Thursday, September 30, 2010

Israeli Settlement "Freeze" Was A Complete LIE! 120 Settlements Expanded During So Called "Freeze"!

I have been saying it for months, and I will say it again... Israel's so called settlement "freeze" was a complete sham and a lie.   These criminals continued to build up their settlements and in some cases actually accelerated their illegal settlement program in the occupied West Bank during the time that they harped to the media and to people around the world that they were in a 10 month "moratorium" on settlement building!

You want proof?  Here is an article from www.uruknet.info, where the Middle East Monitor has come forward and said that 120 illegal Jewish settlements in the West Bank actually expanded during the so called farce of a "freeze".  Here is that article:


Statistics show that 120 Jewish settlements expanded during the "freeze"

Middle East Monitor

MEMO, September 29, 2010


Statistics show that 120 Jewish settlements expanded during the "freeze"As the ramifications of the Israeli decision not to extend the moratorium on settlement building are being digested, statistics released by the Land Research Centre show that 120 illegal Jewish settlements were expanded during the 10 months of the supposed "freeze". The centre's director, Jamal Talab, said that contrary to popular opinion, "settlement activities haven't stopped over the past 10 months". The expansion of the 120 settlements is thought to be in respect of 1,520 housing units.

According to Mr. Talab, Israel has prepared contracts for the construction of 2066 units for settlements in addition to plans for construction of 37,679 additional units in the future. He said that large areas of Palestinian land were annexed during the "settlement freeze", agricultural land was destroyed, 280 homes and other structures were demolished, and 13 Palestinian homes were seized by settlers. The statistics reveal, according to Mr. Talab, that Israel intends to demolish a further 830 Palestinian buildings. Over the past ten months during which this freeze is supposed to have been in place, Israel has refused permission for 10 roads to be paved in Palestinian areas, whereas illegal settlers have had paving installed on 28 roads built exclusively for their use.




:: Article nr. 70287 sent on 30-sep-2010 07:58 ECT

www.uruknet.info?p=70287


NTS Notes:  I never had any doubt at all that these criminals were liars and hypocrites.   But it does seem more and more that they can lie through their teeth, and they will have their controlled media sell the lie to the general public as the truth.

Israel has one goal in mind.  They want ALL of Palestine no matter what.  They will lie, cheat, and steal from the Palestinians to obtain their dream of a "Greater Israel".   It is high time that everyone gets the message and helps in this fight for the rights of the Palestinian people!

More to come

NTS

Israeli Foreign Minister's Speech At UN Shows True Face Of Israel

The entire Middle Eastern so called "peace talks" are an absolute sham.  Israel does not want peace with the Palestinians at all, because the Zionist Jews want territory!  The entire Zionist agenda has been built from the beginning around the eventual goal of having all of Palestine for themselves.   In that sick and twisted thinking, there is absolutely no room at all for the Palestinian people at all.

If you want more proof of what Israel truly wants, I want to present this article that I obtained through Aletho News, at www.alethonews.wordpress.com, where the Israeli foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, gave his speech in front of the UN General Assembly on the 28th of September, and in that speech he basically calls for the eventual expulsion of all of the Palestinian people from Israel as a means of obtaining "Peace"!   I want to present that article here for my own readers to view:

Avigdor Lieberman’s UN Speech Shows the True Face of Israel

By Alex Kane | September 29, 2010
Yisrael Beiteinu’s strong third-place showing in Israel’s February 2009 elections for the Knesset was met with dread and disgust from many different quarters.

Avigdor Lieberman, the founder and leader of the far-right party and the current Foreign Minister, ran a campaign filled with fascist overtones as he called for “loyalty oaths” to be signed by Palestinian citizens of Israel.

But perhaps we should take a look at Lieberman again in light of his much-condemned United Nations General Assembly speech yesterday and instead feel glad that the true face of Israel is shining to the world because of his position of power.

At the UN, Lieberman called for a “long-term intermediate agreement” instead of a solution dealing with all the final-status issues, dismissed the notion that the occupation and colonization of Palestine is at the core of the conflict and proposed a deal with the Palestinians that would be “about moving borders to better reflect demographic realities.”  Although Lieberman claimed that he was not talking about “moving populations,” it’s apparent that Lieberman’s plan would result in the expulsion of Palestinian citizens of Israel to a Palestinian state, all in the service of making Israel an “ethnically pure” Jewish state.

Reactions from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. Jewish leaders were swift, and the media narrative laid out is that Lieberman’s speech revealed “differences” within Israeli politics about the “peace process.”  The New York Times reports today that “sharp differences within the Israeli government over peace negotiations played out in the unusual setting of the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday.”

Netanyahu’s office distanced the prime minister from the speech and said that Lieberman’s speech was “not coordinated” with Netanyahu and that Netanyahu wants “direct talks” with the Palestinian Authority to go forward.

The reaction from Netanyahu was about promoting the image of Israel as willing to sit down and negotiate for peace with the Palestinians, which Lieberman’s speech did damage to.  But that’s all it was about–Netanyahu and the State of Israel’s policies are completely in line with Lieberman’s plan of ethnically cleansing the non-Jewish citizens of Israel and of continuing to colonize the West Bank.

Under Netanyahu, the Bedouin village of Al Araqib has been destroyed multiple times to make way for a Jewish National Fund “ambassador forest.”  Netanyahu has presided over the continued colonization of the West Bank, despite talk of a “settlement freeze,” and that’s likely to accelerate in the coming weeks.  A recent Israeli Supreme Court ruling has Palestinians in Sheikh Jarrah worried about further dispossession at the hands of Jewish settlers, and Silwan in East Jerusalem is still under the threat of home demolitions to make way for Israeli settlements and a theme park.

The list can go on and on.  Actions speak much louder than words, and the State of Israel under Netanyahu has continued routine Israeli policies of land theft, colonization and slow ethnic cleansing.  That’s not much different than the Israel Lieberman showed at the UN yesterday in words.  Maybe that’s a good thing; the true, ugly face of Israeli policy, which the Palestinians know all-too-well, was shown to the world, further confirming that the “peace talks” are useless, and that Netanyahu is playing a public relations game for the international community while the status quo is sustained.


NTS Notes: Readers, you really have to love the spinning by the Zionist Jewish controlled media and the Israeli Government now trying to do some damage control and to distance themselves from the true facts presented in this speech. 

The facts are that what Lieberman has said at the UN is Israel's true agenda.  These criminals do not give a damn about anyone other than themselves and all they want is Palestine all for themselves.    They want a "racially pure" state of Israel that would eventually contain Eastern European/Asian born "Jews" (Khazars) only with absolutely NO Palestinians!

Lets face it once and for all... There is absolutely no chance for any true peace in the Middle East as long as Israel sticks to its Zionist Jewish goals and policies of a Jewish only Palestinian state.  Until that agenda changes, the only hope for the Palestinians is to fight for their rights and their very existence.

More to come

NTS

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Canadian Minister Of Defense, Peter McKay, Squanders Taxpayer Dollars In Hard Times

Right now, most of the world is sitting on the brink of total economic collapse, and resultant chaos.   Most Western nations are mired under trillions of dollars of debt, along with rising unemployment, and falling Gross Domestic Production.   The net result will be a Great Depression that could make the so called Great Depression of the 1930's look tame in comparison.

Canada is absolutely not immune to the impending world wide economic collapse.  This nation is presently suffering from an economic slowdown, increasing debt load, and rising unemployment.  Yet in spite of the tough times that Canada is experiencing, it seems, according to this article from www.vivelecanada.ca, that the Canadian Minister of Defense, Peter McKay, is squandering Canadian taxpayer dollars during these hard times by purchasing war toys that may prove to be totally inappropriate for our present or future needs!  Here is that article:

Minister Of Defense Peter MacKay Squanders Taxpayer Dollars In Hard Times

Posted on Monday, September 27 at 09:20 by robertjb

As Afghanistan is the graveyard of empires so too is it the graveyard of a hopelessly discredited NATO. So too is it the graveyard of defense ministers who are courtesans to the empire and who buy oversold war toys such as the F 35 that are totally inappropriate to our needs and hideously expensive in a time of economic austerity where economies are sagging and too many thousands are jobless.
 
