Thursday, December 31, 2009
I find the MSM spewing out the usual "Al Qaeda" BS, and the American public swallowing that crap to be disturbing. First of all, WE should know by now that Al Qaeda does NOT exist at all. It is a fabrication of the Zionist controlled US Government and the Israeli Mossad for the purpose of supporting wars for Israel. It has worked beyond their wildest dreams in getting the American public on board for new wars against a non-existent terrorist threat!
But back to the Detroit "terrorist" attack. When I first read the reports and the subsequent Media BS, I knew right away that it was a load of crap. The Detroit "terrorist" on NW Flight 253 was obviously a patsy purposely setup by the US Government to get another nice little war going, this time against Yemen! Right now, I want to present a great video from the Russian RT News service, that has an interview with Webster Tarpley. Mr. Tarpley puts most of the truth behind this false flag attack into clear perspective:
NTS Notes: This "terrorist" attack is a sham and a massive lie. The US Government is taking this false flag attack and using it for a war against the rebel forces in Yemen who want to overthrow a very corrupt government supported by the US itself.
It is definitely time for America to wake up and realize that the true "axis of evil" today is Israel, and its puppets in the USA itself!
More to come
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Afghan children 'shot dead' by foreign forces
Afghan civilians 'shot dead' by foreign forces
From The Files Of Absurdity, Volume LXVI: If You Are Against Invading Other Countries, Then You Are Anti-Semitic!
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
The Global Warming nuts have said for years that switching to CFL light bulbs is a great move for the planet. But is it? It seems that people are truly in the dark as to the real dangers of these CFL bulbs, and I am here to present some real facts.
Right now, I want to present an article from the website: www.greenmuze.com that shows the real truth about these CFL bulbs and why it is important that people contact their governments and put a stop to the move to these dangerous devices:
The Dark Side Of CFLs
Consider this - instead of saving the environment, CFLs are actually destroying it. CFLs should be thought of as toxic technology, when mercury contamination, ultraviolet radiation, and radio frequency radiation are factored in. From cradle to grave, CFLs pose a danger to people’s health and well being, as well as adding even more toxicity to the environment. In fact, CFLs do not reduce a person’s carbon footprint and may even increase it in some situations. To make matters even worse, CFLs emit harmful levels of electromagnetic radiation.
Starting in the year 2012, regular incandescent bulbs, the ones invented by Thomas Edison over 100 years ago, will be banned in Canada in the pursuit of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Yet, contrary to popular belief, switching from regular bulbs to CFLs could increase global energy consumption, not reduce it. If that alone does not shake consumer confidence, perhaps the facts that CFLs contain mercury and also emit electromagnetic radiation might give people a wake-up call up to the truth about CFLs.
On the other hand, since CFL producers are being handed a monopoly in the light bulb market by some federal government and are being cheered on by corporatist environmental groups, sales are not about to drop anytime soon.
It seems like the protectors of the environment have jumped ship. Health Canada is simply not doing its job as they ignore the devastating impact of having millions of CFLs in our environment. Why are they sitting by, and allowing the Canadian government to force its citizens to use them?
To make matters even worse, groups such as the Suzuki Foundation and Greenpeace, whom Canadians have come to rely on to protect them from environmental pollutants, have chosen to ignore the potential looming environmental and health risks, and blindly promote the use of CFLs.
Why have environmentalists and the government joined in an alliance with the electrical industry in promoting an undeniably dangerous product? Whose side are they on anyway?
Canadian Health and Safety officials seem to be asleep at the switch, oblivious of the hazards, and environmentalists appear to have sold out, as manufacturers and sellers of CFLs are laughing all the way to the bank. With impunity “los tres amigos”, the manufacturers, the corporatist environmentalist backers and government, are leaving misled consumers to deal with the aftermath of a potential environmental catastrophe.
Meanwhile, the New Zealand government, citing concerns about CFLs lack of efficiency and safety, has lifted its ban on incandescent bulbs. Hopefully other governments will see the wisdom in this decision and follow suit.
Corporatism is the dominant ideology in today’s western democracies. “While the corporatist society maintains a veneer of open criticism and democracy, it squelches opposition to dominant corporate interests by using propaganda and rhetoric to obscure facts and to deter communication among citizens. Corporatism creates conformists who behave like cogs in organizational hierarchies, not responsible citizens,” explains Publishers Weekly, reviewing the book Voltaire’s Bastards by John Ralston Saul. These are just some of the attributes of the ideology that has a strangle hold on our society and, it appears, on our major environmental groups as well.
The environment is too important to be left solely to the environmentalists.
Environmentalists with corporatist tendencies can cause a lot of harm when they are not properly scrutinized and held accountable by the public. They have played a huge role in keeping consumers in the dark regarding the hazards posed by CFLs. The Suzuki Foundation and Greenpeace claim that CFLs are good for the environment and no one dares to challenge them.
The disinformation process begins when public awareness of a harmful product, such as a CFL, is restricted by environmental groups. Over time, with no real criticism of the product, a consensus consciousness is created in the public mind that the product is safe. Finally, in one of the oldest tricks in the book, corporations use these groups as third party endorsers to create a favourable image of a potentially dangerous product. Remember back in the sixties with doctors in TV adds smoking Camel cigarettes?
The evidence that shows that CFLs are hazardous to humans is undeniable. The question is, why are environmental groups willing to risk a safe environment and their reputations by promoting a toxic product?
