Monday, November 28, 2011

More REAL History Revealed: Did Adolf Hitler Save Europe From Communism?

I have always said that our so called "recorded" History that is constantly fed to our children in our disastrous education system is nothing more than a pack of lies.   More and more, thanks to facts coming forward through the Internet, we are finding that what we have been told, and taught in our school systems is nothing more than lies and falsehoods.   I personally have made it my job to present factual history here for everyone to see for themselves.

One piece of history that always perplexed me about World War II was the German invasion of Soviet Russia that started on June 22, 1941, under the code name: "Operation Barbarossa".   I was always curious throughout my years in the failed education system as to why a small nation such as Germany would suddenly gamble away any chances of winning its war for survival by launching a campaign against the massive Soviet Union.   It seemed at the time to be insanity and backed the false claims that Adolf Hitler was a meglomaniac....

But for the last 20 years or so, much of the truth about the Russian-German war on the Eastern Front in World War II had finally come to light, and I want to share one major piece of that intriguing puzzle right here for my own readers to view.  I want to present the following article, that comes from Jim Marrs, through the Rense website, at, entitled: "Did Adolf Hitler Save Europe From Communism".    I have some additional comments to follow:

Did Adolf Hitler Save Europe From Communism?

By Jim Marrs

Excerpted from his book The Rise of the Fourth Reich 


By 1941, the international order had turned against Adolf Hitler. Germany's Blitzkrieg had shocked the ruling elite as first Poland then the rest of Europe came under Nazi control. Britain was helpless to stop Hitler, who was already making preparations for a pre-emptive attack on the Soviet Union. Hitler was getting out of hand. German inventiveness and efficiency as well as financial support from western financiers -- had brought Hitler's Germany to the zenith of its power.


Germany was preparing to strike Russia and Hitler did not want a two-front war, the very situation which caused Germany's defeat in World War I. Hitler wanted England as an ally against communism. "With England alone [as an ally], one's back being covered, could one begin the new Germanic invasion [of Russia]," Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf. In other words, Hitler needed peace with Britain before undertaking an attack on Russia.


Securing peace on the West Front may have become an urgent priority for Hitler. According to former Soviet military intelligence officer Vladimir Rezun (writing under the pen name Viktor Suvorov) Hitler was forced to launch a pre-emptive assault against the Soviet Union in June, 1941, to forestall an attack on Western Europe by Stalin in July.


Suvorov's work has been published in 87 editions in 18 languages, yet has received virtually no mention in the U.S. corporate mass media despite the fact that his assertions turn conventional history upside down. Most people have been taught that Stalin naively trusted Hitler and was totally surprised by Hitler's attack.


Admiral N. G. Kuznetsov, who in 1941 was the Soviet Navy minister and a member of the Central Committee of the Soviet Communist Party, was quoted by Suvorov as stating in his postwar memoirs, "For me there is one thing beyond all argument -- J. V. Stalin not only did not exclude the possibility of war with Hitler's Germany, on the contrary, he considered such a war ... inevitable ... J. V. Stalin made preparations for war ... wide and varied preparations -- beginning on dates ... which he himself had selected. Hitler upset his calculations."


While Suvorov's conclusions grate against the conventional view of Hitler's attack on Russia, he has provided a compelling argument. Suvorov pointed out that by June, 1941, Stalin had massed vast numbers of troops and equipment along Russia's European frontier, not to defend the Motherland but in preparation for an attack westward. Stalin's motive was to bring communism to Europe by force, a plan he expressed in a 1939 speech. "The experience of the last 20 years has shown that in peacetime the Communist movement is never strong enough to seize power. The dictatorship of such a party will only become possible as the result of a major war," stated Stalin.


Noting that when the German attack began on June 22, 1941, they could field a mere 3,350 tanks, mostly lightly armored and gunned, as compared to the Russians 24,000 tanks, many of superior armor and armament, retired U.S. Department of Defense official Daniel W. Michaels wrote, "Stalin elected to strike at a time and place of his choosing. To this end, Soviet development of the most advanced offensive weapons systems, primarily tanks, aircraft, and airborne forces, had already begun in the early 1930sThe German 'Barbarossa' attack shattered Stalin's well-laid plan to 'liberate' all of Europe."


