Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Israel Did 9-11: The Strange Story Of Susan Lindauer - A Time For Truth: Osama Bin Laden's Death Won't End War On Terror Until Americans Understand The Threat Was Always Us (?)

It has been a while since I delved into the attacks of 9-11, and I figured that a new article was long over due.

Many people have not heard of the name: "Susan Lindauer".   She is an American journalist, and peace activist, who was also working for the American CIA at the time of the 9-11 attacks.   She wrote a book entitled: "Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story Of The Patriot Act And The Coverups Of 9-11 And Iraq".   She has always been an advocate of the complicity of the US Government, the Israeli Mossad, and others, in the September 11th, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center, and was even charged with "conspiring" to act as an agent Iraqi Intelligence in 2002 and engaging in financial transactions with the government of Saddam Hussein during that time period.  She was found "mentally unfit" to stand trial, and all charges were dropped in 2009.

Recently, Susan Lindauer released a new article, entitled: "A Time For Truth: Bin Laden's Death Won't End War On Terror Until Americans Understand The Threat Was Always Us", and I want to present the entire article right here courtesy of Mark Glenn's  website: "The Ugly Truth", at  It makes for some interesting reading, and I have some comments to follow:

A Time for Truth: Bin Laden’s Death Won’t End War on Terror Until Americans Understand the Threat was Always Us

Posted: May 13, 2011 by crescentandcross in Uncategorized

By Susan Lindauer, 9/11 Whistleblower and author of Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover Ups of 9/11 and Iraq 

   Some of our leaders think Americans don’t need the truth about 9/11 any more, because Osama’s dead and it’s over.

   As somebody who got brutalized at “ground zero” of the 9/11 cover up for most of the past 10 years, I could not disagree more. I’m sick of asking for a proper Congressional investigation. Congress already knows the truth about 9/11. That’s why they’re not poking around. However, it’s a huge mistake for the rest of us who know the truth, or parts of it, to wait for permission to speak. America has trapped itself in a mythic nightmare about terrorism that exaggerates our enemies, while our leaders manipulate our sense of patriotism and effectively blind us to mistakes in national security policy. It’s not a successful policy if it weakens our country.

   The United States has reached a tipping point when we have to consider the end of the “American Age.” In which case, an honest examination of 9/11 becomes imperative. Americans must understand 9/11, so that we can puncture the creepy bubble around the War on Terrorism, and sweep away the phony threat that’s got all of Washington plotting Wars in the Middle East, bankrupting our economy with runaway defense spending, and tearing down civil rights in the name of national security.

   The lie itself is formidable. Valerie Plame recently tried to assure Bob Tuskin at the Intel Hub that the U.S. government could never keep such a huge and devastating secret as 9/11 for so long. Wanna bet? Myself, I got rewarded with 5 years of indictment as an “Iraqi Agent,” including one year in prison on Carswell Air Force Base in Fort Worth, Texas—without a trial or hearing—after I requested to testify about Iraq and 9/11.

   Thirty days after I spoke with top staffers for Senator Trent Lott and Senator John McCain, the FBI showed up with a warrant for my arrest.

   My 5 year indictment on the Patriot Act nicknamed me “Symbol Susan.” It was not subtle. The viciousness I suffered was purposefully designed to scare off on anybody else who might consider talking. The cover ups of 9/11 and Iraq distinguished the Patriot Act as the premiere weapon to take down whistle blowers.

   To those others I say, they cannot silence us if we refuse to give up our voice. I challenge Congress to put our country on the right track by holdings hearings on 9/11 to take our testimony. I will gladly swear to all of the following under oath:


   The truth is that our team, which triangulated the CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency, discussed the 9/11 attack in its exact scenario and time frame throughout the summer of 2001. We talked about it practically every week at our meetings. We also discussed it on the telephone, pointedly joking “Hello NSA! Pick up the phone—” knowing the National Security Agency had wire tapped my lines.

   There’s no question that the story of the 9/11 conspiracy was planted months in advance to prep the intelligence community for the government’s reaction. And it unfolded exactly as they told us it would—with a little help from an orphan explosives team. That will be explained in a second article. The two are not contradictory.

   Before we get to that, Americans must first accept the motivation for 9/11, and why the U.S. government allowed it to happen. This was a Pearl Harbor Day. And it achieved an agenda, which was already well defined.

From the first moment that I was told about 9/11 in April and May of 2001, I was informed that the United States planned to declare War on Iraq immediately when 9/11 happened. The two were already linked as cause and effect.

Threats of War Against Iraq

   I can testify to that absolutely, because I was the Asset commanded to deliver those threats to Iraqi diplomats at the United Nations. I was instructed to say the “U.S. intended to declare War on Iraq if Baghdad failed to provide actionable intelligence to stop the conspiracy involving airplane hijackings and a strike on the World Trade Center. We would bomb Iraq more aggressively than ever before—back to the Stone Age.”