CFLs Are A Hazardous Product & Do Not Save Energy
It may surprise many people to know that CFLs increase a consumer’s carbon footprint in a ‘cradle to grave’ analysis. Full costs to manufacture, operate and safely dispose of a CFL have never been disclosed to the public. The reality is that residential lighting takes up only 0.8% of energy consumption in Canada.
CFLs are energy hogs to produce, operate and dispose of. Reducing a consumer’s carbon footprint is the CFL’s raison d’être. But before deciding to switch over to compact florescent lights it would be wise to first review a cradle to grave analysis of the carbon footprint of a CFL, compared to an incandescent bulb.
What is the real energy cost of a CFL? What does it cost to mine, manufacture, package, ship, sell, operate, dispose of CFLs on the environment? These are questions ignored by CFL promoters.
An International Association for Energy-Efficient Lighting (IAEEL) study conducted in Denmark, explored some carbon footprint factors, but not all, showing it took 1.8 Kwh of electricity to assemble a CFL compared to 0.11 Kwh to assemble an incandescent bulb. That means it took 16 times more energy to produce a CFL. The study did not include the fact that a CFL is much heavier and is more dangerous to handle, and will thus cost more to package, to ship, and to sell.
This research also did not calculate the energy required to safely dispose of a CFL and reclaim the mercury. The cost of removing mercury from the landfills was also not considered. More over, the potential cost in destroyed lives, illnesses, and lost human productivity due to exposure to mercury and electromagnetic radiation have not been considered.
If such a study could be done, and considered all the negative contributing factors, it would show a CFL has a massive carbon footprint, one that would dwarf a regular incandescent light bulb and it would also show that CFLs will leave behind a wake of environmental destruction.
CFLs Do Not Save On Energy Consumption
An incandescent bulb has a power factor of 1. Most CFLs sold in Canada have a power factor of about 0.55. That means there are about 45% more energy losses in operating the CFL compared to an incandescent bulb. This does not show up on a power bill but the power company has to supply about 45% more power than what the bulb is rated for. Astonishingly, CFLs can take almost twice as much energy to operate than what is on the label and still be listed as an energy star product, something few consumers know. CFL cheerleaders seldom tell consumers that the power factor is not included in their energy consumption calculations.
Energy efficient bulbs increase greenhouse gases. Because they burn cooler, they cause home heating costs to rise. "Lighting regulations (banning incandescent lights) will increase GHG emissions in Hydro’s service territory by 45,000 tons due to cross effects of a switch to cool-burning bulbs,” explained a BC Hydro spokesperson in 2009 Vancouver Sun article.
The ‘cross effect’ referred to is the loss of heat from hotter incandescent bulbs when we switch over to cooler burning CFLs. When a 60watt regular bulb is replaced with a 15 watt CFL, 45watts of heat from inside a house is lost. If that is repeated 20 times, 900watts of lost heat now has to be provided for from another source.
To make up for the lost heat consumers have to turn up electric heating, or worse still, turning up their oil or gas furnace which will leave them consuming even more energy and creating more greenhouse gases than before they made the switch. In the summertime, because of longer natural daytime light, both lighting and heating are used much less. In the wintertime power consumption will rise as lights go on but additional substitution heat is required to compensate for less heat from the CFLs.
Considering the lower power factor as well as the heating losses, it can be concluded that using CFL will not reduce a consumer’s carbon footprint when compared to a regular light bulb. Moreover, instead of saving energy there is good evidence demonstrating that using CFLs will increase the user’s carbon footprint.
CFLs Are Power Dumb
Lighting is a fraction of overall energy consumption and has a limited potential for energy savings. Nevertheless, North Americans should be conserving wherever possible. At the same time, people should not forget that switching incandescent bulbs to CFLs poses a whole range of negative environmental and health impacts with very little, if any, energy savings
An electric hot water tank consumes five times as much electricity as residential lighting.
To put lighting energy consumption into perspective, the Sector Sustainability Table listed in the Government of Canada website reports that “Homes consume 16% of all the energy used in Canada, with lighting using 5% of that figure. Residential lighting therefore represents 0.8% of the total energy consumption in Canada. This means that Canadians are spending millions of dollars on CFLs in a fruitless effort to reduce a fraction of their energy consumption.”
It would be much ‘power smarter’ to focus on residential water heating than light bulbs. An electric hot water tank consumes five times as much electricity as residential lighting. If hot water heating was made 10% more efficient by using inexpensive technology already available, Canadians would save more energy than the most wildly optimistic predictions of savings by CFL promoters. It would be cheaper, simpler, and have no detrimental environmental effects.
CFLs Are Mercury Polluters
More than 98% of used CFLs end up in landfills each year. That is 675 million for the year 2007 according to the National Geographic Society. Each CFL contains about 5 milligrams of elemental mercury as well as other poisonous gases. When mercury enters water sources, biological processes change the chemical form to methylmercury which is the organic, more toxic form found in fish. Methylmercury bio-accumulates through the food chain and once in the body can affect developing fetuses, children and adult nervous systems.
Methylmercury will not stay in landfills as it easily gets transported through the water table. Throwing CFLs into landfills will contaminate the soil, the water table and eventually the air.
More than 60,000 children are born each year in the United States with neurodevelopment impairments caused by exposure in the womb to methylmercury compounds, according to new estimates by an expert panel convened by the National Academy of Science’s Year 2000.
