Thursday, February 23, 2012

The Apollo Moon Landing Hoax: Proof Positive That The Recent LRO Images Of The "Apollo Landing Sites" Were Photo-shopped Fakes!

Just a few years back, the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), that was at the time circling the moon, was directed by operators at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory to take some pictures of the supposed Apollo landing sites.    That was done after years of everyone saying that they wanted proof positive that men actually walked on the moon by having the actual landing sites photographed from either on Earth, or from lunar orbit.

After a bit of delay in releasing the images to the public, NASA presented the world with what they claim was the long awaited "proof" that Apollo was real... But the original images that they passed off as the Apollo landing sites were blurred and very suspect... Later, NASA released more updated images from what they say was pictures taken from the LRO at a lower orbit over the supposed landing sites.  But what we saw again was smudges, blurs, and very suspect images....

However the Apollo Believers have been going absolutely hog wild since the release of these "images" saying that now the Apollo Hoax Believers are beaten and to be laughed at... I for one, was never convinced of these LRO images as proof positive of man being on the moon, due to their flagrant inconsistencies and have long believed, like many in the Apollo hoax group, that they were faked using some photo editing....

Now comes the truth about the LRO images.   Thanks to a great investigator of the truth behind Project Apollo, who uses the Youtube name: "Hunchbacked", we have the long sought proof that the LRO images are indeed fakes using plain and simple Adobe Photoshop editing.  I want to present Hunchbacked's evidence of the fraud of the LRO images in the following Youtube video, entitled: "The Proof That The LRO Photos Are Photoshopped" right here for everyone to observe for themselves...I do have some more comments to follow:



NTS Notes: It is still hard to believe that many people, even with this evidence staring them in their faces, will stick to the lie of Project Apollo being real.  That shows how strong the brainwashing has been by both the liars at NASA, and the liars in our own media and governments, over all these years...

What we have here is another attempt by NASA, to prove their fraudulent Project Apollo as "real", defeated and put out of its misery. I do guarantee that they will, sadly, not stop though in their vain attempts to keep this massive lie alive.

Some may question why I am so much against Project Apollo... Being a man of science, I find NASA's lies of landing a man on the moon through this fraudulent program an insult, and a disservice to humanity, and human history.   What these criminals should be doing is coming clean about the entire scam, and tell the truth that they could not do it and give the reasons why.

It is my belief that human beings have progressed to the point now that they would accept the fact that NASA and the US Government lied about putting men on the moon, as long as these organizations present their truthful explanation for faking Project Apollo.   Real space science, and scientific progress, deserves at least that!

More to come

NTS

30 comments:

Snakey said...

You might find Don Scott's Electric Sky a bit of an eye opener, if you are interested in alternative science theories :)

P.S I visit your blog quite often. Sorry I don't always leave comments.

Northerntruthseeker said...

I have studied the electric sky concept and the electric universe idea very thoroughly... They both show some credibility that goes beyond anything the liars at NASA can ever perceive...

Thanks, and feel free to comment any time...

Frank Fredenburg said...

It is a sad commentary on our scientific community that no one has stepped forword to expose the hoax. What happened to Carl Sagan?

Fowl Ideas said...

Going to the Moon was difficult. Faking it and convincing large numbers of people to keep quiet about it would have been impossible. Nobody can keep a secret.

Northerntruthseeker said...

Sorry, but NASA's agencies that built the machinery for the faked Apollo program was so compartmentalized in the 1960's and 1970's that in spite of some 250,000+ people working on the parts and equipment, only a handful were necessary to be kept in the loop about it being a fake...

Can all those people be kept out of the loop about the fraudulence of Apollo? Also consider the Manhattan Project of WW2 where some 1/2 million people were working on the project, but only about 200 or so actually knew about the building of the bombs...

And about Carl Sagan? Dead now since 1996, but even in his time, was well financed by those organizations associated with NASA.... If he ever turned on NASA, his funding would have disappeared...I do suspect that there are some scientists who know the truth and are in the same boat that would rather sell their souls for their own pockets than have the morality to get the truth out...

Anonymous said...