   My CIA handler further demanded that I stress the threat of War “originated at the highest levels of government—above the CIA Director and the Secretary of State.” He considered the warnings to have more potency if Iraqi diplomats understood the muscle of those issuing the threats.

   As the primary back channel to Baghdad from 1996 through 2003, I delivered that message with all precision from April and May right through August 4, 2001. I can pinpoint the day, because the conversation with my CIA handler took place on the day of the Senate confirmation hearings for Robert Mueller’s appointment to head the FBI.

   My CIA handler, Dr. Richard Fuisz speculated aloud that the 9/11 attack might occur before Mueller was formally instated as FBI Director.

In the same conversation, Dr. Fuisz warned that I must not go back to New York, because the attack was “imminent” and the CIA expected “mass casualties” and a “possible miniature thermo nuclear device.” Over his objections, I insisted on returning to Iraq’s Embassy at the U.N. one last time to see if diplomats had received any reports from Baghdad. Then I promised I would not go back to New York until after the attack.

   My meeting with Iraqi diplomats occurred two days later on Saturday, August 4. I did not return to New York until September 18.

   Let me be clear: The threat was not vague or undefined. We fully expected airplane hijackings and some sort of aerial strike targeting the World Trade Center, specifically. No other target or location was ever discussed.

   Details of the 9/11 conspiracy and the full history of Iraqi Pre-War Intelligence are disclosed in my book, “Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover Ups of 9/11 and Iraq.” It’s a real life spy thriller, and it goes into much greater depth, whereas this article can only scratch the surface.

   “Extreme Prejudice” reveals a truth that’s very different from what America has been told. I challenge Congress to put me under oath and rip me with questions. Americans have the right to hear my direct testimony, which would disclose a complete chronology of our advance discussions about the conspiracy, in addition to our considerable efforts to stop the attack.

   It’s nothing like what you expect. As a life-long anti-war activist, I was highly agitated about the threats of war that I was commanded to deliver to Iraqi diplomats. And I’m not a passive individual. Adding to the tension, by the summer of 2001 the international community had developed a deep loathing for U.N. sanctions that were destroying Iraq’s social fabric and community infrastructure. The days of U.N. sanctions on Iraq—which I reviled, too—were closing fast. The international community would have condemned any rogue military action against Iraq.

   Unbeknownst to the public, from the opening days of the Bush administration in January 2001, our team had begun hammering out a comprehensive framework for achieving all U.S. objectives, including weapons inspections, so that the U.S could claim a major victory while ceding to pressure for the U.N. sanctions to end. Anti-terrorism was a central part of our peace framework. In fact, Iraq had agreed to invite an FBI Task Force to conduct terrorism investigations by February, 2001. The CIA had also won Iraq’s consent for major reconstruction contracts for U.S. corporations in telecommunications, hospitals and health care, transportation— and oil. Everything the U.S. wanted was ours for the taking. And the CIA wanted it all.

Our Team Efforts to Stop 9/11

   When my CIA handler, Dr. Fuisz informed me on August 2 that the 9/11 attack was in play and considered “imminent,” he and I together resolved to take more aggressive action to prevent it.
   I’m not telling you what somebody else did that I heard about later. I’m telling what actions I took myself in “real time” to try to stop the 9/11 attack.

On Monday, August 6, I reported to Dr. Fuisz after my trip to New York. I told him that Iraqi diplomats had thrown up their hands. They had nothing to give us. Yes, they assured me, Baghdad was fully aware that Iraq faced a threat of full scale war, if a 9/11 style of attack occurred. They understood that it would be in their greatest interest to provide us with any fragment of intelligence to help stop the attack. They understood that 9/11 would complicate our peace framework exactly at the moment when the international community was ready to throw off U.N. sanctions. Bottom line, they had nothing to give us.
   I was an unusual party to this discussion, motivated by deep antipathy for sanctions and war. For those reasons, I informed Dr. Fuisz that I felt super motivated to do everything in my power to stop 9/11, both to protect the people of New York City and to prevent an unnecessary War—exactly at the moment when our team was completing this outstanding peace framework that achieved all U.S. objectives.

   At the instructions of Dr. Fuisz on August 6, I personally placed phone calls to U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft’s private staff at the Justice Department on August 7 or 8.  Identifying myself as the CIA Asset covering the Iraq and Libya Embassies at the United Nations, I personally requested that Ashcroft’s Office post “an emergency broadcast alert across all agencies, seeking any fragment of intelligence on airplane hijackings, with a known target of the World Trade Center.” I described the attack as “imminent,” with the potential for “mass casualties. I asked for maximum inter-agency cooperation and urged that any information be forwarded to the CIA immediately.

