Wednesday, November 30, 2011

The Upcoming War Against Iran: To Americans - Israel NOT Worth Destruction Of US!

The psychos in the criminal state of Israel, along with their useful idiots and slaves in the United States government, are now working overtime in getting their newest war, against Iran, off and running sooner than later.   Right now, however, they are planning a small detour to destroy and enslave Syria much like they did to Libya.  But everyone knows that once Syria is eliminated, the next domino to fall will definitely be Iran.


But is a war with Iran worth it to the United States?  With all the false rhetoric that the Jewish controlled media has been spinning in their vain attempts to brainwash the American public into supporting a war against Iran, there are many facts about that upcoming war that needs to be pondered... One is definitely the effect on the petroleum driven world economies that would suffer greatly by escalating fuel costs due to the closure of the Persian Gulf due to a war with Iran.   The ripple effect of such a closure could be total world economic collapse.  


And there is the ominous question about whether Russia and China will stand idly by while their ally,  Iran, is attacked by Israel and their slaves in the United States.  There is a great risk that the upcoming war against Iran could quickly escalate into World War III with the devastating possibility of a nuclear exchange between the United States and Russia/China!  The result would be the total destruction of the United States itself, BILLONS of dead people around the world, and the entire planet devastated by the long term effects of nuclear fallout and radiation.   THIS scenario is definitely the one that I personally dread....


So the question has to become:  Is the undying support by the slaves in the US Government to their masters in Israel worth declaring war against Iran?  


To help answer that important question, I want to present the following article from FARS News Agency, at www.english.farsnews.com, entitled: To Americans: Israel Not Worth Destruction Of US", that talks about the possible devastating consequences of an attack on Iran that many Americans should read and heed..  I do have some comments to follow:






To Americans: Israel Not Worth Destruction of US

TEHRAN (FNA)- Is Israel worth the destruction of the American nation? This is the main question many Americans are asking themselves these days while the US is in the midst of a confrontation with Iran, Syria and many other Muslim nations. 



An Israeli official recently said that Zionists' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is trying to persuade his Cabinet to authorize a military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities - a discussion that comes as Israel successfully tests a missile believed capable of carrying a nuclear warhead to Iran. 

Pakistan, an Islamic country with its own eschatologies, is estimated to have around 100 nuclear warheads. Israel, or better to say the Occupied Palestine a country the size of New Jersey, has, by some estimates, at least 200 nuclear warheads and perhaps as many as 400, some of which are certainly hydrogen (thermonuclear) bombs. 

Everyone in the US should read Charles Pellegrino's excellent book "The Last Train from Hiroshima," to understand the immediate devastation wrought by nuclear bombs about 1/5000th the size of the 50 megaton (that's 50 million tons of TNT) thermonuclear "Tsar Bomba" that the Soviet Union detonated over extreme north central Russia on Oct. 30, 1961. That explosion broke windows 1,000 miles away in Finland, flattened everything within 50 miles, and blinded anyone looking at the explosion within 400 miles. Israel no doubt has weapons of, or approaching, this size. So does China, and Russia, and the US. 

President George Washington warned in his farewell address: 

"(A) passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation), facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation." (Emphasis added) 

"Is Israel worth risking the destruction of our country and world civilization," Elgin Baylor asks in a commentary. 

"Armageddon," after all, is not written in stone, and was most probably inspired in the Bible's book of Revelation by the destruction of Pompeii in 79. Shall we be destroyed because of ancient fatalist political mind control bolstered by absurd threats of eternal damnation? Armageddon is fantasy, not fact. Not yet anyway," Baylor adds. 

"The aftermath of nuclear war can be survived. Witness Hiroshima today. It's the explosions that cannot be survived. A 50-megaton thermonuclear warhead exploded at 2,000 feet would level Philadelphia and everything around it for dozens of miles, blinding everyone from Boston to Washington, D.C., who saw the explosion," Baylor says. 

