Anyone who researches this so called war since 2001 will quickly realize that the only reason that NATO is in Afghanistan is on orders by the Rothschild drug syndicates in Europe. The Taliban had been destroying the Opium production in Afghanistan and executing the drug lords there before the US sponsored invasion of 2001. If anyone takes a look at where the NATO forces are situated, it does not take rocket science to see that they are all being placed around the Opium poppy fields, and the transportation centers of Khandahar province in southern Afghanistan. They are there exactly as I have said previously; To protect these fields and to protect their transport out of that country to markets in Europe.
I found this article, and it again exemplifies the BS that the media is pumping out about Afghanistan these days. The man in charge of NATO gets his orders from his masters, the Rothschilds themselves, and he is now asking that Canada "extend" their commitment beyond the 2011 deadline. He is asking for Canada to commit to help establish Afghan "National Security Forces" which will be nothing more than a private army to protect the Poppy fields!
Here is the article:
NATO chief calls on Canada to extend Afghan mission New secretary general would 'regret' it if Canada’s Afghan mission ends in 2011 By THE CANADIAN PRESS | |||
| | |||
 NATO's new Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen addresses the media at NATO headquarters in Brussels, Monday Aug. 3, 2009. (AP/Yves Logghe)   |
DEH-E-BAGH, Afghanistan — The new secretary general of NATO made a visit to a Canadian model village in Kandahar province Thursday during his first visit to Afghanistan, praising the project and making it clear he would like Canadian troops to remain in the country after 2011.
After visiting Canada’s Deh-e-Bagh project, Anders Fogh Rasmussen said he doesn’t want to interfere in the domestic politics of individual nations.
“But from an alliance point of view, I would strongly regret if that became the final outcome of the Canadian considerations,” Rasmussen said of Canada’s decision to end the military mission in 2011.
“At the end of the day, it’s a question of our own security. We cannot allow Afghanistan to once again to become a safe haven for terrorists. I also think it’s in Canada’s interests to ensure a peaceful and stable Afghanistan.”
The NATO leader, who was accompanied on his tour by U.S. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the new commander of American and NATO forces in Afghanistan, and Canadian Brig.-Gen. Jonathan Vance, commander of Canadian troops, said it’s up to each individual nation to decide how to contribute to NATO efforts.
“What I can do, is to encourage alliance members to do their utmost to ensure continued solidarity within our alliance,” Rasmussen told reporters in the recently rebuilt district centre of Deh-e-Bagh.
Before a brief walk outside the centre’s walls to talk to area merchants, Rasmussen said that a military solution alone will not bring stability to Afghanistan.
“This is exactly the approach we will pursue in the coming years,” he said.
“Obviously we need to strengthen military efforts to improve the security situation, but we also have to realize that there is no military solution solely. So, we have in parallel with our military efforts, to step up our endeavours concerning civilian reconstruction and this project is an example of how we will do it in the future.”
The Dand district, where Deh-e-Bagh is located, has been relatively peaceful region bordering Kandahar city.
But the gravel courtyard of the district centre lays strewn with the crumbled concrete remains of the former district centre, which was attacked three months ago by a suicide bomber.
As the high-ranking military officials met inside the hastily rebuilt centre, medics prepared outside to receive Afghan National Army casualties from a nearby operation. The wounded were taken elsewhere, but everywhere in Afghanistan there are daily reminders of war.
The model village approach is an effort to win the support of Afghans with the promise of reconstruction and employment. Deh-e-Bagh is just the first in what Canadian, and now NATO, officials hope will be many.
Canadian soldiers have quietly overseen the work, which was carried out by more than 100 Afghans. Solar lights have been installed, the centre itself rebuilt from the rubble and an irrigation canal refurbished.
The work continues, and will include improvements to the area school and roads, according to a list drawn up after consultation with locals.
Vance, who has said the model village located south of Kandahar city “is counter-insurgency,” said he appreciated the recognition of the hard work of both the military and civilian contingent involved.
“That someone like the secretary general would like us to stay is vindication, I suppose; certainly reinforces the fact that our men and women, military and civilian, have done tremendous work here,” he said.
But the commander said whether or not Canadian troops remain beyond 2011, is a decision for Canada to make.
“Whether Canada is here or not, is a decision not for me. If Canada was to stay, I’d be more than happy to serve again,” he said.
“There is a thing that happens to you when you come to Afghanistan, where you see the potential.”
The international coalition’s exit strategy for Afghanistan relies on the development of Afghan national security forces - both its army and police - and their ability to hold their own against an insurgency that may not disappear entirely.
While Afghan forces have made much progress, and will make significantly more by 2011, Vance said he doesn’t believe they will be able to stand alone by 2011.
“Indeed, there would have to be international support in Kandahar beyond 2011, whether that’s Canada or another country.”
Ken Lewis, the representative of Canada in Kandahar, said Canada’s development efforts in Afghanistan will continue, regardless of what happens with the military mission.
“We’ll be remaining with diplomacy and development,” he said.
He said there’s a been a resolution in Parliament and “it’s pretty clear the military will leave but we’ll need a security piece here, somehow.”
“We need security forces,” he said, in order to continue with the development work.
NTS Notes: This shill "regrets" if Canada keeps to its 2011 deadline? Who is this fool kidding? If I had my way, I would get the troops out now, and not even wait until 2011. There has already been over 125 Canadian soldiers killed in Afghanistan, plus other NATO forces deaths, all for only to protect the drug production and shipment from there. That is sickening, and must be stopped immediately!
Spread the word around. The media has been lying all along about the war in Afghanistan, and the truth must get out!
More to come
NTS
0 comments:
Post a Comment