Minister MacKay treats the Canadian electorate like local mushroom farmers treat their mushrooms; keep them in the dark and feed them bullshit. Nor is our national media doing Canadians any favors as the Globe and Mail publishes any number of inane reasons for the acquisition of this multi- billion dollar dinosaur that will be still-born seven years from now.
 
 Thanks do go to former civil servant and diplomat Mark Collins for his informative comments published in the National Post giving Canadians a primer as to what the F 35 is really all about. Collins also provides links to the New York Times and elsewhere and we see the F-35 is surrounded in controversy:  
 
Other nations have also debated the necessity of an aircraft as costly and sophisticated as the F-35. Opposition leaders in Denmark and the Netherlands are questioning whether they can afford to buy the plane at a time when their economies are under pressure. Lockheed, however, needs to hold onto the foreign sales to lower the cost of the planes. NYT July18th 2010.
 
Also from the New York Times:
 
The American defense secretary, Robert M. Gates, recently revamped the F-35 program and removed the general in charge, after the Pentagon’s projected costs soared 64 percent to $382 billion for 2,457 planes. The eight allies have invested a total of $4 billion in developing the plane and could buy hundreds of the planes through specific orders, most of which remain to be negotiated.
 
One of the most pertinent issues Collins raises is why Canada is not even considering the state of the art twin engine Super Hornet, successor to the CF-18 Hornet presently used by Canadian Forces. The Super hornet is already in use with the US Navy and is much less expensive than the F-35.
 
In more general terms Minister MacKay appears blissfully indifferent to related issues that need to be addressed.
 
Why are the US and other NATO countries spending over a trillion dollars a year on armaments when there is no real enemy?  The Cold War is in the distant past yet military spending continues at Cold War levels. The answer will no doubt be that the war on terrorism necessitates these expenditures but in fact the war on terrorism is really an overblown ruse to justify an out of control addiction to militarism and the American led pursuit of global hegemony.
 
The London based IISS ( International Institute for Strategic Studies) has just reached the long over due conclusion:
 
The threat posed by al-Qaida and the Taliban is exaggerated and the western-led counter-insurgency campaign in Afghanistan risks becoming a "long, drawn-out disaster", one of the world's leading security thinktanks warned today.
 
            The IISS is still being coy as it should have stated decisively Afghanistan is a "long, drawn-out disaster", by any standard.
 
Minister MacKay et al must ultimately address the fact that military spending now takes the form of corporate welfarism where military needs, capabilities and appropriate weaponry are not assessed objectively but dictated by the profit margins of arms manufacturers, megalomaniacal military lobbyists, and pork barrelling politicians who see militarism as handy job creation programs.
 
The problem with these handy job creation programs is that we end up in a state of continuous warfare, as we are now, and we are assured this will be the norm for some time to come. The cost of excessive military spending is compounded by the costs of conducting consequent warfare. Politicians then have the gall to question the cost of social services as military excesses race out of control responding to “exaggerated” threats with failed strategies, and inappropriate armaments.          
 
Minister MacKay is not really so concerned with buying the best possible equipment as he claims but is practicing the Harper government’s usual blind obedience to Washington’s every wish. Where the claim is made these aircraft are necessary to defend our sovereignty their acquisition is actually an abdication of sovereignty as the Minister of Defense can not make a cogent argument for the acquisition of these aircraft when there are clearly other alternatives that should be explored. The very fact that delivery of these aircraft will not begin until 2017 means the government is buying a pig in a poke, and an aircraft totally irrelevant to our needs at that time.
 
The US is in the process of finalizing an arms sale to Saudi Arabia in the amount of 60 billion dollars, said to be the single largest arms sale ever. This ominous oil-for-arms quid pro quo leaves Saudi Arabia armed out of all proportion to its national needs and America further addicted to its glutinous appetite for oil and compulsive military spending.
 
Both and Canada and Saudi Arabia feel some mad compulsion to feed America’s militarist addiction.         
 
It goes without saying that every nation requires a military capability to defend its sovereignty, but this capability and the armaments chosen must be relevant to the times and existing threats. We are told by experts that we are in the age of “irregular warfare” but politicians and military leaders have yet to find the strategies to fight this type of warfare and fail to  consider the distinct possibility that these hideous, and arguably, phony wars should not be fought at all.  
 
 As the debacle of Afghanistan persists after a decade of fighting and with present assurances(courtesy of US General David Patreus) that this conflict will persist for another decade we can hardly have confidence in the capabilities, strategies, and appropriate responses of our political and military elites. For all the massive loss of life and war crimes committed(of which we live in persistent denial) and trillions spent on recent wars and militarism western powers have failed to achieve success in a minor regional war against one of the world’s poorest countries. There is something desperately wrong and for this there must be accountability. Just imagine if we ever had to fight a real war against a country with real military prowess.
 
As Canada’s Parliament reconvenes it concerns itself with the issue of whether the long gun registry should continue to exist. As it does so it retreats from governance-from the really important issues of the day- and becomes a forum for petty squabbling, partisan infighting, and an abuse of power on the part of the government for it is clearly milking this issue for future electoral advantage. The opposition is derelict in its duty for not fulfilling its role and complacently letting the government set the agenda. The opposition parties should be forcing a full debate on Canada’s role in Afghanistan and the issue of military spending regarding the F-35 and other issues of genuine national importance.  They should be holding the Minister of Defense to account for he has been running on empty for too long.   
 
This, more than buying a bunch of overpriced ill-chosen aircraft becomes a genuine and dynamic expression of sovereignty.    
 
 
 
Mark Collins full commentary can be read at:
 


NTS Notes:  I fully agree with the assessments made in this article.  Yes, the present F-18A Hornets that Canada had purchased during the 1980's may be obsolete by today's standards.  But to move to the absolutely outrageously priced F35 aircraft is definitely squandering Canadian taxpayer dollars when the more fiscally responsible and proven Super Hornets are readily available, and at a far less expensive cost!

It does same strange that the Canadian government is willing to pay BILLIONS of much needed taxpayer dollars on these overpriced machines considering that the Cold War is over, and there is absolutely no such thing as a "terrorist" threat from the CIA/Mossad created phony "Al-Qaeda".   The questions then becomes to Canadians... Why is our government squandering our money, and exactly who is our own government listening to?

More to come

NTS

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Proof Again That The US Government Does NOT Answer To The American People At All

Israel controls the United States.   Another sad fact, readers.... The US Government is totally under the control of Zionist Jewish interests and absolutely does NOT answer to the American public.  Every Senator and Congressman who ever runs and is elected to the US Federal Government must swear their undying allegiance to the nation of Israel first and foremost.  That is also a proven fact!

You want further proof of the fact that the US Government is under the control of Israeli interests?  Well, here is an article from www.google.com/hostednews, where the US Government finally gives its official response to the latest UN report that found Israel totally guilty of murder in their attacks on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla on May 31st, 2010.    It seems that again, the US Government has whored itself to its masters in Tel Aviv!  Here is that article:


US criticizes 'unbalanced' flotilla probe
GENEVA — The United States on Tuesday criticised a UN probe into Israel's storming of a Gaza-bound aid flotilla, urging the Human Rights Council to prevent the report from being used to torpedo peace talks.
"We are concerned by the report's unbalanced language, tone and conclusions," US ambassador Eileen Donahoe told the Human Rights Council.
"We urge that this report not be used for actions that could disrupt the direct Israeli-Palestinian talks now underway or actions that could make it harder," she added.
A probe ordered by the UN Human Rights Council said last week there was clear evidence to back a prosecution against Israel for killing and torture when troops stormed the flotilla in May, leaving nine Turkish activists dead.
The report also threw out Israel's argument that the activists were violent, thereby justifying the decision by soldiers to open fire.
It found that no offensive weapons were taken on board any of the vessels of the flotilla except a few catapults.
From the outset, Israel has rejected the probe as biased.
Other Western states however, called for the report to be transmitted to the a separate United Nations probe into the incident which was set up by UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon.
Switzerland said it hopes that the separate inquiry "would take into account the analysis and conclusions of the Human Rights Council's probe."
The European Union also "encouraged Israel to follow-up on the conclusions" of the rights inquiry.
The Israeli and Palestinian leaders relaunched peace negotiations earlier this month but the fledgling process is already in danger after the expiry of a moratorium on Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank.