"China has an extensive civil defense system capable of sheltering millions for up to a year or more. The USA does not have any similar civil defense shelters, except for military and other power elite," Baylor concludes. 

Iran does not have a nuclear weapon, but its allies have. Take Pakistan for example, a staunch Muslim ally of Tehran, which is these days growingly hostile to the US after the US-led NATO forces killed hundreds of Pakistani citizens for no crime, including 28 soldiers this weekend. 

Americans should realize what they are stepping into!






NTS Notes:  Yes, most Americans are totally unaware of the devastating consequences of their criminal government's undying devotion to the criminal state of Israel.  The spectre of a global nuclear war as a result of an Israeli attack on Iran is absolutely real.


But the enslavement of the US Government by the criminal state of Israel is absolutely complete.   The Israeli sock puppets in the American government are rushing headlong into a conflict to support their masters in Israel and they seem not to care of the consequences.


This is why it is important that everyone get the real news from alternative news sites, understand what is at stake, and get the message out to everyone else possible.  It is time to awaken the American public about the great and grave dangers they now face from their insane criminal government in Washington, and put an end to their madness!


More to come


NTS

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

A Child's Remains And Other Bones Found At Former Canadian Indian School!

Noor, a personal friend of mine who writes Snippits and Snappits (www.snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.com) brought to my attention some time ago the mounting evidence that the British Royal family, including the Queen of England herself along with many others, were involved in a massive pedophilia ring here in Canada, that involved the abduction and murder of aboriginal children at several Aboriginal schools on Vancouver Island, and elsewhere across Canada.

I put up a previous article, with the following link: http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com/2011/10/has-british-monarchy-been-running.html that asked a very hard question, especially for those Canadians that still are madly in love with the shysters called "British Royalty", if the Queen of England herself was involved in a massive pedophilia ring in Canada that involved the abduction and/or killing of aboriginal children here!   The findings were still coming up with no forensic evidence to back them up at the time of that report...

Well, it looks like some damning proof of the abduction and killing of those Aboriginal children since the time of that last report has finally come to light.. According to this new report that comes from the website: Red Dirt Report, at www.reddirtreport.com, it appears that human remains, including those of a child, have been found at a former Canadian Indian School that was implicated in that massive child abduction and pedophilia ring!  This is astounding to say the least, and I have that full report right here for everyone to see for themselves:


A child's remains and other bones found at former Canadian Indian school


Story Image
ITCCS.org
A screen shot of a bone fragment found at Mohawk Nation archaeological dig.

/

By Jeremiah Jourdain and Kevin Annett

For ITCCS.org

Posted: November 29, 2011

BRANTFORD, Ontario -- Archaeological surveys and test digs authorized by we, elders of the Kanien'keha:ka Nation, have been conducted at the former Mohawk Institute Indian residential school since October 1. 


This past week, while on the grounds of the school, our researchers along with Kevin Annett -Rawennatshani, who acts with our approval, have unearthed what has been described as human remains. 

 One bone among sixteen uncovered has been identified, through preliminary visual examination by a competent archaeologist, as that of a young child. This bone sample is described by the same archaeologist as “definitely human."


A test dig in a twenty square foot area on grounds adjoining the former Mohawk Institute have revealed a considerable number of bones, as well as buttons which have been confirmed to be part of the children's school uniforms. Large deposits of coal were also found associated with these remains, all at a depth of barely two feet. Several of the bones have also been cut up, suggesting that the bodies may have been deliberately dismembered, while other bones were broken.


We declare the area on and near the former Mohawk Institute to be a crime site under our jurisdiction, and we will not allow representatives of the Crown or Church of England, or the government of Canada, access to these excavations because of their complicity in this crime.


These institutions have consistently refused to disclose the evidence they possess regarding the Mohawk Institute and the deaths of children under their legal care, and therefore, we are proceeding to charge these bodies with crimes against humanity in international courts of justice, based in part on the forensic evidence we have uncovered. 