Suvorov supported his contention by pointing to the fact that Russian troops were prepared to attack, not defend, which led to the early German victories; that Russian troops had been issued maps only of Eastern European cities, not for the defense of Russia; that Russian troops had been issued Russian-German phrase books with such expressions as "Stop transmitting or I'll shoot;" and that none of Stalins top commanders were ever held accountable for the "Barbarossa" debacle since they had all merely followed Stalin's orders.


Suvorov concludes, "Stalin became the absolute ruler of a vast empire hostile to the West, which had been created with the help of the West. For all that, Stalin was able to preserve his reputation as naive and trusting, while Hitler went down in history as the ultimate aggressor. A multitude of books have been published in the West based on the idea that Stalin was not ready for war while Hitler was."


He also said the resources of Stalin's war machine have been underestimated. "Despite its grievous losses, it had enough strength to withdraw and gather new strength to reach Berlin. How far would it have gone had it not sustained that massive blow on 22 June, if hundreds of aircraft and thousands of tanks had not been lost, had it been the Red Army and not the Wehrmacht which struck the first blow? Did the German Army have the territorial expanse behind it for withdrawal? Did it have the inexhaustible human resources, and the time, to restore its army after the first Soviet surprise attack?"


Perhaps the best support for Suvorov's claims came from Hitler himself. "Already in 1940 it became increasingly clear from month to month that the plans of the men in the Kremlin were aimed at the domination, and thus the destruction, of all of Europe. I have already told the nation of the build-up of Soviet Russian military power in the East during a period when Germany had only a few divisions in the provinces bordering Soviet Russia. Only a blind person could fail to see that a military build-up of unique world-historical dimensions was being carried out. And this was not in order to protect something that was being threatened, but rather only to attack that which seemed incapable of defense ... I may say this today: If the wave of more than 20,000 tanks, hundreds of divisions, tens of thousands of artillery pieces, along with more than 10,000 airplanes, had not been kept from being set into motion against the Reich, Europe would have been lost," the Fuehrer stated in his speech on December 11, 1941, when he declared war against the United States.


Of course, the victors always write history, so whether Hitler's attack on the Soviet Union was sheer aggression or a necessary pre-emptive strike will probably be argued for many years. But, if it proves true that Hitler was merely forestalling an imminent attack by the Soviet Union, it places the history of World War II in an entirely different context. It would certainly go far in explaining Hitler's otherwise inexplicable actions in starting a two-front war, the very situation he had warned against in Mein Kampf. It also would help explain why Franklin Roosevelt, at the bidding of the globalists, was arming the Soviet Union in blatant violation of the Neutrality Acts of 1935, 1936 and 1937. By the end of 1940 with all Europe under German control and Britain threatened, they may have determined to stop Hitler.


Hitler clearly indicated what he saw as the machinations undertaken to prevent any negotiated end to hostilities in 1941. In a speech to the Reichstag less than week before Hess's arrival in Scotland, he declared, "All my endeavors to come to an understanding with Britain were wrecked by the determination of a small clique which, whether from motives of hate or for the sake of material gain, rejected every German proposal for an understanding due to their resolve, which they never concealed, to resort to war, whatever happened."


Some researchers have even argued that Seelowe or Sea Lion, the code name for the proposed German invasion of England, was a "sham right from the beginning", an effort by Hitler to distract Stalin by feinting west when he actually planned to strike to the east. It was merely a cover for the mobilization of men and equipment needed for the invasion of the Soviet Union. One clue that this tactic was in play can be seen in the fact that Hitler, who was known for constantly interfering with his generals on the smallest of details, never showed any real interest in the plans for an invasion of England, according to German military historian Egbert Kieser. These authors, along with other historians, explain Hitler's strange order to halt the German advance at Dunkirk allowed the British Army to escape the continent. Hitler wanted his future ally intact. 