Beware of a broken CFL, as each broken lamp should be considered similar to a toxic spill and care needs to be taken cleaning them up. The manufacturing of CFLs also exposes workers to toxic levels of mercury. CFLs are manufactured mostly in China with virtually no health, safety, or environmental protection regulations. Ironically, most of the electricity used to manufacture CFLs comes from coal-fired generators. As CFLs increase in popularity, mercury exposure to workers, to electricians, to maintenance personal, to consumers, to water supplies, and to the living environment, will go ahead almost unchecked.
How many resources and pollutants does it take to make a light bulb?
“The reality is, even energy-efficient products don’t always come from energy-efficient beginnings. Consider for a second what goes into producing, powering and transporting products around the world like...energy efficient light bulbs. Until they are manufactured in a carbon-neutral way, transported on low-emission vehicles and powered in our homes by cleaner energy—green products will never be as green as they can be,” explained the World Wild Life Fund in MacLean’s Magazine.
Many environmentalists ignore these facts and instead claim that CFLs put less mercury into the environment than what would have been created via a smoke stack to generate the additional electricity needed for regular light bulbs. This is not true. Not all electricity is generated by dirty coal-fired plants. Even if it was, this would still be an irrelevant point given that coal fired power plants could operate with 80% less mercury emissions. In any event, it does not apply to BC where 90% of electrical power comes from hydroelectric dams according to BC Hydro. In Canada, 58% of electrical generation is from hydro and 19% from coal, according to Industry Canada.
CFLs Are Electro-Polluters
CFLs emit electromagnetic radiation, a type of energy that can make people very sick. Many people have reported skin rashes and irritation due to ultra-violet (UV) radiation. Radio frequency radiation is even more of a concern. The effects of exposure to radio frequency radiation, as well as to high voltage spikes and transients, are known to cause illness, are virtually ignored by environmental groups and green building consultants alike.
There has been a ‘rash’ of health problems associated with exposure to electromagnetic radiation such as that emitted by CFLs.
In Sweden, according to polls, up to 290,000 people, or more than 3% of the population, have reported suffering symptoms of EHS when exposed to electromagnetic radiation. Symptoms range from joint stiffness, chronic fatigue, headaches, tinnitus, respiratory, gastric, skin, sleep and memory problems, depressive tendencies, to Alzheimer’s disease and all classes of cancer.
Hope For The Future
Other than the World Wildlife Fund, almost all the major environmental groups have not informed the public about the dark side of CFLs. Why they behave as they do is unknown but promoting CFLs could potentially diminish these groups credibility when the facts become apparent.
Hopefully, other governments will wake up to the shortcomings of CFLs, and follow the New Zealand government’s example and change their policies on banning incandescent lights due to concerns about safety and energy efficiency of the CFLs. Germany has already restricted the use of fluorescent lighting in public places and has banned fluorescent lights in hospitals perhaps showing that this issue is too great to be shrugged off and ignored. North America appears to be headed in the opposite direction and the Canadian Federal government still plans to ban all incandescent lights before year 2012.
There are incandescent light bulbs on the market right now that last longer than CFLs and are 80% more efficient than a regular bulb. In 2010, surprisingly, just as the market gets saturated with CFLs, General Electric is coming out with a new high efficiency incandescent bulb. They claim it will be twice as efficient as a regular bulb.
If they live up to their claims these new incandescent lights will rival CFLs for energy consumption, but will not have all the other environmental problems. Then another buying craze will begin and CFLs may begin to be phased out, leaving behind a long-term problem of mercury disposal, remediation, and an untold toll on human health.
In the meantime, the best way for you to reduce your carbon footprint is to follow your mother’s advice and turn the lights off when you leave the room.
Walt McGinnis is a Licensed Electrician and an Electromagnetic Radiation Tester and a member of the EM Radiation Task Force, living on Vancouver Island, Canada. Visit: http://www.mcginniselectric.ca/
NTS Notes: I have found through much reading that if one single mercury filled CFL was to break in a small home in Canada, the clean up cost to remove the mercury vapor from that home would be in the range of over $3000! That is an outrage!
Tell your politicians that the move to CFL bulbs must stop immediately. We do not want our health, and our environment to be damaged by mercury pollution.
Until they can come up with a truly safe and truly efficient CFL bulb, I recommend stocking up on non threatening and non poisonous incandescent bulbs!
More to come
We have seen the issuance of the Goldstone Report that implicated Israel of committing crimes against humanity during their Operation Cast Lead attacks against the innocent people of Gaza, but the report is still sitting idle in the United Nations waiting for passage through the Security Council. That alone is an outrage.
We have seen the attempt by the Zionists to bring in their One World Government through agreements on their lie of Global Warming at Copenhagen fall apart for the moment. Guaranteed they will try again sometime in 2010 to get this agreement signed and passed into law.
We have seen the reports of Zionist Organ Harvesting as revealed by Swedish reports, and their controlled media has done its best to bury any reports, and to prevent any International investigation from taking place. Definitely another outrage!
It seems that most of the people around the world are still not up to speed on the dangers of the Zionist movement towards World domination, and that is by design. The news media outlets lie and purposely distort all information to protect their love of these criminals and of their criminal state of Israel. It is left up to the Internet, and blogs, to get the truth out.
