the INSIDE of the theater, or out in the parking lot? No CCTV footage? Why? Could it be that it was OBVIOUS in the footage that Holmes just sat there in his car, in a drug induced stupor while a pro shot the place up?

FACT: Holmes knows NOTHING about the shooting and is suffering from amnesia. A good indicator of being drugged, and also a good indicator that it was nothing but a drill and he is being held in court under entirely false pretenses. All it takes is actors when the "suspect" has no memory. With regard to the drugging, please read the second link below; I really think that writer NAILED IT.

UNCONFIRMED: Robert Holmes had been called before Congress to testify for the prosecution in the LIBOR scandal.

To the unconfirmed note, I will post these two links and simply state that I absolutely believe this, but cannot confirm it:

Here is a careful take: Careful take

And Here is one that takes chances with accuracy, but I really believe this is EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED, though it is unconfirmed: Take this creativity to the bank, I bet this guy nailed it!

Addressing the second shooter - An alternate take on Holmes

In the original scenario, the original report, a second shooter shot up Theater 9. That was probably the one Holmes was supposed to hit. And though I do not believe anything happened other than a drill, I am posting this alternative scenario because there is some evidence to support it.

There are some inconsistencies in the initial reports that leave room for an alternate scenario. Of course, this has all been buried since they ironed out the story for public consumption. In the original scenario, there was a second shooter and bombs in theater 9. So Holmes may have been given that one to do, but did not. This alternate take puts that possibility into perspective
The alternate take is,

He met people he thought were friends. They drugged him over a period of time - this can be easily accomplished by spiking food and drinks.

He goes into a black hole haze, and during this time, his hair gets dyed, and they work on him HARD to get him as nutty as possible while stoned. This likely took place over a course of days, during which his apartment is set up with tons of booby traps by a pro who actually would know how to do it, while Holmes, who is living away from people who knew him, people who would know something was fishy with him not being around for days, gets the workover at another location

-A package is mailed in the name of Holmes, with all kinds of nutty stuff in it,
-They set up the hit.    
- He sits out in his car and drools through the whole thing because he is stoned, and they could not get him to actually do the shooting.
- A well trained hit man, who knows all about the weapons goes in and really does shoot up theater 8.
- He takes off in a brown SUV (this was recorded)
- Witnesses say the gunman in the theater looks nothing like the patsy, (this happened, but will probably devolve as witnesses are worked on during cross examinations)
- Police come, the patsy has been pre programmed to say he did it, (he is still just sitting in the car drooling, that's where they found him)
- He takes the rap

That's the alternate scenario. And it could explain why NO ONE got any video, not even the CCTV cameras in the theater. It's all just a black hole. NOTHING came out of that theater. That alone is fishy.

You mean to tell me, that during the opening premier of Bat Man, NO ONE WAS SITTING THERE WITH A CELL PHONE RECORDING IT? Come on now, people do that all the time! And by default they would have captured the shooting, without even thinking about it!


Don't think it's possible for them to Wag the dog with the entire thing? Read this!

CNN caught RED HANDED faking the news

Take a look at this video. CNN is FAKING A NEWS REPORT.
I just hate that agency, which I cannot call news, Oh, the Creative News Network.
This video should show a CNN news reporter, waiting for a connection, trying to cue gunfire for background effect, getting bored, asking for a mattress to sit on, and FINALLY once CNN is on the line, he is suddenly in a "war scene".

This video had to be hotlinked, because Youtube denied embed on this web site..

And down the page a ways at Youtube, there is a comment - This video is not translated correctly, I speak Arabic. Well, that's a lie, because in Arabic he asks for gunfire, the translation says "just tell him to shoot", he fires one shot, and the news reporter does not jump, he just gets confirmation that the background gunner can get the message.

Furthermore, they are right in the middle of Isha prayer, as evidenced by the soundtrack and you won't have that if everything they mentioned later in the newscast really happened, the mosques would be shuttered and silent, with people praying in their homes.

