The Osama Bin Laden Fiasco Continues: One Year On, Still NO Evidence For Osama Bin Laden's Killing!

Yes, it is now May 1st, 2012, and the US Government and the fraudulent liars in the US media are celebrating the one year anniversary of their fraudulent "Seal Team 6 killing Osama Bin Laden" in Pakistan.   It is absolutely appalling to see these liars and hypocrites continue to outright lie to the American public in their false claim that they "finally" got Osama bin Laden... And I am still waiting for the criminal Obama administration to start using the laughable and outright lie of "Obama got Osama" as one of the criminal President's re-election ploys...

There are so many holes in the American story about their Navy Seal team 6 killing Osama bin Laden in Pakistan that it looks like swiss cheese.  Worse, according to this article, from the Activist Post, at www.activistpost.com, it appears that now one year later, there is still no evidence for the Bin Laden assault forthcoming at all!  First, I want to present that Activist Post article right here for my own readers to view for themselves, and I do have my usual comments to follow:

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

One Year On, Still No Evidence For Osama Bin Laden's Killing

Brit Dee, Contributor
Activist Post

It is a year since the US government pulled off one of the most audacious stunts of the 21st century, when on May 2nd 2011 they claimed to have killed Osama bin Laden during a Navy SEALs operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan. The contemptuously sloppy story spun by the US government, parroted without question by the controlled corporate media, and obligingly swallowed by a largely gullible Western public, was dubious in the extreme.

Many credible commentators, including respected intelligence analysts and heads of state, had claimed years before 2011 that bin Laden was dead. It is widely believed that bin Laden suffered from kidney disease; former President of Pakistan General Pervez Musharraf stated in January 2002 that he thought the Al Qaeda leader had died of the disease, and after reviewing video footage of a poorly-looking bin Laden from late 2001, CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta observed that his "frosting of the appearance is something that people a lot of times associate with chronic kidney failure, renal failure, certainly someone who is requiring dialysis would have that."

Even if bin Laden was still alive in May 2011, events following his supposed killing proved, for the rationally critical, very difficult to swallow. Were we really expected to accept without question bin Laden's corpse being hastily buried in the North Arabian sea, within 24 hours of his killing? US authorities made the absurd claim that in doing so they were following Islamic tradition, which dictates that a body should be buried within 24 hours of death. Whilst this is true, Islamic tradition definitely does not require burial at sea, other than in exceptional circumstances such as when a person dies during a sea voyage - when all effort must still be made to perform a burial in the ground. Sceptics also rightly point to historic examples of the US failing to respect Islamic tradition - when, for example, Saddam Hussein's sons Uday and Qusay were killed, and their bodies kept for 11 days before being released for burial. It is difficult not to react with incredulity to the manner in which bin Laden's corpse was supposedly disposed; the ultimate proof of his death, prime evidence which would clearly be demanded by many, simply dumped in the sea.

The public were of course prevented from seeing other evidence of bin Laden's death. Video footage of the raid and photographs of bin Laden's corpse, the government declared, were simply too gruesome to publish. The CIA, who claim to have 52 seperate photos and videos of the raid and burial, has fought hard to keep their purported evidence secret. A Freedom Of Information Request for the photos prompted John Bennett, director of the National Clandestine Service of the CIA, to claim that releasing the images would pose a grave risk to national security. Last week a federal judge agreed. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg said the CIA's "explanation of the threat to our national security that the release of these records could cause passes muster", and that "verbal descriptions of the death and burial of Osama bin Laden will have to suffice, for this court will not order the release of anything more."

We were initially led to believe that Obama and other members of his administration personally watched bin Laden's killing. White House "situation room" photos featured an apparently shocked Hillary Clinton seemingly watching events live - even though it was subsequently admitted by CIA director Leon Panetta that there had been no live feed during the raid. Several other significant revisions were made to the original account of the raid, in the days following May 2nd. It was initially claimed, though subsequently retracted, that bin Laden's henchmen had engaged Navy SEALs in a fierce gunfight, and that Osama himself had been armed. The propagandistic claim that bin Laden cowered behind his wife when cornered by US special forces also turned out to be false. Some asked why, if he did not pose a physical threat to the SEALs, bin Laden had not been taken alive? It would surely have made sense to capture the world's most wanted man, the supposed leader of a global terror network and an invaluable source of intelligence, alive.

