Wednesday, June 16, 2010

The BP Gulf Oil Disaster: New Facts Diabolical

I constantly pour over material from many sites covering a wide range of subjects. I, like others in the blogosphere have been keeping close tabs on the continuing environmental disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, and am increasingly alarmed at the lack of actual leadership out of the US Government in seizing control of the situation and actually putting a stop to the spill. Until now, I have not commented much on the BP oil spill... Until now.....

I have read the following article from my friend, Noor's website at www.snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.com and became angry instantly. The original article was written by Xelan Bonn, and is fabulous in itself, but Noor has taken the original article and enhanced the information splendidly! Noor has hit the problem with the BP Oil spill on the head perfectly with this one, and it is absolutely too important to overlook. Therefore, I am enclosing the entire article within my own blog here for my readers to view. Please read this article thoroughly:

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

OIL GATE: NEW FACTS DIABOLICAL

President Obama addresses the media from the Coast Guard Station in Venice, Louisiana, on May 2 after conducting a personal assessment of the damage in the Gulf.


OIL GATE NEW FACTS DISCOVERED


New facts surrounding the Gulf Oil catastrophe appear to prove:
1. Oil spill could have been plugged on or about May 1st using proven engineered approach (not applied, as yet).

2. That BP, President Obama, and Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal knew of the solution.

3. That BP may be engaged in insurance fraud and guilty of criminal negligence.

4. That President Obama deliberately refused then, as now, to implement the solution (which requires his authority, and not that of BP’s).

5. That President Obama's most likely motivation for keeping the spill flowing is to create major public outrage against Big Oil toward helping establish a strong political climate in support of “cap-in-trade” in which the president and many in or close to his administration or the Dem Party leadership will gain billions of dollars once such a law passes.

6. That the current oil spill could be stopped within 72 hours under an executive order from the White House to the US Navy, at any time.
Oh and it gets better, readers. Or worse. Either way we all lose out in the long run to these absolute buzztards. Doctor tells me my blood pressure is amazingly good but right now it is starting to spike as I work on this piece. Angry is not strong enough!

PHOTO OP? Not exactly a busy looking beach, just a few in attendance to make BP look good.

PLEASE WATCH THIS MOVIE. HEAR THE TRUTH. THEN READ AND LEARN THE LIES! IF THIS REPORT DOES NOT MAKE YOU ANGRY, YOU HAVE NOT BEEN PAYING ATTENTION.

THE SHORT FILM BP DOES NOT WANT YOU TO SEE



By Xelan Bonn (June 7, 2010, updated 8:30pm PST) www.xelanbonn.com

Forget your political wing because no matter who you are, you cannot be rooting for the death of the Mexican Gulf and Southern Seaboard of the United States. Given the beauty and rare diversity of Gulf wildlife and fisheries as well as its delicate relationship with our special wetlands ~ home to some of the rarest species on Earth ~ it’s hard to believe anyone would seek to purposely harm such an environment

~ and yet the facts prove this is exactly what happened.

Let’s start at the beginning.

On April 20, 2010 BP’s “Deepwater Horizon” oil well at about a 5,000 foot depth in the Gulf of Mexico situated about 40 miles southeast of Louisiana’s coast suffered a blow out resulting in bringing down the drilling platform. The result was the immediate spillage of 20 million gallons of crude (stored on the rig) and a deep underwater oil well pumping over 90,000 barrels of oil into the ocean daily. (1, 11, 13, 14).

The oil still flows because the emergency “preventer” valve is stuck open and cannot be repaired or otherwise made to shut. And there were no fail safe requirements set in place by the federal government and its permit processing (even for deep water where highly specialized equipment is required for simple or mundane access and control–safety equipment not owned by either BP or the USA).

Perfect propaganda shot. these are the only workers. flown in a few at at time. for, according to the film above, to create photo ops for the "Royal" family. The moment they are not needed they are sent home for another 24 years. Note the angle of the camera to make the it seem there is another crew doing more work just down the beach. There isn't.

In his initial letter to BP, Smyth reported:

“With cooperation between BP and their ‘Deep Water Technology’ and our military with their weapons technology, it would be a matter of days to produce a sophisticated explosive device for placement at the well head.” (5)
This will keep any more oil from spilling into the ocean, he later said. (4)

Therefore, we now know a proven solution to preventing any further oil spilling into the Gulf was in the hands of BP within 7 days of the initial spill. And according to the Smyth proposal, a solution could have been deployed within a few days.