As for the argument that it would be impossible that so many people keep quiet about it here are two non-moon examples: there is a KGB-Letter on Edward 'Ted' Kennedy and "so many people keep quiet"; there is Vladimir Bukowsky's commentary on the EU and "so many people keep quiet".

(On the other hand we need "Brights" who tell us that Uri Geller or David Copperfield are magicians.)

Thanks for the video!

Anonymous said...

Me again, "Anonymous" from yesterday (from Berlin).

There are two other points: while standing on the moon, in a new and interesting environment, wouldn't you grab a fistful of rocks and throw them, just to see how different it looks than throwing rocks in your garden? Or the moon rover: if you have to transport equipment where every pound, every grain of salf counts, would you build a car with fenders, with a bumper-sticker like logo on it? Oh, and third, then there is the story of Janice Dodero at http://blog.seattlepi.com/movielady/2011/07/23/the-great-moon-landing-hoax-the-truth-is-finally-revealed/ -- if this were a fantasy story (it is a story and not just a comment in a conspiracy forum) and I were Kubrick's family, I would sue.

debdah said...

people are right to be suspicious - i wrote a blog on this last year after feeling incredibly short-changed by LRO images considering in 2005 we were informed via 'NASA Science News'; "I would say the rovers will look angular and distinct," says Mark Robinson, research associate professor at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, and Principal Investigator for LROC. "We might see some shading differences on top from seats, depending on the sun angle....." lol! - here's link to my blog - http://spiritualnetworks.com/blog/76769/occupy-the-moon/

Hens Zimmerman said...

Nasa uses FITS images, which need to be converted to something the public can see on the web. The FITS plugin for Adobe Photoshop is the default method to convert FITS to jpeg, hence the Photoshop headers. Nothing special abou that.

Northerntruthseeker said...

I have received a recent string of "anonymous" comments calling me an "f-ing idiot"....

As I have stated many times, I will not post comments that contain insults and slurs... If you are unable to debate this issue properly, do not bother and waste my time with useless comments...

The facts are clear... We cannot put men on the moon now, so in no way did we do it 40+ years ago.. Facts are facts..

debdah said...

Agree, they have the technology to show us a clear, full colour HD image of the USA flag on the Moon - so why not shut the 'hoaxers' up overnight? Is it because there IS no flag?

We see full colour, crystal clear images of a broken Mars Rover via the MRO camera & Mars has an atmosphere which should mean LESS clarity, why are images still of 1970's quality when it come to lunar imaging? Why monochrome & not full colour?

These are the questions we need to be asking because the Lunar missions are a very important event in human history - they have SHAPED history & that includes shaping of our human psychology & our judgements about America & NASA..

It is possible that successive USA politicians, Intelligence & a whole HEAP of various financial & 'intelligence' agencies have been BLACKMAILING the USA i.e. why DID America suddenly sell-out to China? They KNEW what would happen, it was as inevitable as pulling the plug from a bath full of water.

i know it sounds far-fetched, but considering the stuff that's coming out recently concerning high-level corruption from paedophilia to grand fraud, theft & murder - who knows?

I believe the Moon Landings are a KEY issue and there are many VALID & REASONABLE questions that need answers.

Allain said...

Why in 2005 did NASA-never a straight answer-give their proposed manned moon mission 20 years to put together when in the 60s they completed the mission in less than half the time, and they were working from scratch?

Northerntruthseeker said...

Allain, you are beginning to see the reality...

NASA cannot go now, because they have said in just the last few years that they need to solve the "space radiation" problems first and foremost.. But that statement alone should have people screaming..."Wait a darn minute... If they cannot go because of radiation, then how did they do it over 40 years ago?"

Common sense dictates.. If they cannot do it now, then they definitely did not do it then. If you cannot go somewhere now without dying, then you definitely did not go and die then....

Anonymous said...

"A man of science" and you still believe it was all a hoax! Glad you appear happy in your lonely little world. Thanks for the best laugh I've had in ages!

Northerntruthseeker said...

I really do LOVE these "anonymous" commentators that come in and slam the facts rather than debate the issue..

Sorry, "anonymous", but you are the one living in a dream world.. One of lies and falsehoods generated by your own government...