We now call upon our community and the world to rally behind our efforts to bring recognition to the remains of children buried on the Mohawk Institute grounds, and our work to excavate this site. Prior to any possible repatriation of these remains, and because these remains may include children from other indigenous nations, we look to those nations to participate with us in this work and welcome their input, and we urge them to begin their own excavations at local Indian residential schools.


We appeal to other nations to send archaeological and forensic specialists and international observers and peacekeepers to our territory to operate under our Mohawk jurisdiction, to assist with our inquiry and protect the burial sites until the remains can be accorded a proper burial according to our diverse traditions. 

Until these experts arrive to conduct a professional archeological excavation of these graves, we are temporarily suspending our excavations.


As our investigation continues, the bone samples will be subjected to further forensic tests, and this data about the human remains uncovered at the Mohawk Institute will be prepared in a final report to be delivered in the spring of 2012 to human rights courts and Parliamentarians in Europe, as part of a campaign to bring charges of genocide against the Crown of England, the government of Canada, the Anglican Church in Canada and other guilty parties.


The Mohawk Institute inquiry is held under the auspices of the Onkwehon:we (Mohawk) Nation and Kevin Annett (Rawennatshani) of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State, who has our full authority and protection.


For more information contact us at 519-757-3624 or at rawennatshani@yahoo.ca or hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com

For more information online go to www.itccs.org.
 
NTS Notes:  Yes, this is damning evidence against the Canadian Government, and the British Crown indeed.  If these findings do pan out, and it links back to the Queen herself, then the entire monarchy should be investigated, and that criminal institution rightfully called into question....

I will be awaiting the results of the forensic tests for sure, and will be presenting them here once they come to light.  I guarantee the spin doctors here in Canada and in the United Kingdom will be working overtime now in trying to distance the British Crown from this newest evidence.   But the truth must be told, and if the Queen is found guilty of being a part of this murder of innocent children, and brought up on charges, then there will be hell to pay!

I asked the question before if the Queen herself was involved in a massive pedophilia ring in Canada... If this newest evidence proves factual, then the answer may be YES!    The resultant outcry from the public will indeed be earth shattering and may spell the end of that criminal organization once and for all...

*Further note... After originally posting this article earlier today, it just came to my attention that there is a video that has a news conference by the Mohawk people, dated November 28th, yesterday, that explains this newest finding in detail... Here is that Youtube video:



More to come

NTS

Monday, November 28, 2011

More REAL History Revealed: Did Adolf Hitler Save Europe From Communism?

I have always said that our so called "recorded" History that is constantly fed to our children in our disastrous education system is nothing more than a pack of lies.   More and more, thanks to facts coming forward through the Internet, we are finding that what we have been told, and taught in our school systems is nothing more than lies and falsehoods.   I personally have made it my job to present factual history here for everyone to see for themselves.


One piece of history that always perplexed me about World War II was the German invasion of Soviet Russia that started on June 22, 1941, under the code name: "Operation Barbarossa".   I was always curious throughout my years in the failed education system as to why a small nation such as Germany would suddenly gamble away any chances of winning its war for survival by launching a campaign against the massive Soviet Union.   It seemed at the time to be insanity and backed the false claims that Adolf Hitler was a meglomaniac....


But for the last 20 years or so, much of the truth about the Russian-German war on the Eastern Front in World War II had finally come to light, and I want to share one major piece of that intriguing puzzle right here for my own readers to view.  I want to present the following article, that comes from Jim Marrs, through the Rense website, at www.rense.com, entitled: "Did Adolf Hitler Save Europe From Communism".    I have some additional comments to follow:


Did Adolf Hitler Save Europe From Communism?