Hence, the oil spilling into the Gulf since about May 1st was all preventable ~ which means, essentially, that the environment could have been kept nearly clean by comparison to today’s ongoing spill contamination ~ it means this extended catastrophe was essentially preventable by simply invoking emergency damage control measures.

These facts suggest BP acted in a criminally negligent manner and is continuing to do so. It is also suggests that BP is engaged in a conspiracy to commit insurance fraud, among a long list of other potential criminal violations.

However, BP is not the only culpable party ~ most of the blame actually falls to the Obama Administration by fact of authority, leadership, and access to needed solution tools ~ none of which are under BP’s control.

The Smyth solution was to encase a non-nuclear warhead aka ultra-high-explosive (i.e. Bunker Buster) in a deep sea pressurized protected case, lower it to the bottom of the sea bed near the current oil hole, and set it off, thus sealing the well hole permanently. (4)

The solution concept is not innovative but already proven by Russian experience with such deep water or otherwise inaccessible oil spills.

Komsomoloskaya Pravda, the best-selling Russian daily, reports that in Soviet times such leaks were plugged with controlled nuclear blasts. The idea is simple, KP writes: “the underground explosion moves the rock, presses on it, and, in essence, squeezes the well’s channel,” reported Julia Ioffe in the Moscow Diaries. (2)

Smyth said essentially the same thing but also added…

“The immense ocean pressure will also shove all the surrounding mud and debris on the crater walls down into the new blast hole, which will also work to seal the oil channel… we don’t need nuclear muscle now because the US military already has conventional explosives many times more powerful than those available during the Russian crises, when they really had no other choice,” said Smyth. “There will be a little environmental damage in the immediate blast area but nothing in comparison to a prolonged oil spill.” (4)

To affect the Smyth solution, the US Navy would have to step in under emergency authority brought by President Obama. The Navy has both the explosives and ability to encase them in a high-pressure container to get the bomb to the depths required.

If needed in quickstep action, the Navy could achieve the procuring, encasement, deployment and ignition of the bomb within 72 hours, if not 36 hours or less, given that it already possesses everything needed and has proven itself over and again as capable of great speed in an emergency.

What is missing is the one key thing that would allow it all to happen ~ a presidential order!

An order that has not come in over a month ~ and we must ask "WHY?"

For the president admitted on May 27th that his office had been fully informed of all aspects and potential solutions since the spill and was completely in charge ~ fully responsible. (9)

Therefore, given the president knew of the solution and failed to exercise his authority to stop the spill, we have to ask "WHY?" Here we are on June 7th (Day 49) and still no bomb to seal the well, so why? What could be his motivation to keep the spill flowing?

The answer, unremarkably,

is an ancient motive ~

pure greed!

Understanding Big Oil Motives

Most of us do not think in terms such as if “Event A” happens, it can help “Event B or C” to happen in terms of politics or capitalism but high level politicians and business executive do as a matter of routine.

They are always assessing and calculating, looking for ways to turn loss into win (spin) and in this case, do so by harming taxpayers, the Earth and ocean, and millions of fish and animals ~ some endangered and irreplaceable.

The American people and the news media

appear more than willing to be played as dupes,

refusing to believe or investigate hard realities

that could lead to, likely, the ultimate impeaching

and jailing of their president,

let alone oil executives who are made

to bear all the scapegoat blame.

Getting a company like BP to go along with a prolonged oil spill is simple when it will add to their profit line to do so.

First, blowing the wellhead and sealing the well means BP would have to start over ~ a multi-billion dollar investment lost. Yet, keeping everything in place, allowing the oil to spill, and bringing in a new drilling platform to re-establish the connection and salvage the investment makes great financial sense for BP ~ not so great for the environment but then business greed never does (and that’s why we’re supposed to have government oversight, which normally works until the crooks run government, too)


The issue of environmental clean up is negligible to BP because that’s what they pay insurance premiums for ~ clean-up or damage costs are not shoved onto BP but instead to insurance underwriters and spill trust funds.

The key for BP is to affect damage control to the company

and appear as though everything that can be done

is being done so the insurance companies will pay off

and the public will be pacified. Then get the new rig in place

and start gathering up the oil they sought in the first place.

These are all normal aspects of big business and executive thinking ~ it is the very sort of raw capitalism that marked the turn of the 20th Century and started a long citizen fight toward reforms that have all but been stripped away now. Yet this is not the big picture, not by a long shot, especially when politics and billions in illicit profits stand in the balance.

Kill An Otter, Scam Billions When Public Screams Anti-Oil

On Day 45 of the event, Senator John Vitter of Louisiana was critical of the entire BP and federal government response to the Gulf-spill.