   Hearing my request, staff in the inner sanctum of Attorney General John Ashcroft’s office gave me a phone number at the Office of Counter-Terrorism in the Justice Department, and urged me to repeat exactly what I had just told them. I did so without delay. I dialed the number. I spoke to the staff. 

   I wasn’t taking any chances. A few days later, I visited the home of my cousin, White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card.  I waited in my car while his neighbors peeked out their windows, determined to warn him about our 9/11 scenario, and request cabinet level support to pre-empt the attack. Alas, Andy did not come home. When I drove away after two hours, I did so believing that I might be making the greatest mistake of my life.

   There was still plenty of time for action to pre-empt the attack. Americans have a right to know how top leaders in government handled our warnings, and effectively thwarted those best efforts in August of 2001.

   There was a lot of action that August—including a second set of events that I would learn about years later, involving an unidentified orphan team that would lay explosives in the Twin Towers. My next article will explain how those two conspiracies converged. Contrary to what the 9/11 Truth Community supposes, these two operations do not cancel out each other.

   But first Americans must understand that 9/11 was a “stand down” operation, a true Pearl Harbor Day, meaning that U.S. and foreign intelligence understood what was coming. The leadership at the top of the U.S. government made an active decision to let the attack go ahead— because the decision was already made that 9/11 would provide a pretext for War in Iraq. With peace breaking out in the Middle East at that very moment, the War Party required a massive scale threat to overturn the peace process. Clearly they decided that nothing would be allowed to interfere with that objective.

   Once that factor’s understood, 9/11 becomes comprehensible.

   Some of my testimony would surprise America—like efforts by Saddam Hussein’s government to guarantee Iraq’s complete cooperation with global anti-terrorism efforts before and after 9/11. That will be addressed in another article.

  Finally, my book, EXTREME PREJUDICE provides a full scope of the brutality by the Justice Department to silence me and other Assets, using the Patriot Act as a weapon to guarantee the success of its deception. (A hint:  Assets watched the cover ups of 9/11 and Iraq on prison television. And I wasn’t the only prisoner).

   Oh it wasn’t all bad! My CIA handler got $13 million tax-free from emergency appropriations for the 9/11 investigation in November, 2001— He built himself a grand mansion a stone’s throw from CIA headquarters in McLean, Virginia. Not a dollar or a dime got spent on 9/11. Mind you, the government’s not complaining. But shifting tax dollars away from Iraq’s cooperation with the 9/11 investigation took food off my table. I paid a terrible price for it.

Democracy Requires Accountability

   All parts of the 9/11 warnings, the cover up— the arrests and pay offs— should disturb Democrats and Republicans alike who brag about their leadership support for Assets engaged in anti-terrorism. It makes a lie of their pledge of loyalty, for sure. And it denigrates their performance as stewards of national security, which ought to be a litmus test for the 2012 Campaigns. Those who don’t care for the people’s business don’t belong in government.

   Simply put, democracy requires accountability to the people. Americans have a fundamental right to possess the truth about 9/11 and the decision to declare War on Iraq months before the attack—because national security does matter in this age. Americans require that knowledge, so as to assess the leadership performance and quality of policy making on our behalf.

Good leaders don’t have to be afraid. Bad leaders should be sent packing for the betterment of government.

   Most alarmingly, 9/11′s legacy has proved detrimental to the security of our country. According to the National Journal, fighting this phantom demon of terrorism today involves 1,271 government agencies, producing 50,000 intelligence reports a year that for the most part nobody reads.  Meanwhile, “black budgets” for intelligence operations have mushroomed to $75 billion a year, financing both domestic and international surveillance that monitors law-abiding citizens across the country. There’s no federal auditing authority or Congressional oversight over “black budgets.” It’s all tax free and unregulated. It’s a secret government gone wild.

   Osama’s death has been a great victory for the CIA. But it will not bring U.S. soldiers home from Iraq and Afghanistan, where military operations have cost $1.6 trillion and counting. It won’t end the nonsense War against Libya, which has no justification at all.

   Osama’s death will not quash the planning stages for future wars against Syria, and God help us, Iran.

   Is it really patriotic to stay silent while the military industrial complex devours our economy for its own profits? Without producing benefits for U.S. soldiers? Admiral Mullen, head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff doesn’t think so. He has described America’s national debt as “the greatest threat to our national security.”

   Our country is teetering on the abyss. If we’re going to succeed in restoring the great traditions of liberty and moral authority, we’ve got to relearn the history of 9/11.

   We must acknowledge the real threats to our quality of life are not “out there.”  They start right here. And those threats are perpetuated by the myths that are leaders invented that tragic morning.

  There is no better time for truth than today. The success of our national security policy—and our ability to avoid future wars that are guaranteed to destroy this earth—very well depend on it.
  Susan Lindauer is the author of Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover Ups of 9/11 and Iraq, which recounts her nightmarish ordeal as the second non-Arab American ever indicted on the Patriot Act, facing secret charges, secret evidence, secret grand jury testimony and threats of indefinite detention.