By Jim Marrs


Excerpted from his book The Rise of the Fourth Reich 


11-28-11



By 1941, the international order had turned against Adolf Hitler. Germany's Blitzkrieg had shocked the ruling elite as first Poland then the rest of Europe came under Nazi control. Britain was helpless to stop Hitler, who was already making preparations for a pre-emptive attack on the Soviet Union. Hitler was getting out of hand. German inventiveness and efficiency as well as financial support from western financiers -- had brought Hitler's Germany to the zenith of its power.

 

Germany was preparing to strike Russia and Hitler did not want a two-front war, the very situation which caused Germany's defeat in World War I. Hitler wanted England as an ally against communism. "With England alone [as an ally], one's back being covered, could one begin the new Germanic invasion [of Russia]," Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf. In other words, Hitler needed peace with Britain before undertaking an attack on Russia.

 

Securing peace on the West Front may have become an urgent priority for Hitler. According to former Soviet military intelligence officer Vladimir Rezun (writing under the pen name Viktor Suvorov) Hitler was forced to launch a pre-emptive assault against the Soviet Union in June, 1941, to forestall an attack on Western Europe by Stalin in July.

 

Suvorov's work has been published in 87 editions in 18 languages, yet has received virtually no mention in the U.S. corporate mass media despite the fact that his assertions turn conventional history upside down. Most people have been taught that Stalin naively trusted Hitler and was totally surprised by Hitler's attack.

 

Admiral N. G. Kuznetsov, who in 1941 was the Soviet Navy minister and a member of the Central Committee of the Soviet Communist Party, was quoted by Suvorov as stating in his postwar memoirs, "For me there is one thing beyond all argument -- J. V. Stalin not only did not exclude the possibility of war with Hitler's Germany, on the contrary, he considered such a war ... inevitable ... J. V. Stalin made preparations for war ... wide and varied preparations -- beginning on dates ... which he himself had selected. Hitler upset his calculations."

 

While Suvorov's conclusions grate against the conventional view of Hitler's attack on Russia, he has provided a compelling argument. Suvorov pointed out that by June, 1941, Stalin had massed vast numbers of troops and equipment along Russia's European frontier, not to defend the Motherland but in preparation for an attack westward. Stalin's motive was to bring communism to Europe by force, a plan he expressed in a 1939 speech. "The experience of the last 20 years has shown that in peacetime the Communist movement is never strong enough to seize power. The dictatorship of such a party will only become possible as the result of a major war," stated Stalin.

 

Noting that when the German attack began on June 22, 1941, they could field a mere 3,350 tanks, mostly lightly armored and gunned, as compared to the Russians 24,000 tanks, many of superior armor and armament, retired U.S. Department of Defense official Daniel W. Michaels wrote, "Stalin elected to strike at a time and place of his choosing. To this end, Soviet development of the most advanced offensive weapons systems, primarily tanks, aircraft, and airborne forces, had already begun in the early 1930sThe German 'Barbarossa' attack shattered Stalin's well-laid plan to 'liberate' all of Europe."

 

Suvorov supported his contention by pointing to the fact that Russian troops were prepared to attack, not defend, which led to the early German victories; that Russian troops had been issued maps only of Eastern European cities, not for the defense of Russia; that Russian troops had been issued Russian-German phrase books with such expressions as "Stop transmitting or I'll shoot;" and that none of Stalins top commanders were ever held accountable for the "Barbarossa" debacle since they had all merely followed Stalin's orders.

 

Suvorov concludes, "Stalin became the absolute ruler of a vast empire hostile to the West, which had been created with the help of the West. For all that, Stalin was able to preserve his reputation as naive and trusting, while Hitler went down in history as the ultimate aggressor. A multitude of books have been published in the West based on the idea that Stalin was not ready for war while Hitler was."

 

He also said the resources of Stalin's war machine have been underestimated. "Despite its grievous losses, it had enough strength to withdraw and gather new strength to reach Berlin. How far would it have gone had it not sustained that massive blow on 22 June, if hundreds of aircraft and thousands of tanks had not been lost, had it been the Red Army and not the Wehrmacht which struck the first blow? Did the German Army have the territorial expanse behind it for withdrawal? Did it have the inexhaustible human resources, and the time, to restore its army after the first Soviet surprise attack?"