NTS Notes:  "Unbalanced language, tone and conclusions"?  Israel commits outright murder, especially with the killing of an American citizen on the Mavi Marmara, and the US ambassador tells the UN Human Rights Council that the official report was "unbalanced"?    There is absolutely no justification for cold blooded murder!

Again, and again, I am asking the same question.... When the hell will the American people finally wake the hell up and get these clowns and traitors out of their government?   These morons are elected by the American public and yet they answer only to a foreign power?   Is that not treason?

America needs representatives that answer only to the citizens of the United States.   It is no wonder that the Israelis can act with impunity and outright murder... They know they have their slaves in the US Government in their back pocket just in case they are ever caught and exposed for their crimes against humanity.    It is up to the American public to end this madness and boot each and every one of the traitors out of public office.

More to come

NTS

You Promised Me Democracy

It has been a while since I did any articles pertaining to the American invasion and destruction of the nation of Iraq.  Right now, the American government has pushed the BS that they have now "withdrawn" all of their combat troops out of Iraq and have proclaimed victory in Iraq by saying "mission accomplished".   The truth is that they have almost totally destroyed that nation, and have polluted the entire nation with depleted uranium that will leave the region irradiated for the next 4.5 BILLION years!  On top of that, they are maintaining "bases" in Iraq with 50,000 soldiers, but not calling these soldiers "combat troops".   So much for bringing American style "Democracy" to Iraq!

For today, I want to present the following poem that I found through Mark Glenn's; The Ugly Truth website, at www.theuglytruth.wordpress.com.   It is written by Saeed Malik, and entitled: "You Promised Me Democracy".   It deals with the true nature of what Iraq is like today as a result of the brutal American invasion.    I want my own readers to see this excellent piece of literature for themselves.   Here is that poem:



In Uncategorized on September 27, 2010 by crescentandcross 


You promised me democracy,
But look what you have done to me.
You robbed my past,
and future stole,
and a present
left to me,
crushed beyond
a mending hope.
Ten years before invading me,
you broke my dams
and bridges bombed,
and power plants,
and sewage lines,
and water mains,
You fed the plants
with pesticide,
The baby food and medicine
you destroyed;
and the silos
of my grain
you set aflame.
So I may not
make good my loss
nor repair
my water mains,
you shackled me
in sanctions,
and a million kids
you starved to death.
I lived Saddam’s
nightmare through.
I knew what I
must watch out for.
But now I don’t know
where to hide
for death has lost
its pattern now.
He used to kill
and bury us,
friendless in
our unmarked graves;
but our names
he kept on files.
And now that you
are killing us,
we do not even
have a grave,
nor a number
nor a name–
thus in your books
we never lived.
He was your friend
who hurried us,
so many to their
early deaths,
with weapons that you
sold to him,
while you looked
the other way.
He was not
a ‘tyrant’ then,
which of late
he has become.
You merely changed
the label,
so you could come
and liberate,
the wealth that we
are sitting on,
and this you call
our liberation!
You promised me
democracy,
but look what you
have done to me.
With bombs you won
my heart over,
with blows you changed
my mind.
You tore into
my home at night,
and pulverized
my only peace.
And shrieking as
my mother watched,
with frightened children
Gathered ‘round,
you floored my father
in a heap,
with kicks and blows
and rifle butts,
and tore my humble
home apart.
Then you led
our men away,
with tied hands
behind their backs,
and with their eyes folded blind,
into the endless prison night.
And there you tore
my father’s robe.
To cover then
his nakedness,
upon his head
you put the hood,
and leashed him like
a dog on show,
and your dogs
unleashed on him.
You promised me
democracy,
but look what you
have done to me.
You took my youth
in prime away–
you shredded wedding
gatherings.
The little joys
that I had left,
merriment in
a broken life,
now in collateral
damage rest,
rising up
in smoke and flame,
of a mindless
bombing run.
‘Tis peel and husk
I have for food,
and water mixed
with sewage now
is all I have
to slake my thirst.
You even took
my sand away,
polluted by
uranium dust,
so when I have
my children they
shall be deformed,
unlovely and
unkissable–
and so unlike
your lovely kids!
My millions homeless
roam the road,
and orphaned children
beg in streets.
My women raised
in sanctity,
are now the stuff
of ravishment.
My men are slaughtered
out of hand,
and widows search
the morgues for them.
My dawn is dull,
and dusk is blood,
and bombs and blasts,
my afternoons.
My night in hopelessness is sunk,
when peace with me
a refuge takes,
and heaps on me
another dawn–
another search
of bodies lost;
another count
of heaped insults;
another day
to death evade,
call it life,
and celebrate.
So now when I
am fighting back,
my fearlessness
is causing awe.
Unequal,
but unafraid,
when I equalize myself,
and blow my only
life away,
you are shocked,
and label me
a terrorist!
I who want
my honor lost
and country back–
–a terrorist?
And you who came here
for my oil,
on crutches of
a shameless lie,
are and always
shall remain,
the humanist!
I know your type.
I see your greed
and hunger know,
but it is those
I want to know,
whose vote does so
empower you.
Do they not see
what they have done?
They promised me
democracy,
but look what they
have done to me!

(c) 2010 by Saeed Malik


NTS Notes: This poem says it all.  The American invasion and occupation of Iraq has left that once proud nation almost totally destitute, with much of the Iraqi people living in an impoverished irradiated hell.  

Again, So much for bringing American style "democracy" to that region....

More to come

NTS




 

Monday, September 27, 2010

Israeli Settlers To "Resume" West Bank Construction (Did They Ever Stop?)

The so called "Peace Talks" to try to bring peace between Israel and the Palestinians are mercifully over.  They ended just as I had predicted, with absolutely no peace agreement.    This seems to be the recurring result of all of these "peace talks", and people are finally realizing that they are, and always have been a farce.  The fact is that Israel does NOT want peace at all.... It wants territory, and the eventual expulsion of the entire Palestinian populace out of the West Bank.

Now comes a new article from www.theintelhub.com, where Israeli settlers are now "rejoicing" over the end of the phony moratorium or settlement "freeze" that was supposed to be in place for the last 10 months, but has turned out to be in itself an absolute farce!  Here is that article for my own readers to view:


Israeli settlers to resume West Bank construction




September 27, 2010 by Alex



The Associated Press
JERUSALEM – Israeli settlers say they will slowly resume building new Jewish homes in West Bank settlements — just hours after a construction ban that helped jump-start Mideast peace talks expired.
Mayor Oded Revivi in the Efrat settlement said on Monday that banks and developers are reluctant to get into commitments, fearing construction will be stopped again.
Israeli Zionists Celebrate End of Settlement Freeze:

Tonight, we are returning this decree to the trash bin’

As the sun set on a dirt field at the edge of the Revava settlement in Samaria on Sunday, thousands of right-wing activists counted down the remaining seconds of the freeze that temporarily put a halt to the construction of 2,066 Jewish housing units across the West Bank.
“Three, two, one, the moratorium has ended on the 18th of Tishrei,” MK Danny Danon (Likud) yelled out as he stood on a large outdoor stage that had been set up for the event. Read Article


NTS Notes:  I have asked the question in the heading of this article, and the facts speak for themselves.   There never was a settlement "freeze" over the last 10 months, and in fact Israel went ahead under this phony "freeze" with their building of new settlements at an accelerated pace.    The entire "freeze" was done for publicity and for the gullible people around the world to swallow.   It was a sham and an outright lie by the Zionist criminals to begin with.

