Friday, August 7, 2009

Nagasaki: The Forgotten Bomb

I just days ago put up an article that shows how the arch criminal Zionists used the city of Hiroshima as their proving ground for their latest super weapon, the atom bomb on August 6th, 1945. It came with a terrible loss of life, and has now been shown as unnecessary due to Japan's willingness to surrender unconditionally.

Few talk about the second atom bomb drop, which occurred on Nagasaki, on August 9th, 1945. The Nagasaki bomb was code named "Fat Man" due to its shape. It was a Plutonium based device that was actually more powerful than "Little Boy" which was dropped on Hiroshima. The atomic bombing of Nagasaki was devastating enough, with approximately 75000 people killed instantly. The loss of life was less than Hiroshima only for the fact that it was dropped in the small mountain ringed Nagasaki harbor area, and not directly over the civilian residential area like at Hiroshima. If it would have been dropped on its expected target, it could have easily killed over 200,000 people.

Needless to say, the Nagasaki drop was as unnecessary as the Hiroshima drop. The scientists who developed both bombs wanted to use these cities as their "proving ground" for the power of their new toys, and the Japanese people were the Guinea Pigs for these horrible weapons.

I came across a new article under that does a pretty decent job of explaining the Nagasaki bombing. It does fail though to talk about the Zionist control over the actual drops as explained by Eustace Mullins, and it does fail to finger these criminals as the culprits. It is good material to read and does have some valid arguments. I therefore am presenting the article in its entirety here:

Nagasaki and Hiroshima were disasters of human history.

Nagasaki is like the forgotten bomb. I will be talking about Hiroshima, but I wanted to talk about Nagasaki first. I went to both places and one of my best friends in Japan, Tomoyo is from Nagasaki. When you live in a city and meet all the poeple there and then just imagine it it being blown away it makes you want to stop and cry.

They dropped the Fatman on Nagasaki on August 9th. It was the second atomic bomb dropped and the first and more powerful Plutonium bomb ever used. It not only had plutonium but it had 15% more mass than little boy which was dropped on Hiroshima. The blast was less effective because of the mountains, but 80,000 people were killed and far more would die later from the starvation, radiation, and injury it caused.


A cultural city and history were lost. Erased in seconds. And why? The Japanese had been trying to surrender. Well the main reason the American used the bombs when they did was because they did not want to divide Japan with Russia the way they were East and West Germany. Russia agreed to invade Japan (who had defeated Russia in their last war) three months after the German surrender May 8th. Well that time was August 8th (or Aug 9th Japan time). And the Russian began attacking Manchuria China where the Japanese army was on that day.

The US wanted all of Japan they had plans to invade Korea after all which we all saw and Japan was the unsinkable aircraft carrier. Even now almost 65 years later the US still has troops in Japan. In fact if you are a foreigner whose been to Japan the first questions you will be asked is are you military and Okinawa or Misawa?

When I arrived in Japan 4 years ago it was in August. The first thing I saw on TV was reports about the bombs. Over in Japan every year they talk to survivors and have remembrance. I've been to the museums and I've talked to countless numbers of Japanese about the bombing.

The typical argument for dropping the bombs will never admit to the kind of sick individuals that just revel in the power of it and love the showmanship or shall we say "Shock and Awe" of the bomb that makes them feel mighty through some distance attachment to their ego via nationalism. No the typical rationalization is that the bomb actually saved lives in their bizzaro world. So I guess the next time the police chase a bank robber they should just fire at the car with bazookas or artillery and take out the entire city block for after all, if they tried to shoot the robber with their guns they might get shot back at.

The reason to drop the bombs wasn't to save lives and it did not save lives it killed hundreds of thousands and the US could have ended the war long before dropping the bombs and saved lives on all sides by accepting the surrender the Japanese had been offering. But just like in Europe the US wanted to destroy things in over kill and wreck as many cities as possible. Like in Dresden and Rohan the clean up and reconstruction was just too profitable to pass up. The Russians needed to see US might and the US wanted to take the stage as the next Super power with a flash.