 

Perhaps the best support for Suvorov's claims came from Hitler himself. "Already in 1940 it became increasingly clear from month to month that the plans of the men in the Kremlin were aimed at the domination, and thus the destruction, of all of Europe. I have already told the nation of the build-up of Soviet Russian military power in the East during a period when Germany had only a few divisions in the provinces bordering Soviet Russia. Only a blind person could fail to see that a military build-up of unique world-historical dimensions was being carried out. And this was not in order to protect something that was being threatened, but rather only to attack that which seemed incapable of defense ... I may say this today: If the wave of more than 20,000 tanks, hundreds of divisions, tens of thousands of artillery pieces, along with more than 10,000 airplanes, had not been kept from being set into motion against the Reich, Europe would have been lost," the Fuehrer stated in his speech on December 11, 1941, when he declared war against the United States.

 

Of course, the victors always write history, so whether Hitler's attack on the Soviet Union was sheer aggression or a necessary pre-emptive strike will probably be argued for many years. But, if it proves true that Hitler was merely forestalling an imminent attack by the Soviet Union, it places the history of World War II in an entirely different context. It would certainly go far in explaining Hitler's otherwise inexplicable actions in starting a two-front war, the very situation he had warned against in Mein Kampf. It also would help explain why Franklin Roosevelt, at the bidding of the globalists, was arming the Soviet Union in blatant violation of the Neutrality Acts of 1935, 1936 and 1937. By the end of 1940 with all Europe under German control and Britain threatened, they may have determined to stop Hitler.

 

Hitler clearly indicated what he saw as the machinations undertaken to prevent any negotiated end to hostilities in 1941. In a speech to the Reichstag less than week before Hess's arrival in Scotland, he declared, "All my endeavors to come to an understanding with Britain were wrecked by the determination of a small clique which, whether from motives of hate or for the sake of material gain, rejected every German proposal for an understanding due to their resolve, which they never concealed, to resort to war, whatever happened."

 

Some researchers have even argued that Seelowe or Sea Lion, the code name for the proposed German invasion of England, was a "sham right from the beginning", an effort by Hitler to distract Stalin by feinting west when he actually planned to strike to the east. It was merely a cover for the mobilization of men and equipment needed for the invasion of the Soviet Union. One clue that this tactic was in play can be seen in the fact that Hitler, who was known for constantly interfering with his generals on the smallest of details, never showed any real interest in the plans for an invasion of England, according to German military historian Egbert Kieser. These authors, along with other historians, explain Hitler's strange order to halt the German advance at Dunkirk allowed the British Army to escape the continent. Hitler wanted his future ally intact. 

 

 

To buy Jim Marrs brilliant book, go here: 

http://www.amazon.com/Rise-Fourth-Reich-Societies-Threaten/dp/006
1245593/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1322461264&sr=8-1















NTS Notes:  This article fully vindicates, and backs up all of my comments and statements, in previous articles where I stated that Hitler launched a preemptive strike against Soviet Russia on June 22, 1941, because his intelligence reports showed clearly that Josef Stalin was amassing an incredibly massive force of some 5 MILLION+ combat troops along the German/Russian border to launch his own evil campaign against Germany code named: "Operation Thunder" that was to be launched as soon as July 5th, 1941.    


What Hitler basically did was allow the Russians to build up their offensive forces and wait until the last possible moment to launch his campaign against Russia.  In doing so, Hitler's forces were able to smash the entire Red Army, and capture some 3 million OFFENSIVE forces in the first weeks of the Barbarossa campaign!   True history should show this as a very remarkable achievement, but of course our history is written by criminals and the so called "victors" in any war.


For all my naysayers, and those who question this writing....I personally look upon Adolf Hitler as no saint.   But what he did by stopping the Russians from possibly conquering Europe early in World War II may eventually come down in future and factual history as one of his greatest victories for all of the European nations.