Now the Israelis will go right ahead with their accelerated settlement building,  with absolutely no chance of slowing down!  Very shortly their settlements will simply swallow up what is left of the West Bank, and the entire region will just simply be annexed into  Israel itself.   In doing so, the Zionist Jews will have fulfilled one of their principle objectives when they first founded their sick dreamland of Israel.    It will also mean the end of any chance for a true independent Palestinian state for the rightful heirs to the region, the Palestinians themselves.

More to come

NTS

UN To Appoint "Space Ambassador" To Act As First Contact For Aliens Visiting Earth

OK, for a change of topic, I want to touch on a subject that many of my friends and some emails have asked me to give my views about.   That is the belief in extraterrestrial life and the possibilities that we have already been visited by Alien life forms, or if we are about to be visited shortly by Alien life forms!

Being a man of science, I have long believed that we are absolutely not alone in the Cosmos.   For mankind to think that he is alone in this Universe is absolute lunacy.   This spiral galaxy of ours, the Milky Way, has somewhere in the neighbourhood of some 1 Billion stars.  It is a known fact from astronomical observations and measurements that at least 10% of that total would have companion planets. Now if you take this figure of 100 Million solar systems within our own galaxy and even say that only yellow dwarf stars have the longevity necessary to have planets with possibility of developing complex life forms, and say that only 1% of all stars in our Galaxy are Yellow dwarfs,  you have 1 Million yellow dwarf star solar systems.  Now you take it even further...Now if you say 1% of that 1 Million solar systems would have earth like planets that have developed the type of atmosphere and conditions for life, you have 10,000+ life sustaining solar systems within our own galaxy!    But with new ways of looking at how life can develop in amazing ways throughout the Cosmos,  it can be assumed that even this 10,000+ life supporting solar system number may be too small.

One other major problem with extraterrestrial life is the distance between these life supporting solar systems which limits the possibility of contact with these other worlds.  Our star, Sol, is actually in a very sparse area at the edge of a spiral arm within our galaxy, and the nearest stars that could sustain life are at least 50-100 light years away!     To cover these distances without "faster than light" travel is a near impossibility.    Even radio waves that have been sent out into space for the last century are only now reaching that 100 light year distance.   If our signals are received by alien receivers, the return signal, if any and if limited by the speed of light, will take another century to be picked up here by receivers on earth!

I have also been asked if we are, or have been visited by Extraterrestrial beings.  I look at it this way... If these beings have the technology and capability of visiting our lonely planet, then their technology and science is well beyond ours.   It is my belief that if they are visiting us, then they would be doing it with the understanding of not directly interfering with our own development....Sort of a Universal "Prime Directive" of non-interference.  It would make sense because they would be beyond our scope of science and technology and would be comparable to what the Europeans were to the native Americans when the Europeans began their conquest of the New World.    We can see what the devastating results were by studying history about that interference!

So now comes the question:  Are UFO's real?  Possibly...The facts are now coming out that the strange aircraft that people have been observing for years have a very terrestrial origin and are most probably many secretive projects being carried out by our own governments.    But it is obvious that not ALL of the UFO sightings are military/secret aircraft, and the possibility of them being from a non-earthly source is open to speculation.

Ok, now you have my views on UFO's, ET, etc....Now we come to today, and this new article from www.dailymail.co.uk, where it seems that the United Nations has just appointed a "Space Ambassador" to act as first contact for when or if Alien life forms make official "contact" with Earth.    I want to present the article here for my readers to view, with my further comments to follow:



United Nations to appoint space ambassador to act as first contact for aliens visiting Earth

By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
Last updated at 3:56 PM on 26th September 2010





If aliens ever land on Earth there will no longer be any confusion over who will greet them with the news the United Nations is set to appoint an astrophysicist to be their first human contact.

Mazlan Othman is expected to be tasked with coordinating humanity's response to an extraterrestrial visit, if ever required.

The 58-year-old Malaysian will tell a conference next week that with the recent discovery of hundreds of planets orbiting around other stars, the detection of alien life is becoming more and more likely.

Mazlan Othman
Take us to your leader: Mazlan Othman is expected to be tasked with coordinating humanity's response to an extraterrestrial visit

Ms Othman, currently the head of the UN's Office for Outer Space Affairs (Unoosa), recently told fellow scientists that mankind needed to be ready to deal with alien contact.





'The continued search for extraterrestrial communication, by several entities, sustains the hope that some day human kind will received signals from extraterrestrials,' she said.

'When we do, we should have in place a coordinated response that takes into account all the sensitivities related to the subject. 
'The UN is a ready-made mechanism for such coordination.'

ET
Friendly? Professor Stephen Hawking has questioned the theory of non-threatening alien visitors, such as ET in the Hollywood film
Plans to make Unoose the coordinating body for dealing with alien encounters are set to be debated by UN scientific advisory committees.

If the idea is backed it will then head to General Assembly.

Professor Richard Crowther, head of the UK delegation to the UN committee, admitted recently: '[Ms] Othman is absolutely the nearest thing we have to a "take me to your leader" person.'

In April though Professor Stephen Hawking warned that the alien contact, if it ever comes, may not be as friendly as has been hoped.

In a documentary, the 68-year-old scientist said he imagined aliens arriving in 'massive ships' and could try to colonise Earth and plunder the planet's resources.

'We only have to look at ourselves to see how intelligent life might develop into something we wouldn’t want to meet,' he said.

'I imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the resources from their home planet. Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonise whatever planets they can reach.'

He added: 'It would be 'too risky' to attempt to make contact with alien races. If aliens ever visit us, I think the outcome would be much as when Christopher Columbus first landed in America, which didn’t turn out very well for the Native Americans.'



NTS Notes:  It does seem strange that this type of action is happening now.   It does seem that with the criminal elite failing to get their war with Iran off the ground, and their failure to get their "Global Warming" scam launched, they need something new to scare the crap out of people... So why not a fear of extraterrestrial space aliens, and the possibility of an "invasion" from outer space?

The question becomes:  How gullible will people get?   I have already stated my position as to the probability of Alien existence... But readers, you need to ask yourselves... Why are they pushing this now?

More to come

NTS

Global COOLING And The "New World Order"

OK, readers... Repeat after me.... Man made Global Warming is a massive lie!   There it is in a nutshell for everyone to remember....

Lets face the facts once and for all...The entire farce of man made "Global Warming" was created so that some criminal individuals could get filthy RICH through the imposition of "Cap and Trade" legislation, and "Green Tax" initiatives.  These criminals do not give a damn about anything other than their selfish selves and are driven by pure GREED.   That, readers, is fact and absolutely not fiction!

Lets also face the reality that is happening right now... Our Sun is going through a natural cycle of diminished solar output and a diminished magnetic field output.   The net result is a COOLING on this planet that could last decades.   With everyone still believing the lie of Global Warming, most people will be totally unprepared for the coming Global Cooling, and that, readers, could be a tragedy!

Now to further show that governments are actually abandoning their Global Warming push, comes this interesting article form the Telegraph out of the UK at www.telegraph.co.uk.  It is written by an outspoken critic of the entire Global Warming farce, James Delingpole, and it is entitled: "Global Cooling and the New World Order".  I want to present the entire article here for my own readers to view:


Global Cooling and the New World Order





By James Delingpole  Last updated: September 26th, 2010







blofeld
Bilderberg. Whether you believe it’s part of a sinister conspiracy which will lead inexorably to one world government or whether you think it’s just an innocent high-level talking shop, there’s one thing that can’t be denied: it knows which way the wind is blowing. (Hat tips: Will/NoIdea/Ozboy)
At its June meeting in Sitges, Spain (unreported and held in camera, as is Bilderberg’s way), some of the world’s most powerful CEOs rubbed shoulders with notable academics and leading politicians. They included: the chairman of Fiat, the Irish Attorney General Paul Gallagher, the US special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke, Henry Kissinger, Bill Gates, Dick Perle, the Queen of the Netherlands, the editor of the Economist…. Definitely not Z-list, in other words.
Which is what makes one particular item on the group’s discussion agenda so tremendously significant. See if you can spot the one I mean:
The 58th Bilderberg Meeting will be held in Sitges, Spain 3 – 6 June 2010. The Conference will deal mainly with Financial Reform, Security, Cyber Technology, Energy, Pakistan, Afghanistan, World Food Problem, Global Cooling, Social Networking, Medical Science, EU-US relations.
Yep, that’s right. Global Cooling.
Which means one of two things.
Either it was a printing error.
Or the global elite is perfectly well aware that global cooling represents a far more serious and imminent threat to the world than global warming, but is so far unwilling to admit it except behind closed doors.
Let me explain briefly why this is a bombshell waiting to explode.
Almost every government in the Western world from the USA to Britain to all the other EU states to Australia and New Zealand is currently committed to a policy of “decarbonisation.” This in turn is justified to (increasingly sceptical) electorates on the grounds that man-made CO2 is a prime driver of dangerous global warming and must therefore be reduced drastically, at no matter what social, economic and environmental cost. In the Eighties and Nineties, the global elite had a nice run of hot weather to support their (scientifically dubious) claims. But now they don’t. Winters are getting colder. Fuel bills are rising (in the name of combating climate change, natch). The wheels are starting to come off the AGW bandwagon. Ordinary people, resisting two decades of concerted brainwashing, are starting to notice.
All this, of course, spells big trouble for the global power elite. As well as leading to  food shortages (as, for example, it becomes harder to grow wheat in northerly latitudes; adding, of course, to such already-present disasters as biofuels and the rejection of GM), global cooling is going to find electorates increasingly angry that they have been sold a pup.
Our fuel bills have risen inexorably; our countryside, our views and our property values have been ravaged by hideous wind farms; our holidays have been made more expensive; our cost of living has been driven up by green taxes; our freedoms have been curtailed in any number of pettily irritating ways from what kind of light bulbs we are permitted to use to how we dispose of our rubbish. And to what end? If man-made global warming was really happening and really a problem we might possibly have carried on putting up with all these constraints on our liberty and assaults on our  income. But if it turns out to have been a myth……
blofeld
Well then, all bets are off.
The next few years are going to be very interesting. Watch the global power elite squirming to reposition itself as it slowly distances itself from Anthropogenic Global Warming (”Who? Us? No. We never thought of it as more than a quaint theory…”), and tries to find new ways of justifying green taxation and control. (Ocean acidification; biodiversity; et al). You’ll notice sly shifts in policy spin. In Britain, for example, Chris “Chicken Little” Huhne’s suicidal “dash for wind” will be re-invented as a vital step towards “energy security.” There will be less talk of “combatting climate change” and more talk of “mitigation”. You’ll hear enviro-Nazis like Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren avoid reference to “global warming” like the plague, preferring the more reliably vague phrase “global climate disruption.”
And you know what the worst thing is? If we allow them to, they’re going to get away with it.
Our duty as free citizens over the next few years is to make sure that they don’t.
Al Gore, George Soros, Bill Gates, Carol Browner, John Holdren, Barack Obama, David Cameron, Ed Miliband, Tim Yeo, Michael Mann, Ted Turner, Robert Redford, Phil Jones, Chris Huhne, John Howard (yes really, he was supposed to be a conservative, but he was the man who kicked off Australia’s ETS), Julia Gillard, Kevin Rudd, Yvo de Boer, Rajendra Pachauri….The list of the guilty goes on and on. Each in his own way – and whether through ignorance, naivety idealism or cynicism, it really doesn’t matter for the result has been the same – has done his bit to push the greatest con-trick in the history of science, forcing on global consumers the biggest bill in the history taxation, using “global warming” as an excuse to extend the reach of government further than it has ever gone before.
It is time we put a stop to this. In the US, the Tea Party movement is showing us the way. We need to punish these dodgy politicians at the ballot box. We need to ensure that those scientists guilty of malfeasance are, at the very least thrown out of the jobs which we taxpayers have been funding these last decades. We need to ensure that corporatist profiteers are no longer able to benefit from the distortion and corruption of the markets which result from green regulation.
We need a “Global Warming” Nuremberg.


NTS Notes:  It is truly amazing, from what we see in this article, that the criminals that attended this year's Bilderberg meeting in Spain were fully aware that Global Warming is a massive lie, and that Global Cooling is the actual order of the day!

So what is the game that is being played?  It seems that this power "elite", that pushed the Global Warming farce for them to get their world wide control mechanisms in place, knows that the jig is up when it comes to "Global Warming" and may be pushing for their next game which will be to scare the crap out of people by the new fear of "Global Cooling"!

People need to wake the hell up and see the sick games that these criminals have been playing with their minds.  I do remember the fears of the depleted Ozone Layer, and of course the fear of a new "Ice Age" from the 1970's to early 1980's, and those fears were exposed as falsehoods then.  It seems that we will be constantly subjected to these sick ploys until people smarten up and see the game for what it is, and have these criminals arrested and put to trial for their con game..... A Global Warming Nuremberg trial would be a decent start!

More to come

NTS

Sunday, September 26, 2010

What Actually Happened On September 11th, 2001?

We all know by now that the attacks of September 11th, 2001, was an act of outright murder,  under the cooperation of the US Government and the criminal state of Israel.  Much of the operation itself was conducted by Mossad agents in the United States, along with their faithful helpers, the Sayanim, who assisted with the operation to its fulfilment.   That is a fact, readers.

Now for the questions as to HOW these murderers were able to pull off the 9-11 attacks, and exactly happened on the morning of September 11th, 2001, I want to present the following article from www.serendipity.il.  This article fills in many of the missing facts about the 9-11 Israeli Mossad operation very nicely.  So without any further delay, I want to present that article here in its entirety:


The World Trade Center Demolition
and the So-Called War on Terrorism
4.  What Actually Happened on 9/11?




In October 2001, just one month after 9/11, two articles appeared on the web which provided the first clues to what really happened. One was Carol Valentine's "Operation 911: NO SUICIDE PILOTS". This article drew attention to the possibility of remote control of a large jet aircraft. That this technology exists is public knowledge.  It was developed by Northrop Grumman for use in Global Hawk, an automated American military jet with the wingspan of a Boeing 737.  (For further details about Global Hawk see Operation 911: NO SUICIDE PILOTS.) Since it is possible to control a Boeing 757 or 767 by means of remote control, might not the jets which hit the Twin Towers and the Pentagon have been remotely controlled?  In which case there would be no need to maintain the improbable hypothesis that the four jets were simultaneously hijacked by nineteen on-board Arab terrorists.
The other article discussing the possibility of remote control of Boeing aircraft was Joe Vialls's "Home Run: Electronically Hijacking the World Trade Center Attack Aircraft".
In the mid-seventies ... two American multinationals collaborated with the Defense Advanced [Research] Projects Agency (DARPA) on a project designed to facilitate the remote recovery of hijacked American aircraft.  [This technology] ... allowed specialist ground controllers to ... take absolute control of [a hijacked plane's] computerized flight control system by remote means.  From that point onwards, regardless of the wishes of the hijackers or flight deck crew, the hijacked aircraft could be recovered and landed automatically at an airport of choice, with no more difficulty than flying a radio-controlled model plane.  ... [This was] the system used to facilitate direct ground control of the four aircraft used in the high-profile attacks on New York and Washington on 11th September 2001. — Joe Vialls: Home Run: Electronically Hijacking the World Trade Center Attack Aircraft
Remote control technology is also used with the Predator system (shown at right).
But there's a problem with this theory: Although the technology for the remote control of a Boeing jetliner certainly exists, and could be installed (if it is not already standard) on four Boeings, their hijacking by remote control could not be rehearsed in advance, and there was always the possibility that the pilots might find some way to regain manual control. Considering the stakes involved in an operation which was intended to kill thousands of U.S. citizens, there could be no room for error. What was needed was a fool-proof plan, and the remote hijacking of four planes is a scenario with too many possibilities for something to go wrong. But this does not mean that remote-controlled planes were not involved, only that the hijacking by remote control of four commercial jetliners is not the most likely explanation of what happened.
As regards the Pentagon, although it has been obvious since the French website appeared in February 2002 that whatever hit the Pentagon was not a Boeing 757, no adequate explanation of that attack was provided until two-and-a-half years after it occurred. The evidence was contradictory. Many witnesses claim to have seen a large plane (which, under the influence of the official story) they later claimed was an American Airlines passenger jet. And lamp poles were knocked over by whatever it was that flew at nearly ground level. But, as the photographic evidence shows, whatever hit the Pentagon was definitely not a Boeing 757.
In March 2004 Leonard Spencer published an article, The Attack on The Pentagon, which finally provided an explanation consistent with witness accounts, air traffic controller reports and photographic evidence.