In Arab countries, the mosques all play the prayers over loudspeakers that are mounted high up in the minarets, and can be heard for very long distances. So you can hear several of these mosques in the broadcast. The fact that this was going on in the background proves that it was business as usual that day, and that this video really was as presented - a TOTAL FRAUD. Towards the end he gets connected and look at what they broadcast!

Ok, here is another video. This one focuses more on Aljazeera. Aljazeera was set up by the Rothchilds, it came out of London, and is a zionist news channel which serves to make the Arabs believe they have mainstream representation. Of course, Aljazeera is not as stupid with Arab issues as CNN, because Arabs know too much about their own world. SO Aljazeera is tuned perfectly to make Arabs believe they have representation, while dis informing them as much as possible. This is an important video:


I am holding my ground about Aurora being a wag the dog

I have received several e-mails now, where people claim to have been witnesses. My take on those mails? First of all, my sites combined only get about 500,000 page views a month. So there is no way so many people from a small community would EVER find my site - 500,000 / 8,000,000,000 people. That calculates down to a 6.25 to the negative 5th power chance that ANYONE who witnessed the Aurora shootings would ever find my site to send me a mail telling me they saw it all. To get several mails means all are b.s.

They have the elitist catch phrases in them, which I am familiar with. That's a red flag. Also, consider the first two videos I posted at the top of this page, which PROVE the media fabricates news. Also, consider the police tapes linked below. And most of all, when you see those photos now of bloody little girls with their feet blown off, I ask you to FIRST send those photos provided by the MSM through the crap filter, after the alternative press caught them red handed using the injured face of a man killed somewhere else in the Arab world and copying those injuries to the face of Osama for mass consumption:

And that's my final answer!

It does not have to be real to accomplish a gun grab if the masses fall for it.
Consider this article as well! I STRONGLY recommend you read this article. Scroll down to it, the tops of Whatreallyhappened pages are long.

THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE caused an ENORMOUS number of attacks against this site.   (VN: boy am I familiar with that problem, its almost continuous now.)

Police radio communications CONFIRM - Bat Man shooting STAGED, PHONY, A DRILL.

I have received two e-mails from people saying that witnesses to the shooting posted their accounts of it at a game forum and at Yahoo answers. I am not changing my take on this, and here is why - It's because the CIA hired over a million goons to go around the social forums re-enforcing stories like this and spread disinfo. 

If there ever was something that said it's all fake, it's the look on the face of the shooter afterward, and the photo op photo farther down this page. I don't buy it, and even if I am wrong about this and there really was action the rest of the story does not wash, this event was staged, pure and simple. And either way, these police tapes are worth a listen, because they have details which do not match the whitewash in the press. No shootout with the Joker and the police afterward? GET REAL.

In THE FIRST intercepted police radio tape, (which is silent for the first 11 minutes, indicating nothing was being said for those 11 minutes) at minute 11 the police units involved in the drill check in, and say all are present. Then, right around 13 minutes it is discussed where one of the centers will be. Then, starting at minute 14, they are discussing where they will be at the Aurora mall for the start of the drill at the Aurora theater.


I then skipped to the last of these, where they are talking about setting up the press, where to put the ambulances, where to put the "victims" families, etc for their photo ops. This MP3 has the police communications in the left speaker, overlapped with the Fire department communications in the right speaker It's OBVIOUS what is going on here. Keep in mind, that because this is a drill, bodies and injured WILL be mentioned and played as real, but it's ALL FAKE as confirmed by recording 1, and the overall attitude in this MP3, where they are talking about WHERE TO PUT THE PRESS AND FAMILIES AND AMBULANCES FOR PHOTOS!
My original suspicions were confirmed by these tapes. 

The bat man shooting NEVER HAPPENED AT ALL! These MP3's were posted by, which is begging people to download these and re-post them elsewhere so they do not get shut down. So these are coming off my servers now. I suggest you download them from here to distribute the server load, (I have headroom to spare right now) but if there are any problems they might still be at the source. And I thank for sticking their necks out to spread the truth. Here are ALL files from Aurora. The first and last are linked above (as well as down here), those are the ones I took a peek at.