Right now, I want to present a great video that I came across that shows how the Zionists have (possibly?) triumphed in their goals of World domination! It was actually released almost 8 months ago, and its facts are very foreboding indeed:
NTS Notes: I myself still believes strongly that this fight is not over because many more people are finally awake to the dangers of this criminality. It is very important therefore to continue to spread the message, and to get this video out to as many people as possible.
More to come
Monday, December 28, 2009
It has been a well deserved last few days off to spend time with family and friends.
What did I miss during the last few days? First of all we have another phony terrorist attack on the United States by the phony "Al-Qaeda". There is so much that is being covered up by the media and the US Government since this "attack" that it is anyone's guess what the Zionist motive is behind this entire charade.
In other news, it seems that one year has passed since the brutal attack by the Zionist Israelis against the people of Gaza, and now a year later, these people are still suffering the consequences of that murderous war. When will the world stand up against these criminals and allow the people of Gaza to live in peace?
On to another subject for right now... I came across this important article from anarchore's website: www.ziofascism.net that gives 10 instances in the last year that shows again how my country, Canada, is truly Zionist occupied territory! It is too important an article to overlook, and I am proud to present it here:
Top Ten Most Glaringly Blatant Instances of Zionist Control in Canada for 2009
Copyright admin firstname.lastname@example.org http://ziofascism.net/blog/2009/12/top-10-zionist-control-in-canada/
10. Israel beefing up diplomatic corps in Canada:
Canada is the only country in the world getting two new Israeli consuls
this in addition to the secretive 'Israel Allies Caucus' ensconced in Parliament.
27 August 2009:
Israeli Ambassador Miriam Ziv hailed this as a “positive” step for ties between the two countries, both diplomatic and cultural.
“It proves the importance the Israeli foreign ministry places on our relations with Canada. The bigger staff will enable us to do more,” Ziv told The CJN last week from her office at the Israeli Embassy in Ottawa.
9. Canada excuses Israeli War Crimes:
Canada was ONLY one out of 47 nations on UN rights panel to refuse to condemn military offensive in Gaza:
Jan 13, 2009
OTTAWA–Canada stood alone before a United Nations human rights council yesterday, the only one among 47 nations to oppose a motion condemning the Israeli military offensive in Gaza.
The vote before the Geneva-based body shows the Stephen Harper government has abandoned a more even-handed approach to the Middle East in favour of unalloyed support of Israel, according to some long-time observers.
Thirty-three countries voted for the strongly worded motion, which called for an investigation into “grave” human rights violations by Israeli forces, while 13 nations, mostly European, abstained.
8. British MP, Broadcaster and peace activist George Galloway banned from Canada for bringing food and medicine to Palestinians:
Immigration Minister Jason Kenney cites security concerns at behest of Jewish terrorist group the JDL:
21 March 2009
George Galloway, a British member of Parliament, has been banned from Canada on security grounds, the country's immigration service has confirmed.
Mr Galloway, a Respect Party MP, said the ban was "idiotic" and he would look at legal action to try to overturn it.
British media reported the decision was due to his views on Afghanistan and the presence of Canadian troops there.
Israel's Decision: In all likelihood, the decision was taken in close consultation with Israel under the terms of a farreaching agreement on "public security" signed in Tel Aviv on March 23 2008. The "Declaration of Intent" establishes a framework of bilateral cooperation between Canada and Israel in the area of "Public Security". The agreement has not been the object of debate in the Canadian parliament, nor has it received media coverage.
7. Canada Boycotts Anti-Racism Conference, then Boycotts UN Speech:
US, Israel and Canada Boycott 2009 anti-Racism Conference:
April 20, 2009
...the decision was jointly made by Israel and the USA through senior officials of the U.S State Department and the Israeli Foreign Ministry after the issue was discussed in talks between U.S Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, and Israeli Foreign Minister, Tzipi Livni.
Ahmadinejad’s ‘repugnant’ remarks behind boycott: PM
September 23, 2009
Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s “absolutely repugnant remarks” about the Holocaust are reason enough for Canadian officials to boycott the Iranian president’s address to the UN General Assembly.
6. Ottawa to spend $1M on Holocaust Task Force, $100 million + on Asper Human Rights Museum:
"The timing of the task force and conference are critical... Canadian universities have become a hotbed of anti-Semitism"-Frank Dimant, Bnai B'rith
TheStar.com - Canada - Ottawa to spend $1M on Holocaust education
June 01, 2009
Canada will contribute nearly $1 million to create a three-year national task force to study and educate Canadians about the Holocaust.
Immigration Minister Jason Kenney announced the task force in Toronto this morning at the start of a conference on the Holocaust that marks the 70th anniversary of Canada’s refusal to let hundreds of Jewish refugees aboard the St. Louis from Hamburg, Germany dock in Canada. The ship was forced to return to Europe and the refugees dispersed to various countries. Many would not survive World War II.
Human rights museum needs more money.
Asper's Holocaust Museum is being built in Winnipeg at a projected(and rising) cost of $310 million - most of it taxpayer funded
July 24, 2009
The federal government has already committed $100 million in construction costs and $22 million in annual operating expenses. The Manitoba government has chipped in $40 million and Winnipeg has put up $20 million. Asper estimates she needs at least $7 million in extra funding from provinces and another $3 million from Winnipeg.
5. All Federal political leaders pledge allegiance to Bronfman's Israel Lobby group:
Harper, Ignatieff, Layton and May at 29th plenary assembly of the CJC
the Pro-Israeli Zionist billionaires control ALL parties, not just the Conservatives
June 01 2009
...practically falling over one another to show they love Jews – and Israel – best.