Only those who planned and carried out the attacks of 9/11 know for sure what actually happened. But as in any forensic investigation one has to frame theories as to what actually happened and then test those theories against the available evidence (in this case principally the photographic evidence, but also evidence from other sources).
One theory is that given in the official story. In Section 2 and in Section 3 this theory was shown to be completely inconsistent with the available evidence. So we must look for an alternative theory. It should be clearly understood that theorizing about what happened on 9/11 is entirely reasonable, and theories considered cannot be dismissed as "conspiracy theories", since the formulation of theories is what any investigator does when trying to solve a crime. Unfortunately the Bush administration has done everything it can possibly do to prevent any theory from being considered except its own ridiculous story.
A theory consistent with the evidence was revealed in March 2002 to Carol Valentine by an informant (as recounted in 9-11: The Flight of the Bumble Planes). A plot was hatched, not by Arabs, but by so-called Americans (agents of the civilian "state security and intelligence" agencies and bureaus such as the CIA, top-ranking officers within the U.S. Air Force and high-level officials within the U.S. administration), perhaps with Israeli (Mossad) involvement:
  1. to take control of four civilian airliners
  2. to carry out attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon causing huge loss of life
  3. to make it appear that these airliners were used to carry out the attacks
  4. to eliminate the passengers on the airliners who would not be involved in the operation except as reluctant witnesses
  5. to blame these attacks on "Arab terrorists" and to use this as a pretext to launch military campaigns against "enemies of America" in the Middle East and in Asia, the real aim being to get control of their oil and mineral resources.
This plot, of course, was not hatched in a day (it may have been years in preparation). In September 2002 a congressional report


cited no less than 12 examples of intelligence information on the possible use of airliners as weapons. They stretch from 1994 to August 2001, when word came of a plot by Osama bin Laden to fly a plane into the US embassy in Nairobi, Kenya. — America had 12 warnings of aircraft attack
Sometime during the late 90s the U.S. state security agencies realized that certain foreign terrorists were thinking of hijacking planes and crashing them into significant buildings (naturally the Twin Towers would come first to mind). They might even have recruited these would-be terrorists. In any case, they helped them along (covertly, of course), providing money (transmitted via Pakistani ISI operatives), U.S. visas, introductions to U.S. flying schools and useful tips. The plan was not for these would-be terrorists to do the job (since their predecessors had demonstrated their limitations by botching the 1993 attack on the WTC) but rather to be "useful idiots" who could plausibly be blamed (just as Timothy McVeigh was the "useful idiot" blamed for the Oklahoma City bombing). The actual operation was far more elaborate than the would-be hijackers were capable of carrying out, and required equipment which they did not have and prior access to the Twin Towers which was not possible for them.
The only people who know for sure what actually happened on September 11th are those who planned it and carried it out (though probably the lower-level participants have long ago been terminated to ensure that they would never reveal what they knew). But we can say for sure that what happened was not what the Bush administration said happened. So we need to construct some explanatory hypothesis which takes into account what is known, that is, which explains what happened without being inconsistent with anything we know. What follows is such a hypothesis. It may not be true, but it is a lot more plausible than the official story. If anyone has a better hypothesis (say, simpler, more plausible) which is also consistent with what is known then they are free to present it.


  1. Three planes had been made ready by U.S. military personnel, capable of being controlled remotely, with no-one on board:

    • A military jet either loaded with high explosives or carrying missiles or both (call this "Pseudo Flight 11").
    • A Boeing 767, painted up to look like a United Airlines jet (call this "Pseudo Flight 175").
    • A small plane (or perhaps some kind of missile) around which was constructed a shell so that from a distance it appeared to be a Boeing 757, this being designed so that the shell could be destroyed completely by means of explosives (call this "Pseudo Flight 77").
    In addition two or three cruise missiles are needed, such as the AGM-86C cruise missile capable of being fired from a B-52 and of flying to its target under GPS-guidance (and able upon impact to generate heat of over 2,000°C).
  2. Early on the morning of September 11th, according to the official story, four American Airlines and United Airlines jet airliners take off:

    • UA Flight 93, a Boeing 757, departs from Newark Airport at 8:01 a.m. for San Francisco, taking off with between 26 and 38 passengers (about 16% of capacity) and seven crew members on board.  (This is the jet which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania at about 10 a.m.)
    • UA Flight 175, a Boeing 767, departs from Logan Airport, Boston, at 7:58 a.m. for Los Angeles with between 47 and 56 passengers (about 26% of capacity) and nine crew members aboard.  (This is the jet which allegedly hit the South Tower at 9:03 a.m.)
    • AA Flight 11, a Boeing 767, leaves Logan Airport, Boston at about 7:45 a.m. headed for Los Angeles, with between 76 and 81 passengers (about 39% of capacity) and 11 crew members aboard.  (This is the jet which allegedly hit the North Tower at 8:45 a.m.)
    • AA Flight 77, a Boeing 757, leaves Dulles Airport in Washington D.C. at about 8:10 a.m bound for Los Angeles, taking off with between 50 and 58 passengers (about 27% of capacity) and six crew members aboard.  (This is the jet which allegedly hit the Pentagon at about 9:35 a.m.)
  3. Pseudo Flights 11 and 175 take off from some military base, flying under remote control (there is no-one onboard at the controls), and fly so as to intercept the flight paths of AA Flight 11 and UA Flight 175.
  4. A half-hour or so after taking off the pilots of the four civilian airliners are informed by some means of a real or potential terrorist attack and that they are to shut down their transponders and land their planes at one military base or another in some north-eastern U.S. state (directions to the base are given). The pilots obey this order and change course accordingly.
  5. Shortly after the real Flights 11 and 175 cease transmitting their transponder signals the pseudo Flights 11 and 175 begin to transmit the same signals. They fly toward New York and, if they are visible on the air traffic controllers' screens, they appear to be AA 11 and UA 175, now flying toward Manhattan.
  6. Pseudo Flight 11, under remote control, approaches the North Tower at 8:45 a.m., fires missiles into it then crashes into it, detonating explosives already planted in the building. (George W. Bush watches the impact on a private transmission to the TV in his limousine while travelling to a school in Florida.)
  7. Pseudo Flight 175 approaches Manhattan, also under remote control, and crashes into the South Tower at 9:03 a.m. Its controllers, not used to remotely controlling the 100+ tons of a Boeing 767, almost miss the tower, but manage to hit it toward one corner. Just before the plane hits the building an incendiary missile is fired to create a temperature within the building high enough to ensure ignition of the jet fuel which is about to be released by the impact. Most of the jet fuel passes through the corner of the tower and explodes in a huge fireball outside the building.  (The approach of the Boeing 767 and the impact and the awesome fireball are recorded by many cameras for repeated viewing all around the world.)
  8. After being advised of the second impact George W. Bush continues listening to children read a story about a pet goat for another quarter of an hour, then finally announces to the nation that he has made some phone calls but fails to order defensive action by ordering U.S. Air Force jets from bases near Washington to scramble to intercept the other two (allegedly hijacked) planes still in the air. No other Air Force officer orders jets to intercept the planes (despite this being standard practice whenever a commercial airliner strays from its flight path). Interceptors are finally scrambled an hour after the first of the commercial jets has gone off course and 45 minutes after the impact at the North Tower.
  9. By sometime around 9:15 a.m. all four AA and UA jets have landed at the military base to which they were directed. The 199 (later listed) passengers and crew from AA Flight 77, AA Flight 11 and UA Flight 175 are herded onto UA Flight 93, where they join the 33 (later listed) passengers and crew, for a total of 232 people. Explosives are loaded on board.
  10. Pseudo Flight 77, under remote control, flies at high speed toward Washington D.C., performs a spiral descent at high speed to near ground level, and (at about 9:30 a.m.) looking to observers like a Boeing 757, makes a horizontal approach to the Pentagon, knocking over several lamp posts on the way. Just before impact it is completely destroyed by onboard explosives, producing the minor amount of debris later observed on the Pentagon lawn.
  11. Timed to coincide with this event, two or three high-speed cruise missiles arrive from slightly different directions (travelling so fast as to be mostly unnoticed by witnesses, whose attention is focused on Pseudo Flight 77) and penetrate the outer wall of the Pentagon, producing three exit holes in the 'C' ring of the building. One of the missiles fails to explode, causing less damage than intended. (The unexploded missile will later be carried away covered by a tarpaulin.)
  12. Sometime around 9:45 a.m. UA Flight 93 takes off from the military base (either under remote control or under the control of a military pilot unaware of his fate) and flies toward Washington in a fake "terrorist attack".
  13. The South Tower collapses (at 9:59 a.m.) in a controlled demolition, 56 minutes after impact.
  14. Either explosives on board UA Flight 93 are detonated, or the jet is blown apart by a missile fired by a U.S. Air Force F-16 fighter jet, over Pennsylvania (at 10:06 a.m., almost an hour and a half after it took off from Newark Airport).

