Friday, July 31, 2009
Friday, July 31, 2009
Thursday, July 30, 2009
THURSDAY, JULY 30, 2009
Mother, 40, thrown in police cells after lying pupils made up assault following bullying confrontation
Last updated at 5:56 PM on 30th July 2009
When Anisa Borsberry confronted a group of playground bullies she hoped it would finally bring an end to her daughter's torment.
She never imagined it would lead to eight police officers arriving at her home in three patrol cars and a van to arrest her.
But after the 40-year-old was accused of hitting one of the bullies - claims they later withdrew - she was forcibly removed from her home.
Protective: Anisa Borsberry was arrested after confronting children she thought were bullying her daughter Taylor
Officers surrounded the property, put her in handcuffs and in front of her neighbours marched her to a waiting patrol car.
She was then driven to a nearby police station where she was thrown into a cell for more than five hours.
Her photograph was taken, along with her fingerprints and two swabs of DNA. She was then interviewed at length.
Today the police dropped their case against Mrs Borsberry and confirmed that they had since launched an investigation into her arrest.
'I was speechless when I heard what I was supposed to have done,' she said today.
'I couldn't understand why I was in this situation. I knew I had done nothing wrong and was totally innocent.
'The children had already admitted lying but yet here were two statements they had made to the police after their parents had made a complaint.
'When the police came to arrest me they dragged me outside where the whole street could see me.
'Three police cars and a van had turned up and eight officers went round the back of the house, I assume in case I tried to escape. It was like a scene from a movie.
'The only thing that was missing was a police helicopter. It was a shocking waste of taxpayers' money.'
Pupils at Lambton Primary School in Washington, Tyne and Wear, claimed Mrs Borsberry had hit a schoolgirl
Mrs Borsberry went to Lambton Primary School in Washington, Tyne and Wear, earlier this month after her 11-year-old daughter Taylor arrived home in floods of tears.
She decided to speak to the bullies in question and ask them why they had called her daughter names at the school gates that morning.
'I stood and spoke to this girl and asked her what was going on,' said Mrs Borsberry.
'My daughter stood by my side the whole time holding my hand.
'Halfway through a boy who had been involved in upsetting Taylor decided to shout and scream abuse at me, including the F-word.
'I then took my daughter into school and asked to see her class teacher and reported the incident immediately.'
Gilbridge police station, Sunderland, where Anisa Borsberry says she was locked up for five hours
She hoped that would be the end of the matter.
But when she rang the school back later that day to check on her daughter she was informed that the children she had confronted had accused her of assault.
'After interviewing the children on a one-to-one basis the children all admitted lying and said they had made the whole thing up,' said Mrs Borsberry.
'The school even rang their parents and informed them that the allegations were false.'
But despite withdrawing the allegations police arrived at Mrs Borsberry's home the following day after receiving complaints from their parents.
The eight officers surrounded her home in Washington before one of them handcuffed her and dragged her out to a waiting patrol car.
She was then driven to Gilbridge police station in Sunderland where she was thrown into a cell.
Mrs Borsberry remained there until around midnight when she was released on bail.
Taylor, who waited at home with her father Lee, 37, and brother Myles, 19, said she blamed herself.
'I was really upset,' she said today. 'When they arrested mum I felt like shouting that she hadn't done it. I never thought it would go that far.'
Mrs Borsberry has since been told by her solicitor that no further action will be taken against her, though the police would not confirm this.
'I cried when I heard the news,' she said. 'It has been the week from hell. I've been ill with worry and stress.
'I haven't been able to eat or sleep well and I've been crying non-stop. This nightmare is over for me now thank God.
'Those children do not realise what they have done to me or my character.'
A spokesman for Northumbria Police said today: 'The complaint of assault is not being progressed, so there will be no further police action taken against this woman.
'We have received a letter of complaint from the arrested woman and will be carrying out a full review of all of the circumstances before making a response.'
Perhaps (CLICK) this previous post will provide reasons you will accept I base my assertions on. By the way - if you want to argue go ahead - but without a live Osama to show me you will have one helluva' time making your case - because - he's dead. If you wish to dispute my assertion simply produce bin Boogeyman and I'll take this post down. Oh yeah - he has to be breathing. But since he's dead what is the mission in Afghanistan?
Perhaps (CLICK) this audio of David Ray Griffin will help you enter the realm of reality if you still believe the boogeyman is still alive. Dr. Griffin has just finished "Osama bin Laden Dead or Alive?" - yet another exhaustively researched book demolishing the official conspiracy theory our lying government arrogantly branded into the public mind using shock and repetition. I differ with Dr. Griffin in his pro-world-government stance while I prefer the preservation of the United States under the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Regardless - he's dissected the official fairy tale from many angles ranging from exposing fake evidence to simply pointing out contradictions in the official lie. Those pushing the official lie and those shilling to demonize 911 Truthers protest too much in light of the mountain of evidence collected by the grass-roots 911Truth citizens movement. The evidence in the 911 case does not point to a troglodyte like bin Laden but more towards a military-industrial bad-guy with access to nanotechnology. So what is the mission in Afghanistan?
Since bin Laden is dead and has been since December 13th, 2001 (or 14th) - all communications from bin Laden are either the result of lies our government fed to us via the military-industrial-corporate-controlled media or the U.S. government has some very talented clairvoyants in their employ. I suspect the former. Regardless of your own conclusion can we agree that the U.S. government WANTS WAR? If bin Laden turned up dead tomorrow are you naive enough to think our military would retreat from the over 130 nations in which they are entrenched?
Wait - hold on a minute you say ... Jack Rabbit is a crazy conspiracy theorist. Only a crackpot thinks their government conspires to constructFALSE REALITIES . But Sean (sissy) Hannity, Rush (the pill) Limbaugh, Neal (my dad was a Marine so I am too) Boortz, Laura (shrew) Ingraham, Thom (DeminwythousOK) Hartmann, Ed (Blind) Schultz, Glenn (Crybaby) Dick...somebody in the media wouldreport this? No they wouldn't because they are paid to grow mushrooms not to inform citizens.
So getting back to the reason we are in Afghanistan- if you've taken some time to look at the hyperlinks above - isn't it easier to understand current U.S. policy if one starts with the premise that capturing bin Laden is NOT the basis of the phony war on terror - that instead the war on terror is a liemarketed to the masses so wars of aggression can be expanded? Yes it is that simple. Luckily new weapons are online now to make fighting this war easy.
Drones allow the U.S. military to slaughter people across the globe without breaking a nail, or missing a soccer game. It's kinda' like running a prison camp - go to work in the morning - machinegun a few people in the morning, have lunch, then get the afternoon missile attack on the Paki wedding over before 15:30 hours so damage assessment can give the OK to go home to pick up junior from soccer - or get to the day-care in time not to pay a 10-dollar-a-minute late fee. After all - it's all about the children - American that is.
Wars of aggression are losers in the long run and very unpopular in the fatherland. For this reason mercenaries are used to subjugate the indigenous people in the occupied countries. This allows the concealment of casualties taken in the occupation since they are hidden from the public. Mercenaries are a tacit admission that the fatherland aggressor nation is fighting an unjust war because if the war were a just one Americans would line up by the thousands to fight as they did following the false-flag 911 attacks.
So I ask you reader regarding the bloodbath in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and soon Iran: What is the Mission?