4. Canada represents Israel in Venezuela:
12 February 2009
Canadian Prime Minister Steven Harper’s government publicly supported Israel’s brutal assault on Gaza and voted alone at the UN Human Rights Committee in defense of Israel’s actions three weeks ago. Now Canada has taken over Israeli diplomacy. Literally.
In solidarity with Gaza, Venezuela expelled Israel’s ambassador at the start of the bombardment and then broke off all diplomatic relations two weeks later. Israel need not worry since Ottawa plans to help out. On 29 January, The Jerusalem Post reported that “Israel’s interests in Caracas will now be represented by the Canadian Embassy.” This means Canada is officially Israel, at least in Venezuela.
3. Conservatives Mail out Pro-Israel Pamphlets to Jewish Areas:
Nov 19, 2009
Canada’s Conservative Party, led by Prime Minister Stephen Harper, has continued tryingto win more votes from the 350,000-strong Jewish community by ever-so-delicately implying that its rivals are not big fans of Israel. (As in the United States, Canada’s relatively small Jewish population is disproportionately powerful. Canadian Jews tend to favor the Liberal Party, but there has been the inkling of a trendin the other direction.) Previously, Conservatives sent mailers to strategic neighborhoods asserting that several Liberal MPs attended the anti-Zionist Durban I conference (several did, though some claim this was to defend Israel); that Liberal Party leader Michael Ignatieff accused Israel of “war crimes” (he did, and has apologized); and that the party is soft on Hamas and Hezbollah (debatable at the very best)..
2. Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Antisemitism:
Stealth plan to criminalize criticism of Israel
Dec 06 2009
One of the most recent - but almost totally unreported - developments in Canada is something called the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Antisemitism (CPCCA). It is not an official parliamentary body but is a multi-party, voluntary association of 13 MPs. It is currently holding an inquiry into anti-semitism because, it says, “The extent and severity of anti-semitism is widely regarded as at its worst level since the end of the Second World War.
1. Canadian government says Christian churches anti-Semitic
Anglican, Catholic, and United Churches:
Dec 19 2009
OTTAWA – The United Church of Canada and other Canadian churches are demanding Prime Minister Stephen Harper explain why one of his cabinet ministers accused them of being anti-Semitic.
The United, Catholic and Anglican churches are part of KAIROS, an aid group that was shocked to hear Immigration Minister Jason Kenney say its funding was lifted as part of the Conservatives' effort to cut off anti-Semitic organizations.
NTS Notes: These ten points show clearly how Canada, the country that used to be a beacon of peace and justice in the world, is now fully Zionist occupied territory!
The question becomes again... When will the Canadian people wake up and take their country back from this nightmare?
More to come
Friday, December 25, 2009
Thursday, December 24, 2009
John Kaminski has written some very good articles showing how parts of our history have been purposely distorted to prevent the truth from coming out. Here now I want to present another great article from his website: www.johnkaminski.info that shows how historical records have been purposely distorted, or as Eustace Mullins once said: " Historians have only one goal, to obscure the past and prevent us from realizing the nature of the forces at work. ":
A tale of two traitors
The formula for the subversion of every country in the world
22nd December 2009
. . . our historians have only one goal, to obscure the past and prevent us from realizing the nature of the forces at work. —b Eustace Mullins, The Curse of Canaan, p. 27
"We need to make the enemy burn and bleed in every way." — Winston Churchill in 1941
"People jumped into the canals and waterways and remained swimming or standing up to their necks for hours until the heat died down. Even these suffered burns to the head. The firestorm swept over the water with its showers of sparks so that even thick wooden posts burned down to the level of the water. Children were torn away from their parents’ hands by the force of the hurricane and whirled into the fire." — Written by the police chief of Hamburg, Germany in 1943.
The first thing the Jewish pawn Oliver Cromwell did after capturing command of the newly formed English Republic in 1649 was to give his army, which had finally toppled a succession of befuddled kings, something to do. What Cromwell did then was to go to Ireland and butcher everyone in sight, thus starting a neverending war of Protestants and Catholics, conceived and executed by this maniacal puppet of the Jewish bankers in Holland.
As the Jews had slyly taken over England through bribery, they utterly mutilated Ireland in perpetuity, starting three centuries of “the troubles” between Protestant and “Papist” Irish that may well have been the first Jewish false flag terror attack.
Sure, the Irish have a legitimate reason to hate the stupid and cruel British, but it should be known that the Brits — like the French, Russians, Germans and Americans who were to follow the same poisoned path centuries later — were guided into this murderous colonial stupor by Jewish bankers who twisted the puppet strings of the gullible goyim into perpetual wars for profit.
The history of England sprawls across the landscape of our history like an endless road, from Julius Caesar to Queen Elizabeth, with a hundred kings — most of them not very British — in between.
One of the best ways to view this stupendous vista of history is in Winston Churchill’s “History of the English Speaking Peoples,” with an abridged version at about 500 pages, covering from the Roman occupation to the end of the Victorian Era, or almost 2,000 years.
Even Winston Churchill, who colluded with the Jewish banker power elite on a continuous basis for more than a half century, was appalled and ashamed of what Cromwell, who after engineering the killing of the English king, inflicted such an atrocity on the Irish that it is remembered to this day with a blood-curdling hatred.