Another piece of real history coming to light... As more historical facts do come forward, I will be presenting them here for everyone to see and judge for themselves... Stay tuned..


More to come


NTS



America Is Finished: US Senate To Vote TODAY On Legislation That Will Allow The US Military To Detain US Citizens Without Charge Or Trial! (Absolutely Insane!)

OK... Picture a nation that arrests and detains its own citizens without any trial or any provocation.  And upon the arrest of said persons, they are locked away, without any charges, without any outside contact, and are absolutely not allowed to contact anybody for proper legal representation.  


If you say that only happens in countries such as Russia, China, or even Iran... You are wrong!  As of today, the US Senate will vote on new legislation that will allow the US government, via its military, to take anyone they want and throw them in jail without any charges at all!


If you still do not believe it...Then please take the time to read this article originally from the Intel Hub (www.intelhub.com), that I grabbed from my friend Whitewraithe, who writes the blog: Pragmatic Witness, at www.whitewraithe.wordpress.com.  I do strongly recommend that all of my friends in the once a upon a time free United States of America to read this article very carefully and take heed.    What we are seeing is the removal of what is left of any freedoms in America if the criminals in the US Senate get their way.  Here is that article, and I do have some comments to follow:



Detaining Americans Without Charge or Trial will most likely be written in stone by Senate Traitors come Monday, Nov. 28, 2011





ALERT: Senate To Vote On Legislation That Allows U.S. Military to Detain Americans Without Charge or Trial

By Mac Slavo
SHTFplan.com
November 25, 2011
Remember that debate between Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich, where Mr. Gingrich suggested we should expand and strengthen the Patriot Act in the name of protecting US citizens from terrorists?
Mr. Gingrich indicated that there exists a line between criminal law and the war on terror, and that we need not worry the government will overstep its bounds.
While Americans enjoy the Thanksgiving weekend and join the annual running of the bulls celebration at malls and retail outlets, something sinister is taking place in Congress – and it should scare the hell out of you.
If the President and Senate have their way, your front lawn will soon become a battlefield, and you’ll be subjected to military, not criminal, law.
From the ACLU Via The Daily Sheeple:
The Senate is  gearing up for a vote on Monday or Tuesday that goes to the very heart of who we are as Americans. The Senate will be voting on a bill that will direct American military resources not at an enemy shooting at our military in a war zone, but at American citizens and other civilians far from any battlefield — even people in the United States itself.
The Senate is going to vote on whether Congress will give this president—and every future president — the power to order the military to pick up and imprison without charge or trial civilians anywhere in the world. Even Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) raised his concerns about the NDAA detention provisions during last night’s Republican debate.
The power is so broad that even U.S. citizens could be swept up by the military and the military could be used far from any battlefield, even within the United States itself.
The worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial provision is in S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, which will be on the Senate floor on Monday.
The bill was drafted in secret by Sens. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) and passed in a closed-door committee meeting, without even a single hearing.
I know it sounds incredible. New powers to use the military worldwide, even within the United States?
Hasn’t anyone told the Senate that Osama bin Laden is dead, that the president is pulling all of the combat troops out of Iraq and trying to figure out how to get combat troops out of Afghanistan too? And American citizens and people picked up on American or Canadian or British streets being sent to military prisons indefinitely without even being charged with a crime. Really? Does anyone think this is a good idea? And why now?
This is happening right now – IN AMERICA! A law that is designed to specifically bypass Constitutional protections and one that will undoubtedly be used against the American people to further advance and expand the national police state.
Once signed into law the President (or anyone of his minions within the Justice Department or Homeland Security acting on his behalf) can issue orders to arrest, detain and imprison an American citizen in the United States without due process.
Since most terror arrests fall into the realm of national security, and therefore are secret, no evidence would ever need to be presented for the permanent detainment (and who knows what else) of an American imprisoned under this law.
Source: The Intel Hub