    Pennsylvania state police officials said on Thursday debris from the plane had been found up to 8 miles away (from the crash site) in a residential community [Indian Lake] where local media have quoted residents as speaking of a second plane in the area [this was the F-16] and burning debris falling from the sky. — Reuters, Sept. 13, as quoted in Troubling Questions in Troubling Times
    All passengers and crew from all four "hijacked" planes, perhaps or perhaps not including those 34 (later unlisted) passengers (including Mohammad Atta) who are part of the operation, are in this way eliminated.
  15. The North Tower collapses (at 10:29 a.m.) also in a controlled demolition, 1 hour and 44 minutes after impact.
  16. The outer wall of the impact site at the Pentagon is caused to collapse (so that the small size of the hole in the wall produced by the missiles would no longer be visible).
  17. Around midday the media whores begin to disseminate the story that this "terrorist attack" was masterminded by Usama bin Laden.
  18. Around 5 p.m.the building known as WTC 7 collapses in a controlled demolition.
  19. Misled by the White House and the mainstream media a shocked and outraged American public demands revenge against the perpetrators, whom they assume to be Arab Muslim fundamentalists.
  20. George W. Bush announces his "War on Terrorism" and the Pentagon swings into action to implement its previously-prepared plans to bomb Afghanistan (into submission to U.S. oil interests).
Of course, some of the details of this account may turn out to be incorrect, but it is a plausible explanation of the events of September 11th and (in contrast to the official story) is consistent with all the evidence and is contradicted by none. [Note added 2006-01-24: A more recent hypothesis is given at A Possible 9/11 Scenario.] Only a full and impartial investigation of what happened on September 11th will reveal the truth, but the Bush administration (fearing the consequences when the American people find out what actually happened and who was behind it) has done everything it can to prevent such an inquiry from taking place.



In March 2003 Leonard Spencer examined the Valentine-Plissken hypothesis, basically confirming it, but suggesting a significant modification with respect to Flight 93, and tentatively identifying the airport at which the airliners were instructed to land as Yeager Airport near Charleston, W. Virginia.:




What Really Happened? A Critical Analysis of Carol Valentine's "Flight of The Bumble Planes" Hypothesis
In August 2003 the Valentine-Plissken hypothesis was refined further by Prof. A. K. Dewdney in his Operation Pearl, where he provides a more detailed theory as to what happened on September 11th and a timeline of events consistent with the evidence ("X" in flight numbers refers to planes substituted for the original planes):






  Time    Event  
  7:59 am    AA11 takes off from Boston's Logan Airport  
  8:14 am    UA175 takes off from Boston's Logan Airport  
  8:16 am    First deviation of AA11 north of Albany, NY  
  8:20 am    AA77 takes off from Washington's Dulles Airport  
  8:20 am    AA11 transponder turned off  
  8:30 am    First swap: Flight AA11-X takes over, transponder off  
  8:35 am    Beginning of NY ATC transcript  
  8:40 am    UA175 transponder is turned off  
  8:42 am    UA93 takes off from Newark, NJ  
      First deviation of UA175 over northern NJ  
  8:46 am    Second swap: Flight AA77X takes over, same t-code  
  8:46 am    AA11-X strikes north tower of WTC  
      Nationwide alert begins  
  8:53 am    Third swap: Flight UA175X takes over, transponder off  
      AA11 lands at Harrisburg  
  8:54 am    End of NY ATC transcript  
  8:55 am    AA77X transponder is turned off  
  9:02 am    UA175X strikes south tower of WTC  
      UA175 lands at Harrisburg  
      Fourth swap: Flight UA93X replaces UA93  
  9:07 am    UA93 lands at Harrisburg  
  9:09 am    AA77 lands at Harrisburg  
  9:37 am    AA77X overflies the Pentagon, aircraft or explosion at Wedge 1  
  9:45 am    UA93 takes off from Harrisburg  
  10:06 am    UA93 crashes near Shanksville, PA  
As in the Valentine-Plissken hypothesis, all innocent passengers on board flights UA 175, AA 11 and AA 77 were placed on board Flight UA 93, which was then shot down by a U.S. Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt over Pennsylvania.
A-10 ThunderboltIt came right over me, I reckon just 40 or 50ft above my mini-van ... Then it disappeared behind some trees. A few seconds later I heard this great explosion and saw this fireball rise up over the trees, so I figured the jet had crashed. ... [It] was only when I got home and saw the TV that I realised it wasn't the white jet, but Flight 93. The plane I saw was heading right to the point where Flight 93 crashed and must have been there at the very moment it came down. There's no way I imagined this plane — it was so low it was virtually on top of me. It was white with no markings but it was definitely military, it just had that look. It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side. — Susan Mcelwain, quoted in What did happen to Flight 93?
For a detailed analysis (posted 2005-01-08) of witness reports connected with the crash of UA 93 see:


The other three Boeing jetliners ended up in pieces at the bottom of the Atlantic ocean.



Some people have said that this account of the events of September 11th 2001 is "too convoluted to understand".  Actually it's quite simple:


  1. Four commercial passenger jets (American Airlines Flights 11 and 77 and United Airlines Flights 93 and 175) take off and shortly after the pilots are ordered to land at a designated airport with a military presence.
  2. Two previously-prepared planes (one a Boeing 767, painted up to look like a United Airlines jet and loaded with extra jet fuel) take off and are flown by remote control to intercept the flight paths of AA 11 and UA 175 so as to deceive the air traffic controllers.
  3. These (substituted) jets then fly toward Manhattan; the first crashes into the North Tower and (eighteen minutes later) the second crashes into the South Tower.
  4. A mock 757, destroyed just before impact, and two or three cruise missiles, hit the Pentagon.
  5. The people on three of the Boeings are transferred to the fourth (UA 93).
  6. This plane takes off and is shot down by a U.S. Air Force jet over Pennsylvania, eliminating the innocent witnesses to the diversion of the passenger planes.
  7. Under cover of darkness later that evening the other three Boeings are flown by remote control out over the Atlantic, are scuttled and end up in pieces at the bottom of the ocean.



Prof. Dewdney concludes his Operation Pearl article thus:


Under the Operation Pearl scenario, the most likely perpetrator would be Mossad, Israel's spy agency. An arm's-length relationship with the Bush administration, with neocon elements acting as go-betweens, would enable Rumsfeld, Bush and other members of the US administration to disclaim any "specific" knowledge of a forthcoming attack.
So it appears that the Bush clique (including neocons Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz) collaborated with the Israeli government to stage the September 11th attacks, with Mossad providing the hands-on direction of the operation. But it is unlikely that Operation Pearl could be carried out entirely by Mossad agents — Americans within the U.S. Air Force and the state security and intelligence agencies had to be involved.