In describing Cromwell’s “savage crimes,” Churchill writes, “Cromwell in Ireland, disposing of overwhelming strength and using it with merciless wickedness, debased the standards of human conduct and sensibly darkened the journey of mankind.”
Although the writer didn’t mean it that way, this an apt epitaph for what Jewish manipulation of governments from behind the scenes has done to the world.
Churchill as an establishment historian, unfortunately for everyone, was no better than Churchill as a corrupt politician. After reading his mammoth tome, and after persevering through a almost two millennia of constant bloodshed, I came away with the impression that the greatest hero in British history was the invincible Lord Marlborough, a.k.a. John Churchill, who year after year would ride out into Europe, conquer someone after famous battles, and return to England with the bounty, all for the glory of the realm. Ten years in a row he did this in the early 1700s.
England in the early 1700s was a confusing jumble of Protestant religious denominations. All the Protestant denominations today were initially sponsored by Jewish bankers in Holland to undermine the authority of the Church of Rome (something to keep in mind when you’re bragging about religious superiority).
The Jews conquered England by means of religion. Circumstances developed that a Catholic king was in line for the throne, so the Protestant Dutchman William of Orange married the daughter of the Duke of York, which eventually led to a new royal family.
Marlborough, Winston says, eventually parted company with the new King William, but here we begin to see the difference between mainstream history and what really happened.
The real historians, Archibald Maule Ramsay and Eustace Mullins, tell a very different story.
In “The Nameless War,” Ramsay writes:
“With James II's (the Duke of York’s) accession (promotion to king), the crisis could not be long delayed. The most unscrupulous pamphleteering and propaganda was soon in full swing against him, and it is no surprise to find that many of the vilest pamphlets were actually printed in Holland. Britain was now quite openly the focus for all disaffected persons (read ‘Jews’); and considerable comings and goings took place during these years.”
“Stories were brought to the King that his own brother-in-law (William of Orange) had joined those who plotted against him; but he utterly refused to credit them, or take any action till news came that the expedition against himself was actually under way.”
“The chief figure amongst those who deserted James at that crucial juncture was John Churchill, first Duke of Marlborough. It is interesting to read in the Jewish Encyclopedia that this Duke for many years received not less than 6,000 pounds a year from the Dutch Jew Solomon Medina.”
“The real objective of the "Glorious Revolution" was achieved a few years later in 1694, when the Royal consent was given for the setting up of the "Bank of England" and the institution of the National Debt.”
“This charter handed over to an anonymous committee the Royal prerogative of minting money; converted the basis of wealth to gold; and enabled the international money lenders to secure their loans on the taxes of the country, instead of the doubtful undertaking of some ruler or potentate which was all the security they could previously obtain.”
[Hmm, sounds a lot like what’s happening today, doesn’t it?]
“From that time economic machinery was set in motion which ultimately reduced all wealth to the fictitious terms of gold which the Jews control; and drained away the life blood of the land, the real wealth which was the birthright of the British peoples.”
That’s the way Capt. Ramsay called it in “The Nameless War” (p. 11, on my site and on Jackie’s, Daryl’s and Anthony’s). The legendary historian Eustace Mullins, on pp. 83-84 of “The Curse of Canaan,” describes it this way.
“On Jan. 30, 1657, King Charles was beheaded at Whitehall. Cromwell did not live long enough to enjoy his triumph. He died in 1661, making it possible for King Charles II to regain the throne. Many of Cromwell’s most dedicated revolutionaries emigrated to the American colonies, where they have exercised a pernicious influence ever since. The Cromwellians were the guiding inspiration of the abolitionist movement which precipitated the Civil War; they have been the behind-the-scene figures in many other disasters in the United States.
“Because Charles II was now on the throne of England, the Amsterdam bankers instituted a great financial depression in England in 1674. The unrest caused by this development paved the way for the House of Nassau to seize the throne of England. England made peace with its nemesis, Holland, in 1677. As part of the deal, William of Orange married Mary, daughter of the duke of York, who became King James II when Charles II died in 1685. James now became the only obstacle to William’s taking over the throne of England.
“The Amsterdam bankers now launched a frenetic campaign of bribing King James II’s leading aristocratic supporters. The first to succumb was the Duke of Marlborough, John Churchill, ancestor of Winston Churchill. As head of the army, Marlborough’s support was crucial. He accepted bribes of some 350,000 pounds from de Medina and (Moses) Machado.” (end citation)
Winston Churchill, the two-time prime minister of England, and esteemed author of this and many other lengthy tomes. “History of the England Speaking Peoples” indeed. “What the folks who control you want you to know” would have been a better title.
Capt. Ramsay has quite a bit to say about Winston Churchill, who most people today remember as that fat little man sitting next to Roosevelt and Stalin in that famous photo from Yalta.
As judicial-inc.biz sets the scene . . .
The post World War I 1918 Versailles Treaty decimated Germany — causing a depression, enabling Jews to buy up vast amounts of German industry. It left Germans bitter.
International Jewry, represented by 80 percent of those at Versailles, forced Germany to give a portion of their country — the Danzig Corridor — to Poland.
Hitler was pleading with Poland to give Germany a one mile access to their provence of East Prussia. Both parties were in agreement when in 1939 when Poland suddenly broke off all negotiations.
Roosevelt gave Churchill assurances that the USA would be brought into war against Germany. They secretly made a pact with Poland to come to their defense if Germany attacked.