To buy Jim Marrs brilliant book, go here:

NTS Notes:  This article fully vindicates, and backs up all of my comments and statements, in previous articles where I stated that Hitler launched a preemptive strike against Soviet Russia on June 22, 1941, because his intelligence reports showed clearly that Josef Stalin was amassing an incredibly massive force of some 5 MILLION+ combat troops along the German/Russian border to launch his own evil campaign against Germany code named: "Operation Thunder" that was to be launched as soon as July 5th, 1941.    

What Hitler basically did was allow the Russians to build up their offensive forces and wait until the last possible moment to launch his campaign against Russia.  In doing so, Hitler's forces were able to smash the entire Red Army, and capture some 3 million OFFENSIVE forces in the first weeks of the Barbarossa campaign!   True history should show this as a very remarkable achievement, but of course our history is written by criminals and the so called "victors" in any war.

For all my naysayers, and those who question this writing....I personally look upon Adolf Hitler as no saint.   But what he did by stopping the Russians from possibly conquering Europe early in World War II may eventually come down in future and factual history as one of his greatest victories for all of the European nations.

Another piece of real history coming to light... As more historical facts do come forward, I will be presenting them here for everyone to see and judge for themselves... Stay tuned..

More to come



Anonymous said...

I am no fan of Hitler, but anyone that gets vilified as much as he does by the Judaic MSM cannot have been ALL bad. If modern historians call a man scum, he is usually rather decent (even if only in a few areas of lesser importance). If they call a man great, he is often the scum of the earth. War is peace, eh?

Noor al Haqiqa said...

Amen to what Purification has to say about Hitler and MSM. I remember that almost meaningless story about the black American runner and Hitler, and how the press had to go wild about Hitler's anger over losing the race to a black man, when in reality, the athlete himself carried a note and a photo from Hitler to his death. Hitler had praised his accomplishment. Now, if they take a little thing like this and blow it up, what else of major political importance did they mess up?

Don't answer that! LOL. Everything they could... Look at what they did to Saddam, Gaddafi, again, not the nicest men in the world, but certainly not the horrible creatures they have been painted to be...

How else can you get idiots to fight for you unless you prove that your past track record of killing the demons of society is stellar mmm?

On the otherhand, it makes you wonder about how lauded Gandhi and MLK are doesn't it?

Anonymous said...

Both Stalin and Hitler were Rothschild puppets. Both were unknowingly/knowingly serving the interests of the bigger foe and that is Zionism.

In fact lets put it this way in a nutshell


The British Israel lobby bankrolled both the Third Reich and the Red Army because they served their ever so trustworthy HEGELIAN DIALECTIC of ORDO AB CHAO = ORDER OUT OF CHAOS.

With Hitler as an illegitimate Rothschild Jew they could plant the seeds of hate and confusion in Germany against their lowly Jewish adversaries who by boycotting German goods undermined their economy (a similar tactic Bush used against Iraq by Kuwait who slashed oil prices, thus pre-empting the Gulf War).

With the Russian Revolution Zionist stooges Trotsky, Lenin and Kerensky already clearing the ground of any Orthodox Christian Romanov and Ukraine dissenters, Stalin was their perfect foil for a New World Order experiment only to be held in check by their other NWO experiment, namely the Third Reich. Both would be led to mutually destroy the other with mainly Christians(and Torah Jews) as their victims.

So with Germany's Christians decimated along with their Soviet counterparts, a double whammy was achieved by the Zionists in London, and they got what they bargained for and that was the prize that is ISRAEL!

Once Hitler had done their dirty work and sympathy for a Jewish state was authorised by the UN, it was held in check by their Soviet agents who closed off the gate to the West in a game of charades whereby British M16 agent and Rothschild puppet spy Anthony Blunt would give them the A bomb within 5yrs!