“The only thing the federal government has done is throw up road blocks,” said Vitter (R. Louisiana) (12)

Meanwhile, reporters like Sean Hannity are now showing reels of the White House pushing “green” cap-in-trade scams over emergency responses to the spill ~ showing the president spending more time playing golf than working to fix the spill.


WHAT IS CAP AND TRADE?

An excellent little film that explains it beautifully for the least initiated among us.


In the mean time, most Americans do not realize that the mechanisms for processing “cap-and-trade” have already been created and are merely awaiting a new law to begin the process of reaping billions of scam dollars off US citizens and businesses.

It is considered by researchers
as the single largest scam proposal in US history.
And now it’s a political motive
for keeping a Deepwater oil spill flowing
and killing sea life and animals such as otters,
dolphins, mantas, and pelicans, just to name a few.

The foundational story begins with a so called “green” concept that is meant to confuse and trick most Americans ~ a concept proven failed in Europe already.

Cap-and-trade ~ what is it? It’s the trading of puffs of air. Company A pollutes more than Company B. Company A must pay a fine, which is transferred to Company B, who earns a credit. The companies continue to pollute the exact same way, it just costs Company A more and Company B gets rewarded… It’s scam. It’s like being at the beach and selling people a bucket of saltwater. ~ Glenn Beck (6)

Who will broker all the cap-and-trade certificates to keep American companies in legal compliance ~ why the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX), of course. And who will ultimately pay all the costs ~ US consumers and taxpayers as higher prices are passed along. And who are the major stockholders who stand to transition from stockholder losers to massive windfall winners as CCX stockholders, or those who own stocks in other companies that own CCX stocks?

• Barack and Michelle Obama

• Al Gore (Generation Investment Management)

• Senator John Kerry (major political broker of cap-in-trade)

• Bill and Hillary Clinton

• Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley

• David Blood (Former CEO of Goldman Sachs Asset Management)

• Maurice Strong (central figure on United Nations oil-for-food scandal)

• Franklin Raines (The guy that ran Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into dumper and who ensured exclusive rights for CCX)

• Joel Rogers (head of Emerald Cities, Apollo Alliance)

• Gerald Hudson (SEIU)

• And many more in or near the White House Administration. (6, 7, 8, 10)

What has been omitted is the fact that, just weeks prior to the explosion, Halliburton bought a highly oil clean up company housed in the Gulf. This company had done much work on the Arabian Gulf accident a few years ago. Also not mentioned is that, while prices were still very high, Goldman Sachs and others dumped all their own stocks,in the millions. This way other investors lose their shirts when the money is reclaimed virtually within minutes.

Understanding Diabolical Politics

If you are a so called “green environmentalist” then what better catastrophe could there be than one that is so devastating as to fully engage public outrage? A small oil spill would never do the trick, but kill endangered mantas in the Everglades and show pictures of dolphins with bellies full of oil after a prolonged and massive oil spill, and the political climate shifts dramatically into your favor ~ easily beguiled Americans will then swallow any bait you feed them in their anger ~ even a new cap-and-trade law that will not help the environment one bit but will merely appear to do so ~ all while you and your cohorts rake billions off the top ~ all ultimately paid for by the very voters you manipulated and duped by destroying their prized environment.

Does anyone remember David Icke's Hegellian Dialectic?

This whole situation is a perfect example of its implementation.




Today, a bill requiring cap-in-trade that was once seen as dead is now suddenly being brought back to life by folks like John Kerry and other Dems and groups who stand to rake in billions. Do they discuss government’s role in the spill? No, they blame “big oil” and push what amounts to a criminally conceived cap-in-trade scam bill on a public too ignorant of the facts to know they’re being tricked.

A cunning and diabolical political strategist might have foreseen such a possibility, having invested tens of millions in preparing for cap-in-trade only to see it in jeopardy until such a disaster could rear its head ` the political timing of such an event seems uncanny, to say the least ~ as if the oil rig itself could sense a higher purpose… that cap-in-trade was on a precipice and its own suicide into the deep sea would prove convenient toward saving such a noble objective ~ yeah right!

And given all these facts and realities, is it now so far fetched when we hear those on the Far Right conjecturing the Deep Horizon platform may have been deliberately sabotaged ~ makes one wonder if a full, impartial, international investigation is not called for here?

In all cases, we now know for fact that the President of the United States is duplicitous and not otherwise incompetent on this issue ~ instead, fully responsible for the world’s largest environmental catastrophe; and all in the name of hidden greed.