NASA has never explained WHY there has not been a "return" to the moon for over 4 decades now.. and their most recent comments have been about the need to derive a "new method" of surviving the radiation of outer space before they can go "back" to the moon.. Gee, I was hoping that someone would have caught on to this by now and gone after these clowns with a basic..."Hey wait a minute guys...You are saying that they cant go to the moon NOW because of the radiation, but yet you did it...9 times in 1968-1972 successfully? What gives???"

This man of science does not hide behind falsehoods and nonsense... If you actually want to seek credibility and actually try to show the scientific evidence of the Nasa Apollo project, then go right ahead and we can debate.. If not, stop wasting my time....

Northerntruthseeker said...

And debdah.. It gets better with the most recent fraud of Curiosity on Mars...

Lets get the facts straight.. Curiosity is absolutely NOT on Mars, period, end of discussion.. Its method of "landing" on Mars is the most telling fraud... "Parachutes in an almost vacuum atmosphere? A "skycrane" that has never existed before, and has never been "tested" before, and yet works miraculously the first and ONLY time on a world 130 Million miles away (position of Mars to Earth at time of landing, on far side of Sun)??? Come on now!!!

AND the biggest fraud about Mars is the color of the sky.. I have gone into great detail trying to explain to people that Mars's sky should have NO color at all, but be totally BLACK... There are not enough martian air particles to diffuse incoming solar light to color the sky at all! Proof: Look at the color of the sky above Earth at an altitude of over 120000 ft.... Not enough air particles to diffuse light at that altitude, so sky is automatically BLACK...... Pressure at martian surface is (supposedly) the same as Earth at 120000 ft altitude.... So WHY is the Martian sky not totally black?

And dont give me the crap about Martian "dust" particles in its atmosphere giving it the red hue color... Mar's atmosphere at 0.004 BAR is too thin to even hold up dust particles and allow sky to be any color....

NASA has been lying since 1976 with the fraud Viking probes (landed with parachutes????) and having to color the Martian sky... Subsequent missions both real and fraud have had to have their pictures doctored to continue the fraud...

Riley said...

What in the world did I just read...just curious but from what background do you come from at which to discuss about atmospheric pressure vs particle suspension? I'm currently studying to be a meteorologist but some of this information does not fit well with me. There's too many variables associated with the make up of an atmosphere. That's not accounting temperature fluctuations either. With pressure that low is the reason why weather exists during Mar's elliptical orbit, right? I mean it's the perfect recipe for sublimation to occur. Some of the storms were visible under our orion skyquest telescopes a few years ago. So why wouldn't dust stay suspended in the wake of those storms? Being half the size of earth, Mars has hardly enough gravity to even keep those particles on the surface.

John Mclaren said...

Sigh...all these claims about the LRO images being photoshoped gets old real fast. The only thing it proves is that RAW images were saved into jpeg format via adobe photoshop. Which means absolutely nothing! JPEG images won't show ANY workflow that is done to said image. You don't know if it got cropped, stitched, or resized. And so far, all the examples are JPEG images! The special cameras from NASA NEVER saves images in compressed jpeg format! They are ALWAYS RAW. If anyone is familiar with RAW image formats, you'll clearly recognize that a majority of them are HUGE in file size. We're talking anywhere between 1MB to 500MB in file size! We're talking about images containing meta data such as camera calibrations, coordinates, e.t.c that contribute to their file sizes. It would be extremely foolish to ONLY distribute RAWs to the public. JPEG compression is used for two main reasons:

1) End-user storage capacity constraints. If you were to download all of NASAs images in RAW, you'll easily hit Terabytes of data. The average end-user wouldn't like the idea of downloading images worth an average of 100MBs a pop. The increased downloading times will also create bottle-necking when multiple users are downloading.

2) Lack of image viewing compatibility. Most end-users will NOT be able to open RAW image formats on-the-fly (like IMG, DNG, MOS, or IIQ to name a few) unless they have access to a photo editer that can open the images while maintaining its embedded calibrations. This is the primary reason most RAWs are compressed into jpeg format.

As Hens Zimmerman stated earlier, saving them into jpeg format eases distribution.