The CIA has always maintained as a matter of historical record that it has never murdered an American citizen on American soil. If, as a result of Eric Olson's persistence in trying to uncover what really happened to his father [Dr Frank Olson, a U.S. Army scientist], and the investigating skills of public prosecutor Saracco, this turns out to be a lie, it could well be the beginning of the end of the Agency.— THE OLSON FILE: A secret that could destroy the CIA
Similarly if the CIA can be shown to have been involved in the murder of the 200 or so passengers (most of them American citizens) on the four Boeing jets, who died when UA Flight 93 exploded in the sky over Pennsylvania, then the Agency will be finished (and none too soon either).




Those Fabricated Cellphone Calls

As for the tale which appeared in Newsweek, etc., about plucky passengers on UA Flight 93 jumping the hijackers ("OK, let's roll!") — this was entirely fictitious, fabricated by some psy-war operative with training as a two-bit Hollywood scriptwriter and disseminated with the help of some willing media whore.
The story even has the ultimate terror of imminent death in the 'reported' (but unheard by you or I) last words of an airline stewardess.  "My God, my God, I see buildings....water!"Down at the bottom of the Bargain Bin, in the pulp fiction section of the local charity shop, I can find dime-a-dozen trashy novels with plenty of "My God, My God..." dialogue.
But the REAL world of actual airline stewardess has people, not cartoon dumb blondes.  They KNOW what New York looks like from the air ...
She might have said something credible like: "Jesus Christ! We're gonna hit Manhattan."
But no. "I see buildings...." (...and, wait for it...) ..pause.. "...water."  Check out that pregnant pause in every publication of the quote.  Does that pause feel right to you?  Not to me.  The whole thing feels like a ham-fisted effort designed to make us believe certain things. — Tall Tales of the Wag Movie
If cellphones work from a plane flying at 30,000 feet and at a speed of hundreds of miles an hour then the Newsweek story about the passengers making calls might contain some truth (they were told to call so as to provide support for the soon-to-be-released official story) — but not that part of the story which has one of the passengers, Mark Bingham, calling his mother, saying "Hi Mom, this is Mark Bingham."
In fact there is no evidence, except anecdotal, that any of the doomed passengers made any cellphone call. For the view that the alleged call by Barbara Olson (who was on Flight AA 77) to her husband (Ted Olson, the US Solicitor General) was a fabrication, as were the other stories, see Joe Vialls's Mother of All Lies About 9/11.
And in fact research by Prof. A. K. Dewdney and others (try this yourself) has shown that it is practically impossible that multiple calls from a plane flying at the normal cruising height and speed of a commercial airliner could be made.


As was shown above, the chance of a typical cellphone call from cruising altitude making it to ground and engaging a cellsite there is less than one in a hundred. To calculate the probability that two such calls will succeed involves elementary probability theory. The resultant probability is the product of the two probabilities, taken separately. In other words, the probability that two callers will succeed is less than one in ten thousand. In the case of a hundred such calls, even if a large majority fail, the chance of, say 13 calls getting through can only be described as infinitesimal. In operational terms, this means "impossible." — 'Project Achilles' - Final (Third) Report and Summary of Findings
So there were no cellphone calls from UA Flight 93 or any of the other planes.  The story was a hoax.



From 9/11 and CellPhone Calls (continued in Part 2):


Jane Pauley did a televised interview with the Glick family, whom Jeremy Glick phoned from Flight 93. ... Glick's family are the only relatives [who] actually say on national television — repeatedly — that they had spoken directly to a passenger. So we need only one voice mimicry setup. Glick worked for Vividence, which is an internet marketing research firm. ... Vividence tracks web users' individual surfing habits for marketing predictions. ... You can imagine intelligence services being interested in such technology. Maybe Vividence wasn't all a front, but had in place, coincidentally, a person who was connected to the intelligence community. This person would have been Glick's superior in the organization.I am taking a flying leap here. Glick was a pawn from the git go. 9-11 had been scripted, including hero passengers attacking the hijackers. Flight 93 was never meant to hit anything but the ground. The plot needed a believable attacker. Glick, a collegiate judo champion, a big tough guy, was believable. His pretty wife would be a sympathetic widow. At Vividence his job required him to travel, so when the time came, he could be booked onto a flight, and take it, no questions asked. With months or weeks of lead time, voice mimicry of one person is easy. There would be opportunities to learn biographical details for the fakeout. There would be ample opportunity to test Glick's captured voice on his business contacts to see if it played.



From Michel Chossudovsky's More Holes in the Official Story: The 9/11 Cell Phone Calls:


The 9/11 Commission's Report provides an almost visual description of the Arab hijackers. It depicts in minute detail events occurring inside the cabin of the four hijacked planes.In the absence of surviving passengers, this "corroborating evidence", was based on passengers' cell and air phone conversations with their loved ones. ...
Focusing on the personal drama of the passengers, the Commission has built much of its narrative around the phone conversations. The Arabs are portrayed with their knives and box cutters, scheming in the name of Allah, to bring down the planes and turn them "into large guided missiles" ...
[But] what this carefully drafted script, fails to mention is that, given the prevailing technology in September 2001, it was extremely difficult, if not impossible, to place a wireless cell call from an aircraft traveling at high speed above 8000 feet ...
While a few of these calls (placed at low altitude) could have got through, the wireless technology was not available. On this issue, expert opinion within the wireless telecom industry is unequivocal.
In other words, at least part of the Commission's script in Chapter 1 on the cell phone conversations, is fabricated.



See also:


The media whores cannot be unaware that several companies (during 2004-2005) have been working on making in-flight cellphone calls possible. And surely at least some of the media whores are sufficiently bright to understand that this implies that inflight cellphone calls were not possible on September 11, 2001. But do we hear a word about this from the media whores?

Just in:


  • David Ray Griffin, 2010-01-15: Phone Calls from the 9/11 Airliners


    Without the widespread assumption that the 9/11 attacks had been planned and carried out by al-Qaeda, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq would not have been possible. With regard to the war in Afghanistan in particular, Michel Chossudovsky has recently emphasized the fact that NATO's decision to support this US-led war was based on a briefing by Frank Taylor of the US State Department, in which he provided what was called conclusive evidence of al-Qaeda's responsibility for the attacks. Although the contents of Taylor's briefing have never been made public, the main evidence provided to the general public has consisted of the hijack-describing phone calls reportedly received from passengers and flight attendants aboard the airliners. But when subjected to a detailed analysis, these alleged phone calls, far from supporting the war-justifying story, lead to a very different conclusion: that these alleged calls were faked. This analysis thereby suggests that the entire 9/11 story used to justify the US-led wars is a lie.


NTS Notes:  Many of the inconsistencies of the 9-11 attacks are covered in this interesting article.  There has always been wide speculation that it was a cruise missile that struck the Pentagon, and absolutely not Flight 77 as the media stooges continue to spew.  

This article also covers why even I knew from early on that what we had been sold about 9-11 was a total lie by the findings that the so called cell phone calls made from these flights were impossible because the aircraft were either too high for ground RF cell phone sites to pick up, or the fact that there were no cell phone transponders on these flights for airborne cell phones to work to link to ground sites!

This article also covers what happened to all the passengers on board the three initial flights, if these flights were all landed and disembarked at a US base, and then their flights were replaced with remote controlled planes.  It would explain how they got rid of the major evidence of their attack which would have been the passengers themselves!  This article gives the theory that they disposed of the passengers from the initial three flights, by shooting down "Flight 93" with missiles fired from an A-10 Warthog aircraft.   This article also shows how they could have used such a military aircraft for the final shoot down, by having it fly below radar to avoid detection from Federal aviation radar screens until it was ordered to take the deadly shot!

Again, we know by now that what we have been subjected to by the controlled media about 9-11 has been a complete lie.  It will only now take the courage of the American public to call on their own government to be forced to come clean with the truth about this horrendous act of murder.    That time is now....

More to come

NTS