The accounts of locals in Abbottabad also contradicted the official narrative. Whilst US authorities admitted they lost a helicopter during the raid, they said no US military personnel had been injured or killed. Eyewitness Mohammed Bashir, however, lived opposite the compound and claimed to have seen many dead bodies in the crashed helicopter. And whilst officials say none of the SEAL Team 6 members involved in the compound raid were amongst the unit's 22 soldiers killed in a helicopter crash in Afghanistan in August 2011, some have speculated that the incident was part of a coverup connected to the raid in May. There are other intriguing local testimonies. A BBC journalist who spoke to 50 Abbottabad residents could only find one who believed bin Laden had been living at the compound. One local was adamant that the elderly figure purported to be bin Laden, who appears in a video apparently recovered from the compound, is actually his neighbour - a man he knows "very well" and whose name is "Akbar Khan". It is also odd that the fugitive bin Laden would choose to hide in, of all places, Abbottabad - being as it is a military town home to the Kakul military academy.

The coverup appears to have continued this year, when in February "bin Laden's compound" was totally demolished. On February 27th we reported that "Pakistani authorities began tearing down the house on Saturday night, working under floodlights, with the local population subject to a strict curfew and Pakistan Army soldiers and police personnel reportedly deployed in large numbers", and how the "total destruction of the death scene makes it much less likely independent verification of the official narrative will ever be established".

As the mainstream seems determined to ignore, downplay, or ridicule attempts to verify the official narrative, it is clearly down to us - the alternative, independent media - to try and do so.

This article first appeared at Resistance Radio.
Brit Dee runs an independent online radio station called Resistance Radio, which broadcasts daily news, views and analysis challenging the lies of our corrupt political and financial leaders, and the controlled corporate media, at http://www.resistradio.com. 

NTS Notes:  It is so disgusting to see the American people being led along like fools by the liars in their own government and media about this entire Osama bin Laden fiasco. 

First, it must be repeated that Osama bin Laden died sometime around December 13th, 2001, from complications due to his failing kidneys.    Ever since the attacks of September 11th, 2001, in which he was falsely accused of masterminding, he had been on the run and with no proper access to dialysis equipment, he succumbed to complications from his failing kidneys.  He was buried in the Tora Bora region in northwestern Pakistan.

But the US administration needed their boogeyman for the Israeli Mossad assault of 9-11, so they selected their US CIA agent, Tim Osman, aka, Osama bin Laden to be their convenient fall guy.

Now with his usefulness at an end, they conveniently created the entire fraudulent "Seal Team 6" assault on the "Bin Laden compound" in Pakistan as a method of doing away with their CIA trained boogeyman and at the same time try to garner support for the failing Obama administration in America to boot. 

The problem has always been that in spite of the majority of Americans blindly and stupidly cheering for the demise of bin Laden, many could see through the farce and charade, and have wanted proof from the US government of his demise.  To prevent themselves being caught in a massive lie, the US government first claimed they disposed of the body by "burial" at see to conveniently rid the evidence, and then they tried to pass off phony photos of his death and even a BS video, to the American people.  Again, people could see the fraud, but the US government instead of coming clean has long claimed that they will not release any real evidence for "security" reasons.  

Now a year later, even the most idiotic Americans are finally seeing that they have been had and that the attack of last May 1st was a fraud.   A year later, the criminals still cannot show the evidence because there is none.  Instead, they have been hoping that the American public will with time let this issue die, or simply go away....

Readers, and especially those in America, We must keep the pressure up on these criminals for this outright lie.   These criminals in the US government have lied for so long about a multitude of their actions.    It is time for the public to know the truth, these criminals exposed, and hopefully removed from office immediately!

More to come

NTS