I took more of a look at these than I planned to. It is mega obvious the drill was not even of primary importance to the police department, it's just a side thing.

1. Setting up the drill
2. The drill in progress (boring police tape with other stuff mixed in)
3. The drill in progress (boring police tape with other stuff mixed in)
4. The drill in progress (boring police tape with other stuff mixed in)
5. The drill in progress (boring, supposedly the shooter is in this one)
6. The drill in progress (boring, a second bomb is supposedly in this one)
7. Where should stuff go for the photo ops?

MANY THANKS to forum member Kwai_Chang for linking to in the forum, absent that I would have never found this.

Bat man shooting CONFIRMED a wag the dog

There are serious problems with the story surrounding the "shooting" in Colorado.
There is no evidence being presented of: DEAD BODIES, A SHOT UP THEATER, NO CCTV FOOTAGE, RIDICULOUS PLOT (How does an unemployed college student get ahold of $20,000 worth of extremely controlled military gear) or anything else he had. You don't need any dead bodies to put an ambulance on camera and have a dozen or so actors cry for a camera. Why ONE BIG AMBULANCE, not many? Easier to manage. Cheaper. WHY were the police there INSTANTLY? This is a WAG THE DOG, COUNT ON IT!!! 

And in the end, it will work JUST AS WELL. AND, why this shooting, so close to the previous in Colorado? Not plausible either, unless you have a community there that has been assigned by the power elite to pull these stunts. I do not believe it ever happened. PROVE ME WRONG. Oh, the elite stronghold under the Denver airport - the new base for everything. Cute. Consider that as well.

SO far documented, 1 ambulance 1 fire truck, several police, one Joker getup, a shirt with a bullet hole and a total of about a dozen crying people in photos. No stretchers, No CCTV footage, NO shot up theater pics, No bodies being carried out, NO pictures of people with any bandages or injuries present, NOTHING. 

This is a lazy cheap fake at best, being rammed down the throat of the public by a scamming media. And after being quickly nailed by viewers of Aljazeera, and having people point out immediately that the dead osama photo published in the U.S. was fake, it seems they did not want to take chances with stock photography and therefore we are seeing NOTHING OF PROVABLE SUBSTANCE.

"No plane theory" anyone? Possibly rightfully so!

Looking over the pictures published thus far, it really does look like a mega stupid fake once you realize the things I mentioned above. Capture this moment, because if people wake up to this they will have countless fake photos made to order. For now, they are resting easy.

NTS Notes:  I want to thank the Vatic Project, at, for bringing this article to my attention.  The findings are indeed astounding!

When I read this report the first thing that came to my mind was... "Dallas Goldbug" and how that disinformation agent has been stating for a while that most recent shootings in America were complete frauds and the victims were actually actors.   I will not give Mr. Goldbug any credit, however, because he sticks to strange and outrageous allegations about many people that are absolutely ridiculous.   But  the thought that we are being played as suckers and fools, by the Jewish power elite in all of these alleged shootings, has definitely crossed my mind...

I leave it up to my own readers to take this very interesting piece of information by Jim Stone and do their own research.   The Aurora Shooting itself has been wrought with very strange circumstances, and the facts that we have been presented by the so called mainstream media is pure and utter bull crap.  Therefore, the idea that it was nothing more than another psy-op by criminals is very possible indeed!

More to come



Noor al Haqiqa said...

Amazing research here and....

well the fact that incidents are already in the can and ready to go does not surprise me in the least.

Your comments about Goldbug are quite accurate too. He has done one or two amazing things but... when he declared Kennedy was now Carter ~ or that Hitler became Walt Disney ~ I rather lost the plot.

I am amazed at how many people now quote him as the ultimate truth now though.

Stone is, as ever, bang on.

Northerntruthseeker said...

Thanks, Noor..

When Dallas first showed up about a year ago, I smelled a rat.. His explanations raised a lot of questions..But after analyzing many of his assertions, we can see that he is misleading...

I care not for his disinformation, and will always refuse to post any of his ridiculous ideas here!

Bob Marley said...