And all this time we in the West are told how 'evil' Hitler was at fomenting a 'holocaust' against Jews with little or no acknowledgment of Stalin and Co's far greater and real evil, the extermination of 40+million Ukraine, Kulac farmers and Orthodox Christians at the hands of the Zionist funded Red Army comprised of Bolshevik convicts.

Of course its only the Jews that suffered remember. Only Jews have ever been victims right????. Its a shame Hitler didn't incarcerate the wealthy Satanic Jews who were financing his war machine but maybe he was too stupid to figure and when he did it was too late, he had done their blood work and was expendable!

Like every Rothschild war, it didn't need to happen but it was brought about by the hordes of greedy Zionist banksters in Wall Street and Westminster and their criminal mafia network across Europe that looted the wealth of sovereign states and held them in a web of debt ever since.

So did Hitler save Europe from Communism? On the surface it appears so huh. But wait, what do i see coming - a European Superstate!

The answer is ultimately NO!. The Zionists merely used both ISMs to create Zionist democracy, a stepping stone to the New World Order of global tyranny. But to achieve this they need to create a mutual extermination of their bi product Zionism as outlined by Albert Pike. Enter Islam!



Sadly once again the sheeple will take up arms to fight each other and hand the prize to their Jewish masters. A cycle that repeats itself over and over until only divine intervention can save us in the end.

Northerntruthseeker said...

Not to disagree, anonymous, because many of your points are valid... But what we have learned from WW2 is that the Jewish controlled "Communist" Russia wanted to take over Europe from the get go....

The fact is also that WW2 just like other wars was nothing but a bankers' war, where they financed both sides into total ruin... The winners were just as bad off as the losers and in debt enslavement...

I am just pointing out in this article the fact that what we have been told about Operation Barbarossa is totally false, and most history has to be rewritten.... The truth does come out eventually....

Northerntruthseeker said...

One other note... There is so much information and disinformation written about Adolf Hitler that it is hard to sift through it all for the truth...

There are even reports of Hitler being a Tavistock trained drone that was groomed early on for his eventual role to rise to power in Germany and to also have it destroyed....

Anonymous said...

I agree NTS and applaud your conviction at exposing Zionist war crimes. History is indeed always written by the victor and what we have seen in the past 100 yrs of London Tavistock programming is how far off the mark it is.

The Zionists(US/UK/Israel) have always depicted themselves as heroes fighting against 'tyranny', but in reality it is the exact opposite! They are the tyrants and have always been from the ancient days of Sumer, Phoenicia, Greece, Rome, the British Empire and now the resurrected Fourth Reich of the West.

They have infiltrated all the major govts and are playing a chess game of bi proxy and asymmetrical warfare until they get the entire world to WHORE ship Satan, their 'god'.

They will drum their drums against the good people of Iran with the fakir Christian fascists on their side of Israel. See how clever the devil is! To see the face of the devil just go into any church in the West and he is preaching the NWO!

It perplexes me why Christians support Israel because a vote for Israel is a vote for the NWO and the Antichrist govt that's coming. Christ was against the Pharisees and Sadducees and condemned their hypocrisy and lies yet these evil Christian Zionists have aligned themselves with them!!

What fools! They didn't study their Bible and allowed the Charlatans to destroy them and they are going to Hell unless they wake up fast.

"Oh Israel! Your prophets are like jackals amongst the ruins! . . . . .
They have envisioned futility and false divination but the Lord hath not sent them!' Ezek13(4-6).

anonSaxon said...

"Anonymous", I completely agree with your analysis. I have covered much of the info you mentioned at my own blog "Thy Weapon of War".

Also, thought I would mention that a friend of mine and I have just started a new message board forum designed for complete freedom of speech for truthseekers. We would love to have you join us.

Here is the forum:
Knowledge is Power - The Uncensored Free Speech Forum

Brandt Hardin said...

Hitler was just a misunderstood artist. Rejection is the most brutal of human conditions and young Adolf underwent the metamorphosis into the monster of our historical lore by his rejection from art school. See him his happiest and read all about it at