I should also remind people about JPEG compression. The lossy algorithm will ALWAYS introduce artifacts into the image. This is completely unavoidable so long as any image is saved into jpeg format. I would be EXTREMELY careful about analysing any of the LRO images that were compressed into JPEG if you have no prior skills of discerning artifacts from the actual image. Stick with the actual RAWs if you want see the images with clarity. The LRO actually pumps out resolutions of 5024 x 52224!

If you can open EDRs with your software, try the EDR from the M111443315RE from the LRO image search database for starters!

With regards to Mars and its atmosphere not being completely black...I have to agree with what Riley said. I couldn't help but chuckle when the reference to the barometric pressure between Mars and Earth came up. Sure, while the surface pressure on mars roughly equates to the pressure on earth at an approximate altitude of 120,000 ft. and claiming "the sky should be black" is not as relevant since you are totally disregarding the fundamental principles of scale height, temperature, and gravity between these two atmospheres as they play an important function with how molecules stay afloat in the atmosphere (of what's left mars anyway). Mars' relatively weak gravity allows even slow moving particles to escape from the planet's clutches.

Oh well...back to work I go. Working on cell banks really doesn't give you much time to do anything with all these routine passages -_-

steve button said...

James....we know you really need that job...but really...you don't expect us to really believe that long -winded nonsense that passes for an explanation? It's funny how you think if you can describe the surface of Mars in such a detailed way then it must be - must be - that you know all about Adobe photo-shop too....puuuuulleeezzzze...

Fake....faker...oh boy..

The Real Truthseeker said...

If you were the 'truthseeker' you claim to be, you would not be afraid of the truthful opinions of *all* the commentators of your blog, even the ones who upset you with mean words you obviously aren't man enough to handle! 'Truthseeker'? You don't know the meaning of the word! You hide behind your little blog, afraid of all the real people out here, and worst of all, you embarrass New Zealand by having such a ridiculously distorted understanding of science and history! People the world over must think our education system is third world when they read blogs like yours! Of course, you won't have the guts to publish my comments, which suits me just fine, as it will only confirm my, and the rest of the world's educated majority's, opinion of you!

Northerntruthseeker said...

Sorry, but the "real truth seeker" is not yourself obviously...

I have been in this exposure of the fraud of Apollo for almost 35 years now, sonny... What you are saying in the form of insults is nothing new, and shows how the brainwashing of the media and the lies of Apollo continue to this date..

Have you even bothered to look at Jack White's excellent expose of the fraud of the Apollo imagery over at aulis.com..? or the Moonfaker series by Jarrah White on Youtube for starters???? How anyone cannot see the obvious shows that some people such as yourself lack critical thinking skills and cannot see the fakery...

I have had enough of clowns who cannot see the truth about Apollo and NASA... Mankind cannot go beyond low earth orbit and there is nothing yet available to go further.. That is fact...

Northerntruthseeker said...

Once you see the lie of Project Apollo, your mind opens up to all the other lies of history.. Including the Holy hoax of world war II, the fraud of the wars themselves, who controls the banks and our governments, etc...

Project Apollo was only one of the many lies of our history... People are slowly waking up, and it will take time...

Steve Thomas said...

"Or the Moonfaker series by Jarrah White on Youtube for starters???? "

Are you serious? For a conspiracy theorist you seem reasonably articulate demonstrating uncharacteristic levels of equanimity as opposed to the usual irrational hysteria associated with your counterparts. You then completely destroy what vestige of credibility that you''d managed to cling on to by endorsing Jarrah White??!!!??? Careful, you'll be quoting Ralph Rene next.

Northerntruthseeker said...

I do not know who you are "Steve Thomas" but I stand behind every assertion that I have ever made that Apollo was a fraud..

I have yet to hear of you and others that say that Apollo was real to show me proof positive that it was real.. All evidence shows clearly that the moon landings were faked and only fools would still believe them to be real.

If you do not like Jarrah White and his fabulous series that puts nails into the coffin of the fraud of Project Apollo, that is your opinion... I have dealt with the science behind the fraud of Apollo for 35 years and Jarrah's research is sound and factual...

The fraud moon landings were bad enough, but NASA faked the Mars Landings as well... How's that for something for you to think about!

Steve Thomas said...

Thank you for your prompt reply. Of course you don't know who I am...why should you? You object to 'anonymous' posts, and in deference to you and your blog, I have provided my full name. It didn't give me the option of leaving my address, marital status, occupation, pin number, blood group and associated transcription of my medical records.