Bombing Nagasaki was completely unnecessary. Hiroshima was already wiped off the map. The war was over. The US kept killing until they had total control. In the aftermath of the war Japan was turned into ruins, the CIA paid the Yakuza Mafia to run the show, women whored them selves out to GIs for they were without homes, work or food in many cases. An entire entertainment ring grew up in the new generation of black markets, gambling, and prostitution.


There is no justification for killing civilians must less cities full of them. Just imagine where ever you are right now and everyone you know, being bombed. You might be completely against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan but imagine you were blown up anyway. Kids, babies, animals, everything sacrificed because you're the same nationality as the people at war. The US propaganda towards Japan was highly racist and well received. It wasn't much different than the Nazi Propaganda about the Jews. And to top it off, in America Japanese citizens were put into "internment" camps. They didn't do that to the Germans or Italians just the Japanese. Don't think it was because it's easier to tell who is who. It's no easier to tell the difference between Asians as it would be between European groups.

Some hot headed people will say, "well they shouldn't have bombed Pearl Harbor." Well that's damn right they shouldn't have bombed Pearl Harbor. But that's just the thing "THEY" didn't bomb the harbor the military did. And when the Japanese military bombed the Harbor that's what they bombed, US war ships, not Hawaii and not cities full of civilians. And will leave aside the issues of the US antagonizing that by the oil embargo the attacks in China as well as the foreknowledge of the attack. The fact is the people living in Nagasaki and Hiroshima had about as much say in that as you or I did (and I wasn't even born yet).

For the record my grand father fought the Japanese all the way to Okinawa. He used a flame thrower to toast bunkers and holes and was shot in the leg eventually but continued to fight. I'm proud of him for serving his country. But like he felt himself, there was no glory in burning people alive even soldiers. It was just a horrible thing to never talk about. War is hell and nationalism attached to war is a sick sick disease. There is no shame in serving in WWII. The issue here is with the nuclear bombs. There was no need to add that pointless destruction to the innocent.

Just imagine right now if America nuked Iraq, and not a base but a city. Imagine if they had nuked Fallujah a few years ago under the wild justification that it would save American lives. I could see some imperialist idiot saying to nuke every inch of Afghanistan just to kill bin laden or to turn the whole middle east not only Iraq but all of it into a glass parking lot. That was the kind of Insane comments made by many Americans in the run up to the Iraq War or after 9/11.

Nuclear weapons are terrible. And right now the new nuclear weapon first used by Israel in 1973 and currently used by the US is depleted Uranium. This stuff murders by radiation poisoning. If causes massive birth defects and destroys the unborn and the young the most.

What is the argument for it? "Saving lives" really saving lives by killing people and putting a radioactive poison in the ground for eons?! Radiation doesn't create super heroes. In the real world it only does one thing, kill everything around it. Other than creative torture it is among the most horrible ways to die possible.

Well winners write the history. Had the allies lost the war the nuclear bombings of Japan would be seen as what they are. Human atrocities. People are still dying from those damn bombs.

And it was not "good for Japan." Japan rose to its economic leadership because of the Japanese's people. For one they didn't have to spend countless billions on war and military defense. Secondly they have year round school, the longest work hours, and busted their asses day and night to make Japan what it is. There is nearly no religion, and there are creative minds to invent and improve things. Rather than selling guns, they produced goods sold all over the world. But with the stroke of a pen the BIS ended all of that. Japan once held one half of all the money in the world. Now it's down to about a 1/6th. Still they have the longest life expectancy, most centurions, gold reserves, most advanced technologies in several fields, top two in language and math, top two in health care, highest standard of living, lowest crime rate in the industrialized world even with the biggest cities. Japan has the second largest market in the world behind US of America which is currently falling apart and was based mostly on credit.