   The next article in this series will show how the detonation theory fits hand in glove with the airplane hijackings and aerial strike on the World Trade Center. Americans will see why the two are not contradictory at all.

NTS Notes:  OK... Now for some real truth.... I strongly suspect that Susan Lindauer is one of many agents of disinformation to lead people down the wrong path and away from the real truth behind the 9-11 attacks, and to purposely lead people away from the real criminals involved, which are of course the Israeli Mossad.

In this, her latest article, she again tries to emphasize that her "team" tried to stop the 9-11 attacks during the summer of 2001.. To me this is nothing but fantasy... The CIA was in cahoots with the Mossad from the get go, and worked diligently to make sure that the attacks went off as smoothly as possible.  One major factor that is always overlooked is the fact that the CIA went to the Dubai hospital in July, 2001, to visit their operative, Tim Osman...aka.. Osama Bin Laden, most probably to give him his newest marching orders to proceed to Afghanistan in time for the September 11th attacks.

And of course no where in any of her articles does she even talk about the total control of the American government by Jewish banking "elitists", and their criminal agents .   She talks about the complicity of the American government itself in the murders of 9-11 without even shedding any truth about how that government has been hijacked for years, and only act as puppets under the control of the criminal state of Israel. 

I do have an interview that Susan Lindauer did with Kevin Barrett back on January 4th, 2011, in which she deflects the direct involvement of the Israeli Mossad for the attacks of 9-11, and instead talks about their "complicity" in the attacks! .   Here is the link to that interview:  I do recommend that readers listen to this interview and judge for themselves.

There have been many others in the real truth movement that have not bought into Susan Lindauer and her story.    She continues to preach the falsehood that Al Qaeda exists, when she knows damn well that this so called "terrorist' group is nothing more than a CIA/Mossad invention for the phony "War On Terror".   She also knows damn well that Osama Bin Laden died years ago, and fails to put that fact in this, her latest article!

A very strange story indeed.   It does appear that Susan Lindauer is part of the disinformation to keep people on the wrong track when it comes to the truths about the attacks of 9-11.   Those who know the truth are not so easily fooled....

More to come



Anonymous said...

she is disifo

she gets paid each time she mentions
'panes, hijackers'
'we were attacked'

yea, we were attacked by Rothschild and his mossaad and cia, fbi and us military, FDNY, cnn bbc fox etc

Susan said...

Hello, I'm Susan Lindauer-- not quite! Israel's role and the convergence of the hijacking/detonation are the focus of Part 2. This is such a big story that I've been trying to get people used to the truth that we possessed advance knowledge of 9/11. A lot of 'truthers' can expect that, but others find it very difficult. The second part of the conversation requires a strong grasp of the first set of facts, so that it all makes sense. Thank you for giving me a forum, so that we don't get the facts out there. It's much bigger than most people realize. And yes, I was arrested on the Patriot Act when I requested to testify about Iraq & 9/11. They wanted to stop all of you from discovering these crucial details.

Vote 1 Shlomo Soetero said...

Agree with your view, NTS.

Lindauer is being used to muddy the waters and point the finger of blame away from the Israeli Government of America, where it rightly belongs.

Anyone who still thinks Americans govern America is beyond hope.

Roderick Horton said...

My name is not important. my nationality is not important. However, I feel what I have to say is important. I tried very hard to warn the CIA FBI Bush and other about what would become 9/11. I even sent message to Britain about what would become 9/11. Because I electronically signed the document to Britain, what I had to say was ignored because of my mental status.
I suffer from Paranoid Schizophrenia, depression and just generally mentally ill. I have attempted suicide 5 or 6 times and I even went to prison for a crime I didn't commit. This crime I was accused of caused me to be placed in a secure medical facility for a mental evaluation. I couldn't get back to the FBI to warn them of what I suspected. I did try to get my doctors to get the judge that put me in the secure medical facility to release me so I could go to NEW YORK because I believed it NYC was going to be attacked.I failed the country not Bush Not Susan Lindauer not Rumsfield and not Condaleeza Rice. I failed the people who died on 9/11. I had been to an office of people who might have been able to help. However, the message I had to present never made its way into a conversation because I had been warned about being too aggressive when I was in the military. At Captain's Mast my C.O. specifically warned me that I couldn't cram things down peoples throat. I failed you on 9/11. However, I did try.

Roderick Horton said...

I wish I could tell you everything that was going on. But everybody was against me.I am generally viewed as a reliable source of information. Susan Lindauer was making inquiries into information I was passing on to the intelligence agencies. Not warning of 9/11. I failed you on 9/11. Not Bush Not Rumsfield Not Condaleeza Rice and not George Tenent.