This event now has earned the name Oil-Gate and the president no longer has a legitimate claim to credibility ~ especially on matters pertaining to the environment ~ no matter how he spins it in the future.

Only time and top journalistic or police investigation will find the absolute truth in all of this but so far, the smoking gun is clearly in the hand of a president with diabolical motives!

And as a lover of the environment, I feel sick to my stomach in having to report such harsh realities ~ for nobody of sound moral and ethical mind ~ no DECENT human being ~ regardless of political views, can see this revelation as anything but shameful to all Americans, regardless party lines ~ for we put a diabolical criminal mind in control of our White House and mislaid our trust only to convey irreversible damage to our nation, ocean and planet ~ and we, as a nation collective, owe a great apology to the world!

And we owe it to ourselves to get this illness fully exposed, those responsible fully prosecuted and removed from their positions or offices, and do it with God’s Speed And Grace.

Oil blobs on the surface.

Xelan Bonn, MBA, is a highly seasoned freelance journalist and past president of nonpartisan Patriot Union of America (and past Editor-in-Chief of PUA News), as well as past contributor to one time White House and Congressional think tank, Patriot Society. He has numerous original breaking new stories to his credit that have later been followed extensively by the mainstream press.

References

(1)Wikipedia: “Deep Water Horizon Oil Spill” (May 25, 2010)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill

(2) True Slant: “Nuke That Slick” (May 2, 2010)

http://trueslant.com/juliaioffe/2010/05/04/nuke-that-slick/

(3) Komsomoloskaya Pravda: (May 3, 2010)

http://www.kp.ru/daily/24482/640124/

(4) Direct interview with Joe Smyth.

(5) In-hand copies of correspondences as provided by Roger Peterson on behalf of Joe Smyth.

(6) Fox ~ Glenn Beck: “Crime Inc.” (April 30, 2010)

http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/39847/

(7) Fox ~ Glenn Beck: “Crime Inc.: What ‘Greening of America’ Means” (May 6, 2010)

http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/40154/

(8) Fox ~ Glenn Beck, General Research

http://www.glennbeck.com

(9) Presidential News Conference (May 27, 2010)

(10) Canada Free Press: “Obama’s Inolvement In Chicago Climate Exchange ~ The Rest Of The Story (March 25, 2009)

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/9629

(11) Mioboo: “BP Oil Spill Live Feed Update: BP Oil Spill Cap is Now Collecting 10,000 Barrels of Oil Daily” (June 7, 2010)

http://www.mioboo.com/1692/bp-oil-spill-live-feed ~ update-bp-oil-spill-cap-is-now-collecting-10000-barrels-of-oil-daily/

(12) Fox: Hannity Interview (June 6, 2010 airing)

(13) ABC News: “How Much Oil’s Spilling? It’s Not Rocket Science” (May 23, 2010) [as calculated by Purdue University engineering professor Steve Wereley and not BP]

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/WhosCounting/oil-spilling-gulf-mexico-bp-basic-calculations/story?id=10705575

(14) There are generally 42 gallons per barrel of oil.

Note: There are many traditional methods of controlling the spill but nearly all have their own risks and complications (such as drilling relief wells), however, the only proven method for ensuring an end to the spillage is by blowing the well and crushing the drillholes and concrete sleeves within through a major geological shift event. Otherwise, traditional cures could take from 2 months to a full year to install, depending upon variables such as weather, equipment, success rates, etc. And each day of delay adds up to 90,000 barrels of oil to the environment.

Original Article: http://www.xelanbonn.com/2542/oil-gate-new-facts-diabolical/



NTS Notes: Again, thanks again to Noor for this fabulous article. I hope that everyone is as angry as I became after reading this article. It does definitely appear that there is a more sinister reason as to why the Government is refusing to step in and finally put a stop to the massive leak. The information presented in this article about how Barry Soetoro and his cohorts are in it for their personal GREED and to bring in their phony Cap and Trade legislation seems to be the only logical explanation to this entire fiasco.

Using this environmental disaster to further the criminal plan for phony Cap and Trade and Green Tax laws is diabolical. The American public must be brought up to speed immediately about this sinister planning on the part of their own Government. Therefore it is imperative that the video, and this article gets spread around to everyone. The livelihoods of millions of people living in the Gulf region are at stake.

More to come

NTS


3 comments:

Noor al Haqiqa said...

Check out what is going on in Canada. Did a post today on our own Helen Thomas, Vancouver politician Libby Davis who actually dared to mildly (by our standards) critique Israel to a reporter who was doing his damndest to trick her into a trap. Now Boob Rae and Harper are calling for her head on a platter.