The 1939 Danzig Massacres: The Polish Jewish Bolsheviks killed 58,000 German nationals in the Danzig corridor In the months leading up to the German invasion. Mass killings of thousands of civilian ethnic Germans (Volksdeutsche) by both civilian and Russian NDVK Jews, who were confident that Poland would quickly defeat Germany. Many apparently expected to take possession of German farms and businesses. An estimated 58,000 German civilians lost their lives in the massacres carried out prior to the 1939 invasion.
Poles had been merrily slaughtering anything or anybody German since at least as early as April 1939, with smaller incidents stretching back to the close of WW I — you haven't been told that by the Mass Media, or the fact that these atrocities were one of the main causes for the German invasion of Poland.
Polish Jews were confident they would win against Germany and went on a rampage of ' Blood Lust ' that was unmatched in the small town of Bromberg, which had been given to Poland by the Versailles Treaty. Groups of Bolsheviks attacked from Ponz, Lotz and Warsaw approached the town and started killing the farmers on the outskirts. Children were nailed to barns, women were raped and hacked to death with axes, men were executed where they stood.
On Bromberg Bloody Sunday, thousands of ethnic Germans were slaughtered like pigs in an alley because the majority "poles" (the "slavic", non-Teutonic types, really Turco-Ugaric, Hunnic, Tartar and Mongoloid residue from the old "Dark Age" invasions) knew they could do so with total impunity.
Bloodthirsty Polish Jewish Bolsheviks raped the women, and then killed them. Then they forced the Germans into a church, and burned them alive, 3,500 of them.
Capt. Ramsay, whose short work “The Nameless War” details the Jewish Revolutions in England, France, Russia and Germany, was a member of the English Parliament and adviser to Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in the late 1930s.
Chamberlain had signed the famous non-aggression treaty with German Field Marshal von Ribbentrop in 1938, and actually thought he had averted war with Germany.
“Never before in history had any country not only repulsed organised revolution, but discerned Jewry behind it, and faced up to that fact. We need not wonder that the sewers of Jewish vituperation were flooded over these men and their leader; nor should we make the mistake of supposing that Jewry would stick at any lie to deter honest men everywhere from making a thorough investigation of the facts for themselves. “Nevertheless, if any value liberty, and set out to seek truth and defend it, this duty of personal investigation is one which they cannot shirk. To accept unquestioningly the lies and misrepresentations of a Jew-controlled or influenced press, is to spurn truth by sheer idleness, if for no worse reason. “To act on such unverified a basis is to sin against the Light.” “By September of 1938,” Ramsay writes, “matters had reached a desperate pass. Mr. Chamberlain himself flew out to Munich and achieved the historic settlement with Hitler. It seemed as though the war mongers had been frustrated, and Europe saved. Rarely had such scenes and evidences of spontaneous delight and thankfulness been evoked as were witnessed throughout Britain and Europe at that triumph.”
“Those who knew the power of the enemy, however, knew that Mr. Chamberlain's work was certain to be swiftly sabotaged. I remember remarking, on the very evening of his return from Munich, that within a week every newspaper in this country and the war mongers in Parliament, would be attacking Mr. Chamberlain for having secured peace; regardless of the fact that in so doing they were contemptuously flouting the real wishes of the people. This remark was only too true, as events proved.”
In a “book to justify the indiscriminate use of bombers against the civil population, Mr. J. M. Spaight (a British official) boasts that this form of bombing "saved civilisation": and reveals the startling fact that it was Britain that started this ruthless form of war on the very evening of the day on which Mr. Churchill became Prime Minister, May 11th, 1940.
“On page 64 of his book, Mr. Spaight gives a further piece of information, which renders this sudden change of British policy all the more astonishing; for he states that a declaration was made by the British and French Governments on 2nd September, 1939, that "Only strictly military objectives in the narrowest sense of the word would be bombarded."
“This declaration, of course, was made in the days of Mr Chamberlain's Premiership; and no single fact perhaps could demarcate and differentiate more clearly the difference in the character and behaviour between Mr. Chamberlain and Mr. Churchill.”
“Inside the House of Commons, the pro-Jewish war mongers were now becoming more and more intransigent; and more and more set on sabotaging the chances of turning the "phoney war" into a negotiated peace. This in spite of the fact that Britain had nothing to gain by further and total war, and everything to lose.”
“The Jews, of course, had everything to lose by a peace which left the German goldfree money system and Jew-free Government intact, and nothing to gain. It seemed clearer to me every day that this struggle over the question of civilian bombing was the crux of the whole matter; and that by this method of warfare alone could the Jews and their allies cut the Gordian knot of stalemate leading to peace; and probably later on to a joint attack on Jewish Bolshevism in Russia.”
“There can be little doubt but that these two downright answers crystallised the resolves of the war mongers to get rid of a Prime Minister whose adherence to an upright and humane policy must inevitably frustrate their plans, seeing that Hitler wished no war with Britain, and would therefore never start civilian bombing himself.”
“The machinery of intrigue and rebellion against Mr. Chamberlain was set in motion. Ultimately he was saddled with the blame for the Norway blunder; and this pretext was used by the Churchillian-cum-Socialist caucus to secure his downfall.”
“It should be remembered in this connection that prior to and during the Norway gamble, Mr. Churchill had been invested with full powers and responsibilities for all Naval Military and Air operations; and if anyone therefore deserved to be broken over that second Gallipoli (pursued in defiance of high naval authority warning that, without control of the Cattegat and Skaggerack it could not possibly succeed) it should have been the Minister responsible.”
