The MYTH Of The Iranian Nuclear Bomb

We in the blogosphere have been saying it for years now: Iran does NOT possess nuclear weapons, and it has absolutely no plans in the foreseeable future to manufacture or obtain any nuclear weapons!

People must understand and be brought up to speed on the truth. The truth is that Israel wants to destroy the only threat it has to Middle Eastern Hegemony today, and that is the state of Iran. It was outlined clearly in their most evil document" "Securing The Realm" which was first made light of in the year 2000, and is still pertinent today. That document showed the need to eliminate all of Israel's threats in the Middle East, which included at the time Syria, Iraq, and Iran. Eliminating these threats would secure Israel's dominance in the Middle East for decades. It did not matter that thousands, if not millions, of innocent people would die for the blood thirsty Zionists to dominate the region. All that anyone needs to look at is how the Israelis got their American puppets to destroy Iraq, and the subsequent murder of millions of innocent Iraqis to see this plan in motion.

Again, I need to ask where is the outcry? Why are people in America blindly listening to their Zionist controlled MSM that wants all American citizens on board for the next war for Israeli dominance against Iran? People need to see the facts and the facts are not coming from the MSM!

Here now, I want to present this article from teh American Conservative Magazine, via their website at www.amconmag.com that gives clear evidence of the MYTH of the Iranian nuke that is being falsely fed into the minds of Americans daily. My comments to follow:

Myth of the Iranian Nuke

Posted on February 16th, 2010 by Patrick J. Buchanan

Did Robert Gibbs let the cat out of the bag?

Last week, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told the world that Iran, unable to get fuel rods from the West for its U.S.-built reactor, which makes medical isotopes, had begun to enrich its own uranium to 20 percent.

From his perch in the West Wing, Gibbs scoffed:

“He (Ahmadinejad) says many things, and many of them turn out to be untrue. We do not believe they have the capability to enrich to the degree to which they now say they are enriching.”

But wait a minute. If Iran does not “have the capability” to enrich to 20 percent for fuel rods, how can Iran enrich to 90 percent for a bomb?

What was Gibbs implying?

Is he confirming reports that Iran’s centrifuges are breaking down or have been sabotaged? Is he saying that impurities, such as molybdenum, in the feed stock of Iran’s centrifuges at Natanz are damaging the centrifuges and contaminating the uranium?

What explains Gibbs’ confidence? Perhaps this.

According to a report last week by David Albright and Christina Walrond of the Institute for Science and International Security, “Iran’s problems in its centrifuge programme are greater than expected. … Iran is unlikely to deploy enough gas centrifuges to make enriched uranium for commercial nuclear power reactors (Iran’s stated nuclear goal) for a long time, if ever, particularly if (U.N.) sanctions remain in force.”

Thus, ISIS is saying Iran cannot make usable fuel for the nuclear power plant it is building, and Gibbs is saying Iran lacks the capability to make fuel rods for its research reactor.

Which suggests Iran’s vaunted nuclear program is a busted flush.

ISIS insists, however, that Iran may still be able to build a bomb. Yet, to do that, Iran would have to divert nearly all of its low-enriched uranium at Natanz, now under U.N. watch, to a new cascade of centrifuges, enrich that to 90 percent, then explode a nuclear device.

Should Iran do that, however, it would have burned up all its bomb-grade uranium and lack enough low-enriched uranium for a second test. And Tehran would be facing a stunned and shaken Israel with hundreds of nukes and an America with thousands, without a single nuke of its own.

Is Iran running a bluff? And if Gibbs and Albright are right, how long can Iran keep up this pretense of rapid nuclear progress?

Which brings us to the declaration by Ahmadinejad on the 31st anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, which produced this headline in The New York Times: “Iran Boasts of Capacity to Make Bomb Fuel.”

Accurate as far as it went, this headline was so incomplete as to mislead. For here is what Ahmadinejad said in full:

“When we say that we don’t build nuclear bombs, it means that we won’t do so because we don’t believe in having it. … The Iranian nation is brave enough that if one day we wanted to build nuclear bombs, we would announce it publicly without being afraid of you.

“Right now in Natanz we have the capability to enrich to more than 20 percent and to more than 80 percent, but because we don’t need to, we won’t do so.”

On Friday, Ahmadinejad sounded like Ronald Reagan: “We believe that not only the Middle East but the whole world should be free of nuclear weapons, because we see such weapons as inhumane.”

Now, if as Albright suggests, Tehran cannot produce fuel for nuclear power plants, and if, as Gibbs suggests, Iran is not capable of enriching to 20 percent for fuel for its research reactor, is Ahmadinejad, in renouncing the bomb, making a virtue of necessity?

After all, if you can’t build them, denounce them as inhumane.

Last December, however, The Times of London reported it had a secret document, which “intelligence agencies” dated to early 2007, proving that Iran was working on the final component of a “neutron initiator,” the trigger for an atom bomb.

If true, this would leave egg all over the faces of 16 U.S. intelligence agencies whose December 2007 consensus was that Iran stopped seeking a bomb in 2003.

The Times credited an “Asian intelligence service” for having ably assisted with its story.

U.S. intelligence, however, has not confirmed the authenticity of the document, and Iran calls it a transparent forgery. When former CIA man Phil Giraldi sounded out ex-colleagues still in the trade, they, too, called the Times’ document a forgery.

Shades of Saddam seeking yellowcake from Niger.

Are the folks who lied us into war on Iraq, to strip it of weapons it did not have, now trying to lie us into war on Iran, to strip it of weapons it does not have?

Maybe the Senate should find out before voting sanctions that will put us on the road to such a war, which would fill up all the empty beds at Walter Reed.

NTS Notes: Iran knows the consequences if it was to even dare to develop a nuclear weapon. Israel possesses hundreds of nuclear bombs, and would use them in a heartbeat against Iran if the Iranians were stupid enough to try to build one of their own. Therefore the truth is that Iran is not going to try!

Wake up, people, and see the truth for yourselves. There is no threat from Iran other than what the Zionists want to you to believe falsely. It is time for us to focus on the real threat in that region, which is the Zionist state of Israel itself.

More to come

NTS