The future for hybrids, robotics, cell phones, flat screens, mass transit, wind power, game consuls, and international business is Japan.

One reason is the country's near empty appetite for war. With shinto now disconnected form government, and organized religion all but reduced to rituals for funerals and weddings there just isn't a way to amass the people into senseless violence. There would be a better chance of violence from angry baseball fans than from nationalism or religion. Japan is proud of what it can Create not Destroy.

America could learn from that. America's ego is still attached to what it can break.

NTS Notes: 64 Years ago, we were led to believe that the Atomic Bombing of Japan would prevent further loss of life and bring to an end the second World War. We are now learning that history as stated in our books is not as it seems. Research, and look up all articles online for yourselves.

It must also be noted that is taking important articles off line due to "copyright infringements" or "user deletion". I have not given up on that site as a source for my articles, and hopefully many will be available soon. Until then, many of these articles are available by simply googling the name, and reading them as PDF files.

More to come


4 comments: said...


Roger Helbig said...

Teacher Paris, what do you teach? Or are you actually just a shill for the primary poster. There are substantial errors in this piece. Israel did not exist until 1947, so it had no hand in the development of the atomic bomb. Depleted Uranium kinetic energy penetrators were developed by the US Army after the 1973 war; Douglas Lind Rokke's claim that DU was used in the 73 War is totally bogus and may be more related to Rokke's close connection with Neo Nazis - see American Free Press/The Barnes Review convention - look for David Von Kleis introducing the star of his video "Beyond Treason" at this Neo Nazi conclave. DU is not a nuclear weapon. A nuclear weapon explodes because of either fission (the original atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki) or fusion of two deuterium nuclei into helium, the "hydrogen bomb". DU kinetic energy penetrators are just plain ordinary bullets; they are weakly radioactive and mildy poisonous as a heavy metal, but lead is quite poisonous as a heavy metal as well. DU has been subject to a continuous propaganda campaign since about 1992 when Saddam Hussein wanted out from under the UN Sanctions and Rokke first came on the stage as a speaker at anti-sanctions rallies. He found that a free trip to Cambridge England was pretty nice and he has enjoyed travelling at the expense of well meaning but naive peace activists and concerned veterans and their families. Rokke puts on a very good, well rehearsed show, much of it has changed little since 1999, but it is a show, not fact, and Rokke is really a modern version of the travelling medicine man selling snake oil from town to town. I plan to put detailed information on Rokke that I have gotten from various Freedom of Information Act requests up in the Internet Archive. I posted this document about Leuren Moret last night. See and look at the Archive for future Rokke, Moret, Durakovic and other personality documents as I get an opportunity to post them. said...

I do not make extended responses to mannerless scum.

Northerntruthseeker said...

It may finally be happening that some of the Zionist shills are finally showing their faces in this room...

I never said Israel, but the Zionists, who have been around for centuries, and made their plans fully known through Theodore Herzog in 1896, and previously in their Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Your attempt to associate Israel's "existence" automatically into the fray is very interesting indeed... HMMM...

I have fully read your comment, Mr. Helbig.. and all I see is statements that have no bearing on the intent of this article but goes off elsewhere, and attacks another blogger to boot!. You are clouding the issue by going off on a tangent about DU. MY article has nothing to do with DU, but deals with actual history where 80000 people died, and ties in an article from another source. Yes that OTHER source does deal with modern weaponry including DU, but the focus of this article is still on Nagasaki.

Is this person, "Roger Helbig" one of the ones hired by the newly formed Israeli Internet action force to distort any articles that are not "friendly" to the evil and twisted Zionist state? Twisting any information is laid out clearly in the Protocols.

I will be monitoring this person from now on, and if any more information comes from him that goes off on a serious tangent, then I will delete the comments.

Again, The entire focus of my article is the Nagasaki bombing. I really don't give a hoot about your your own "research" about DU! If you have comments about the attached article's original author and his research about DU, then go to his/her website and attack them there!