“He however was not only unbroken, he was acclaimed Prime Minister. The man who would tear up the British pledge of September 2nd, 1939, and start bombing the civilians of Germany was the man for the war mongers who now ruled the roost.”
“And so civilian bombing [by England] started on the evening that the architect of the Norwegian fiasco became Prime Minister, viz., May 11th, 1940.”
That’s right. On the day Churchill took office, he started bombing civilian targets in Germany. That’s how WW II really started.
Ramsay discovered that James Forrestal (the murdered U.S. Secretary of the Treasury) wrote about a conversation he had while playing golf with former U.S. Ambassador to Britain Joseph P. Kennedy, founder of the so-called Kennedy Dynasty.
Kennedy recounted that British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, before being forced from office, had told him: “Neither the French nor the British would have made Poland a cause of war if it had not been for the constant needling from Washington. . . . Chamberlain, he said, stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war."
To repeat: The United States, controlled by World Jewry, started World War II. In four years, 60 million people died.
And there you have it. A tale of two traitors both named Churchill, one who killed the rightful British king and then slaughtered half of Ireland; and his descendant Winston, who started bombing Germany the very day he took office. And both of them working for the Jews.
Now do you know what’s happening?
NTS Notes: The truth must get out to everyone about these important parts of our history. These criminals have done well to cover their evil doings, but now it is up to us to have real history and how it has been purposely distorted, revealed to the masses.
It is very true about the statement that says: Those who have not learned from history are doomed to repeat it!
More to come
Now it seems that the ultra Zionist criminal, Netanyahu, has the sheer audacity to say that his nation faces the "Goldstone" threat to its very existence, while preparing for another brutal attack against the unarmed and innocent people of Gaza! Here is the article from www.jpost.com:
Dec 23, 2009 15:23 | Updated Dec 23, 2009 23:39
PM: Israel faces the 'Goldstone threat'By JPOST.COM STAFF
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu told the Knesset plenum on Wednesday that in the face of the Iranian nuclear threat, concerted attacks on Israel's right to self defense and a stalled peace process, it was imperative for the opposition to support the government.
Netanyahu opened his address to the plenum by listing the major issues facing the country, which he said were "the Iranian [nuclear] threat, the missile threat and a threat I call the Goldstone threat, along with the mission of renewing and completing the peaceprocess with the Palestinians."
Israel was working intensively on the Iranian issue, the prime minister told the lawmakers.
"We are dealing with this a whole lot. Not everything is evident, and sanctions are an important and even necessary condition, [only] time will tell if they are sufficient, to stop the Iranian nuclear program. I assess that the UN will make decisions on the matter in February," Netanyahu said.
Regarding the "Goldstone threat," Netanyahu told the lawmakers: "Goldstone is a codeword for an attempt to delegitimize Israel's right to self-defense."
"The international battle against Israel began in UN Durban Conference I, and continued in the 2005 IJC advisory opinion against the security fence and in the Durban Conference II, as well as the Goldstone Report. This is a comprehensive attack, not on a specific Israeli government but on the state ofIsrael.""Fighting against terrorists requires internal unity. We mustn't search for the cracks through which to weaken or attack the government at these times," he said.
On the Palestinian issue, Netanyahu claimed the principles set by the government represented a wide consensus.
"I set two basic principles that almost everyone ... can agree to; a demand to recognize Israel as a Jewish state - meaning that the Palestinians must give up the demand for the return of Palestinian refugees, and a demand for real demilitarization of a Palestinian state," he said.
Netanyahu said the Palestinians were stalling on negotiations with the aim of blaming Israel "despite the facts" and causing divisions among the country's public and politicians.
"Our internal unity is important to successfully deal with the attacks on Israel's right to self-defense and in order to continue the peace process. When we fight false accusations made against Israel we must fight together. We must do this together. The real options are either to ram the government or to support it. This is no less than what I asked of the opposition only several months ago when I was chairman of the opposition," Netanyahu asserted.
NTS Notes: This criminal is a liar and a hypocrite indeed. He spews about the falsehood of Iran being a Nuclear Threat as a means of trying to get his own opposition parties to come with him under a need for unity? We know that Iran has NO nuclear weapons and is not a threat, while Israel possesses hundreds of Nuclear Weapons and is the REAL threat to everyone!
Also the demand that the Palestinians must recognize Israel as a "Jewish" state would spell a death knell against the Palestinians themselves. This criminal also claims that it is the Palestinians that are holding up the so called "peace process" while his own forces continue to kick Palestinians out of East Jerusalem, and he continues to build illegal settlements on their land!
These criminals have absolutely no consciences, or souls. They will kill their neighbours while claiming self defense. Their audacity absolutely knows no bounds.
More to come
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Taliban Claims Control Over 80 Percent of Afghanistan
December 22, 2009
>Once seen as something relegated to the more remote border provinces, this seems to be a nationwide phenomenon now, and the Taliban insists that it actually has a controlling presence in around 80 percent of the country.
In fact Taliban officials insist they are doing so well in reclaimed the country that they have abandoned Pakistan entirely, saying they don’t need to flee into the neighboring country.
Though the Taliban’s claims appear incredible on the surface, it must be remembersed that the ICOS think-tank had determined the Taliban had a "permanent presence" in 72% of the nation a year ago, and the resurgent Taliban has surely increased its holdings over the past year.