Senators Demand the Military Lock Up American Citizens in a “Battlefield” They Define as Being Right Outside Your Window

ACLU.org
November 25, 2011
While nearly all Americans head to family and friends to celebrate Thanksgiving, the Senate is gearing up for a vote on Monday or Tuesday that goes to the very heart of who we are as Americans.
The Senate will be voting on a bill that will direct American military resources not at an enemy shooting at our military in a war zone, but at American citizens and other civilians far from any battlefield — even people in the United States itself.
Senators need to hear from you, on whether you think your front yard is part of a “battlefield” and if any president can send the military anywhere in the world to imprison civilians without charge or trial.
The Senate is going to vote on whether Congress will give this president—and every future president — the power to order the military to pick up and imprison without charge or trial civilians anywhere in the world.
Even Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) raised his concerns about the NDAA detention provisions during last night’s Republican debate.
The power is so broad that even U.S. citizens could be swept up by the military and the military could be used far from any battlefield, even within the United States itself.
The worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial provision is in S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, which will be on the Senate floor on Monday.
The bill was drafted in secret by Sens. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) and passed in a closed-door committee meeting, without even a single hearing.
I know it sounds incredible. New powers to use the military worldwide, even within the United States?
Hasn’t anyone told the Senate that Osama bin Laden is dead, that the president is pulling all of the combat troops out of Iraq and trying to figure out how to get combat troops out of Afghanistan too? And American citizens and people picked up on American or Canadian or British streets being sent to military prisons indefinitely without even being charged with a crime. Really? Does anyone think this is a good idea? And why now?
The answer on why now is nothing more than election season politics. The White House, the Secretary of Defense, and the Attorney General have all said that the indefinite detention provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act are harmful and counterproductive.
The White House has even threatened a veto. But Senate politics has propelled this bad legislation to the Senate floor.
But there is a way to stop this dangerous legislation. Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) is offering the Udall Amendment that will delete the harmful provisions and replace them with a requirement for an orderly Congressional review of detention power. The Udall Amendment will make sure that the bill matches up with American values.
In support of this harmful bill, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) explained that the bill will “basically say in law for the first time that the homeland is part of the battlefield” and people can be imprisoned without charge or trial “American citizen or not.” Another supporter, Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) also declared that the bill is needed because “America is part of the battlefield.”
The solution is the Udall Amendment; a way for the Senate to say no to indefinite detention without charge or trial anywhere in the world where any president decides to use the military.
Instead of simply going along with a bill that was drafted in secret and is being jammed through the Senate, the Udall Amendment deletes the provisions and sets up an orderly review of detention power. It tries to take the politics out and put American values back in.
In response to proponents of the indefinite detention legislation who contend that the bill “applies to American citizens and designates the world as the battlefield,” and that the “heart of the issue is whether or not the United States is part of the battlefield,” Sen. Udall disagrees, and says that we can win this fight without worldwide war and worldwide indefinite detention.
The senators pushing the indefinite detention proposal have made their goals very clear that they want an okay for a worldwide military battlefield, that even extends to your hometown. That is an extreme position that will forever change our country.
Source: The Intel Hub



NTS Notes:  This is possibly the most sinister piece of legislation to be placed in front of the criminals occupying the US Senate in quite some time.   And the most sinister thing about it is that quite possibly almost none of the citizens in the United States are even aware that it is being voted on right now!


Again, my American friends, take this information and inform your friends, relatives, and anybody that would possibly listen, to inform them that they are about to lose all of their freedoms today!   With this heinous legislation, the US government could, with the introduction of any "martial law" or by putting and using American military forces on American soil, suddenly take anyone they want off the streets in America and throw them in jail without any provocation, or any charges... 


It is so sad to see the end of the United States of America as a nation take place right before our eyes... What is especially maddening is that the sheep that some call American citizens are doing absolutely nothing to stop it!


More to come


NTS