I have no desire to even discuss the veracity of N.A.S.A. or the Apollo programme with you. You have made it perfectly clear that any adherent to the view that the moon landings were legitimate is a 'fool'. This is your blog and that is your prerogative. I would however point out that as one that is alleging fakery the burden of proof is upon you to scientifically substantiate those claims not the other way around. In so doing, I would ill advise using the words 'scientific' or 'fact' in the same sentence as Jarrah White. That is all.

Anonymous said...

Dear __________,

Please shepherd these videos to the Internet, and, in effect, the public domain. I wish to remain anonymous, and I trust you will take care in my request. I would be very grateful. I am asking other parties for the same favor. I hope someone obliges me. These videos are significant, I humble say.

In these videos I absolutely and unequivocally prove that the Apollo moon landing footage is manufactured on Earth through extensive analysis of falling objects and sand seen in the TV footage. However the complete analysis is far more involved than just that. I believe you will be impressed.

The Presentation videos are YouTube and Vimeo upload-ready. I would also appreciate if you would post all of the video links provided below for download by anyone.

I thank you.


Presentation Videos:

Make_Believe___part_one___MAIN_____.mp4 5.94 GB
https://mega.co.nz/#!0ghi0T7T!eqLYOfkdF1MMoLjEE8FyO_IMVOFsiOLwW3wFJlD9MWU

Make_Believe___part_two___APPENDIX_.mp4 1.88 GB
https://mega.co.nz/#!U1QmGZ6D!zzpsHqGwsPTG1b1TcCqNAFUcKyjQHWXy0PvBEWc8JXQ


TVcamera footage edits:

A11_tvcamera_raw_and_retime_f4v.zip 641.7 MB
https://mega.co.nz/#!lkByyZ7b!IUl6FxRHfTORfON50-k0yDgc8aMixcl_oq0rlcjKRyU

A12_tvcamera_raw_and_retime_f4v.zip 160.1 MB
https://mega.co.nz/#!A8BRmIAA!K4Zc0CURPahJvWvDbSYGteTHoqB4w9HsoC3XhFLLsNY

A14_tvcamera_raw_and_retime_f4v.zip 1.93 GB
https://mega.co.nz/#!4x4yjSzJ!KDH7XH36n7ntDcaRf4RBe8IUzdHFtbojnz2lFAEpvyQ

A15_tvcamera_raw_and_retime_f4v.zip 2.89 GB
https://mega.co.nz/#!xxwymArR!E_V83ZM2j4pEiIRYAvwqyt5Rt9WWVLUHGQnNz68BdtA

A16_tvcamera_raw_and_retime_f4v.zip 3.97 GB
https://mega.co.nz/#!E8w01BaC!uQdNiOIXhZ8ngSAA_PtTwaAfcAvILzHjef_REy5FFAc

A17_tvcamera_raw_and_retime_f4v.zip 4.10 GB
https://mega.co.nz/#!5wBSWIQY!kZGTHi00zNqf-QZ3uYmJlC06G-rry_aBiFApv9kkiU0





Anonymous said...

A kind citizen has already uploaded the main videos to his site. You can view them here:

Make_Believe___part_one
http://krishnatube.com/video/1502/Make-Believe-NASA-Moon-Missions-Part-1

Make_Believe___part_two
http://krishnatube.com/video/1505/Make-Believe-NASA-Moon-Missions-Part-2

The more the merrier!

I thank you.

Anonymous said...

It's all useless. Most scientists cannot be independant. And americans cannot accept that they cannot do it. They can do anything! ...... And NASA is busy to get an opportunity to plant some lunar stuff on the moon before they will be ratted out. Just ignore the usa-lunar stuff/news; it's crap.

Anonymous said...

Awesome blog you have here but I was wanting to know if you knew of any
user discussion forums that cover the same topics discussed here?

I'd really like to be a part of online community where I can get feed-back from
other knowledgeable individuals that share the same interest.

If you have any suggestions, please let me know.
Cheers!

Also visit my blog; surprise eggs

Naveed Ayub said...

The reality is exposed Moon landings were fake or not?