Want to tell our listeners how Aurora was staged? At this point I'd consider any explanation other than an official one. Our Show Conspiracy Corner runs on blogtalkradio Wednesday evenings 7-9pm. Call in at (347) 308-8713 or email and we can use Skype if you prefer.

Northerntruthseeker said...

I appreciate the thought, "Bob Marley" and will possibly consider it..

I find most of the facts still misleading about the entire Aurora episode,and have only now begun to put all the pieces of the puzzle together...

There are still others who know even more about this fraud than I do...

Thanks again


Anonymous said...

I like it. Creative, but I will say that at my closest movie theater, the front 'screen-side' exits are not emergency exits. They are simply exits straight to the parking lot so you don't have to go back through the whole place when the movie is done. They aren't alarmed, because I've seen people leave through them during a movie. They are one-way of course, so someone inside would have to open one to let someone in. And also- the assertion that ALL theaters have cc cameras is extremely questionable. Why would ANY theater have them? So you can watch people leaving, or watch them in darkness as they watch a movie? It's Dark in there. What would a video camera be useful for?

Anyway, it's just some observations of mine that really don't impinge too much upon your premise- there were NO video/pics at all from inside, because there probably weren't any installed cameras, and exit doors that aren't designed to be alarmed don't set off alarms. The lack of any cell phone video or pics has a dual explanation. First of all; it's dark, but more importantly, who the hell is going to pull out a cell phone and spend the time playing with it to record video or take pics while the theater is being shot up? And if it's a drill of some kind, in the manner you describe, why not throw a few fake cell phone images to the media?

The lack of internal images of the event isn't unusual, if images from theater cc cameras and cell phones is expected. There is no reason to expect them, and no reason to wonder why none exist.

If the alleged shooters father was indeed about to testify about libor (which you say is unconfirmed), how does it necessarily follow that he wouldn't go through with it if his son was accused of this crime? His son being set up in this extravagant way is a warning? Why not just get rid of the father? You say the libor thing is unconfirmed, which means that you haven't been able to find any solid evidence of it anywhere, which also means that DAD isn't 'on the radar' in any way. So why not just get rid of him?

Interesting hypothesis for sure, and it's an obvious setup, but...

Gun said...

You have done a great research, i am sure it will definitely help out in my project also.

Anonymous said...

On July 19th 2012, I went to see a marathon showing of Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, and ending with a midnight showing of The Dark Knight Rises. I ALWAYS sit in the front row. I go to the movies A LOT and can count on one hand the times I have EVER seen someone use the emergency doors by the sides of the screen. Halfway through the second film I saw person get up and leave through the emergency exit. I remember thinking what a waste of money it was to pay for a marathon and then leave halfway through. Then thought nothing of it until the next day when I heard about the Aurora incident. Specifically the reports of the "shooter" entering and exiting through an emergency exit.

Could numerous cities be targeted as candidates for these false flags up until the last minute when given the OK for the final op to begin in the final target city?

Anyone else recall odd incidents happening at your midnight showing of The Dark Knight Rises on July 20th?

Also, director Tony Scott's mysterious death a month later raises questions. Where are the autopsy photos? Was the 45 min. long aurora aftemath crime scene video shown to jurors faked by director Tony Scott? Why is this video non-existent online?

In a theater full of 200+ people with cellphones and cameras and all we get is some blurry cell footage from outside the theater?

The DARPA and FICO algorithm angles are red herrings.

Also, when the shooting began the scene on screen in theater 8 reported by multiple witnesses was the scene where SWAT enters the bar with Cat woman and the dude from Torch wood.
Which helped to further add to the confusion that it was "all part of the show" or a prank. How could James Holmes have had the foresight to know to wear riot gear and use tear gas at that particular moment during a film that no one except the hollywood elite had ever seen?

If we can examine these events close enough, we may be able to predict the next one in order to obtain more evidence to prove that these are military funded operations used to smokescreen the american government's illegal drone strikes on innocent aid workers overseas and to further the militarization of our public spaces, malls, schools, and theaters.

The Riddler has red hair...not The Joker.