Anyhow... Every photo I see of dead animals makes me want to weep. I am getting SO F*CKING P*SSED AT THESE PEOPLE. There are no words... just no words...

Meanwhile, people still listen to Sarah Palin, Glenn whatsishame and think the Pope is a good Catholic boy.

HELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPP!

Anonymous said...

Some things to take into consideration.

Yes, Russia has used nuke's. From what we know, 3 out of 4 times was successful.

What we are not sure of is the condition underground. What damage was done underground?

Some of the reports I have read is that the casing underground was damaged and that when they tried to cap it, the oil and gasses began to come out from other areas in the bedrock.

How deep down is the damage and would a nuclear device seal these areas also? If not, what would happen? Would the pressure leaking out punch other holes in the bedrock ever expanding, eventually to the point that all of the oil in the cavity spills into the gulf? (This may end up happening anyway through the wellhead if they don't hurry the hell up.)

What would you say if they did in fact use a nuclear weapon at which point this volcanic pressure blew out at another point in the ocean floor?

Other than "We are dead"....which we may be anyway, you would be saying what a stupid bunch of F*****S. (Well, we are saying that now..)

I am not saying to not be angry at all involved. Our feeling in just how angry we are I think are mirrored.

What I am saying is to THINK. What are the similarities and differences between this tragedy and those of the Russian oil disasters? Did they also have secondary leaks miles away? Were there the same pressures, same depths? Were their well casings also damaged or were they relatively sound beneath the ground? In the 3 out of 4 successes the Russians had, why did the 3 succeed, why did the 1 fail? Were there any greater repercussions from the 1 that failed?

I initially thought the same as you do now when I heard that this has happened before to the Russians and they had some success (AND FAILURE)with this method.

What caused me to rethink my position was that as more and more of the truth came out I came to realize that (though hard to imagine) a nuclear device could actually make the situation much, much worse.

On the surface of the ocean floor, the use of a nuclear device could possibly seal the initial leak, but would most likely cause other blowouts. If we were somehow able to put a device into the pipe down near the entrance of the oil cavity, it MAY work, but even this could cause unintended consequences having the same effect as a surface explosion.

If the casing were not damaged, I would immediately agree with your assessment and I would not hesitate to say blow it. Because there are secondary leaks already and the casing is damaged, I can not agree.

You may very well be right that the reason they have not used a nuke is because of their greed. If so, I think that for once in my life I am thankful for this because if they by chance did have our best interests at heart (yeah right) and attempted to seal this leak quickly using a nuke without knowing about the secondary leaks, it could have had unintended and even more devastating consequences.

I'm not saying that I am right in my assessment, I'm just asking that we all THINK before we take any rash actions.

Dave.

Anonymous said...

Oil was getting awfully close to 60$ a barrel. There are a lot of Bankster fat cats holding futures positions betting oil will transact above 80$/BBL before those options expire. A lot of them. Oil is in such oversupply that big tankers normally used transport oil were charging a premium to service as temporary storage facilities until their cargo could be offloaded.

Thank YHVH for forestalling the oil market dipping below 60$/BBL.

This is not about saving the whales - this is about save the DOW JONES INDEX - and that's all it's about.

This is about a manufacturing a constriction in supply through delay and malfeasance. Anything and everything in the oil patch requires a government permit. The permit to drill the relief well was delayed 11 days by the Obama administration.

Valdez gave the American vocabulary a new word, spillionaire. The lack of effort by wasting 2 months pointing fingers so GE could earn it's 138 Billion Dollar bailout Obama, through the FDIC, granted them paid for 24/7 MSNBC shills casting blame without looking at the facts or investigating the conspicuous delays in controlling the spill. GE gets taxpayer grants for stilling corn fuel (it requires 160% more BTUs to produce corn fuel than corn fuel delivers) with the hopes the GE's partnership with Pickens would allow more taxpayer pocket picking by GE to sell America windmills.

The spill is a great poster boy to hustle cap and tax for sure.

The biggest consumer of oil on the planet is the defense department. KBR, for the Afghanistan theater alone, under cost plus contracts, delivers fuel to Marines their at a cost of 300 Million a day (and KBR's "taste" will go up with the price of oil and gas). So, one way we could measure the 20 Billion Escrow promised by BP would be 8 Afghanistan weeks of fuel delivery to the marines there.

The last people in the world that want to see oil drop below 60$/BBL are the people we employ to manage the ship of state (president, congress, political agency appointees) and the banksters on wall street that pull their strings.